TON 链上生态报告:趋势与机会,如何在TON生态中找到切入口

Odaily星球日报Published on 2023-11-11Last updated on 2023-11-11

Abstract

本报告主要整理 TON Blockchain 早期生态发展、公链更新与开发等,分析 TON 生态的资料成长、叙事角度及发展趋势。

2023 年 9 月,Telegram 与 TON 基金会正式对外宣布两方达成合作关系,为 Telegram 用户整合了 TON 推出的自托管加密钱包“TON Space”。这是继 2020 年 Telegram 出于合规问题宣布放弃其创立的“Telegram Open Network ”项目之后,两者正式的官方合作互动。由此,背靠社交平台 Telegram 这一流量切入口已成为 TON 的核心竞争力。

Web2 流量、Web3 用户、社交媒体平台叠加高性能公链,让仍处于早期阶段的 TON 生态备受投资人关注。本报告主要整理 TON Blockchain  早期生态发展情况、公链更新与开发、链上生态数据、相关融资信息等,分析 TON 生态的数据增长、叙事角度及发展趋势,以供参考。

 本报告由 Starbase 与 Blocktempo 联合撰写并发布,同时感谢由 TON 及 TonX Studio 提供内容建议与支持。

TON 链上生态报告:趋势与机会,如何在TON生态中找到切入口

TON 链上生态报告:趋势与机会,如何在TON生态中找到切入口

TON 链上生态报告:趋势与机会,如何在TON生态中找到切入口

TON 链上生态报告:趋势与机会,如何在TON生态中找到切入口

TON 链上生态报告:趋势与机会,如何在TON生态中找到切入口

TON 链上生态报告:趋势与机会,如何在TON生态中找到切入口

TON 链上生态报告:趋势与机会,如何在TON生态中找到切入口

TON 链上生态报告:趋势与机会,如何在TON生态中找到切入口

TON 链上生态报告:趋势与机会,如何在TON生态中找到切入口

TON 链上生态报告:趋势与机会,如何在TON生态中找到切入口

TON 链上生态报告:趋势与机会,如何在TON生态中找到切入口

TON 链上生态报告:趋势与机会,如何在TON生态中找到切入口

TON 链上生态报告:趋势与机会,如何在TON生态中找到切入口

TON 链上生态报告:趋势与机会,如何在TON生态中找到切入口

TON 链上生态报告:趋势与机会,如何在TON生态中找到切入口

TON 链上生态报告:趋势与机会,如何在TON生态中找到切入口

TON 链上生态报告:趋势与机会,如何在TON生态中找到切入口

TON 链上生态报告:趋势与机会,如何在TON生态中找到切入口

TON 链上生态报告:趋势与机会,如何在TON生态中找到切入口

TON 链上生态报告:趋势与机会,如何在TON生态中找到切入口

TON 链上生态报告:趋势与机会,如何在TON生态中找到切入口

TON 链上生态报告:趋势与机会,如何在TON生态中找到切入口

TON 链上生态报告:趋势与机会,如何在TON生态中找到切入口

Related Reads

U.S. Government Bans Foreign Nationals from Using Fable 5, Anthropic Issues Rebuttal

U.S. Government Bans Foreign Access to Fable 5, Anthropic Issues Rebuttal On June 12th, the U.S. government ordered AI company Anthropic to immediately suspend all foreign access—including foreign nationals within the U.S. and Anthropic's own foreign employees—to its newly released Fable 5 and Mythos 5 AI models, citing national security concerns. This forced Anthropic to temporarily disable access to both models for all users globally, as it cannot technically differentiate user nationality at scale. The models, released just three days prior, represent Anthropic's highest public capability tier. Fable 5 is the first publicly available model from the advanced "Mythos" family, while Mythos 5 is a less-restricted version for approved cybersecurity and critical infrastructure partners. The government's directive was reportedly triggered by claims from another company that it could "jailbreak" Mythos 5, raising alarm within the Trump administration. Anthropic, in a detailed public statement, strongly challenged this rationale. The company argues the demonstrated "jailbreak" is a narrow, non-generalized technique that merely involves identifying minor, known software vulnerabilities—a capability common to other publicly available models like OpenAI's GPT-5.5 and routinely used by cybersecurity defenders. Anthropic stated it has complied with the order but disagrees with the government's standard, warning that applying it industry-wide would halt all new frontier model deployments. The company criticized the lack of a transparent, fact-based legal process and expressed confidence the situation stems from a misunderstanding. It is working to restore access and will release more technical details within 24 hours. Other Anthropic models remain unaffected.

链捕手10m ago

U.S. Government Bans Foreign Nationals from Using Fable 5, Anthropic Issues Rebuttal

链捕手10m ago

The Revelation from the Raydium Theft Incident: New DeFi Vulnerabilities Lurking in Forgotten Old Contracts

**Raydium Exploit Reveals DeFi's Hidden Risk: Forgotten "Zombie" Contracts** A recent attack on Raydium's deprecated V3 AMM pools resulted in a loss of approximately $1.34 million. The hacker exploited pools that were no longer supported by Raydium's current UI or SDK but remained fully functional and accessible on-chain. This incident highlights a critical, often overlooked category of risk in DeFi: inactive or legacy smart contracts that projects fail to properly decommission. Since March 2025, there have been at least 8 publicly reported attacks targeting such abandoned contracts, with total losses around $10.8 million. Including older pools and deprecated features, the count rises to 10 incidents with roughly $22.5 million in losses. These "zombie contracts" represent a lifecycle management failure rather than a code vulnerability, yet they are typically misclassified under general "code bug" categories in security reports, masking the true scale of the problem. The root cause is that projects often merely document a contract as "deprecated" without taking essential technical steps to secure it: withdrawing remaining assets, disabling external call functions, and implementing ongoing monitoring. These forgotten, under-monitored components become prime targets for attackers. To address this, the industry needs to recognize "zombie contracts" as a distinct risk category and establish standardized decommissioning protocols. Essential steps should include: 1) a formal retirement announcement, 2) removal of all front-end integrations, 3) withdrawal of locked assets, 4) disabling key contract functions, 5) ongoing security monitoring, 6) clear user communication, and 7) a post-mortem analysis. The value of a DeFi project lies not only in its current TVL but also in the security of its historical codebase, which has now become a new attack surface.

Foresight News1h ago

The Revelation from the Raydium Theft Incident: New DeFi Vulnerabilities Lurking in Forgotten Old Contracts

Foresight News1h ago

Robots Begin to 'Consume Data': The Hidden Production Chain from Indian Data Factories to Billion-Dollar Humanoid Robots

Robots have started to 'consume data,' driving the formation of a new industrial supply chain focused on producing training data for embodied AI. Unlike large language models, which are trained on vast internet text corpora, embodied AI models face a 'data desert' in the physical world. This has created a massive demand for first-person perspective video data (Ego Data), captured by workers wearing cameras in places like Indian garment factories. Companies like Neocambrian AI are establishing 'data factories' where workers perform standardized tasks (e.g., sorting clothes, kitchen organization) to generate thousands of hours of video. Research, such as NVIDIA's EgoScale, demonstrates that scaling this human demonstration data predictably improves robot performance, particularly for dexterous manipulation. This has validated a training path combining large-scale human data for pre-training with smaller amounts of robot-specific data for fine-tuning. The value of different data types varies significantly, forming a 'data pyramid.' The base consists of low-cost, large-scale internet and Ego Data. Higher layers include more expensive motion-capture data (e.g., from data gloves), simulation/synthetic data, and the most costly and scarce layer: real robot teleoperation data. This demand has spawned a layered ecosystem of data suppliers: low-cost data factories, motion capture and alignment specialists, robot-native teleoperation service providers, simulation data companies, and platforms aiming for data standardization. Robot companies themselves are adopting a 'layered procurement' strategy: outsourcing generic Ego Data while building in-house capabilities for robot-specific adaptation data and the critical deployment/failure data generated in real-world applications. The industry is shifting focus from hardware and basic mobility to the data pipelines required for general-purpose capability. While parallels exist to data labeling companies like Scale AI in the LLM boom, the physical complexity of robot data—involving action success ambiguity and sim-to-real gaps—requires more integrated solutions for data collection, annotation, and a continuous feedback loop. The race is on to build the data engines that will teach robots to operate reliably in the unstructured real world.

marsbit4h ago

Robots Begin to 'Consume Data': The Hidden Production Chain from Indian Data Factories to Billion-Dollar Humanoid Robots

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片