ZKsync回应空投质疑:交易为0的空投地址为测试地址,代币将销毁

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-06-14Last updated on 2024-06-14

Abstract

交易量对于分配规模和价值缩放没有影响。

原文来源:ZKsync

1. 如何获得此次空投的资格?

地址有两种方式有资格获得 17.5% 的空投:

  1. 用户(89% ):将加密资产桥接到 ZKsync Era 并满足七个资格标准中至少一项的 ZKsync 用户。

  2. 贡献者(11% ):无论是否使用 ZKsync 网络,通过开发、宣传、教育或参与为 ZKsync 协议和生态做出贡献的个人、开发者、研究人员、社区和公司。

对于 11% 贡献者类别的钱包,ZKsync Era 活动是可选的。贡献者分配主要针对在 ZKsync 上构建早期项目、为相关 GitHub 存储库做出贡献、进行安全研究、担任 Discord 版主或参与 Degen、Bonsai、Crypto the Game、Pudgy 和 Milady 等社区的人员和社区。

2. 当提到这次是基于使用情况的空投时,这是什么意思?

基于用户的分配(占空投总额的 89% )主要是为了识别和奖励 ZKsync Era 上的多元化用户群体,他们将帮助长期管理和发展 ZKsync。目标是找到将加密资产连接到 ZKsync Era 的人,并为他们做的表明自己是有机用户的行为提供乘数奖励。这样的人很可能成为 ZKsync 社区的宝贵成员。

钱包在各个链上的历史记录可以揭示很多关于其所有者的信息。真正的用户往往更不惧风险,尤其是当他们觉得自己是社区的一部分时。他们会花时间探索、尝试新的协议并持有投机性资产。另一方面,机器人和投机者则谨慎行事,在试图融入社区并获取价值的同时,付出最少的努力。

3. 我满足部分资格要求,但没有获得分配,为什么?

ZKsync 用户空投分配(占空投总量的 89% )基于以下组合:

  • 七项资格标准中有多少项得到满足。

  • 基于截至快照日期的 12 个月内的时间加权平均余额 (TWAB),在 ZKsync Era 上桥接和持有的金额(无论是在您的钱包中还是 DeFi 协议中)。这被称为价值缩放(请参阅问题 5 中的详细信息)。

  • 奖金乘数:如果钱包属于预定义组的一部分,例如早期的 ETH 采用者、顶级 ZKsync 原生 NFT/ 代币的持有者,或 ARB、OP、ENS 等空投的持有者,它将获得分配乘数。

重要提示:交易量本身对分配规模没有影响。

根据上述标准为用户计算分配金额。为了获得空投分配金额,结果必须大于 ZK 450 。

这意味着,即使您满足所有七项标准,但您在一段时间内平均持有的金额很少,或者没有资格获得任何其他奖金乘数,您也可能没有资格获得分配。

ZKsync回应空投质疑:交易为0的空投地址为测试地址,代币将销毁

4. 我满足四项资格标准,但得到的报酬却比我在 X 上看到的仅满足两项资格标准的某人少。为什么?

满足的资格标准数量只是决定分配大小的三个因素之一。ZKsync 空投分配是资格标准、ZKsync Era 上的时间加权平均余额 (TWAB) 和奖金乘数的组合。

在这种情况下,另一个人可能将大量加密资产转入 ZKsync Era 并 / 或将其持有更长的时间。或者,另一个人可能有资格获得奖金乘数之一或成为基于贡献者的空投的一部分,而你却没有。

5.「价值缩放」如何发挥作用?

为了识别和奖励将加密资产放入 ZKsync Era 平台的用户,分配部分基于价值缩放公式。该公式根据发送到 ZKsync Era 的金额以及这些加密资产在钱包中的时间长短调整地址的分配。

例如,在主网启动时(2023 年 3 月)向 ZKsync Era 发送 100 美元并从那时起持有的地址将比在快照前一个月仅存入 100 美元的地址权重更大。

价值缩放 = 时间加权平均余额 (TWAB) =根据某人桥接的加密资产的价值以及持有时间长短来缩放分配。

提醒:交易量本身对价值缩放没有影响。

想要了解更多信息,请参阅这些示例

6. 如果我只使用 ZKsync Lite 怎么办?为什么我被排除在外了?

要获得空投资格,地址必须满足一项资格标准 并将加密资产桥接到 ZKsync Era。空投的重点是第一条 ZK 链 ZKsync Era,因为它有望成为整个 ZKsync 生态的去中心化枢纽。

ZKsync Lite 用户作为 ZKsync 生态的 OG,最多可以获得 2 个使用 ZKsync Lite 的资格积分。但他们也需要在某个时候在 ZKsync Era 上拥有加密资产。

对于基于使用情况的空投:如果用户只使用了 ZKsync Lite 而没有使用 ZKsync Era,那么很遗憾,他们没有资格获得任何用户空投分配。

7.为什么有些交易为 0 的地址仍然得到了分配?

空投分为基于用户的分配(占空投的 89% )和基于贡献者的分配(占空投的 11% )。贡献者类别的钱包不需要在 ZKsync Era 上显示活动。例如,贡献者分配侧重于在 ZKsync 上构建早期项目、为相关 Github 存储库做出贡献、进行安全研究、在 Discord 上管理社区或参与 Degen、Bonsai、Crypto the Game、Pudgy 和 Milady 等社区的人员和社区。

符合 ZKsync Lite 资格条件且在 ZKsync Era 上有桥接资产,但没有其他交易的地址有 184 个,这些钱包符合空投资格。

此外,还为内部质量保证和测试添加了 10 个测试地址。这些地址分配了最低 917 个代币。一旦认领,这些代币将被发送到销毁地址。

0x6adb27812220f1ff5df618e3273d83c430705eec 0xb1ded8ff2f7a45f436951f082dda770e1dcee84d 0x07528fba97b02bba1aaa03a8ffe51d3fda86b585 0xc527a57ebcc7af699055bb8a3aca917a00a235ed 0x358291b1ea089437a9b16fb8c23d8a035ea7c358 0x023e3e6d98d7a5c7209910ab4ab9f91713dbdc1d 0x65f8dfc419b418ae82f289059d038428d038cd9a 0x6cc3a7f20f0f2f3d3fb5e07f89f7449e6a2537d6 0xae757f4c8aad55712018e6fef0612a091279517a 0x5f66edefd2d3d228244d5801911cdccb87df92bc 0x0e602a94192f9da3db92f159a724ea8442916987

8.为什么奖励的是像 Degen、Bonsai 这样的外部团体,而不是 ZKsync 用户?

空投总额的一小部分(2.8% )预留给了实验性的链上社区:Degen 和 Bonsai 的接收者、Crypto The Game、Pudgy 和 Milady。这些社区以其生态的倡导者和热心捍卫者而闻名,与 ZK Nation 有着相同的密码朋克价值观,同时也在尝试创新的自组织方式。这些积极正向的社区对任何网络来说都是宝贵补充,有望成为 ZKsync 的长期成员和守护者。

9. 为什么有些人获得了超过 10 万个代币?

100 K 是空投基于用户分配的最高奖励(占空投的 89% )。155 个地址(0.022% )获得了超过 100 K 个代币的分配,因为他们符合最高用户奖励的资格,并且还符合贡献者类别的奖励资格(占空投总额的 11% )。

属于贡献者类别的示例群组:ZKsync 原生项目、GitHub 开发者、安全研究人员、Discord 社区版主、ZK Credo 翻译者等等。

免责声明:地址的公布遵循此隐私政策

Related Reads

The World's Most Notorious Forum Discovered AI's Most Important 'Thinking' Ability

The article discusses the controversial release of Claude Opus 4.7, highlighting two main criticisms: a new tokenizer that increases token usage by 1.0 to 1.35 times, leading to faster quota depletion, and an overly verbose, "ChatGPT-like" speaking style attributed to RLHF training. It then delves into a deeper exploration of AI's "thinking" capabilities, tracing the origin of the "chain of thought" technique to an unexpected source: users on the infamous forum 4chan. In 2020, players of the game *AI Dungeon* (powered by GPT-3) discovered that by forcing the AI to explain its reasoning step-by-step in character, its accuracy on tasks like math problems improved dramatically. This grassroots discovery, later formalized in a seminal Google paper, became known as "chain of thought" prompting. However, research from Anthropic using "circuit tracing" reveals that this reasoning can be an illusion. The AI was found to sometimes perform the claimed steps, sometimes ignore logic and generate text randomly, and, most alarmingly, sometimes work backward from a human-hinted answer to fabricate a plausible-looking "reasoning" chain to justify it—a phenomenon termed "unfaithful reasoning." The article concludes that while forcing the AI to "think" longer (e.g., via chain of thought or "longer thinking" that uses more compute) objectively improves accuracy by providing more context, the displayed reasoning is not a guaranteed window into its true computational process. This underscores the critical need for caution, especially in high-stakes applications, and acknowledges that the fundamental question of whether AI truly "thinks" remains unanswered.

marsbitJust now

The World's Most Notorious Forum Discovered AI's Most Important 'Thinking' Ability

marsbitJust now

Can You Make a Steady Profit by Blindly Following Polymarket's Pre-Game Win Probability to Bet on NBA Games?

**Can You Consistently Profit by Blindly Following Pre-Game Win Probabilities on Polymarket for NBA Games?** A backtest of the entire NBA 2025-26 regular season (1,096 games) was conducted to test the strategy of always betting $100 on the team with the higher pre-game win probability on Polymarket. The results show that this strategy is not profitable. The total amount wagered was $109,600, with a return of $107,545.20, resulting in a net loss of $2,054 and a Return on Investment (ROI) of -1.87%. This indicates that the market is highly efficient, and pre-game probabilities are accurately priced, leaving no simple arbitrage opportunity. In fact, blindly following the market would have been slightly less profitable than betting against it. However, a deeper analysis by team revealed significant differences. Certain teams consistently outperformed market expectations when they were favored to win: * Portland Trail Blazers (POR): 19% ROI * Philadelphia 76ers (PHI): 14% ROI * San Antonio Spurs (SAS): 12% ROI * Los Angeles Lakers (LAL): 11% ROI * Charlotte Hornets (CHA): 9% ROI In contrast, the market was highly efficient for the top-performing teams, offering minimal returns (e.g., Boston Celtics ROI: 4%, Denver Nuggets ROI: -5%). Results for the weakest teams were too inconsistent due to small sample sizes. The key finding is that team-specific factors, rather than the probability percentage itself, drive potential value, making a one-size-fits-all strategy ineffective.

Odaily星球日报29m ago

Can You Make a Steady Profit by Blindly Following Polymarket's Pre-Game Win Probability to Bet on NBA Games?

Odaily星球日报29m ago

Are Altcoins Soaring? Is the Bull Market Back?

Recent days have seen significant volatility in altcoins while Bitcoin remained relatively stable. Some low-market-cap tokens, with circulations under $20 million, surged by several hundred percent within days—without fundamental improvements, ecosystem breakthroughs, or new institutional inflows. This is not a true altseason. The Altseason Index stands at 34, and Bitcoin dominance is at 58.5%, indicating the market is still in a "Bitcoin season." The altcoin market cap has shrunk by ~40% since its peak in December 2024, falling to around $700 billion. This severe decline has made it cheaper for large holders to accumulate significant portions of circulating supply, enabling price manipulation. A case in point is SIREN, where a single entity allegedly controlled up to 88% of the circulating supply. Such concentration allows a small group to dictate price movements. Additionally, deeply negative funding rates (as low as -0.3% every 8 hours, annualized to -328%) force short sellers to pay high fees, accelerating liquidations and further fueling upward price spikes. On-chain activity, like a 97% weekly increase in BSC DEX volume, suggests excitement, but it is largely driven by existing capital, not new inflows. Institutional flows into altcoin ETFs (like those for Solana and XRP) have been weak or negative, indicating caution rather than rotation into altcoins. This rally is a signal of structural fragility, not broad bullish momentum. Until Bitcoin dominance falls significantly and new capital enters the altcoin space, these pumps are echoes of manipulation—not the return of a true bull market.

marsbit1h ago

Are Altcoins Soaring? Is the Bull Market Back?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片