回顾PlusToken案 加密市场如何再次被其牵动敏感神经

币界网Published on 2024-08-09Last updated on 2024-08-09

币界网报道:

作者:Revc,

一、前言

加密市场情绪还未在8月6日的暴跌中恢复,而8月7日一则关于Plustoken消息,再次牵动加密市场的敏感神经。

据Lookonchain的监测,数百个已经休眠了3.3年的钱包开始转移大批量的以太坊(ETH),可能涉及789,533枚ETH,约合20亿美元。链上追踪显示,这些资金来自一个名为“Plus Token Ponzi 2”的钱包。该钱包在2020年将789,533枚ETH分散到数千个钱包中,此后自2021年4月以来一直未有任何动静。

据链上分析师余烬监测,Plustoken相关钱包大部分已在2021年被出售,目前归集的仅有25,757枚 ETH。随即市场情绪获得安抚。

随后Arkham在X平台表示,Plustoken钱包与数十个钱包相关联,仅在过去12小时内就转移了4.647亿美元的ETH。

二、PlusToken事件梳理

案件背景

PlusToken 于2018年5月推出,声称是一个多功能跨链去中心化钱包和“智能狗搬砖”套利平台。通过宣传“币王”、“千倍币”、“8个月上涨82倍”等吸引眼球的口号,迅速吸引了大量投资者加入。该平台利用传销模式,通过推荐码邀请新会员,并要求缴纳至少500美元的加密货币作为门槛,以获取平台收益。

发展过程

2018年5月:PlusToken 推出

平台以“区块链钱包”和“智能搬砖”为幌子,吸引大量投资者。仅一年时间,注册会员数达到270万,最大层级达到3293层。

2019年6月27日:提现问题暴露,运营停滞

PlusToken 开始无法正常提现,引发了投资者的恐慌。尽管平台官方未对此作出解释,部分投资者依然选择相信平台,导致更多资金继续涌入。在平台停止运营后,Plustoken 账户仍然收到价值1.5亿人民币的加密货币,

2020年11月26日:二审宣判

2020年11月26日,江苏省盐城市中级人民法院对PlusToken案进行了二审判决,裁定没收该案中扣押的加密货币,并将所得资金及收益依法上缴国库。

三、资金去向

PlusToken通过庞氏骗局骗取了全球投资者20亿至29亿美元的加密货币。该平台主要依赖场外交易(OTC)渠道进行大规模的资金进出,并通过复杂的链上资产转移和混币服务来规避追踪。部分资金被用于购置房产和豪车,而其他部分则通过OTC市场变现。

2020年6月,78.95万枚以太坊(ETH),当时价值约1.919亿美元,从一个PlusToken钱包中被转移,并通过数百个中介钱包进行分散转移。

5SwrrMrJh4ksF2wadyoZc8amLZBlEkcbGKdtt4kG.png

在2021年6月至9月期间,大部分Plustoken钱包中的以太坊(ETH)通过多个地址被转入了Bidesk交易所(该交易所于2021年底倒闭)。随后,这些ETH又从Bidesk交易所被转移至火币交易所。仅通过四个Bidesk存款地址转入的ETH数量就达到了268,843枚。

KIq9Q5Z8qCNmwXZr86pvlctT57Pdw2cbtGcAW12g.png

资金收缴国库

Plustoken涉及的加密货币总价值超过150亿元人民币。根据裁定书,执法部门共查获了194,775枚比特币、833,083枚以太坊、140万枚莱特币、2760万枚柚子币(EOS)、74,167枚达世币(DASH)、4.87亿枚瑞波币(XRP)、60亿枚狗狗币(DOGE)、79,581枚比特现金(BCH)和213,724枚泰达币(USDT)。最终,涉案组织者因传销诈骗被判刑,平台资金被依法没收。

四、小结

Plustoken相钱包的活动继续牵动投资者的敏感神经,并影响了近期ETH的走势。根据链上数据分析,这次钱包转移可能来自案件中已刑满释放人员操作。除了对市场行情的影响外,人们更为关注的是投资者在事件中遭受的巨大损失。自案件爆发以来,加密货币的价格已经上涨了数十倍。然而,在加密行业的早期阶段,许多投资者未能守住自己的财富。如果将当前的加密行业比作北美的淘金时代,它正释放出广阔的发展与财富增长空间。投资者需要确保资产安全,避免陷入庞氏骗局,从而享受时代发展的红利。

Related Reads

NVIDIA CPU Advances, China's RISC-V Responds: Semiconductor Deep Dive - Part Four

NVIDIA is set to launch its new Vera AI data center CPU in China as early as August, with high pricing. While this move offers a new option, it highlights China's continued dependence on foreign-controlled Arm architecture. In response, the Chinese semiconductor industry is increasingly turning to RISC-V as a strategic alternative for achieving high-performance computing autonomy. The article explores the concept of the "impossible triangle" in CPU development—balancing prosperity, control, and autonomy—and posits that RISC-V's open-source, modular nature offers a unique path to achieving all three. While RISC-V is already dominant in embedded systems, the focus is now shifting to data centers and AI workloads. China has become a global hotspot for RISC-V development, driven by AI-driven compute demand, supply chain concerns from export controls, cost benefits of open-source, and strong policy support. Multiple Chinese companies have reportedly crossed the key performance threshold of 15 SPECint per GHz, a benchmark for entering the high-performance CPU club. Progress extends beyond single-core benchmarks. Companies are developing complete computing subsystems, including commercial-grade coherent network-on-chip (NoC) technology and server processors with up to 40 cores that strictly adhere to the RVA23 standard to ensure software compatibility. Real-world applications are emerging in areas like video transcoding and edge AI. However, significant challenges remain. The RISC-V ecosystem faces fragmentation, immature toolchains and verification processes, and gaps in single-core performance and energy efficiency compared to mature x86 and Arm architectures. The formidable software moat, epitomized by NVIDIA's CUDA, is a long-term hurdle. In conclusion, while RISC-V cannot immediately replace offerings like NVIDIA's Vera, it represents a viable long-term path for China to develop a self-sufficient, high-performance CPU ecosystem. The journey is acknowledged to be long and arduous, requiring sustained effort to overcome technical and ecosystem challenges.

marsbit3h ago

NVIDIA CPU Advances, China's RISC-V Responds: Semiconductor Deep Dive - Part Four

marsbit3h ago

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

The author built a custom monitoring dashboard for Polymarket, a prediction market platform, and tested it with $1,600, achieving over 30% returns. However, the core argument is that Polymarket is not a good venue for traditional arbitrage. The dashboard has two main sections: a "Portfolio Dashboard" for tracking active positions with key metrics like total capital, P&L, and a risk-control module using a tier system (T1, T2, T3), and an "Opportunity Watchlist" for monitoring markets. The article details a critical structural trap in binary markets: a bet with a high perceived probability of success still carries a 100% loss risk if wrong. The author's T1/T2/T3 system is designed to manage this by limiting position sizes based on conviction and time horizon, emphasizing that high confidence should not equal high concentration. A key insight is the danger of "pseudo-diversification"—betting on different markets driven by the same underlying variable. The author concludes that Polymarket offers few true low-risk, arbitrage opportunities. It is instead a high-risk environment where wins can create a false sense of mastery, leading to large losses. The platform is better viewed as a training ground for honing judgment through disciplined, framework-driven betting rather than a reliable income source. The tools help transform intuition into structured, rule-based decisions to mitigate the risk of catastrophic errors.

marsbit6h ago

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

marsbit6h ago

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

**"WeChat AI Card" Practical Test Guide: Has the Era of AI Shopping Arrived?** WeChat has officially launched the "AI Exclusive Card," a feature integrated into its Workbuddy AI assistant. This card is designed to handle payments for AI-initiated purchases. Our hands-on test reveals it's not yet a tool for fully autonomous AI shopping, but rather a controlled payment layer for AI agents. The AI Card functions as an isolated sub-wallet within WeChat Pay. Users must bind the card and transfer funds into it from their main wallet. Crucially, every transaction requires explicit user confirmation via smartphone scan; AI cannot spend autonomously. Currently accessible through the Workbuddy agent, the card targets specific digital consumption scenarios: purchasing paid content (reports, data), calling paid APIs/tools, and subscribing to services. Its design prioritizes security and control by separating funds and mandating approval for each payment. We tested a real-world scenario: ordering bubble tea via Workbuddy using a "Meituan Life Assistant" skill. The process encountered multiple hurdles: high "skill" usage costs (exceeding daily free credits), and most importantly, while a payment was successfully initiated, the AI purchased an incorrect product (a mismatched group-buy coupon instead of the desired drink). This highlights the current limitation: the **AI Card only solves the payment step**. The broader challenge lies in the **AI agent's execution chain**—accurately understanding intent, navigating third-party platforms, selecting the right product, and ensuring proper fulfillment. The payment succeeded, but the purchase failed to meet the user's need. In conclusion, the WeChat AI Exclusive Card is a cautious, early-step experiment in AI commerce. It provides a secure, user-controlled payment method for agent interactions but is not yet capable of reliable, end-to-end complex purchases. For now, it's best used for low-value, low-risk digital services with careful user verification at each step. The vision of AI handling complete shopping tasks remains a work in progress.

marsbit9h ago

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

marsbit9h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片