加密货币领导人呼吁白宫声称“Chokepoint 2.0”不是真的

币界网Published on 2024-08-09Last updated on 2024-08-09

币界网报道:

据福克斯商业报道,周四上午,几位加密货币行业的领军人物会见了白宫官员,试图修复新兴金融科技行业与美国民主党之间的关系。

据报道,当政府否认该行业声称正在协调努力切断加密货币公司与银行系统的联系时,会议变得紧张起来,这一阴谋被广泛称为“窒息点2.0行动”

加密货币的银行问题

正如周四报道的那样,财政部副部长Wally Adeyemo告诉加密货币与会者,监管机构并没有积极试图切断加密货币与金融体系的联系。

作为回应,一位出席的加密货币高管要求举手表决,由于白宫政策,哪些加密货币公司被拒绝进入银行。几乎所有行业成员都举手了,其中包括Mark Cuban、Anthony Scaramucci,以及Coinbase、Kraken、Uniswap和其他公司的代表。

据福克斯报道,一位与会者表示:“高管们毫不犹豫地告诉政府代表,他们对数字资产的行动对加密货币行业和民主党造成了多大的损害。”。“他们基本上只是被大喊大叫。”

加密货币的银行业问题可以追溯到几年前,始于FTX倒闭后,这使得对区块链公司的监管打击进入了高潮。

Castle Island Ventures的合伙人Nic Carter在2月份发表了一篇题为“Operation Choke Point 2.0正在进行中”的博客文章,详细介绍了其中一些早期的努力。其中一项行动包括美国货币监理署、联邦存款保险公司和美联储的指导,阻止银行为加密货币公司提供服务。

仅仅一个月后,包括银门银行、Signature银行和硅谷银行在内的加密货币友好型银行都被迫关门。这三家公司的意外倒闭——让加密货币公司在国外为银行生命线而苦苦挣扎——被该银行自己的领导人解释为发出了强烈的“反加密信息”

Nic Carter在回应这一消息时表示:“Harris管理员不及格的人试图假装没有系统性的银行账户取消——与此同时,通话中的每个加密货币代表都表示他们没有银行账户。重置进展顺利!”。

民主党人会在加密货币问题上采取行动吗?

尽管周四的会议气氛紧张,但一些加密货币巨头对哈里斯政府至少试图与他们进行富有成效的接触持乐观态度。

天桥资本创始人Anthony Scaramucci表示:“我在加密货币领域的同事们现在希望采取行动,这是可以理解的,但华盛顿的情况并非如此。”。“我认为我们正在取得稳步进展。”

Coinbase CLO也满怀希望,称Kamala Harris是“成为加密货币新面孔并与过去决裂的完美人选”

尽管如此,许多人仍然怀疑政府的善意姿态能否转化为适当的政策行动。例如,Gemini联合创始人泰勒·文克莱沃斯(Tyler Winklevoss)质疑哈里斯本人为什么没有出现在虚拟圆桌会议上。

周四,随着Customers Bancorp受到美联储执法行动的打击,人们的怀疑进一步加剧,该行动现在迫使该银行在与一家数字资产公司建立任何新关系之前提前30天通知美联储。

Winklevoss表示:“美联储证实,窒息点2.0行动仍在全面展开,为其工作原理提供了宝贵的见解,并证实哈里斯加密货币“重置”是一个骗局。”。

Related Reads

BIT Research: Liquidity is Disappearing, Will Bitcoin Replay the Bottoming Pattern of 2022?

The crypto market is currently in an adjustment phase driven by policy expectations and liquidity shifts. Despite a brief rebound fueled by geopolitical easing and SpaceX's strong IPO performance, unexpectedly hawkish signals from new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh have removed anticipated easing support. Concurrently, stablecoin liquidity is shrinking, with insufficient new capital inflows, pushing the market into a typically quiet summer period. Pricing lacks catalysts for a sustained rally. Daily trading volume has significantly contracted, stablecoin growth has slowed markedly, and the supportive effect of Strategy's (formerly MicroStrategy) STRC preferred stock-financed Bitcoin purchases is fading. Amid policy uncertainty, seasonal weakness, and liquidity contraction, Bitcoin faces near-term downward pressure. Warsh's hawkish pivot and refusal to provide a clear policy outlook have increased risk premiums, historically unfavorable for Bitcoin. Technically, the trend remains bearish below $73,700, with $62,446 as critical support. A break below could accelerate declines, though a prolonged consolidation phase, similar to 2022's bottoming process, is possible. Liquidity is a core constraint. Current daily volume is around $500 billion, roughly 25% of the peak during the July-Oct 2025 rally. The 12-month growth rates for USDT and USDC have fallen to ~20%, with 6-month growth near zero, indicating weak new inflows. Bitcoin ETF and Strategy-driven inflows have also weakened, with a 30-day rolling net outflow. With inflation at 4.2% above the Fed's target, combined hawkish policy, seasonal factors, and liquidity shortages challenge Bitcoin's ability to hold above $60,000. However, this adjustment phase may be forming a cyclical low this summer, potentially setting the stage for the next bull cycle.

marsbit3m ago

BIT Research: Liquidity is Disappearing, Will Bitcoin Replay the Bottoming Pattern of 2022?

marsbit3m ago

Who Makes the Best Use of Claude Code? The Answer Might Not Be Programmers

Claude Code Usage Report Summary (Based on ~400k sessions) Core Finding: In agentic programming with Claude Code, a clear division of labor has emerged: humans primarily decide *what* to build (planning decisions), while Claude decides *how* to build it (execution decisions). Key Insights: 1. **Effectiveness is not limited to programmers.** In code-generation tasks, success rates for users in non-technical fields (law, finance, management, research) are nearing those of software engineers. What matters most is the user's domain expertise and understanding of the problem to be solved. 2. **Domain expertise drives success and efficiency.** Sessions where users exhibited "expert" proficiency in the task's domain saw verified success rates double compared to "novice" sessions. Experts also delegated more work per instruction, with Claude executing more actions and producing more output. 3. **AI is amplifying, not replacing, domain knowledge.** Claude Code lowers the *implementation* barrier, not the *judgment* barrier. The value of knowing the "what" and "why" is increasing relative to just knowing the "how" to code. 4. **Usage is evolving.** Over a 7-month period (Oct '25 - Apr '26), the share of sessions for debugging halved, while use for software operations, data analysis, and non-code writing roughly doubled. The estimated economic value of typical tasks increased by ~25%. Conclusion: The data suggests coding agents are making programming background less critical for completing technical tasks. However, they reward and amplify deep domain understanding. The ability to successfully direct an AI agent stems more from mastery of a specific field than from coding skill itself. The primary gains come from being competent in a domain; deep specialization adds only marginal additional advantage. This may signal a shift where software creation becomes integrated into various professions.

marsbit38m ago

Who Makes the Best Use of Claude Code? The Answer Might Not Be Programmers

marsbit38m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片