SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240221):ETH挑战3000点

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-02-21Last updated on 2024-02-21

Abstract

ETH在重新触碰3000点后带动BTC一同出现回调,两者当前分别处在51000和2900上方震荡。期权方面,过去24小时远端IV普遍滑落1~2%Vol左右,ETH整体水平高出BTC 2.5%Vol以上。

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240221):ETH挑战3000点

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240221):ETH挑战3000点

昨日(20 FEB)市场开始出现讨论美联储是否需要重启加息的讨论,花旗集团表示,针对美联储可能只进行非常短暂的宽松周期,随后不久就重启加息的风险,投资者应具备更多的对冲措施,美债收益率呈现 V 字型走势,当前两年期/十年期分别为 4.589% /4.270% 。美股方面,在英伟达财报公布前,SPX 出现了以科技股为首的全面下跌(-0.6% ),道指/纳指也分别收跌 0.17% /0.92% 。

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240221):ETH挑战3000点

Source: SignalPlus, Economic Calendar

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240221):ETH挑战3000点

Source: Binance & TradingView

数字货币方面,ETH 在重新触碰 3000 点后带动 BTC 一同出现回调,两者当前分别处在 51000 和 2900 上方震荡。期权方面,过去 24 小时远端 IV 普遍滑落 1 ~ 2% Vol 左右,ETH 整体水平高出 BTC 2.5% Vol 以上,前端 IV 更是在其挑战 3000 点的刺激下明显上扬,但期权成交量并没有见到明显的上涨,各期限上对于 3000-C 的博弈占据了昨日 ETH 成交的大量篇幅。除此之外,与价格回调一同出现的还有 Vol Skew 从历史高点出现的回落,前端甚至已跌破至负值,除开统计上 Skew 指标和价格的常见的正相关性,从交易上解读,BTC 短期大量的 Sell Call,或是 29 MAR 24 上形成的 Long Call Spread(Buy ATM Sell OTM )也部分解释了 25 dRR 下降的情况。

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240221):ETH挑战3000点

Source: Deribit (截至 21 FEB 16: 00 UTC+ 8)

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240221):ETH挑战3000点

Source: SignalPlus

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240221):ETH挑战3000点

Source: SignalPlus

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240221):ETH挑战3000点

Source: Laevitas,ETH 触碰到 3000 后并没有带动期权交易量上涨

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240221):ETH挑战3000点

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240221):ETH挑战3000点

Data Source: Deribit, 3000-C 成为市场热点

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240221):ETH挑战3000点

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240221):ETH挑战3000点

Data Source: Deribit

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240221):ETH挑战3000点

Source: Deribit Block Trade

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240221):ETH挑战3000点

Source: Deribit Block Trade

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240221):ETH挑战3000点

您可在 ChatGPT 4.0 的 Plugin Store 搜索 SignalPlus ,获取实时加密资讯。如果想即时收到我们的更新,欢迎关注我们的推特账号@SignalPlus_Web3 ,或者加入我们的微信群(添加小助手微信:SignalPlus 123)、Telegram 群以及 Discord 社群,和更多朋友一起交流互动。

SignalPlus Official Website:https://www.signalplus.com

Related Reads

OpenAI's "Most Open" Move: Codex No Longer Exclusively Favors GPT

OpenAI has significantly opened up its Codex programming agent by introducing a "model provider" configuration layer that allows users to connect it with various open-source models, not just its proprietary GPT. Through a configuration file or a simple `--oss` command-line flag, Codex can now route requests to local services like Ollama or LM Studio, or to third-party APIs such as Mistral or DeepSeek. This move is seen as one of OpenAI's most "open" steps, potentially lowering costs and enhancing privacy for developers who can run code generation offline. However, integration isn't seamless for all models. Codex primarily uses OpenAI's newer Responses API, while many open-source models rely on the older Chat Completions interface. This creates compatibility issues, especially for advanced features like function calling. The developer community is already building "routing" or adapter layers (e.g., CC Switch, LiteLLM) to translate between these protocols, enabling hybrid setups where GPT handles planning and open-source models handle execution. Analysts interpret this as a strategic shift for OpenAI: from competing solely on model superiority to controlling the platform and interface standards. By making Codex a flexible, pluggable entry point for AI-assisted programming, OpenAI aims to become the central hub in the developer toolchain ecosystem, even as users gain the freedom to switch underlying models.

marsbit18m ago

OpenAI's "Most Open" Move: Codex No Longer Exclusively Favors GPT

marsbit18m ago

When 500 Million People Abandon ChatGPT

ChatGPT's Global AI Assistant Market Share Drops Below 50% Three and a half years after its groundbreaking launch, ChatGPT faces a pivotal moment. While it remains the largest AI assistant globally, its market share has fallen below 50% for the first time, reaching 46.4% as of May, according to Sensor Tower's 2026 AI landscape report. Google's Gemini (27.7%) and Anthropic's Claude (10.3%) are now its main competitors, with Grok, Perplexity, and others also gaining ground. The market has evolved from awe and initial adoption into a phase of product comparison, ecosystem integration, and commercialization. User behavior has matured significantly. Loyalty is low; users readily switch between assistants for specific tasks. Gemini benefits from deep integration within Google's ecosystem (Search, Gmail, Android), while Claude has carved a niche among productivity-focused users with strong retention, nearly matching ChatGPT's. User choice is now influenced by a complex mix of capability, ecosystem, price, use case, and even brand trust. Commercialization is accelerating. AI app downloads continue but growth is slowing, while user spending is rising. Over $4.2 billion was spent in-app during H1 2026. Claude leads in premium subscription conversion rates (13%). OpenAI is expanding its revenue streams, testing ads shown to 17% of ChatGPT users daily by May. This shift highlights the immense financial pressure of model training and inference costs. Despite revenue growth, OpenAI's cash burn is intense, reaching $3.7 billion in Q1 2026. The company projects this could rise to $25-57 billion in the coming years, underscoring the industry-wide challenge of scaling profitably. The symbolism is clear: ChatGPT no longer defines the AI assistant market alone. The era of a single dominant product is over. Gemini, Claude, and specialized tools are collectively shaping user habits and business models. As AI assistants move from novelty to utility—judged on accuracy, efficiency, and value—they are becoming embedded in everyday digital life. ChatGPT may have lost its majority, but AI as a whole is winning, entering a mature, competitive, and diverse new phase.

marsbit20m ago

When 500 Million People Abandon ChatGPT

marsbit20m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片