Coinbase表示,美国证券交易委员会拒绝提供对其防御至关重要的文件

币界网Published on 2024-07-24Last updated on 2024-07-24

币界网报道:

Coinbase已提交一项动议,要求美国证券交易委员会(SEC),特别是针对主席加里·詹斯勒(Gary Gensler),出示被认为对其对抗监管机构至关重要的文件。

在周二提交给纽约美国南区法院的一项动议中,Coinbase声称,在法律诉讼之前的几年里,美国证券交易委员会表示,它已与加密货币市场利益相关者会面,并就加密货币监管提供了指导。

Coinbase辩称,美国证券交易委员会现在拒绝搜索并向其提供文件,同时也没有按要求记录特权文件。

Coinbase的动议写道:“美国证券交易委员会不会搜索这些相关文件。”。“它拒绝在自选的执法部门调查档案之外搜索任何文件。”

美国证券交易委员会坚称,其调查文件之外的文件无关紧要,搜索这些文件将是一项繁重的任务。美国证券交易委员会也以特权为由拒绝记录文件。

然而,Coinbase辩称,这些文件对其辩护至关重要,批评美国证券交易委员会没有证实其责任主张,并声称许多要求的文件涉及与代币发行人和市场参与者的通信,这不应享有特权。

该动议强调了三项具体的文件要求:

    执法部门以外的文件:Coinbase向美国证券交易委员会其他部门(如FinHub、公司财务)和专员寻求文件,声称这些文件与美国证券交易委员的索赔和Coinbase的公平通知辩护有关。公开发行文件:Coinbase要求提供与其公开发行相关的文件,以证明美国证券交易委员会此前并不认为其运营违反了证券法。Gensler主席的沟通:Coinbase寻求SEC主席Gary Gensler的沟通,包括以个人身份进行的沟通,以澄清SEC对数字资产的公开声明和监管立场。

Coinbase称美国证券交易委员会的立场“站不住脚”,并敦促法院迫使美国证券交易委员进行彻底搜查,并出示或记录所要求的文件。

2023年6月,美国证券交易委员会指控Coinbase经营一家未注册的证券交易所、经纪商和清算机构,并声称其质押服务构成未注册证券发行。

Coinbase对这些指控提出异议,声称美国证券交易委员会缺乏监管数字资产的国会权力,Coinbase没有收到任何违规行为的公平通知。

Coinbase和美国证券交易委员会没有立即回复置评请求。

编辑:塞巴斯蒂安·辛克莱

Related Reads

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

"Why DeFi Insurance Remains Unpurchased" explores the paradox of decentralized finance insurance. While DeFi insurance promises automatic, unbiased payouts via smart contracts—eliminating traditional insurers' denial practices—it struggles to attract users. The core issue is economic viability. Premiums are prohibitively high relative to the yields from DeFi protocols. For example, insuring a deposit on Aave or Maple Finance can consume most or even all of the annual yield, leaving returns comparable to or worse than traditional savings. Only the safest protocols, like MakerDAO, offer affordable premiums. Furthermore, the DeFi insurance model is structurally fragile. Unlike traditional insurance where risks are uncorrelated, DeFi risks are highly interconnected (e.g., oracle failures, bridge hacks). A single major exploit can simultaneously threaten multiple protocols, potentially bankrupting the entire insurance pool, which holds only millions against billions in total value locked. The governance model also creates a conflict of interest. In platforms like Nexus Mutual, token holders who vote on claims risk their own capital if payouts are approved, incentivizing denials. Consequently, the market is tiny and shrinking. Nexus Mutual dominates with $81.56 million in assets, but the industry lacks the capacity to cover a catastrophic event like the $292M Kelp DAO hack. Other providers have dwindled or shut down. The article concludes that DeFi insurance faces a "tragedy of the commons": its stability requires widespread adoption, but individual users have no incentive to pay for it, as premiums destroy their yields. Current solutions involve preventative measures like bug bounties and seeking external capital from traditional reinsurance, acknowledging that on-chain capital alone is insufficient to cover on-chain risks.

marsbit2h ago

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片