SEC主席罕见松口:现货以太坊ETF上市速度将取决于发行人!

jin10Published on 2024-06-13Last updated on 2024-06-13

美国证交会(SEC)主席根斯勒周三表示,对于与加密货币以太坊挂钩的现货ETF何时开始交易,在很大程度上取决于发行人对SEC询问的回应速度。

SEC上月批准了纳斯达克、芝加哥期权交易所和纽约证交所上市现货以太坊ETF的申请。对于加密货币行业来说,这是一个意外的胜利,该行业曾预计,在与监管机构举行会议后,SEC会拒绝这些申请。

在ETF开始交易之前,SEC仍必须批准ETF发行人的注册声明,其中详细说明了投资者的信息披露。这一过程通常涉及ETF发行人和SEC官员之间的大量往来。

他说,“这些注册人都会主动对收到的意见作出回应,但回应的程度如何,实际上取决于他们自己。”根斯勒拒绝透露他认为这个过程需要几周还是几个月的时间。

根斯勒和SEC官员此前并未就SEC为何态度大转弯、批准现货以太坊ETF的申请发表评论,但他周三表示,去年灰度提起的诉讼迫使SEC在1月份批准了现货比特币ETF,这影响了SEC对以太坊的看法。

灰度当时成功地辩称,SEC此前批准了与比特币期货挂钩的ETF,因此它也应该批准现货比特币ETF,因为比特币期货价格与现货价格高度相关。

根斯勒表示,这些案例是相似的,因为期货以太坊ETF自去年以来一直在交易。SEC工作人员“查看了这些文件,查看了各种相关性……这种相关性与比特币领域的相关性相对相似。”

在去年法院做出对灰度有利的裁决后,SEC于今年1月批准了现货比特币ETF。根斯勒当时在一份声明中承认了法院的决定,并补充说他认为批准这些产品是“最可持续的前进道路”。

十年来,SEC一直拒绝比特币ETF。根斯勒说,“但法院却做出了相反的裁决。我们进行了调整。”

不过,他补充说,他仍然认为加密货币领域“充斥着欺诈、骗局和冲突”。

Related Reads

Bitcoin Trading Strategy Breakdown: Celebrity Predictions and Classic Models All Fail, Only These Four Indicators Remain

Analysis of Bitcoin Trading Strategies: Why Celebrity Forecasts and Classic Models Fail, Leaving Only These Four Reliable Indicators This analysis examines the failure of common Bitcoin prediction methods and identifies four reliable indicators for constructing a trading strategy. The author reviewed all major BTC prediction approaches from 2017-2025, categorizing them into three groups: celebrity price targets (consistently over-optimistic), analytical models like Stock-to-Flow (broken post-2022), and on-chain signals. The key finding is that more data often creates confusion, not clarity. The strategy discards unreliable elements: celebrity predictions (incentivized to be extreme), pure models (invalidated by post-ETF market changes), and the Fear & Greed Index used alone (too many false signals). Four reliable indicators were selected: 1. **MVRV Z-Score:** Accurately identifies cycle bottoms when entering its green zone (e.g., 2018, 2020, 2022). Note: Its ability to call tops is now ineffective post-2024. 2. **SOPR (28-day MA):** Consistently signals bottoms when below 1.0, indicating holders are selling at a loss. 3. **ETF Net Flow:** A crucial post-2024 metric showing institutional momentum (e.g., sustained inflows = buying). 4. **Macro Liquidity (Fed policy & M2):** Sets the overall directional bias (e.g., bullish during easing cycles). The core strategy involves waiting for a multi-signal共振 (resonance). For example, a bottom signal requires MVRV in the green zone + SOPR < 1.0. A top signal requires overheated on-chain data + sustained ETF outflows. Macro policy sets the overall direction. The Fear & Greed Index is only used as a weighted confirmatory signal, never alone. Action is only taken when three or more indicators align. The author automated this into a monitoring system that sends Telegram alerts only when signals trigger. As of the article's date (April 15, 2026), the system showed a strong bottom signal: extreme fear (F&G=12), MVRV in the buy zone, and SOPR < 1.0. The only contrary signal was weak ETF flows. Historically, such triple on-chain共振 has preceded 100%+ returns. The conclusion emphasizes building a personal framework over relying on external predictions, allowing for iterative improvement and customization based on individual risk tolerance.

marsbit1h ago

Bitcoin Trading Strategy Breakdown: Celebrity Predictions and Classic Models All Fail, Only These Four Indicators Remain

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片