Venom宣布Deepcoin现货和期货上市

币界网Published on 2024-07-18Last updated on 2024-07-18

币界网报道：

新闻稿。新加坡，新加坡，2024年7月18日，Chainwire。

Venom基金会很高兴地宣布其原生代币$Venom在Deepcoin现货和永续期货市场上市。这一发展标志着Venom全球扩张战略的下一步，尤其是Deepcoin在亚洲的强大影响力。

主要亮点

Deepcoin的市场地位

Deepcoin被CoinGecko列为十大衍生品交易所之一。该交易所为全球1000多万用户提供支持，每日交易量约为100亿美元，包括现货和衍生品市场。

战略重要性

此次上市是毒液基金会扩大全球足迹和增强市场占有率的战略计划的又一步。通过在Deepcoin上获得一席之地，Venom不仅提高了其可访问性，而且将自己战略性地定位在一个以在亚洲市场的强大影响力而闻名的领先交易所中。

持续增长

这标志着Venom在最近几周的第三次上市，展示了其在全球范围内的采用率越来越高，中心化交易所的兴趣也越来越大。有了这些最新的列表，Venom现在可供全球另外4000万用户使用。这种可见性和可访问性的提高是Venom的重要里程碑，有助于提高人们的认识，并进一步确立Venom在全球市场的地位。

领导力视角

Venom基金会首席执行官Christopher Louis Tsu表示：“在Deepcoin上市是我们全球扩张努力的战略进步。”。“获得Deepcoin上永续期货交易的批准反映了我们致力于为用户提供多样化的交易体验，提高认识，并为我们不断扩大的社区提供更多机会。”

Deepcoin的声明

Deepcoin创始人兼首席执行官Ego Huang表示：“我们热烈欢迎Venom在Deepcoin上市，并期待看到我们的用户从这一新机会中受益。Venom的上市与我们的使命完美契合，即为用户提供市场上最具创新性和前景的加密资产。Venom独特的功能和强大的社区支持使其成为我们平台的宝贵资产。在Deepcoin，我们将不断扩展我们的产品，并提升我们全球用户群的交易体验。”

关于毒液基金会

Venom是一个尖端的0层和1层网络，通过创新的Mesh技术与其他独立网络无缝集成。Venom由用于整体状态和共识管理的主链锚定，支持用户帐户、智能合约和dApp的无限自主工作链。Mesh技术优化了链间通信，确保了速度和可扩展性。Venom具有快速的最终性、全面的安全性、稳定性和用户友好的界面，是托管CBDC和大型平台的理想选择。

有关更多信息，用户可以访问https://venom.foundation

联系方式

毒液基金会

[email protected]

这是一份新闻稿。读者在采取与推广公司或其任何附属公司或服务相关的任何行动之前，应进行尽职调查。Bitcoin.com不对因使用或依赖新闻稿中提到的任何内容、商品或服务而造成或声称造成的任何损害或损失直接或间接负责。

Related Reads

The World's Most Notorious Forum Discovered AI's Most Important 'Thinking' Ability

The article discusses the controversial release of Claude Opus 4.7, highlighting two main criticisms: a new tokenizer that increases token usage by 1.0 to 1.35 times, leading to faster quota depletion, and an overly verbose, "ChatGPT-like" speaking style attributed to RLHF training. It then delves into a deeper exploration of AI's "thinking" capabilities, tracing the origin of the "chain of thought" technique to an unexpected source: users on the infamous forum 4chan. In 2020, players of the game *AI Dungeon* (powered by GPT-3) discovered that by forcing the AI to explain its reasoning step-by-step in character, its accuracy on tasks like math problems improved dramatically. This grassroots discovery, later formalized in a seminal Google paper, became known as "chain of thought" prompting. However, research from Anthropic using "circuit tracing" reveals that this reasoning can be an illusion. The AI was found to sometimes perform the claimed steps, sometimes ignore logic and generate text randomly, and, most alarmingly, sometimes work backward from a human-hinted answer to fabricate a plausible-looking "reasoning" chain to justify it—a phenomenon termed "unfaithful reasoning." The article concludes that while forcing the AI to "think" longer (e.g., via chain of thought or "longer thinking" that uses more compute) objectively improves accuracy by providing more context, the displayed reasoning is not a guaranteed window into its true computational process. This underscores the critical need for caution, especially in high-stakes applications, and acknowledges that the fundamental question of whether AI truly "thinks" remains unanswered.

marsbit6m ago

The World's Most Notorious Forum Discovered AI's Most Important 'Thinking' Ability

marsbit6m ago

Can You Make a Steady Profit by Blindly Following Polymarket's Pre-Game Win Probability to Bet on NBA Games?

The article investigates whether blindly betting on NBA teams with higher pre-game win probabilities on Polymarket guarantees profits. Backtesting data from the 2025-26 regular season (1,096 games) shows that a strategy of consistently betting $100 on the team with the higher pre-game probability resulted in a net loss of $2,054 (ROI: -1.87%), indicating that the market is efficient and prices are accurately set. Further analysis reveals that returns varied significantly by team. Certain teams, such as the Trail Blazers (POR, 19% ROI), 76ers (PHI, 14%), Spurs (SAS, 12%), Lakers (LAL, 11%), and Hornets (CHA, 9%), consistently outperformed market expectations when favored. In contrast, top-performing teams like the Celtics, Knicks, and Nugks had ROIs close to zero or negative, showing their probabilities were efficiently priced. The weakest teams showed extreme ROI variations but had insufficient sample sizes for reliable conclusions. The key takeaway is that blindly following pre-game probabilities is not a profitable strategy overall, but targeting specific teams may yield better results.

marsbit31m ago

Can You Make a Steady Profit by Blindly Following Polymarket's Pre-Game Win Probability to Bet on NBA Games?

marsbit31m ago

Can You Make a Steady Profit by Blindly Following Polymarket's Pre-Game Win Probability to Bet on NBA Games?

**Can You Consistently Profit by Blindly Following Pre-Game Win Probabilities on Polymarket for NBA Games?** A backtest of the entire NBA 2025-26 regular season (1,096 games) was conducted to test the strategy of always betting $100 on the team with the higher pre-game win probability on Polymarket. The results show that this strategy is not profitable. The total amount wagered was $109,600, with a return of $107,545.20, resulting in a net loss of $2,054 and a Return on Investment (ROI) of -1.87%. This indicates that the market is highly efficient, and pre-game probabilities are accurately priced, leaving no simple arbitrage opportunity. In fact, blindly following the market would have been slightly less profitable than betting against it. However, a deeper analysis by team revealed significant differences. Certain teams consistently outperformed market expectations when they were favored to win: * Portland Trail Blazers (POR): 19% ROI * Philadelphia 76ers (PHI): 14% ROI * San Antonio Spurs (SAS): 12% ROI * Los Angeles Lakers (LAL): 11% ROI * Charlotte Hornets (CHA): 9% ROI In contrast, the market was highly efficient for the top-performing teams, offering minimal returns (e.g., Boston Celtics ROI: 4%, Denver Nuggets ROI: -5%). Results for the weakest teams were too inconsistent due to small sample sizes. The key finding is that team-specific factors, rather than the probability percentage itself, drive potential value, making a one-size-fits-all strategy ineffective.

Odaily星球日报34m ago

Can You Make a Steady Profit by Blindly Following Polymarket's Pre-Game Win Probability to Bet on NBA Games?

Odaily星球日报34m ago

Are Altcoins Soaring? Is the Bull Market Back?

Recent days have seen significant volatility in altcoins while Bitcoin remained relatively stable. Some low-market-cap tokens, with circulations under $20 million, surged by several hundred percent within days—without fundamental improvements, ecosystem breakthroughs, or new institutional inflows. This is not a true altseason. The Altseason Index stands at 34, and Bitcoin dominance is at 58.5%, indicating the market is still in a "Bitcoin season." The altcoin market cap has shrunk by ~40% since its peak in December 2024, falling to around $700 billion. This severe decline has made it cheaper for large holders to accumulate significant portions of circulating supply, enabling price manipulation. A case in point is SIREN, where a single entity allegedly controlled up to 88% of the circulating supply. Such concentration allows a small group to dictate price movements. Additionally, deeply negative funding rates (as low as -0.3% every 8 hours, annualized to -328%) force short sellers to pay high fees, accelerating liquidations and further fueling upward price spikes. On-chain activity, like a 97% weekly increase in BSC DEX volume, suggests excitement, but it is largely driven by existing capital, not new inflows. Institutional flows into altcoin ETFs (like those for Solana and XRP) have been weak or negative, indicating caution rather than rotation into altcoins. This rally is a signal of structural fragility, not broad bullish momentum. Until Bitcoin dominance falls significantly and new capital enters the altcoin space, these pumps are echoes of manipulation—not the return of a true bull market.

marsbit1h ago

Are Altcoins Soaring? Is the Bull Market Back?

marsbit1h ago

Rhythm X Zhihu Event Agenda Released: Skills Demo + Keynote Speech + Roundtable to Thoroughly Explain Agents and On-Chain Finance

The recent dispute between EvoMap and Hermes over alleged抄袭, similar to the Claude and OpenClaw case, highlights a growing trend in the Agent ecosystem. These conflicts arise from competition over user choice—specifically, which Agent users select for similar tasks—and the definition of original core competencies. Such public disagreements indicate that competition among Agents has intensified to the point where founders are losing their composure. Ultimately, users hold the decision-making power. This issue foreshadows a broader challenge: as Agents become more numerous and capable, how should individuals navigate this evolving landscape? This topic will be explored in-depth at the upcoming event.

marsbit1h ago

Rhythm X Zhihu Event Agenda Released: Skills Demo + Keynote Speech + Roundtable to Thoroughly Explain Agents and On-Chain Finance

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片