Bitcoin Ordinals are upending NFT trading amid surge in popularity

THE BLOCKPublished on 2023-05-24Last updated on 2023-05-24

Abstract

Bitcoin Ordinals, the non-fungible tokens minted on the world’s most valuable blockchain, have been the talk of the industry since they emerged virtually overnight earlier this year and quickly rose to prominence. Now they're providing serious competition to other networks, and changing trading behavior.

Bitcoin Ordinals, the non-fungible tokens minted on the world’s most valuable blockchain, have been the talk of the industry since they emerged virtually overnight earlier this year and quickly rose to prominence. Now they're providing serious competition to other networks, and changing trading behavior.

While Ethereum, long the dominant blockchain for NFTs, still ranks number one in terms of trading volume and is unlikely to lose that lead any time soon, Bitcoin has been maintaining a firm grip on second place for more than three weeks.

Besides frustrating rival chains like Solana and Polygon that have been consistently ranking second and third for several months, Bitcoin’s ascendance in the NFT space could have the knock-on effect of spurring a decline in wash trading which can sometimes distort markets.

“Wash trading” generally refers to artificial trading that, rather than representing genuine supply and demand, inflates trading volumes as parties trade between their own wallets. It's harder to do on the Bitcoin network when it comes to NFT trading.

“You can’t really create tokens and advance smart contracts on Bitcoin, thus making token incentives for trading near impossible and wash trading less likely,” said The Block Director of Research Steven Zheng.

Before exchanges like LooksRare and Blur launched ambitious token-incentive programs designed to steal traders away from top NFT marketplace OpenSea, wash trading was minimal, according to Zheng. Most recently, Blur began awarding tokens to traders based on the total value of the trading they conducted on the marketplace.

Zheng illustrated the power of Blur’s incentives by providing the example of someone trading $1 million worth of NFTs on Blur in the hope of securing more than $1 million worth of BLUR tokens.

“This incentive mechanism doesn’t exist on Bitcoin," he said. "At least not yet.”

Can Bitcoin Ordinals help restore legitimacy to NFT markets?

At the end of last year, an online sleuth known as @hildobby_ on Twitter posted a Dune analytics dashboard which posited that more than $30 billion of transaction volume, and roughly 44% of all NFT trading, was in fact nothing more than wash trading. At its peak, according to the same dashboard, wash trading accounted for about 80% of the total volume of NFT trades.

Blur’s program, like LooksRare’s before it, led to many traders selling high-valued NFTs from collections like Bored Ape Yacht Club and CryptoPunks in order to collect tokens. During its February peak, Blur’s token hit a price of $1.24 on more than $600 million in trading amid a flurry of transactions on the NFT marketplace.

While trading can cause the NFT market to appear more robust than it actually is — weekly trading is still down more than more than 90% since the height of 2021's bull run — many argue it casts a pall over the industry for various reasons.

“Wash trading distorts the NFT market, creating an illusion of demand and value,” web3 advocate @kouk_web3 said in a Twitter thread from March. “It hurts trust, makes real investors vulnerable to losses, and can even lead to regulatory crackdowns.”

In a report published in 2022, leading blockchain analytics firm Chainanalysis agreed.

“NFT wash trading exists in a murky legal area," it said. "While wash trading is prohibited in conventional securities and futures, wash trading involving NFTs has yet to be the subject of an enforcement action. However, that could change as regulators shift focus and apply existing anti-fraud authorities to new NFT markets.”

Related Reads

Jensen Huang: Prompts are Becoming Obsolete, Loops are the New Paradigm

Jensen Huang, alongside AI leaders like Peter Norvig, Boris Cherny, and Andrew Ng, is advocating for a shift from "prompt engineering" to "loop engineering" as the new paradigm for AI development. Instead of manually crafting individual prompts, the focus is now on designing autonomous loops—systems where AI agents execute tasks, self-validate results, and iterate until completion without constant human oversight. A loop is a management framework that enables agents to operate independently. Key implementations are seen in Claude Code (with features like /loop, /goal, and /schedule) and OpenAI Codex, which employ multiple agents working in parallel within isolated environments. A core principle is the separation of roles: one agent (or model) performs the task, while an independent agent (or a smaller, separate model) validates the output to ensure objectivity. The article outlines a practical roadmap for implementing loops, starting with a "four-condition test" to assess suitability, building a minimal viable loop, and emphasizing critical pitfalls to avoid, such as lacking hard stop conditions or allowing loops to handle tasks requiring human judgment. This evolution is framed as the fourth major shift in AI interaction: from Prompt Engineering (crafting instructions) to Context Engineering (providing background information), then to Harness Engineering (building tool-enabled environments), and finally to Loop Engineering (creating self-sustaining systems). This progression reflects a consistent trend of increasing abstraction, moving human involvement from direct instruction to system design and rule-setting. The concept has academic roots in frameworks like ReAct, which formalized the "reason-act-observe" cycle. While loop engineering promises greater automation, experts caution about managing token costs and warn against outsourcing understanding—AI can assist, but deep problem comprehension remains essential.

marsbit39m ago

Jensen Huang: Prompts are Becoming Obsolete, Loops are the New Paradigm

marsbit39m ago

MemeCore Token Crashes As ZachXBT Warning Puts Insider Supply Back In Focus

MemeCore's M token experienced a severe crash, plunging over 70% in a single session. This sudden sell-off revived concerns highlighted by on-chain investigator ZachXBT regarding tokens with concentrated insider supply and thin liquidity. The incident underscores the fragility of many memecoins, where large paper valuations can vanish quickly when selling pressure hits illiquid markets. It also brings exchange listing standards into question, as listings can imply a legitimacy not supported by the underlying token structure. The crash serves as a stark warning for traders that social traction and high market capitalization do not guarantee resilient liquidity, emphasizing the risks inherent in high-beta crypto assets.

bitcoinist1h ago

MemeCore Token Crashes As ZachXBT Warning Puts Insider Supply Back In Focus

bitcoinist1h ago

GPT Designs GPT

OpenAI has unveiled its first custom AI chip, Jalapeño, a move signaling a strategic shift beyond being a mere model company. While many see it as a challenge to NVIDIA, its core aim is to control the entire intelligent production pipeline—from models and chips to data centers and energy. The key driver is the evolving competitive landscape: model advantages are shrinking, while the computational gap in areas like cost-per-token, system throughput, and energy efficiency is becoming the true long-term barrier. Jalapeño is primarily an inference chip, targeting the massive and growing "inference tax"—the daily operational cost of generating tokens for services like ChatGPT and APIs. By designing its own hardware optimized for its specific workloads and future product roadmaps (even using AI to aid the chip design process), OpenAI aims to drastically reduce token generation costs and improve system efficiency. This creates a potential flywheel: better models help design better chips, which lower costs for running next-generation models, supporting more users and products, which in turn provides more data to refine future chips. The strategy mirrors Apple’s integrated approach, building a closed loop where hardware, software, and applications are co-optimized. In the long term, OpenAI is not trying to become the next NVIDIA (a supplier of "shovels" to all AI companies) but to own and operate the entire "mine"—selling the end product of intelligence itself. This move marks OpenAI's ambition to evolve from creating the smartest models to controlling the foundational infrastructure of AI production.

marsbit1h ago

GPT Designs GPT

marsbit1h ago

Ethereum Foundation Interim Executive Director Speaks Out: What Is Our Mission?

The Ethereum Foundation's core mission is to ensure Ethereum remains a truly permissionless, censorship-resistant, private, and open infrastructure for large-scale, sovereign coordination. The article clarifies the EF's focus and dismisses irrelevant objectives, such as pursuing institutional popularity or short-term speculation. Its core work centers on eliminating systemic weaknesses. This involves fortifying Ethereum across multiple layers—protocol, access, user, and institutional—against exploitation, control, or surveillance. Key initiatives include minimizing harmful MEV and preventing privileged control over transaction flow, making unconditional privacy a foundational default, ensuring staking remains permissionless and decentralized, and strengthening user-facing access points to uphold autonomy. Concurrently, the EF aims to seize strategic opportunities. These include leading the transition to post-quantum cryptography, achieving a fully verifiable protocol stack, establishing Ethereum as private digital cash, integrating user-owned AI agents with personal wallets, and demonstrating that trusted-neutral infrastructure can competitively handle disintermediated coordination at an institutional scale. The article also addresses recent organizational changes, stating that personnel departures were due to strategic realignment, role fit, or natural evolution. It clarifies the approach to spin-outs, emphasizing that external funding will be provided only for work critical to the EF's mission that reduces Ethereum's dependency without creating new risks or mission drift. Ultimately, the EF is committed to building an enduring, neutral system that reshapes global coordination, focusing relentlessly on the principles of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and sovereignty (CROP).

链捕手1h ago

Ethereum Foundation Interim Executive Director Speaks Out: What Is Our Mission?

链捕手1h ago

Switching Research Fields in the Final Year of My PhD, I Landed an Offer from OpenAI: My Interview Journey Was Full of 'Surprises'

Yong Zheng-Xin, a final-year PhD student at Brown University, secured an OpenAI offer after pivoting from multilingual models to AI safety research in his last year. In his blog post "Surprising lessons from my research scientist job search," he shares six unexpected insights from his job hunt. He found that often only one or two key papers matter for securing an interview, not the total number. Interview formats were highly diverse, including unexpected rounds on system design and AI agent usage. "Work trials," common in AI startups, involved paid, sometimes week-long collaborative tasks that disrupted other interview preparations. Timing proved crucial, with opportunity windows sometimes lasting less than a month. Return offers for research roles were rare compared to software engineering. Surprisingly, many interview rounds were unrelated to his specific AI safety focus, instead testing broader research competencies. Zheng-Xin concludes that the ability to demonstrate relevant expertise in a new field can unlock opportunities, regardless of one's previous publication record.

marsbit1h ago

Switching Research Fields in the Final Year of My PhD, I Landed an Offer from OpenAI: My Interview Journey Was Full of 'Surprises'

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片