2026 Outlook: The Next Phase of Quantitative Trading and Structural Opportunities in Alternative Assets

比推Published on 2026-01-27Last updated on 2026-01-27

Abstract

The 2025/2026 China Quantitative Investment Summit highlighted key shifts in the quant industry. Traditional alpha is diminishing, prompting a move toward greater flexibility, domain-specific modeling, and advanced AI applications. Large language models (LLM), particularly the "Order as Token" concept, are revolutionizing trading by predicting price movements as sequences, similar to NLP models predicting words. Concurrently, alternative assets like cryptocurrencies are gaining institutional interest due to their low correlation with traditional markets and high alpha potential. Strategies such as funding rate arbitrage in crypto perpetual contracts offer market-neutral returns. In 2026, quant strategies will emphasize dynamism, anti-fragility, and dynamic asset allocation to manage crowding risks. Structured products with capital protection features will grow in demand. The industry is evolving through either technological innovation, like AI-driven models, or diversification into emerging asset classes such as crypto.

Author: Max.s

Original Title: Foreseeing 2026: Prospects of Quantitative Trading and How to Allocate Alternative Assets


After experiencing the extreme volatility of 2024 and the profound reshuffle of 2025, the quantitative finance industry stands at a new crossroads. At last week's 2025/2026 China Quantitative Investment New Year Summit, Dr. He Kang, Chief Strategist and Head of Financial Engineering at Huatai Securities Research Institute, delivered an in-depth speech titled "2025 Trends and 2026 Outlook for the Quantitative Industry." This is not just a strategic report on the A-share market; it is a field manual on how Alpha finds new survival space in an increasingly crowded market.

For practitioners at the intersection of Web3 and traditional finance, this report sends a clear signal: traditional Alpha is decaying, and new paradigms—whether the "Order as Token" based on large models or alternative assets represented by cryptocurrencies—are becoming must-haves for institutional investors.

Below is an in-depth review and industry outlook based on the content of Dr. He Kang's speech.

For the quantitative industry, 2025 was a year of both "high prosperity" and "high volatility." One notable data change is that while the scale of securities private equity remains high, the growth of public fund quant is even more rapid. By the third quarter of 2025, the scale of public fund index enhancement products had exceeded 200 billion yuan, with active quant strategies reaching 120 billion yuan.

Behind this lies an interesting structural change: the top player has changed.

The landscape of former leading players has been broken, with institutions like Bodo and Guojin rising rapidly through extremely flexible strategies. In Dr. He's research, these top-performing public quant funds are essentially "private funds in public fund clothing." They boast extremely high turnover rates, astonishingly fast strategy iteration speeds, and even rival top private funds in the use of intraday reversal (T+0) trading.

This phenomenon reveals the survival rule of 2025: as the difficulty of obtaining excess returns increases exponentially, only extreme flexibility can break through in a red ocean. For investors, the past logic of "choosing a big name and lying flat" is no longer applicable; they must use more refined attribution analysis to identify managers who truly possess "agile development" capabilities.

Over the past five years, the mainstream narrative of the quantitative industry has been "full position stock selection," using Alpha from the stock selection side to cover market fluctuations. However, after the market education of 2025, "timing" has returned to the center of the table. Dr. He Kang categorized managers in the market into five types, A through E, with the most noteworthy being Type E managers—those who time the market based on logical rules (Logic-based). Unlike black-box predictions, these strategies build explicit logical chains of "If A then B."

The rise of Sub-domain Modeling.

As market efficiency improves, factors applicable across the entire market are becoming increasingly difficult to unearth. Top managers have begun adopting a "divide and conquer" strategy: slicing the entire market stock universe into different "domains" such as growth, cyclical, small-cap, and micro-cap, and training models separately within each domain. This is akin to how in Web3, you cannot use the same logic to trade Bitcoin and on-chain Meme coins—their pricing logic, liquidity characteristics, and participant structures are completely different. Through sub-domain modeling, quantitative strategies can extract higher excess returns in local markets.

If sub-domain modeling is a tactical optimization, then the introduction of large language models (LLMs) is a strategic dimensional reduction strike. Dr. He Kang mentioned three application tiers for large models in quant, the most memorable being the third tier: treating financial trading as a language, i.e., "Order as Token."

In traditional NLP (Natural Language Processing), GPT predicts the next word (Token); in a financial large model, the input is the price series, trading volume, and order flow over a past period, and the model predicts the next "price Token." This is not just a technological migration but a revolution in thinking.

Traditional quantitative models are often based on linear or nonlinear regression in statistics, while the Transformer architecture allows models to capture extremely long-term dependencies and complex nonlinear patterns. Imagine future trading not being based on a linear weighting of a few factors, but a pre-trained financial large model "generating" future price paths, much like generating text. This shares similarities with the AI Agent trading logic based on Intent-centric approaches in the Crypto field—AI is no longer an auxiliary tool but the direct execution agent.

The Blue Ocean of Alternative Data: The Institutionalization of the Cryptocurrency Market

When excess returns in the A-share market are "competed" to the extreme, smart money begins to look towards alternative markets with lower correlation through total return swaps (TRS) or offshore entities.

Compared to the T+1 system and price limits of A-shares, the crypto market features 7*24 hour trading, T+0 settlement, high volatility, and fragmented liquidity. For quantitative institutions with high-frequency trading capabilities and risk control models, this is like the A-share market before 2015—Alpha is everywhere, and the competitive landscape is not yet solidified.

Here is a special introduction to the Funding Rate Arbitrage strategy. In the perpetual contract mechanism of the crypto market, long and short positions need to pay funding fees to maintain price anchoring. In a bull market cycle, longs often need to pay high fees to shorts. This creates a market-neutral strategy akin to fixed income: buy spot, short an equivalent value of perpetual contracts, hedging price volatility risk while steadily earning the funding rate. In this field, the 1Token Funding Rate Arbitrage Strategy Index has become an important industry bellwether.

According to industry data, such strategies' annualized returns in specific market cycles far exceed those of traditional fixed-income products, and their correlation with traditional assets (stocks, bonds) is extremely low. 1Token, as a professional digital asset institutional service provider, constructs indices that not only reflect the overall market arbitrage space but also embody the evolution of Crypto quant from "artisanal workshops" to "institutionalization and indexation."

For traditional finance practitioners, the significance of paying attention to indices like those from 1Token is that it provides a window to observe the Web3 liquidity premium. When funding rates remain high for a long time, it signifies extremely exuberant market sentiment and is a warning of spot selling pressure; conversely, it may be a good opportunity to buy the dip.

Looking ahead to 2026, the keywords given by Dr. He Kang are "Dynamic" and "Anti-fragile."

From Static Allocation to Dynamic Game Theory. In the past, doing FOF (Fund of Funds) or major asset allocation often involved setting a static weight (e.g., a 60/40 portfolio). But in the future, a dynamic adjustment mechanism must be introduced. For example, when the crowding degree of a certain strategy (e.g., micro-cap index enhancement) becomes too high, due to the "stampede risk" brought by homogenized trading, its weight must be actively reduced, even if its historical performance is excellent.

The "Airbag-ization" of Products. Having experienced the pain of drawdowns, investor aversion to downside risk has peaked. Derivative products with "airbag" or "snowball" structures, as well as index enhancement products protected by options, will become mainstream in 2026. This logic is identical to that of DeFi structured products—sacrificing a portion of potential upside gains in exchange for higher certainty and principal protection.

Finding Low-Correlation Assets. Whether seeking independent Alpha within A-shares or allocating to Hong Kong stocks, US stocks, or even Crypto assets, the core goal is to reduce the overall correlation of the portfolio. Dr. He Kang specifically mentioned that while making pure Alpha in Hong Kong stocks is difficult (poor liquidity, expensive shorting tools), its value as part of a diversified allocation still exists. And the Crypto market, with its unique driving logic, will become an important piece for hedging traditional financial risks.

Dr. He Kang's speech, in fact, reveals the essence of financial engineering: the process of finding certainty within uncertainty.

In the 2025 quantitative industry, the traditional low-hanging fruit has been picked. Practitioners face only two paths: either persevere technologically, using large models to mine deeper nonlinear patterns; or go overseas on the asset side, conducting dimensional reduction strikes in blue oceans like Crypto.

For Web3 natives, this is also a warning: as top institutions like Huatai Securities begin to deeply research and focus on this field, the entry of正规军 (regular army/institutional players) is only a matter of time. When traditional quantitative dragon-slaying skills are applied to decentralized trading markets, new红利 (dividends/opportunities) and new brutal competition will arrive simultaneously.

In 2026, whether in TradFi or Crypto, only the evolvers will survive.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7605979

Related Questions

QWhat are the key trends and challenges facing the quantitative trading industry in 2025, as discussed in the article?

AThe quantitative trading industry in 2025 is characterized by 'high prosperity' and 'high volatility.' A key trend is the rapid growth of public fund quantitative products, with enhanced index products surpassing 200 billion CNY in scale. The challenge is the exponential increase in the difficulty of obtaining alpha, forcing managers to adopt extreme flexibility and rapid strategy iteration to survive in a highly competitive market.

QHow is 'Order as Token' conceptualized in the application of large language models (LLM) to quantitative trading?

A'Order as Token' is the third and most advanced application level of LLMs in quantitative trading. It treats financial trading as a language, where the model inputs past price sequences, trading volumes, and order flows, and predicts the next 'price token.' This represents a revolutionary shift from traditional statistical models to using transformer architectures to capture long-term dependencies and complex nonlinear patterns, akin to AI generating future price paths.

QWhat is the 'Funding Rate Arbitrage' strategy in the cryptocurrency market, and why is it attractive to institutional investors?

AThe 'Funding Rate Arbitrage' strategy is a market-neutral strategy in crypto perpetual contracts. It involves buying spot assets while shorting an equivalent value of perpetual contracts. This hedges price volatility risk while allowing the investor to earn the funding fee, which is typically paid by longs to shorts in a bull market. It is attractive because it offers returns that far exceed traditional fixed-income products and has extremely low correlation with traditional assets like stocks and bonds.

QAccording to the article, what is the significance of 'sub-domain modeling' in modern quantitative strategies?

ASub-domain modeling is a strategy where the entire stock market is divided into distinct domains such as growth, cyclical, small-cap, and micro-cap stocks. A separate model is trained for each domain. This 'divide and conquer' approach allows quantitative strategies to extract higher alpha in local markets by accounting for their unique pricing logic, liquidity characteristics, and participant structure, much like using different logics to trade Bitcoin and meme coins in Web3.

QWhat are the key recommendations for asset allocation and risk management in 2026, as outlined by Dr. He Kang?

AThe key recommendations for 2026 are 'dynamic' allocation and building 'anti-fragile' portfolios. This involves moving from static asset weights to dynamic adjustments based on strategy crowding (e.g., reducing exposure to overly crowded strategies like micro-cap index enhancement). For risk management, products with 'airbag' or 'snowball' structures that use derivatives and options for capital protection will become mainstream. The core goal is to lower portfolio correlation by diversifying into assets like港股,美股, and Crypto.

Related Reads

In-Depth Report on the On-Chain Lending Market: When Off-Chain Credit Meets On-Chain Liquidation

The on-chain lending market has evolved from a peripheral DeFi niche into core financial infrastructure. As of early 2026, total value locked (TVL) in on-chain lending protocols has reached $64.3 billion, accounting for 53.54% of total DeFi TVL, making it the largest and most mature vertical within decentralized finance. Aave dominates the sector with approximately $32.9 billion in TVL, commanding nearly half of the market—a leadership position that is unlikely to be challenged in the foreseeable future. However, the path of on-chain lending forward is not without risk. Liquidation cascades, credit defaults, and cross-chain vulnerabilities remain systemic threats hanging over the industry. At the same time, a deeper structural transformation is underway: on-chain lending is shifting from a “leverage tool for crypto-native users” to a “compliant gateway for institutional capital”. The scale of RWA (Real World Asset) lending has surpassed $18.5 billion, with U.S. Treasuries and government securities increasingly serving as core collateral. Institutional capital inflows are reshaping both the user base and risk appetite of the sector. This report systematically analyzes the evolution of on-chain lending definitions, competitive dynamics, core risks, and future trends, providing a comprehensive industry outlook for investors and trade practitioners. Key findings suggest that the “one dominant player with several strong challengers” structure will persist in the short term, while fixed-rate lending, compliant collateral, and institutional credit underwriting will define the next phase of competition. For investors focused on DeFi infrastructure, three key opportunity tracks stand out, namely, the Aave ecosystem (Morpho, Spark), RWA lending protocols (Ondo, Maple) and fixed-rate innovation (Notional, Pendle).

HTX Learn56m ago

In-Depth Report on the On-Chain Lending Market: When Off-Chain Credit Meets On-Chain Liquidation

HTX Learn56m ago

Fu Peng's First Public Speech in 2026: What Exactly Are Crypto Assets? Why Did I Join the Crypto Asset Industry?

Fu Peng, a renowned macroeconomist and now Chief Economist at New火 Group, delivered his first public speech of 2026 at the Hong Kong Web3 Festival. He explained his perspective on crypto assets and why he joined the industry, framing it within the context of macroeconomic trends and financial evolution. Fu emphasized that crypto assets are transitioning from an early, belief-driven phase to a mature, institutionally integrated asset class. He drew parallels to the 1970s-80s, when technological advances (like computing) revolutionized traditional finance, leading to the rise of FICC (Fixed Income, Currencies, and Commodities). Similarly, current advancements in AI, data, and blockchain are reshaping finance, with crypto assets becoming part of a new "FICC + C" (C for Crypto) framework. He noted that institutional capital, including traditional hedge funds, avoided early crypto due to its speculative nature but are now engaging as regulatory clarity emerges (e.g., stablecoin laws, CFTC classifying crypto as a commodity). Fu predicted that 2025-2026 marks a turning point where crypto becomes a standardized, financially viable asset for diversified portfolios, akin to commodities or derivatives in traditional finance. Fu defined Bitcoin not as "digital gold" in a simplistic sense but as a value-preserving, financially tradable asset. He highlighted that crypto's future lies in regulated, institutional adoption, moving away from retail-dominated trading. His entry into crypto signals this maturation, where traditional finance integrates crypto into mainstream asset management.

marsbit2h ago

Fu Peng's First Public Speech in 2026: What Exactly Are Crypto Assets? Why Did I Join the Crypto Asset Industry?

marsbit2h ago

Justin Sun Sues Trump Family: What $75 Million Bought Was Only a Blacklist

Justin Sun, founder of Tron, has filed a lawsuit in federal court against World Liberty Financial (WLF), alleging he was made the "primary target of a fraudulent scheme" after investing $75 million. Sun claims the investment secured him an advisor title and WLFI tokens, which were later frozen by WLF, causing "hundreds of millions in losses." The dispute began in late 2024 when Sun's investment helped revive WLF's struggling token sale, which ultimately raised $550 million. Shortly after, the SEC dropped its lawsuit against Sun following Donald Trump's inauguration. However, relations soured when Sun refused WLF's demands for additional funding. In August 2025, WLF added a "blacklist" function to its smart contract, allowing it to unilaterally freeze tokens. Sun's holdings, worth approximately $107 million, were frozen, and he was threatened with token destruction. The lawsuit highlights WLF's structure, which directs 75% of token sale profits to the Trump family, who had earned $1 billion by December 2025. WLF's CEO is Zach Witkoff, son of U.S. Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff. The project faces scrutiny for opaque operations, including a controversial loan arrangement on the Dolomite platform, co-founded by a WLF advisor. Despite Sun's history with the SEC, the case underscores centralization risks within DeFi, as WLF controls governance and holds powers to freeze assets arbitrarily. Sun's tokens remain frozen as legal proceedings begin.

marsbit2h ago

Justin Sun Sues Trump Family: What $75 Million Bought Was Only a Blacklist

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片