以太坊ETF今年能否通过?AR的出货策略是什么?

金色财经Published on 2024-07-08Last updated on 2024-07-08

来源:道说区块链

1、比特币二层的龙头是哪个?

我觉得现在比特币二层中暂时还没有龙头。不少项目现在都还没发币。一些发了币的项目都是一些比较老的项目。这些发了币的老项目我觉得无论在技术上还是在TVL的沉淀上明显都不如新项目。所以未来的龙头大概率会是在还没发币的新项目中,至于具体是哪个,还是等市场竞争给出答案吧。

2、以太坊ETF今年能否通过?

我觉得判断这个比判断美联储降不降息还难,因为它没有明确、公开的政策和标准,所以美国监管部门操作的空间很大。

既然操作的空间很大那就必然涉及众多利益的博弈和妥协。这里面最大的博弈力量估计就是华尔街的财团和监管部门了。

长远看,我相信这个ETF一定能过,因为财团们已经从比特币ETF中看到并收获了巨大的红利,不可能放着第二大资产以太坊置之不理。

更重要的是在现有的加密生态中,以太坊具备完备的设施,可以让开发者开发各种金融工具和应用,这里面的想象空间太大了。

比如贝莱德一直以来在以太坊ETF方面的各种公开动作和喊话就是最明显的标志。

但是作为监管,要考虑的问题也会很多,比如:从正常的逻辑来说,如果以太坊ETF获批,那其它一系列POS区块链的ETF就都没有理由阻拦;可现在比特币ETF才刚批没多久,又接二连三批出这么多ETF,监管又会受到质疑......

我有时候会想香港在这方面能不能动作更快一些,步子更大一些?

在最近香港举行的一系列Web 3活动中,木头姐就公开表达了对香港监管在加密生态监管方面的赞美。对她的这个评价我是很赞同的。如果香港能在以太坊ETF方面先行一步,将会起到很好的推动作用,也能为香港经济找到新的动力和活力。

说起香港,最近还看到一则挺有意思的新闻:国内一些基金公司,包括像嘉实、华夏这样的大基金都准备在香港开设比特币ETF。它们的这些动作显然是面对一些高净值国人群体的。

这些动作客观上都在为接下来的牛市蓄水。

3、AR的出货策略?

AR和我所有看好的币一样,都不会现在出货,只要项目方不出问题,我只会在接下来的牛市接近高潮时再考虑出货。

4、比特币ETF通过后,通过ETF购买的,当利润丰厚时,这些人会选择卖出,机构对应就要卖出。那是不是对应未来也可能出现这些人疯狂卖出ETF也会导致比特币被疯狂抛售?

我也注意到了这个问题,并且一直在观察。

一个很值得关注的现象是:在最近这一轮调整中,比特币从最高大概7.4万美元跌到了最低6.1万美元。在这个过程中ETF一直在流出。这个过程和ETF通过以前我们散户买卖的行为非常类似。

而现在还不是牛市,并且还有ETF的加持,在这样的情况下,比特币依旧能有接近20%的跌幅。这说明至少在接下来的牛市中,比特币下跌20%甚至更多是完全可能的。

我之所以也在关注这个问题,是因为这个特性对牛市中制定抛售策略非常重要。

此前我在文章中写过,我一直在考虑需不需要在接下来的牛市中调整曾经的抛售策略。而这需要观察一系列ETF通过后,市场可能出现的新特性和新规律。

比特币可能的跌幅就是其中一个非常重要的指标。

Related Reads

Hubei State-Owned Assets Achieve the Largest Return in History

After years of anticipation, Yangtze Memory Holdings Co., Ltd. (YMTC) has filed for an IPO on Shanghai's STAR Market, seeking to raise 33 billion yuan—the largest offering in the board's history. This move follows the recent listing of its peer, ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT), which reached a market valuation exceeding 4 trillion yuan. Dubbed the "twin stars of domestic memory," both companies, founded in 2016 in Hefei and Wuhan respectively, symbolize China's push for semiconductor self-sufficiency. YMTC's journey began with its predecessor, Wuhan Xinxin, established in 2006. Backed by substantial state investment from Hubei and Wuhan, it evolved into a national memory base. The company achieved key technological breakthroughs, and now ranks as the world's third-largest and China's top NAND Flash manufacturer by sales. Its recent financials are strong, with Q1 2026 revenue of 47.04 billion yuan and net profit of 33.38 billion yuan. Post-IPO, its market value is widely expected to surpass 1 trillion yuan. The potential windfall highlights the success of long-term, patient capital from Hubei's state-owned entities. Key shareholders like Hubei Changsheng, Xintech, and government-backed funds have supported YMTC through years of development. Their collective stake could be worth hundreds of billions after the listing. This model mirrors other successes in Wuhan, such as Huagong Tech, where local state investment during a low point later yielded massive returns. The story reflects a broader national trend of regional transformation through strategic, high-tech investments. Hefei's bet on CXMT, now worth over 3.7 trillion yuan, propelled the city's A-share market cap to 4th nationally, showcasing how a major firm can reshape an entire local industry ecosystem. Similarly, Wuhan's photoelectronics cluster, now worth over 850 billion yuan, aims to become a world-class hub. The takeaway is clear: in the reshuffling of Chinese cities, patient, courageous state investment in core technologies—from memory chips to advanced manufacturing—is proving to be a decisive factor, turning long-term visions into economic reality.

marsbit19m ago

Hubei State-Owned Assets Achieve the Largest Return in History

marsbit19m ago

The Myth of AI Investment Collapses

"The AI Investment Myth Bursts: The Swift Collapse of a $45 Billion Fund The high-flying hedge fund Situational Awareness (SA), founded by 24-year-old former OpenAI researcher Leopold Aschenbrenner, neared total collapse in late July. Once a Wall Street darling, the fund saw its assets under management rocket from $1.5 billion to $45 billion in under a year, driven by a massively leveraged bet on the AI boom. Its core strategy was a 'Texas hedge'—simultaneously buying stocks seen as AI beneficiaries (like chipmakers) and shorting those deemed AI victims (like certain software firms). In reality, both sides of this trade were dependent on unbroken market confidence in AI. This strategy generated staggering returns, peaking at 439% year-to-date. However, it concealed extreme concentration, high leverage (reportedly 3-to-1), and liquidity risks from illiquid private holdings like Anthropic. When semiconductor stocks corrected sharply in late July, SA's long positions plummeted. Simultaneously, its short bets failed as 'AI victim' stocks rose, causing losses on both sides. The fund faced immediate, massive margin calls. With minutes to spare before a forced liquidation by its prime brokers, SA sold its entire public market portfolio at a discount to Citadel on July 30, narrowly avoiding a market-wide cascade. The fund's value crashed from $45 billion to roughly $10 billion (excluding its remaining Anthropic stake). The episode exposes the systemic risks embedded in the frenzied, highly leveraged chase for AI returns. It serves as a stark reminder of the old Wall Street adage: markets can stay irrational longer than investors can stay solvent. The crisis shifts focus from Aschenbrenner's AI predictions to whether capital markets will continue ignoring such dangerous concentration and leverage in pursuit of the next 'sure thing' narrative."

marsbit20m ago

The Myth of AI Investment Collapses

marsbit20m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片