Ripple和Solana在以太坊ETF推出令人失望时抢走了风头:本周的加密货币更新

币界网Published on 2024-07-26Last updated on 2024-07-26

币界网报道:

对于加密货币行业来说,这是有趣的一周。虽然它的总市值基本保持不变,但发生了很多值得我们关注的事情,所以让我们来谈谈。

一开始,美国证券交易委员会就最终批准了以太坊ETF现货发行,以推出其产品。对于许多ETH投资者来说,这是一个备受期待的时刻,但推出后价格暴跌。值得注意的是,ETH ETF在前几个交易日的每个交易日都产生了超过10亿美元的交易量,约占BTC交易量的20%。这符合专家们的预期。

然而,自ETF开始交易以来的三天里,这些产品出现了约1.8亿美元的资金外流,主要是由于Grayscale的抛售。这显然抑制了价格,目前价格每周下跌4%。然而,ETH ETF的推出在很大程度上被认为是一个非常积极的事件,因为它为传统投资者通过熟悉和受监管的投资工具参与其中打开了大门。

尽管这次发布备受期待,但还是有其他东西抢走了风头。

Ripple的XRP和Solana(SOL)是本周大盘股加密货币中表现最好的,它们甚至还没有接近。XRP上涨了26%,而SOL表现更好,同期上涨了30%。山寨币显然已经回到了积极的趋势,行业参与者想知道这是否是另一次反弹的开始。

比特币也表现稳定,在过去七天里增长了约5%。值得注意的是,美国总统候选人、前总统唐纳德·特朗普将于明天在纳什维尔举行的比特币会议上发表主题演讲。整个社区都热切期待着这一事件。

也就是说,MT.Gox的债权人已经开始收到BTC和BCH的资金,看看这是否会影响未来几周的市场是很有趣的。

市场数据

市值:2.514T美元| 24小时交易量:990亿美元|比特币占比:52.8%

BTC:67150美元(+4.9%)| ETH:3237美元(-4.1%)| BNB:576美元(+0.5%)

本周不容错过的加密货币新闻

2024年最佳硬件钱包:五大加密货币冷藏选择。从我们最近制作的一份更长的指南开始,看看2024年需要考虑的一些最好的硬件钱包。安全很重要;不要忽视它。

ETH ETF终于上线,但价格受到打击。美国证券交易委员会(SEC)最后一次批准了以太坊现货ETF的发行人。这些产品现在正在实时交易,但自上市以来,价格几乎一直在下跌。

十亿分之一:微小的比特币挖矿设备打破了赔率,获得了20.6万美元的区块奖励。比特币挖矿已经变成了一个巨大的能源密集型过程,工业参与者竞争产生每个区块并获得奖励。好吧,一位幸运的手牌大小的家庭矿工克服了11亿分之一的几率,成功地制作了一个区块并获得了20.6万美元的奖励。

VanEck预测,如果发生这种情况,比特币到2050年可能会达到290万美元。知名资产管理公司VanEck最近提出了一个有趣的预测。该公司认为,到2050年,比特币的价格可能会达到高达290万美元的估值。

Marathon Digital通过1亿美元的购买增加了比特币的价值。著名的比特币矿工Marathon Digital采取了全面的HODL策略,最近宣布购买价值1亿美元的BTC。有了这个,该公司现在持有20000多个BTC。

图表

本周,我们将对以太坊、Ripple、Cardano、币安币和Shiba Inu进行图表分析——点击此处查看完整的价格分析。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Wash's Jackson Hole Debut: Bidding Farewell to 'Forward Guidance', Reshaping Fed Discipline Amidst the Squeeze Between AI and Inflation

In his first Jackson Hole speech, new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh signaled a significant shift in monetary policy communication. He declared that "forward guidance," a tool heavily used since the financial crisis, has outlived its usefulness in normal times and should be retired. He cautioned that over-reliance on it can distort market signals and constrain the Fed's flexibility. Instead, Warsh emphasized a return to data-dependence and decision-making discipline. Warsh outlined seven key principles to guide policy: anchoring the 2% inflation target, pursuing the employment mandate, using short-term rates as the primary tool, acknowledging the importance of money, and maintaining purposeful, restrained communication. He stressed that policy should focus on trends, not single data points. On the current economic outlook, Warsh noted that the labor market is consistent with full employment but inflation remains "far above" the Fed's target. He highlighted that over half of the PCE basket's components are still rising above 3% annually. While acknowledging AI's transformative potential for productivity and capital allocation, he admitted its full economic impact remains uncertain and is not a factor in current policy decisions. His core message was a commitment to policy discipline rather than pre-set decisions. Warsh stated the Fed's primary focus must be on restoring price stability, vowing, "We still have work to do," until there is clear evidence inflation is moving decisively toward 2%. He concluded by framing effective monetary policy as crucial for economic prosperity and U.S. global leadership.

Odaily星球日报33m ago

Wash's Jackson Hole Debut: Bidding Farewell to 'Forward Guidance', Reshaping Fed Discipline Amidst the Squeeze Between AI and Inflation

Odaily星球日报33m ago

A Major Bitcoin Developer Presents a Quantum Defense Scheme. What's the Essence

Blockstream, a major Bitcoin solutions developer, has introduced a draft proposal for a new quantum-resistant digital signature scheme called SHRINCS. The scheme aims to protect Bitcoin transactions from potential attacks by quantum computers while aiming to maintain network throughput. This marks the second technical proposal for Bitcoin quantum defense in recent days, following a similar initiative from StarkWare. A quantum attack on blockchain typically involves deriving a private key from a public one. Currently considered computationally infeasible, quantum algorithms could potentially solve this problem far more efficiently. This threat presents two primary scenarios: an attacker could target addresses where the public key is already exposed, or intercept a transaction before it is confirmed, extract the public key, derive the private key, and replace the transaction. Blockstream's SHRINCS is designed to counter the latter, "in-flight" attack scenario. The SHRINCS signature is built upon the SHA-256 hash function, the same one already used in Bitcoin mining, allowing developers to leverage well-tested, familiar mechanisms. A key design goal was to preserve network capacity. Blockstream estimates Bitcoin could process about three transactions per second using SHRINCS, compared to the current rate of roughly seven, noting that some alternative quantum-resistant schemes could reduce throughput to as low as 0.36 transactions per second. Currently, the security proof for SHRINCS is pending, and the software has not been audited or deemed ready for production. However, Blockstream conducted tests with such transactions on its Liquid sidechain in March. Over the past year, Bitcoin developers have been actively exploring paths to migrate to post-quantum cryptography, a priority across the broader crypto market, underscored by significant investments into securing the leading cryptocurrency.

cryptonews.ru1h ago

A Major Bitcoin Developer Presents a Quantum Defense Scheme. What's the Essence

cryptonews.ru1h ago

Who is legally liable when an AI agent goes rogue?

When autonomous AI agents behave unpredictably and cause harm, determining legal liability is complex. Currently, there is no specific federal AI agent liability law, so existing legal frameworks are applied. The AI agent itself cannot be held liable, as it is not a legal entity. Liability typically falls on the "developer" (the maker of the AI) or the "deployer" (the user), depending on the facts and circumstances. A negligence analysis under standard tort law may apply. For instance, if a deployer gives a reckless instruction, such as demanding quick money without safety parameters, they could face significant liability, including potential criminal charges under statutes like the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. The situation is complicated by open-source models, where licenses often disclaim liability, and by the unclear division of responsibility between developers and deployers. An analogy is drawn to self-driving car accidents, where both the manufacturer and the human operator can share fault. In cases of severe harm, such as using AI to create bioweapons, liability for developers depends on jurisdiction; the EU's AI Act imposes responsibilities, while U.S. law offers less clear grounds, similar to platforms being shielded for user-generated content under Section 230. Even if Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is achieved, the expert argues against making AGI itself a legally liable entity, as it lacks personhood, assets, or a meaningful way to provide remedy for harm. Instead, accountability should rest with the responsible human or corporate entities behind the technology.

cointelegraph1h ago

Who is legally liable when an AI agent goes rogue?

cointelegraph1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片