SEC Committed 'Gross Abuse of Power' in Suit Against Crypto Company, Federal Judge Rules

CoinDeskPolicyPublished on 2024-03-17Last updated on 2024-03-18

Abstract

The regulator will be required to pay attorneys' fees for the defendants.

A federal judge ruled that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission must pay legal costs for DEBT Box, a Utah-based crypto company the SEC brought a suit against, finding that the regulator had committed a "gross abuse of power" in its efforts to secure a temporary restraining order.

The SEC sued the crypto project last year alleging fraud, securing a temporary asset freeze and restraining order against the company. According to the SEC, DEBT Box was telling customers it was selling licenses to mine cryptocurrency, but was in reality just creating tokens with code. DEBT Box filed to dissolve the temporary restraining order, claiming the SEC had misled the court about the company moving its funds and closing its bank accounts.

In an order Monday, Chief Judge Robert Shelby, from the District of Utah, wrote that the SEC's attorneys misled the court both in applying for a temporary restraining order as well as afterward, when DEBT Box filed to dissolve the order, noting at the end that the order is focused on the TRO question, and not the underlying case.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The SEC will be required to pay defendants' and receivers' fees as part of the court's sanctions, the judge wrote.

"Each piece of support the Commission offered in seeking the TRO – and then later reiterated in defending the TRO – proved to be some combination of false, mischaracterized, and misleading," the order said. "Further, the Commission not only repeated and affirmed its misrepresentations in the face of contrary evidence, it presented new falsehoods to the court in an effort to subtly shift from its previous misrepresentations without acknowledging its previous errors."

An SEC spokesperson said the agency was "reviewing the decision."

Edited by Kevin Reynolds.


Related Reads

Stock Price Doubles Within the Year, Plummets 20% After Resumption, Baolai Medical's 'Chip Backdoor Listing' Script Ends

On August 10, 2026, BPL (300246.SZ) resumed trading after a nearly week-long suspension and immediately fell by a 20% limit-down. This plunge was triggered by the termination of a planned controlling stake transfer, dashing earlier market speculation. In January 2026, Zhejiang Quwei Zhihe Partnership entered as a significant shareholder, sparking hopes. Investors speculated that its backer, Weigu Information—a specialized "little giant" company in high-reliability solid-state storage chips—might be seeking a backdoor listing through BPL. This "cross-industry restructuring" expectation fueled a strong rally, with BPL's stock price more than doubling in 2026 prior to the halt. However, the deal was called off on August 7, directly causing the sharp sell-off. Underlying BPL's vulnerability is its fundamentally weak business. The company, a medical device firm, is mired in losses, having reported three consecutive years of net losses totaling over 200 million yuan. Its core hemodialysis business is squeezed by government procurement price cuts, while growth in its patient monitor segment has stalled. Furthermore, BPL faces imminent debt pressure with convertible bonds worth approximately 218 million yuan due in September 2026, and its current stock price is far below the conversion price. The failed control transfer may represent a delayed release of negative news, but BPL's core challenges remain: reversing operational losses and addressing its urgent liquidity crisis.

marsbit2h ago

Stock Price Doubles Within the Year, Plummets 20% After Resumption, Baolai Medical's 'Chip Backdoor Listing' Script Ends

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片