BRC-20 Tokens Lose 40% Market Cap In 7 Days – Here’s Why

newsbtcPublished on 2023-05-15Last updated on 2023-05-15

Abstract

The crypto market has been looking to consolidate following a major price correction earlier in the week. One market that has felt the brunt of this correction is BRC-20 token...

The crypto market has been looking to consolidate following a major price correction earlier in the week. One market that has felt the brunt of this correction is BRC-20 token which has suffered a major dip in its market cap. 
According to brc-20.io, which tracks the nascent market for tokens minted on the Bitcoin blockchain, the market cap of all BRC-20 tokens between May 8 and 11 went from $990,000,000 to $379,000,000, a 62% drop. At the time of writing, the market cap of BRC-20 tokens has rebounded and is around $570,000,000, making it a 40% dip within the seven-day trading period.
The BRC-20 market is largely tied to the capitalization of ORDI token, which dominates more than 80% of the trading volumes. At the time of writing, it is currently trading around $15, down from its all-time high price of $28, achieved earlier in the month. The importance of ORDI in this market means that price variations directly and considerably affect the market cap of BRC-20 tokens. 

Ordi tokens dominates with more tha 80% of the BRC-20 MarketCap

Ordi tokens dominate with more than 80% of the BRC-20 MarketCap: source @brc-20.io A Deep Dive Into BRC-20 Token 
BRC-20 is an experimental standard for issuing and transferring fungible tokens on the Bitcoin network. The deployment, issuance, and transfer of these tokens is done via a JSON data entry. Hence its relationship with the NFT Ordinals of Bitcoin. 

The creation of this standard is credited to a developer known as Domo on Twitter. On March 8, the computer scientist announced his progress in this area and acknowledged that it would be difficult for him to take this test further. For this reason, he preferred to share the project with others to experiment with. Since then, the ecosystem has exploded, with more than 14.000 tokens launched, according to brc-20.io.
Although the name BRC-20 is a reference to Ethereum’s ERC-20 standard. However, both standards differ in several of their characteristics, especially due to the differences between the networks in which they work, Bitcoin and Ethereum.
First of all, Bitcoin’s BRC-20 tokens do not have the ability to interact with smart contracts, while ERC-20s do. Other limitations of the BRC-20 tokens compared to those of Ethereum is that they cannot have decimals, be burned or frozen, and have additional functions such as approval or delegation.


BRC-20 Tokens Not Without Controversy
Some Bitcoin maximalists have criticized the growing popularity of BRC-20 tokens due to their effect on the Bitcoin network. There has been growing congestion on the Bitcoin network, and it broke the record for the average number of transactions processed per block with an astonishing 4,373 transactions, marking an all-time high. Nevertheless, proponents of this token standard argue that it expands the Bitcoin blockchain to new possibilities and provides new use cases for the leading cryptocurrency. 

Bitcoin hovering close to the $27,000 mark

Bitcoin hovering close to the $27,000 mark: source @tradingview -Featured Image from iStock, charts from brc-20.io and Tradingview


Related Reads

The First Encyclical of the New Pope in Rome, to Save the Common People in the AI Era

New Pope's First Encyclical Aims to Safeguard Humanity in the AI Era On May 25th, Pope Leo XIV issued his first encyclical, "Magnifica humanitas," a 40,000-word document addressing the profound challenges posed by Artificial Intelligence. Released on the 135th anniversary of Pope Leo XIII's "Rerum novarum," it positions itself as a guide for the Church's social doctrine in the AI age. The encyclical's central concern is preserving deep humanity amid rapid technological advancement. It argues technology is never neutral, carrying the values of its creators and users, and warns against building a "Tower of Babel" of technological tyranny versus a human-centric community. Pope Leo XIV criticizes the concentrated, opaque power of tech giants and the "new forms of slavery" emerging in the digital economy, where humans risk being reduced to mere instruments. A significant focus is the military use of AI. The Pope declares traditional "just war" theory obsolete, arguing that delegating lethal decisions to opaque algorithms severs moral accountability. He calls for "disarming AI" from military and economic arms races. The document also warns that deepfakes and information manipulation erode societal trust and rational discourse. Anthropic co-founder Chris Olah, present at the Vatican, responded by acknowledging the AI industry's limitations due to commercial and competitive pressures, necessitating external ethical oversight. He emphasized that AI's nature and its interaction with the world are ultimately philosophical and religious questions, not solvable by computer science alone. Olah revealed unsettling findings from his team's research into AI internals, including structures mirroring human neuroscience and evidence of internal states resembling emotions and introspection. The dialogue highlights a pivotal shift: AI is not a passive tool but an entity with emerging "quasi-agency." As creators themselves express unease, science is turning to realms like religion to grapple with fundamental questions about human identity and dignity. The core imperative becomes safeguarding irreducible human qualities—compassion, conscience, free will, and the pursuit of truth—in the face of a potentially more efficient intelligence.

Odaily星球日报4m ago

The First Encyclical of the New Pope in Rome, to Save the Common People in the AI Era

Odaily星球日报4m ago

On-chain Analyst: Why Are Most Zcash Transactions Still Traceable?

Title: Why Most Zcash Transactions Remain Traceable Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency launched in 2016, was designed to offer anonymity by hiding transaction details like sender, receiver, and amount using zero-knowledge proof technology (zk-SNARKs). However, in practice, a significant portion of ZEC transactions are still traceable on-chain. The key reason is Zcash's dual-address system. It features transparent addresses (t-addresses), which work like standard Bitcoin addresses with all data public, and shielded addresses (z-addresses) that encrypt transaction details. There are four transaction types with varying privacy levels: fully transparent (t→t), partially shielded (t→z and z→t), and fully private (z→z). Despite its privacy capabilities, most real-world Zcash activity involves transparent addresses, primarily because major exchanges and institutions use them for regulatory compliance. As a result, blockchain analytics platforms like Arkham can track and attribute a substantial volume of Zcash transactions. Arkham reports it has identified entities behind over $420 billion in ZEC transaction volume. Case studies highlight this traceability: the U.S. government holds seized Zcash from a dark web case, visible via its transparent wallet, and individual traders' profitable moves are trackable from purchase to exchange deposit. In conclusion, Zcash's privacy is not inherent but user-dependent. While purely shielded (z→z) transactions remain cryptographically private, the prevalence of transparent address usage makes much of the network's activity traceable. The actual privacy protection offered depends entirely on how users choose to transact.

marsbit50m ago

On-chain Analyst: Why Are Most Zcash Transactions Still Traceable?

marsbit50m ago

From Power Infrastructure to Token Economy: The 'Seven-Layer Cake' of the AI Industry Chain

From Power Grid to Token Economy: The AI Industry's "Seven-Layer Cake" The AI industry is shifting from a "model-centric" paradigm focused on massive training to a "token-centric" industrial era driven by inference demand. This new phase revolves around the production, distribution, scheduling, and consumption of tokens—the units of computation used by AI agents for every interaction and task. The article proposes a "seven-layer cake" framework for the AI economy: 1. **Power**: The foundational energy source, with competition shifting to securing stable, low-cost electricity. 2. **AIDC (AI Data Centers)**: Large-scale "Token factories." A trend toward smaller, modular, and regionally deployed AI Factories is emerging for efficiency and proximity to users. 3. **GPU**: The core production hardware for tokens. While NVIDIA dominates, competition exists from AMD, ASIC makers, and Chinese chipmakers, with a growing focus on inference efficiency. 4. **LLMs**: The "engines" that generate tokens. The competition is evolving beyond model size to prioritize factors like token cost, inference efficiency, and operational synergy with infrastructure. 5. **Token Distribution**: The "grid" that allocates and rents out compute resources, led by cloud giants and specialized AI-native platforms. 6. **Token Optimization & Intelligent Scheduling**: The critical "brain" layer that intelligently routes tasks (e.g., to local, cloud, or edge models) for optimal cost, latency, and privacy—maximizing the value of each token. 7. **AI Agents & Models**: The end consumers of tokens. The vision involves billions of AI agents working and interacting concurrently, consuming vast amounts of tokens. Currently, the industry faces fragmentation and inefficiencies between these layers. The true "mass adoption era" of AI will begin only when this seven-layer infrastructure is fully integrated and operates as a cohesive, intelligent network—transforming AI from a software tool into a global industrial system spanning energy, hardware, and compute logistics.

marsbit1h ago

From Power Infrastructure to Token Economy: The 'Seven-Layer Cake' of the AI Industry Chain

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片