TRALA LAB与zkSync合作，共同致力于推动全球游戏产业创新

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-04-03Last updated on 2024-04-03

Abstract

基于zkSync，TRALA LAB将加速带数百万玩家进入新游戏时代。

TRALA LAB与zkSync合作，共同致力于推动全球游戏产业创新

4 月 3 日，TRALA LAB 宣布与 zkSync 建立战略承诺，zkSync 采用了前沿的零知识(ZK) 技术。TRALA LAB 是韩国上市游戏公司 Joycity 的子公司，以“Gunship Battle”和“街头篮球”等大型游戏闻名。

TRALA LAB 与 Matter Labs 将开始全面合作。基于全面的专业技术及开发支持 TRALA LAB 将在 zkSync 上发布多种 AAA 级别游戏。此外，TRALA LAB 与 Matter Labs 之间的战略合作标志着在全球游戏市场上推动创新并解决关键挑战的重要一步。

TRALA LAB 将致力于通过解决诸如缺乏高质量游戏内容等关键问题来革新游戏领域。TRALA LAB 把重点放在构建长期可持续的游戏平台上，并计划在 zkSync 上接入一系列 AAA 级别的 global 游戏 IP，包括全球累计下载量分别达到 1.5 亿和 1.6 亿的《Gunship Battle》和《街头篮球》。

TRALA LAB 将为制定高质量游戏内容的新标准而努力，计划利用其已覆盖 249 个国家的全球营销渠道，为世界舞台引入新的游戏浪潮。除了将 TRALA LAB 的游戏接入 zkSync 生态系统外，战略合作还涉及共同努力推出利用 ZK Stack 的 TRALA 的游戏平台。

Matter Labs 的 Head of Web3 Entertainment and Media， Rich Kim 表示：“Joycity 是一家成功的国际化游戏公司，并拥有众多成功的 IP。我们很高兴能够看到未来各种 AAA 游戏将通过 TRALA 进入 zkSync 生态，也期待其能够激发 zkSync 的游戏生态系统。”

TRALA LAB BD director， Ivan Chung 表示：“与 Matter Labs 的合作标志着在全球游戏市场上开辟新的道路的第一步，我们对 TRALA LAB 与 Matter Labs 之间的协同效应抱有很高的期望。我们非常高兴能够通过我们的游戏为 zkSync 生态系统做出贡献。请继续关注我们。”

关于 TRALA LAB

想了解更多 TRALA LAB 相关信息，请加入官方TRALA Discord。在 TRALA 社区可以参与各种活动赢得 special role，并与社区互动。

更多动态，详见官方X, Discord, Medium

关于 Matter Labs

Matter Labs 是一家专注于为以太坊和其他区块链创建扩展解决方案的领先研究和开发公司。该公司是零知识证明技术的先驱，利用该技术构建了可实现快速、安全和可扩展交易的区块链基础设施。Matter Labs 致力于隐私和去中心化，正在推动区块链技术的下一波创新。

关于 zkSync

zkSync 使用最先进的零知识（ZK）技术来扩展以太坊并将加密货币引入主流 - 连接数百万开发人员和数十亿需要技术解决方案以实现进步和繁荣的人群。zkSync 区块链网络深植于推进人类自由的使命，使数字自我所有权普遍可用。zksync 是一条 trustless, secure, reliable, censorship-resistant, privacy-preserving, hyper-scalable, accessible 区块链网络。需要了解有关 zkSync 的更多信息，请访问http://www.zksync.io。

Related Reads

Ethereum's Next Stop Glamsterdam: The Core Upgrades You Must Know

The Glamsterdam upgrade, scheduled for late 2026, is a major Ethereum hard fork combining the Amsterdam execution layer and Glasgow consensus layer updates. Its primary goal is not simply increasing throughput but restructuring Ethereum's block production, validation, and resource pricing to enable future scaling. Key technical changes include **EIP-7732 (ePBS)**, which formally enshrines proposer-builder separation into the protocol. This decouples consensus and execution tasks, extending the execution payload propagation window to ~9 seconds. This provides more time for node verification, allowing for safer increases in block capacity (Gas limit) in the future. Another core component is **EIP-7928 (Block-Level Access Lists - BAL)**. It mandates a list of all state accessed within a block, moving this feature from an optional transaction-level (EIP-2930) to a mandatory block-level requirement. This explicit access list enables client optimizations like parallel disk reads and state root computations, paving the way for parallel execution. To manage long-term state growth, **EIP-8037** increases the cost of creating new state (e.g., accounts, storage slots), separating the pricing of permanent database bloat from temporary computation. This allows execution capacity to scale more aggressively without causing state size to explode proportionally. The planned upgrade bundle includes around 10 EIPs categorized into: 1) Core protocol restructuring (ePBS, BAL), 2) Resource pricing adjustments (state costs, calldata costs), and 3) EVM/developer improvements. Several other EIPs, including those potentially improving staker exit liquidity (EIP-8061, EIP-8080), are under consideration. The technical development coincides with significant personnel changes within the Ethereum Foundation's Protocol team. The Foundation's official communications frame this as part of a broader shift towards a "coalition of organizations" working on the Ethereum roadmap, citing new entities like ethlabs and the Ethereum Economic Zone. In summary, Glamsterdam represents a foundational re-engineering of Ethereum's block pipeline and economic model—focusing on ePBS, BAL, and multi-dimensional resource pricing—to prepare the network for sustainable, high-throughput scaling in the years ahead.

Foresight News5m ago

Ethereum's Next Stop Glamsterdam: The Core Upgrades You Must Know

Foresight News5m ago

The Ethereum Foundation Has Split?! An In-depth Look at Ethlabs' "Bright Future"

"Ethereum Foundation Splits? Understanding Ethlabs and Its 'Bright Future'" Former Ethereum Foundation members Ansgar Dietrichs, Barnabé Monnot, Caspar Schwarz-Schilling, Josh Rudolf, and Julian Ma have announced the launch of Ethlabs, an independent non-profit research and development lab. Announced on June 22nd, the initiative comes amidst discussions about the need for new organizational structures within the Ethereum ecosystem, a point highlighted by Bankless founder David Hoffman. Ethlabs' mission is to establish Ethereum as the foundational settlement layer for the global economy. The organization positions itself as a bridge connecting frontline developers, applications, and user needs with the core protocol. It aims to translate real-world demands into protocol improvements, industry standards, and deployable products. The founding team brings significant expertise: Dietrichs and Monnot are highly cited researchers in areas like Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) and MEV, while Schwarz-Schilling, Rudolf, and Ma contribute backgrounds in economic modeling, consensus research, and applied cryptography. Initial supporters include BitMine, a major corporate ETH treasury; Sharplink, another treasury firm; and Consensys founder Joe Lubin in a personal capacity. Community backers include figures like Uniswap's Hayden Adams and Base's Jesse Pollak. The timing coincides with internal Ethereum Foundation discussions about "spinout" projects. While Ethlabs and the Foundation share research interests like MEV mitigation, Ethlabs frames its role not as a competitor but as part of a shift from a "single-core coordination model" to a "multi-R&D entity collaboration model." It views Ethereum as a public project belonging to all builders, with Ethlabs as one node in a broader governance network. Ultimately, Ethlabs represents an organizational evolution within the maturing Ethereum ecosystem. The key question is whether multiple research bodies can collaborate effectively to advance Ethereum as a competitive global settlement infrastructure.

Odaily星球日报9m ago

The Ethereum Foundation Has Split?! An In-depth Look at Ethlabs' "Bright Future"

Odaily星球日报9m ago

'Bear' Doomsday Prophecy: AI 'Reaching Its Peak', U.S. Stocks to Top Out Fastest in Q3, Down 30-50%

"A Short Seller's Dire Prediction: AI Boom Fading, US Stocks to Peak by Q3 with 30-50% Decline" Prominent macro investors Jeffrey Gundlach and Felix Zulauf warn that the AI-driven market rally is nearing its end, forecasting a major US stock market correction of 30-50%, potentially beginning as early as Q3. Their analysis points to alarming parallels with historical market tops, citing extreme concentration in the top AI-related stocks within the S&P 500. Zulauf's bearish thesis hinges on unsustainable capital expenditure trends among major cloud companies, negative free cash flow emergence, and soaring semiconductor prices. Gundlach highlights dangerous parallels to the 1999 tech bubble peak. A key divergence from conventional wisdom is Gundlach's view that long-term Treasury yields will not fall meaningfully even during a recession, due to America's structurally out-of-control fiscal deficits and soaring interest costs. He warns this could force the government into yield curve control or even a sovereign debt restructuring. Both investors express severe concerns about the opaque private credit market, drawing parallels to the pre-2008 financial crisis environment. They allege widespread rating inflation, misrepresented credit quality, liquidity illusions, and fraudulent asset valuations within this sector. The analysis links the AI boom and private credit crisis through financing costs. They argue that as AI companies' cash flows weaken and they seek funding, a high and sticky long-term interest rate environment will severely stress lower-rated corporate borrowers, exposing cracks in credit markets. Finally, they predict a regime shift where the US dollar weakens and US equities underperform global markets, marking the end of their long dominance. The stage is set for a significant market reversal.

marsbit17m ago

'Bear' Doomsday Prophecy: AI 'Reaching Its Peak', U.S. Stocks to Top Out Fastest in Q3, Down 30-50%

marsbit17m ago

Why Does No One Buy DeFi Insurance?

**Title: Why Isn't DeFi Insurance Being Bought?** DeFi insurance, which promised automated, unbiased payouts via smart contracts, has failed to gain traction. The core issue is economic: high premiums severely erode the yields that attract users to DeFi in the first place. For example, insuring a USDC deposit on Aave V3 could cost 1.5–2.5% of the annual yield, leaving a net return barely above a savings account. For riskier platforms like Maple Finance or Ethena, premiums can even turn net yields negative. Consequently, users often forgo insurance, as it nullifies their profit motive. The market also suffers from structural flaws. First, DeFi risks are highly correlated (e.g., an oracle failure can impact multiple protocols simultaneously), unlike the independent risks in traditional insurance. This makes large-scale events potentially catastrophic for insurers. Second, the total capital in DeFi insurance pools (e.g., Nexus Mutual's ~$81.5M) is minuscule compared to the hundreds of billions in total value locked (TVL), creating a massive capacity gap. A single major hack could drain the entire industry's reserves. Furthermore, the governance model where tokenholders vote on claims creates a conflict of interest, incentivizing them to deny payouts to protect their own funds. As a result, the sector is shrinking. While pioneers like Nexus Mutual are pivoting to preventative measures (bug bounties) and seeking external capital via reinsurance, the fundamental problems remain. DeFi insurance represents a public good—its stability benefits the entire ecosystem—but without a mechanism to share costs, a "tragedy of the commons" ensues where no one is willing to pay, leaving the system vulnerable.

marsbit31m ago

Why Does No One Buy DeFi Insurance?

marsbit31m ago

SPCX Pre-Market Dips Below $150 IPO Price, But Don't Rush to Buy Yet

SpaceX's share price (SPCX) has fallen sharply, briefly dropping below its $150 IPO price in pre-market trading. The decline follows a catastrophic explosion during a Starship static fire test and was exacerbated by the company's announcement of a planned $20 billion bond issuance. This move, coming soon after its IPO raised $85.7 billion, raised concerns about SpaceX's cash burn rate and AI infrastructure spending surpassing expectations. The sell-off is also tied to a broader global pullback in AI-related stocks, with investors questioning the return on massive capital expenditures. Analysts note the initial IPO surge was largely driven by retail investor frenzy, which has now waned as sentiment turns cautious. With only about 5% of shares currently floating, the market is bracing for significant potential selling pressure when employee lock-up periods expire later this year. While some, like Cathie Wood's ARK Invest, remain long-term bullish on SpaceX's core ventures, other research firms argue the current stock price is driven by narrative rather than fundamentals and that future growth is already priced in. The next potential catalyst is the stock's possible inclusion in the Nasdaq 100 index in July.

Odaily星球日报32m ago

SPCX Pre-Market Dips Below $150 IPO Price, But Don't Rush to Buy Yet

Odaily星球日报32m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片