拆解盲盒,回溯已发币项目对「Gitcoin捐赠者」的空投规则

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-04-28Last updated on 2024-04-28

Abstract

Gitcoin 空投收益以前也许只要捐赠,现在得看金额、捐赠项目、捐赠轮次等,更多是作为项目空投的「权重之一」。

原文作者:Biteye

通过 Gitcoin 捐赠争取空投就像拆盲盒,为了帮助大家更好进行判断,Biteye 分析了 Optimism、Dmail、Namada、NIM Network、Celestia 的空投规则。

它们都对参与过 Gitcoin 捐赠的地址进行空投,规则有些许不同,请看以下对比。

规则 1 : Gitcoin 捐赠者可直接拿到空投,不限轮次和金额

Optimism 是以太坊 Layer 2 ,第一轮空投将 OP 供应量的 5% 分配给 248, 699 个地址,其中包括 Gitcoin 捐赠者。

主要要求在快照前已通过 L1 上的 Gitcoin 进行过链上捐赠,无论轮次和金额,每个地址可以得到 555.92 枚 OP,按照开盘价算约为 800 美元,十分可观。

拆解盲盒,回溯已发币项目对「Gitcoin捐赠者」的空投规则

规则 2 : Gitcoin 捐赠者可直接拿到代币,限制轮次和金额

Dmail 提供加密电子邮件服务,在第一季空投 750 万枚 DMAIL(总供应量的 3.75% )。

在过去两轮 Gitcoin 捐赠中向 Dmail 捐赠 5 美元以上所有地址空投总量 3.75 万枚 DMAIL,如果是捐赠 ETH,将根据当时汇率(2268.26 美元 /ETH)换成美元。

拆解盲盒,回溯已发币项目对「Gitcoin捐赠者」的空投规则

规则 3 :Gitcoin 捐赠者可直接拿到代币,限制轮次,将金额进行排序

Namada 是用于链间资产权益证明的 L1,在 RPGF Drop 空投 6500 万枚 NAM(总供应量 6.5% ),其中 26% 给 ZK Tech 和 Advocacy 项目 Gitcoin 的捐助者。

要求在特定轮次对特定项目捐赠,按各轮捐赠总额排名,最低名次区间可得到 71 枚 NAM。

拆解盲盒,回溯已发币项目对「Gitcoin捐赠者」的空投规则

规则 4 :Gitcoin 捐赠者可直接拿到代币,限制捐赠类型

NIM Network 是基于 Dymension 的 AI 游戏区块链,空投了 9000 万枚枚 NYM(总供应量的 9% )。

项目方对在 Gitcoin 捐赠过特定开放游戏、基础设施、开源软件项目的 7599 个钱包进行空投,具体比例不详。

拆解盲盒,回溯已发币项目对「Gitcoin捐赠者」的空投规则

规则 5 :将 Gitcoin 捐赠作为打分权重

Celestia 是第一个模块化区块链网络,创世空投 6000 万枚 TIA (总供应量 6% ),其中 1/3 给以太坊 Rollups 早期活跃者。

衡量用户链上活跃水平时,官方对一些链上行为加权,为每个地址生成与空投代币数量挂钩的分数(满分 23 分),Gitcoin 捐赠者可以获得 3 分。

拆解盲盒,回溯已发币项目对「Gitcoin捐赠者」的空投规则

拆解盲盒,回溯已发币项目对「Gitcoin捐赠者」的空投规则

总结

Gitcoin 捐赠是良好的链上交互行为,甚至有概率得到优质项目空投,以小博大。

值得注意的是,整个撸毛界都越来越卷,Gitcoin 捐赠也是,空投收益已经不如从前,以前也许只要捐赠就可以,现在得看金额,捐赠项目,捐赠轮次等,更多是作为项目空投的「权重之一」。

Related Reads

Preferred Stock Is Not the Trigger for Corporate Bankruptcy, MicroStrategy's Dollar Reserves Can Cover Dividend and Interest Payments Until February 2027

Preferred Shares Are Not the Catalyst for Corporate Bankruptcy; MicroStrategy's Dollar Reserves Can Cover Dividend and Interest Payments Until February 2027. This article analyzes the nature of preferred shares used by MicroStrategy (MSTR). Legally equity but economically similar to debt, these shares, including its Bitcoin-linked STR convertible preferred notes (STRC), offer fixed or floating dividends. Crucially, MicroStrategy's preferred shares lack rigid redemption clauses, meaning they are not classified as traditional debt. This eliminates principal repayment pressure and means missed dividends do not constitute default or trigger bankruptcy, creating a "self-contradictory virtuous cycle." The article clarifies that if funds are short, MicroStrategy can defer or suspend preferred share dividends (except for non-cumulative types like STRD) without immediate risk. The real potential crisis point lies with its convertible bonds. If a prolonged bear market prevents conversion, MicroStrategy might need to sell Bitcoin to repay these bonds starting from the earliest maturity in September 2027, potentially creating a downward spiral. Preferred dividend suspensions would only exacerbate market panic in such a scenario. Recent financial activity shows MicroStrategy strengthened its position through four weeks of common stock (MSTR) issuances, raising over $851 million without issuing new preferred shares. It increased its dollar reserves to approximately $1.4 billion, which is sufficient to cover all preferred share dividends and interest until around March 2027. While Bitcoin purchases slowed recently, this prioritization of cash reserves enhances the company's near-term financial safety. The analysis concludes that if the Bitcoin bear market ends by early 2025 as anticipated, MicroStrategy can resume issuing MSTR stock in a rising market to replenish reserves and manage future dividend obligations, thereby reducing the long-term pressure from its preferred share structure.

marsbit48m ago

Preferred Stock Is Not the Trigger for Corporate Bankruptcy, MicroStrategy's Dollar Reserves Can Cover Dividend and Interest Payments Until February 2027

marsbit48m ago

Giants Wage the Context War, Reconstructing AI Moats

The article "Giants Launch the Context War, Reconstructing AI's Moat" discusses how leading AI companies—OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google—are shifting their competitive focus from model size to acquiring, managing, and utilizing user context (Context). Initially, Context referred to the length of text a model could process, leading to a "arms race" for longer context windows. However, the competition has evolved through three key phases: expanding text capacity (long context windows), enabling memory across sessions, and finally, integrating AI into real user environments like browsers and desktops to capture dynamic task states. Each company is pursuing a distinct strategy. OpenAI is building Context around the ChatGPT account, turning it into a central hub that accumulates user understanding across various integrated applications and tools. Anthropic, lacking a major user base, focuses on high-value verticals like coding, empowering its Claude model to actively gather Context through GUI interaction (Computer Use) and system connections (MCP protocol). Google, with vast existing user data from products like Search and Gmail, faces the challenge of restructuring this data into actionable, AI-understandable Context for its Gemini model within its ecosystem. The core argument is that the nature of competitive advantage in AI is changing. The internet era prized network effects—connecting more users. The AI era values "individual depth": the ability to build deep, task-specific understanding of a user. This creates a new moat through 1) the compounding value of accumulated Context, 2) deep integration with user tools and permissions, and 3) the establishment of trust for complex tasks. Therefore, the battle for Context is fundamentally about capturing "task entry points" and converting existing digital ecosystems into environments where AI can effectively understand and act, rather than merely scaling user numbers.

marsbit1h ago

Giants Wage the Context War, Reconstructing AI Moats

marsbit1h ago

Foundation Steps Back, Ethlabs Steps Forward: Ethereum Undergoes Its Largest Restructuring in History

On June 23rd, the Ethereum ecosystem witnessed two major shifts, signaling a significant governance realignment. First, former Ethereum Foundation researchers established Ethlabs, a new independent non-profit. Backed by major ETH holders like Bitmine and SharpLink, Ethlabs aims to address practical needs for institutional adoption, including faster settlement, native asset issuance, cross-chain transactions, and mainnet scaling. Secondly, the Ethereum Foundation announced a major restructuring, laying off 54 employees (20% of its staff) to become a leaner entity focused on protocol governance and maintenance rather than being the primary builder. This move represents a pivotal correction. Criticisms had mounted over the Foundation's perceived slowness, lack of clear strategy, and over-reliance on Vitalik Buterin's influence. Ethlabs emerges as a more execution-oriented, "industrialized" layer focused on market adoption—bridging the gap between research and real-world use. Notably, Vitalik Buterin is absent from its list of supporters, interpreted as an intentional step to avoid excessive personal endorsement and allow the organization to build independent credibility. The Ethereum Foundation's downsizing and redefinition mark a retreat from its former central coordinating role. It now aims to share the "privilege of stewarding Ethereum" with other emerging groups like Ethlabs, the Ethereum Applications Guild, and The Ethereum Economic Zone. Analysts frame this dual shift as the Foundation ensuring Ethereum remains "correct" (credibly neutral), while Ethlabs must prove it remains "effective" (competitive and attractive for capital and adoption). This addresses community "shareholder-like anxiety" about ETH's market performance. While risks exist—such as concerns over shifting from Foundation centrality to large-holder influence—the consensus is that the greater risk for Ethereum was inaction, caught between technical idealism and organizational inertia. These steps aim to create a more multi-stakeholder, execution-driven future for the network.

链捕手9h ago

Foundation Steps Back, Ethlabs Steps Forward: Ethereum Undergoes Its Largest Restructuring in History

链捕手9h ago

Second Half of U.S. Crypto Policy: The Clarity Act Aims for 60 Votes, CFTC's "One-Person Commission" Becomes Biggest Variable

In a pivotal year for US crypto policy, the "CLARITY Act" is advancing in the Senate but faces a high hurdle, needing 60 votes to pass. Key challenges include bridging partisan divides on ethics and swaying undecided Republican senators within a tight legislative calendar of only about 40 working days. The policy "second half" involves intense negotiations on a broader framework for Web3 and DeFi, including crypto tax reforms and the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act. A significant uncertainty is the understaffed CFTC, operating with four commissioner vacancies, which complicates regulatory clarity. Meanwhile, the departure of key "crypto champions"—SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce and Senator Cynthia Lummis—will impact ongoing policy efforts. Industry experts are cautiously optimistic but realistic. Sara K. Weed notes that while progress is being made, CLARITY is unlikely to pass this Congress, pushing agencies like the SEC and CFTC to provide more guidance. Sulolit Mukherjee suggests meaningful crypto tax legislation is more likely to be attached to larger must-pass bills. Rashan Colbert discusses the jurisdictional debate over prediction markets, emphasizing the need for a regulatory framework that fosters their development as financial tools rather than treating them broadly as gambling. The clock is ticking, but opportunities remain for substantive progress through continued bipartisan dialogue and pragmatic efforts.

marsbit11h ago

Second Half of U.S. Crypto Policy: The Clarity Act Aims for 60 Votes, CFTC's "One-Person Commission" Becomes Biggest Variable

marsbit11h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片