MicroStrategy(MSTR)股票现在便宜了90%-原因如下

币界网Published on 2024-08-08Last updated on 2024-08-08

币界网报道:

MicroStrategy(MSTR)的股价在周四开盘时仅为131美元,比前一天收盘时下跌了89.4%。

价格变化不是由于市场崩盘或大规模抛售,而是之前宣布的“股票分割”的结果,该分割现已永久生效。

MicroStrategy股票分割

股票分割是指公司通过向所有现有股东按其当前持股比例发行新股来增加其已发行股份的数量。

上个月,MicroStrategy宣布,MSTR股票将在8月7日交易结束后进行10比1的股票分割,截至8月1日,投资者每持有一股,将额外获得9股。

随着新供应的涌入,周四在分割调整的基础上开始交易后,个人股价自然暴跌。然而,每个投资者在该公司的股份最终保持不变,而获得MicroStrategy敞口的“进入壁垒”已大大降低。

比特币教育家Rebecca Goodwill周四在推特上写道:“股票分割旨在使新投资者更能负担得起股票价格。”。她继续说道:

“虽然股票分割不会让你一夜暴富,但这表明公司的表现优于市场,股价需要重置,公司正在为下一个增长阶段做准备。”MicroStrategy(MSTR)price。来源:TradingView

MicroStrategy的比特币控股

拆分前一天,MSTR的股价为每股1246美元。今年早些时候,由于1月11日美国比特币ETF推出后比特币价格上涨,比特币价格达到1919美元的20年高点。

MicroStrategy目前在其资产负债表上持有226500 BTC,按货币价格计算价值131.2亿美元。与此同时,雅虎财经的市值为254亿美元,大约是这个数字的两倍。

该公司通过利用资本市场获得了比特币储备,包括发行新股和出售廉价债务。在该公司于2020年8月宣布首次购买比特币之前,其股票的交易价格为每股123美元,与今天大致相同,但在任何形式的股票分割之前。

此后,Semler Scientific和MetaPlanet等其他公司采用了MIcroStrategy的策略,将比特币作为其企业资产负债表的核心。与MicroStrategy不同,MetaPlanet最近进行了10比1的反向股票分割,使其股价上涨了10倍。

Related Reads

NVIDIA CPU Advances, China's RISC-V Responds: Semiconductor Deep Dive - Part Four

NVIDIA is set to launch its new Vera AI data center CPU in China as early as August, with high pricing. While this move offers a new option, it highlights China's continued dependence on foreign-controlled Arm architecture. In response, the Chinese semiconductor industry is increasingly turning to RISC-V as a strategic alternative for achieving high-performance computing autonomy. The article explores the concept of the "impossible triangle" in CPU development—balancing prosperity, control, and autonomy—and posits that RISC-V's open-source, modular nature offers a unique path to achieving all three. While RISC-V is already dominant in embedded systems, the focus is now shifting to data centers and AI workloads. China has become a global hotspot for RISC-V development, driven by AI-driven compute demand, supply chain concerns from export controls, cost benefits of open-source, and strong policy support. Multiple Chinese companies have reportedly crossed the key performance threshold of 15 SPECint per GHz, a benchmark for entering the high-performance CPU club. Progress extends beyond single-core benchmarks. Companies are developing complete computing subsystems, including commercial-grade coherent network-on-chip (NoC) technology and server processors with up to 40 cores that strictly adhere to the RVA23 standard to ensure software compatibility. Real-world applications are emerging in areas like video transcoding and edge AI. However, significant challenges remain. The RISC-V ecosystem faces fragmentation, immature toolchains and verification processes, and gaps in single-core performance and energy efficiency compared to mature x86 and Arm architectures. The formidable software moat, epitomized by NVIDIA's CUDA, is a long-term hurdle. In conclusion, while RISC-V cannot immediately replace offerings like NVIDIA's Vera, it represents a viable long-term path for China to develop a self-sufficient, high-performance CPU ecosystem. The journey is acknowledged to be long and arduous, requiring sustained effort to overcome technical and ecosystem challenges.

marsbit4h ago

NVIDIA CPU Advances, China's RISC-V Responds: Semiconductor Deep Dive - Part Four

marsbit4h ago

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

The author built a custom monitoring dashboard for Polymarket, a prediction market platform, and tested it with $1,600, achieving over 30% returns. However, the core argument is that Polymarket is not a good venue for traditional arbitrage. The dashboard has two main sections: a "Portfolio Dashboard" for tracking active positions with key metrics like total capital, P&L, and a risk-control module using a tier system (T1, T2, T3), and an "Opportunity Watchlist" for monitoring markets. The article details a critical structural trap in binary markets: a bet with a high perceived probability of success still carries a 100% loss risk if wrong. The author's T1/T2/T3 system is designed to manage this by limiting position sizes based on conviction and time horizon, emphasizing that high confidence should not equal high concentration. A key insight is the danger of "pseudo-diversification"—betting on different markets driven by the same underlying variable. The author concludes that Polymarket offers few true low-risk, arbitrage opportunities. It is instead a high-risk environment where wins can create a false sense of mastery, leading to large losses. The platform is better viewed as a training ground for honing judgment through disciplined, framework-driven betting rather than a reliable income source. The tools help transform intuition into structured, rule-based decisions to mitigate the risk of catastrophic errors.

marsbit7h ago

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

marsbit7h ago

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

**"WeChat AI Card" Practical Test Guide: Has the Era of AI Shopping Arrived?** WeChat has officially launched the "AI Exclusive Card," a feature integrated into its Workbuddy AI assistant. This card is designed to handle payments for AI-initiated purchases. Our hands-on test reveals it's not yet a tool for fully autonomous AI shopping, but rather a controlled payment layer for AI agents. The AI Card functions as an isolated sub-wallet within WeChat Pay. Users must bind the card and transfer funds into it from their main wallet. Crucially, every transaction requires explicit user confirmation via smartphone scan; AI cannot spend autonomously. Currently accessible through the Workbuddy agent, the card targets specific digital consumption scenarios: purchasing paid content (reports, data), calling paid APIs/tools, and subscribing to services. Its design prioritizes security and control by separating funds and mandating approval for each payment. We tested a real-world scenario: ordering bubble tea via Workbuddy using a "Meituan Life Assistant" skill. The process encountered multiple hurdles: high "skill" usage costs (exceeding daily free credits), and most importantly, while a payment was successfully initiated, the AI purchased an incorrect product (a mismatched group-buy coupon instead of the desired drink). This highlights the current limitation: the **AI Card only solves the payment step**. The broader challenge lies in the **AI agent's execution chain**—accurately understanding intent, navigating third-party platforms, selecting the right product, and ensuring proper fulfillment. The payment succeeded, but the purchase failed to meet the user's need. In conclusion, the WeChat AI Exclusive Card is a cautious, early-step experiment in AI commerce. It provides a secure, user-controlled payment method for agent interactions but is not yet capable of reliable, end-to-end complex purchases. For now, it's best used for low-value, low-risk digital services with careful user verification at each step. The vision of AI handling complete shopping tasks remains a work in progress.

marsbit9h ago

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

marsbit9h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片