Odaily编辑部投资操作全记录(6月17日)

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-06-17Last updated on 2024-06-17

Abstract

麻了,疲惫,难熬,但永远有板块抄底,永远热泪盈眶……

本新栏目为 Odaily 编辑部成员真实投资经历分享,不接受任何商务广告,不构成投资建议(因为本司同事都很擅长亏钱),旨在为读者扩充视角、丰富信源,欢迎加入 Odaily 社群(微信@Odaily 2018 ,Telegram 交流群X 官方账号)交流吐槽。

Odaily编辑部投资操作全记录(6月17日)

推荐人:Asher(X:@Asher_ 0210 

简介:低市值山寨长线埋伏、链游打金、撸毛党

分享

  1. BTC 行情,目前有所调整,日线关注 64500 附近,不跌破还是看涨。

  2. 撸毛:继续撸 The Beacon(灯塔),可以说全网工作室都在撸了,毕竟没成本,大概率最后最后是要查女巫的,多号还是要上独立 IP;Pixelverse,很省事,每 8 小时点一下收收金币,宠物升级就好了;Pixels,马上第二章,这段时间知道的不少工作室 bot 号大批量被封,看看第二章打金收益。

推荐人:南枳(X:@Assassin_Malvo

简介:链上玩家,数据分析师,除了 NFT 什么都玩

分享

  1. 链上 Meme 持续熄火,但局部热点仍存在,重点关注重要角色背书或者相关概念代币。今日案例为,币安官推回复的 BILLY 六小时突破 2000 万美元市值,并带起了一小部分仿盘。

  2. 以太坊 ETF 进展在即,低位购入以太坊相关资产。

推荐人:Azuma(X:@azuma_eth

简介:铁头韭菜

分享

  1. ZKsync 空投已开放,不打算立即出手的可以考虑先做一做 LP,价位区间可考虑 0.2-0.4 ,一般大热项目第一天的 LP 收益都会比较可观,可覆盖并抵消潜在的无常损失。

  2. Lido(LDO)这波下跌中反弹势头不错,加上亲儿子项目 Symbiotic 的潜在场景加持(支持所有 ERC 20 去做再质押,LDO 可能会是第一波试验代币),可以继续保持关注。

推荐人:golem(X:@web3_golem

简介:比特币生态捕手、撸毛练习生

分享

  1. 将 SOL 换仓 ETH,SOL 车目前太重,虽然从链上看 Solana 比以太坊活跃很多,各项数据都不错,但相比以太坊 ETF 通过在即的利好,还是差了一些,熬不住了,决定和主流大资金站在一起。

  2. 之前打的符文 COOK•THE•MEMPOOL 打完就跌,也是因为前几天 mint 时赶上了交易所归集资金,链上 gas 走高抬高了成本,但是我也是劝大家,现在不要轻易打符文了,中西方目前都没有新资金入场。

推荐人:Wenser(X:@wenser 2010 

简介: 10 U 战神,Meme 分手大师,兼职外卖员

分享

  1. 埋伏的体育概念都亏麻了,之前提醒大家不要买先看看,自己先冲了,目前单个币种亏损 15% 起步;

  2. 其他的链上资产还在逐步清仓中,虽然 7 月 2 号 ETH 现货 ETF 大概率会通过,但是已经不抱太大的拉盘希望了,这个猴市已经让我有点身心俱疲那感觉了;

  3. NOT 回调到了 0.018 ,继续 HODL,有消息说 TON 生态其他的病毒小游戏也会陆续发币了,龙一概念还是持续看好;

  4. CRV 那一波抄底脑子想到了,操作没跟上,只能反思了,至少 0.22 的时候应该买点的,搏个短期反弹预期也是应该的,还是没想清楚很多事情;

  5. 下一步不看好 ZK、ZRO、BLAST 的后市表现,只能看 8 月初了。

最后, 6 月还是个丰收的季节,但我已经不是农夫了。——“查了,我查询了我所有的地址,我拥有的每一个地址都被举报了。我完全退出了撸毛赛道,我再也受不了了。激进的女巫举报,担惊受怕的生活,一切都是那么煎熬。撸毛结束了,我出局了。”

推荐人:星球小花(X:@mandywangETH

简介:合约小作手

分享

行情横在这个位置,基本就两个剧本,BTC 上行破 72000 美元进一步新高;和彻底跌破 65000 美元后下探破 60000 美元,在  5w+美元区域甚至更低找支撑, 65000 美元是 120 日线位置,目前仍然在磨蹭。

无论哪个剧本,比特币终将新高,但如果是后者剧本的话很有可能接下来会走得十分磨叽,甚至要 2、 3 个月后才有趋势行情了。

场内流动性吃紧,场外流动性被 ETF 和美股等更低门槛、高热度的标的分薄,山寨持续阴跌,消息面带来的短期上涨皆无法持续,突破多为假突破,操作必须见好就收,尤其是大部分“行业重量级”项目(L2等)持续解锁,VC 基本逢解锁必出货,价格新低但流通盘持续增大,如果行情持续下跌,建议别因为“价格便宜”抄底,与之相比还不如低倍杠杆上比特币。

往期记录 

6 月 3 日

6 月 5 日

6 月 7 日

6 月 12 日

6 月 14 日

推荐阅读

机构集体“打脸”,后市行情会如何发展?

大波动在即,机构如何看待后市行情?

Related Reads

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

Tidal Investment remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market narrative has changed. While recent large-scale IPOs (e.g., SpaceX) and major fundraising plans by tech giants like Alphabet and Meta have caused some nervousness, this isn't a sign of an AI peak. The focus has moved from the initial question of AI's viability to the sustainability of massive investment cycles. The key players—primarily the major cloud providers—are not slowing down; their capital expenditure (Capex) guidance for 2026 has been increased across the board (e.g., Alphabet to $180B, Amazon to $200B). This investment cycle is proving resilient and difficult to stop. Unlike traditional hardware cycles, current AI Capex is distributed across multiple physical layers—computing, memory, networking, and critically, power infrastructure. Bottlenecks are shifting from chips to elements like electricity, transformers, and cooling systems, which have much longer lead times and cannot be easily pre-built like fiber optics during the dot-com bubble. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's 240% YoY data center orders) confirms this broad-based, project-driven expansion. Market concerns are acknowledged but viewed differently. First, while Capex growth currently outpaces revenue growth, raising ROI questions, this mirrors the early scaling phase of cloud computing itself. A change in view would require concrete signals like downward Capex revisions or missed AI product targets, which haven't materialized by mid-2026. Second, comparisons to the 2000 dot-com bust are flawed. That crash was driven by a massive, parallel oversupply of cheap capacity (fiber). The current cycle faces *supply constraints* in critical, capital-intensive physical infrastructure that cannot be overbuilt as easily. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the next, more complex act of the AI story. Physical bottlenecks and sustained high Capex plans suggest this is not the finale but an ongoing, capital-intensive build-out phase. The script has changed, but the play is far from over.

marsbit7m ago

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

marsbit7m ago

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But for Different Reasons Now

Tidal Investments remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market is concerned about massive concurrent fundraising by tech giants like SpaceX, OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta, fearing an AI peak. However, the authors argue this signals the next act of AI development, not its end. Capital expenditure (Capex) from major cloud providers (Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, Oracle) continues to surge aggressively into 2026. This investment cycle is more resilient than past hardware cycles due to its scale and complexity. Bottlenecks have shifted from chips to critical physical infrastructure like power grids, transformers, cooling, and data center construction—areas with long lead times and limited capacity for rapid expansion. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's orders) confirms substantial, tangible progress. Key market concerns are addressed: 1. **ROI vs. Capex Growth**: While Capex growth outpaces revenue, the authors note cloud giants have historically overcome similar phases through scale. The cycle will only be in danger if Capex guidance is cut, orders are canceled, or AI product demand falters—none of which are currently observed. 2. **Comparison to the 2000 Dot-com Bubble**: Unlike the telecom bubble, where cheap, oversupplied fiber crashed prices, AI infrastructure (especially power) is constrained, customized, and subject to lengthy approvals, making a similar supply glut and crash unlikely. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the immense, ongoing capital needs for AI's next phase, constrained by slow-moving physical bottlenecks. The AI cycle is not over; the script has simply changed.

链捕手14m ago

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But for Different Reasons Now

链捕手14m ago

Grayscale: These 15 Profitable Crypto Protocols Are Severely Undervalued

Grayscale Research identifies 15 top-revenue crypto protocols trading at significant valuation discounts, with many at single-digit or even 1x revenue multiples. Protocols like Pump.fun, PancakeSwap, and Meteora have market capitalizations roughly equal to their annual revenue. The report argues these financially-focused protocols (DEXs, lending, staking) are fundamentally undervalued and could benefit from the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, expected as soon as next month. This legislation aims to clarify digital asset regulation, potentially reducing institutional barriers and driving on-chain activity. The analysis breaks down the protocols into three groups: the "1x Club" (market cap ≈ revenue), mid-tier protocols with 3-9x multiples (e.g., Aave, Lido, Jupiter), and high-multiple protocols like Hyperliquid (15x) and Uniswap (37x), where valuation reflects future potential rather than current cash flows. Grayscale applies a traditional DCF model to Aave, suggesting a one-year price target of ~$175, representing ~130% upside from current levels. The report notes a risk-off macro environment since the Iran conflict has further compressed valuations, creating a potential entry window. The conclusion highlights that while the valuation data presents an intriguing opportunity, the investment thesis is contingent on the CLARITY Act's passage and subsequent institutional capital flows. Investors are cautioned to consider Grayscale's inherent conflict of interest as a crypto asset manager with products tied to these assets.

marsbit41m ago

Grayscale: These 15 Profitable Crypto Protocols Are Severely Undervalued

marsbit41m ago

Sam Altman's Personal Alchemy of Wealth: Investing in 400 Companies, Over 10 Deeply Tied to OpenAI

The article investigates Sam Altman's personal wealth strategy, centered around his investments in approximately 400 companies while serving as OpenAI's CEO. Despite not holding direct equity in OpenAI, Altman has built a vast portfolio, with at least 10 of his investments having commercial ties or ongoing negotiations with OpenAI. This creates a complex network of potential conflicts of interest, drawing scrutiny from U.S. congressional committees and state attorneys general. Key investments highlighted include the anti-aging startup Retro Biosciences (valued at $258 million for his stake as of late last year) and the chipmaker Cerebras, whose value soared following an OpenAI procurement deal. His most significant financial gain is linked to the nuclear fusion company Helion, where a recent funding round reportedly increased his stake's value to at least $4.1 billion. The article details a decade-long relationship between Altman, Helion, and OpenAI, including a controversial non-binding power purchase agreement and Altman's efforts to secure investments from OpenAI and its backer SoftBank for Helion. Other points include internal investigations at Tools for Humanity (developer of Worldcoin) and OpenAI's massive contracts with tech giants like Nvidia. According to Forbes, Altman's net worth is around $3.4 billion, ranking him 1251st globally—a rise of over 1400 places since 2024. OpenAI's board states that Altman's external dealings are transparent and potential conflicts are carefully managed.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Sam Altman's Personal Alchemy of Wealth: Investing in 400 Companies, Over 10 Deeply Tied to OpenAI

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片