反弹还是牛市?

币市操盘手Published on 2022-03-30Last updated on 2022-03-30

Abstract

随着美联储3月份加息正式落地,加密市场终于迎来了本年度最强劲的反弹。

随着美联储3月份加息正式落地,加密市场终于迎来了本年度最强劲的反弹。3月28日,在比特币成功突破重压位45000的提振下,低位主流币和山寨币纷纷开启暴涨模式,市场压抑已久的多头情绪全面爆发,市场赚钱效应应大幅改善。而随着行情的逐渐回暖,市场成交量快速回升。CoinMarketCap数据显示,加密市场3月28日的交易量为1051亿美元,环比增长56%,刷新了2022年单日成交量的新高。那么,在连续低迷了4个月之后,市场是否迎来了真正的牛市回归?

前面提到,美联储加息的不确定性因素落地和俄乌战争带来的逆全球化影响是本轮反弹的主要驱动力。特别是在俄罗斯能源委员会主席帕维尔.扎瓦尔尼宣布接受比特币用于能源支付之后,去中心化、稳定安全且交易摩擦极小的比特币获得了空前的关注,这是本轮反弹最重要的导火索。因为一旦接受比特币支付,这意味着俄罗斯间接承认了比特币作为货币的合法地位。同时比特币还可能被俄罗斯央行以外汇储备的方式纳入资产负债表。显然,俄罗斯在比特币支付上的试水无疑为长期被西方金融制裁的国家提供了新的出路,这也使得比特币未来的想象空间进一步被打开。

作为资金流向重要的风向标,链上的数据变化一直是判断行情走势的参考依据之一。在前面的文章中,笔者也根据链上的变化,给大家总结了三条看多的依据:一、在过去调整的3个月里,持币数量前100名的巨鲸虽然名单发生变化,但是持仓占比在过去一个月里仅减少了0.2%,这说明了超级巨鲸依然对市场保持控盘的状态;二、在35000-45000反复震荡的过程中,选择清仓的大多数比特币地址的持仓成本都在47200美元以上,且持币时间基本都低于155天,这说明了下跌的动能主要来自短线客割肉。三、BTC和ETH在3月15日之后开始连续流出交易所,且链上多个巨鲸开始逐渐恢复增持的动作。“一”、“二”已经反复分析过这里就不再赘述,但在提到“三”时,笔者曾在3月17日的文章中预言,产业资本的增持可能已经在路上。而从最近公布的信息来看,市场确实出现一个超级买家,那就是Terra生态发展组织LunaFoundationGuard(LFG)。

据彭博社报道,TerraformLabs首席执行官Dokwon披露,自1月底以来,LFG已购买了超过10亿美元的比特币。单3月28日,LFG就豪掷1.3亿美元增持了2830枚比特币。目前,LFG的比特币钱包余额增至27785枚BTC。按照Terra创始人的计划,LFG未来比特币储备目标约为100亿美元,这意味着LFG仍将通过二级市场购入约87亿美元的比特币。如果LFG的储备计划能够最终实现,那么LFG将成为仅次于灰度的比特币吸金兽。

尽管市场利好接踵而至,但到目前为止,笔者依然认为本轮上涨只是超跌反弹而并非反转。因为相比5月份的50个基点和缩表,三月份的25个基点只是本轮紧缩的热身运动而已。近期,随着第二次加息的临近,美国十年期国债的收益率开始大幅飙,加息和缩表对流动性的影响仍没有完成被市场反映。而从历史的经验来看,无风险利率快速上行最终都会引发风险资产剧烈波动。此外,就在流动性即将转入紧缩周期的大背景下,美联储主动下调美国经济增速和美债收益出现倒挂的现象也使市场对美国经济即将陷入衰退产生了极大的担忧。总之,5月份的月份,规避风险的最好办法就是减仓并学会等待。

在3月份上线的众多新币中,拥有BYBC无聊猿背书的ApeCoin格外引人瞩目。这也使得APE一经发布便被一众交易所争先抢上,二级市场的币价更是一度达到20美元一枚,并以56亿美元的流通市值超越MANA,成为元宇宙头号霸主。就在市场还在为每个NFT对应10万美元的空投津津乐道的同时,BoredApeYachtClub高调地公布了无聊猿IP的元宇宙战略,而此次代币空投和土地空投都是为后面的链游计划做准备。关于APE是否具有投资价值的问题,市场一直存在诸多争议,笔者在这里谈谈自己的看法。

从经济模型的设计来看,Apecoin更像是一个创始团队躲在幕后的流量变现游戏。首先,APE本质上是DAO组织的治理代币,代币的数量直接与投票权的占比挂钩,但社区作为项目发展的主要贡献者却只获得治理代币总发行量的15%,权力分配并不合理。所以,空投的主要目的不是为了回馈社区用户和分散权力,而是既得利益群体为项目提供早期流动性的必要步骤。其次,项目运营方为ApeDao,研发的外包方为游戏开发商AnimocaBrand等,YugaLabs既不是发币方,也没有直接参与社区的运营和元宇宙生态的研发,却获得与社区一样获得15%的代币分配,这不禁让人怀疑,YugaLabs便是ApeCoin幕后的策划者,而DAO治理框架和社区赠予代币的说辞,很可能就是YugaLabs规避了SEC的监管风险和撇清运营责任的手段。

当前,无聊猿的NFT总市值约为30亿美元,APE代币的流通市值为40亿美元,这意味着Ape元宇宙生态的估值,已经超过无聊猿IP的价值。然而,到目前为止,ApeDao仅仅完成发币的第一步,还没开始做事便获得如此之高的估值溢价,高估值早已透支了未来的成长空间。众所周知,上一个如此高调的项目OpenDao仅存活了3周就开始走向崩溃。所以在早期阶段,笔者并不建议大家去追高APE,特别在是在风险偏好下行的市场环境中,几乎99%的次新币最终都会有估值修正的过程。

从当前的时点来看,反弹行情无疑已经进入了下半场(最佳反弹时间窗口为3月下旬-4月上旬),而下半场应该做的事情便是逐渐逢高兑现。如果本周的成交量仍维持在1000亿美元附近无法继续上台阶,那么笔者倾向于认为本轮反弹的主升浪基本结束,而接下来的行情大概率只剩下修修补补的机会。在下半场的行情中,行情将从普涨走向分化,除了储存、DEFI、元宇宙等前期超跌的板块仍有继续发酵的机会,大部分币种或将逐渐转入震荡走势。

Related Reads

Miners Advised Not to Buy GPUs for AI and to Focus on Infrastructure

A founder at an energy investment forum advises bitcoin miners not to purchase GPUs for AI themselves, but to instead focus on infrastructure like power and data center space. Mike Alfred of Alpine Fox stated that while AI infrastructure demand is a long-term, 20-30 year trend, it presents a key choice for miners. The first, riskier model involves owning and operating GPUs, which requires financing expensive hardware that quickly becomes obsolete. The second, more conservative model is akin to real estate: providing colocation services where clients bring their own servers, and the miner sells space, power, cooling, and water. Alfred noted this model is easier to finance. Most existing bitcoin mining sites are difficult and expensive to convert for AI, as AI data centers require far higher construction costs, redundant fiber connections, backup power, complex cooling, and near 100% uptime. A hybrid model, where mining acts as a flexible load to use excess power during AI data center construction or from generation facilities, was discussed. However, participants concluded this is only viable with very cheap power; otherwise, developers are better off focusing solely on AI. Miners are increasingly being evaluated for their available power capacity and project portfolios rather than just bitcoin output. Panelists also warned of risks in the AI sector, predicting at least one major default or contract breach among AI tenants, lenders, or landlords before bitcoin's next halving in 2028.

cryptonews.ru5m ago

Miners Advised Not to Buy GPUs for AI and to Focus on Infrastructure

cryptonews.ru5m ago

Millisecond 'Pay-to-Cut': How Did Hyperliquid's Priority Fee Turn into a Multi-Million Dollar Business?

"Millisecond 'Paid Queue-Jumping': How Hyperliquid's Priority Fee Became a Multi-Million Dollar Annual Business" In traditional finance, high-frequency trading firms spend millions on infrastructure for millisecond advantages. Hyperliquid has translated this race onto the blockchain with its "Priority Fee" system, creating an open economic game for speed. This system auctions two types of priority: **Gossip Priority** for faster data feeds (via a Dutch auction every 3 minutes), and **Order Priority** for front-of-queue trade execution (users bid a fee for lower latency). This converts a hardware race into a transparent, market-priced mechanism. Since launch, this feature has generated over $5M in protocol revenue. Projected annualized buybacks from this income exceed $30M, accounting for ~7% of total protocol revenue. The demand stems from large traders and market makers on Hyperliquid, for whom milliseconds can mean the difference between profit/loss or avoiding liquidation. Market makers pay these fees as "protection" to ensure their orders execute first, which in turn improves liquidity for all users. Crucially, Hyperliquid internalizes Maximum Extractable Value (MEV) that typically leaks to external validators or searchers, creating a new revenue stream beyond trading fees. The mechanism also strengthens HYPE's tokenomics. While 97% of trading fees fund secondary market buybacks (via the Assistance Fund), Priority Fees are **directly burned**, adding a second deflationary engine. Furthermore, fees for order priority are deducted from users' undelegated HYPE balances, encouraging large traders to hold and lock up tokens, reducing circulating supply. However, a key challenge remains: balancing the speed needs of institutional players with fair market access for retail users, as those who cannot pay high fees may suffer worse slippage during volatility. In summary, Hyperliquid's Priority Fee is a novel model that monetizes latency, captures MEV for the protocol, and enhances its native token's value through burning and lock-ups.

marsbit10m ago

Millisecond 'Pay-to-Cut': How Did Hyperliquid's Priority Fee Turn into a Multi-Million Dollar Business?

marsbit10m ago

The Truth Behind Digital Banking: The Fragile Ecosystem Supporting 1.46 Billion Users

The article "The Truth About Digital Banks: The Fragile Ecosystem Behind 1.46 Billion Users" provides a data-driven analysis of the digital banking sector based on a verified list of 368 active neobanks as of July 2026. While these platforms collectively serve 1.46 billion users, with Asia (817 million users) and institutions like WeBank and Nubank dominating the landscape, the sector faces significant structural vulnerabilities. A key finding is that only 127 of the 368 neobanks hold full banking licenses. The majority operate atop third-party infrastructure providers like Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS) platforms, creating systemic risk where the failure of a single provider, as seen in past cases like Wirecard and Synapse, can jeopardize multiple consumer brands. Furthermore, the industry experiences a steady, quiet stream of failures, mergers, and shutdowns that often go unreported. The analysis also examines the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI), finding only 67 platforms (18%) have deployed AI at scale, with many innovators based in emerging markets like Nigeria and the Philippines. The infrastructure layer is highly concentrated, with 106 providers supporting the entire ecosystem of 368 consumer-facing brands. The article concludes with three predictions: the unlicensed gap will close through acquisitions or exits; an AI credit model is likely to fail in the next economic downturn; and a nascent but significant trend is the emergence of financial services designed for AI agents rather than humans.

marsbit25m ago

The Truth Behind Digital Banking: The Fragile Ecosystem Supporting 1.46 Billion Users

marsbit25m ago

Digital Asset Trading Platform Uphold Cuts 17% of Global Workforce Amid 'Crypto Winter'

Cryptocurrency trading platform Uphold has laid off approximately 17% of its global workforce, affecting 85 full-time employees and contractors. The cuts are part of a strategic shift to reallocate resources towards its rapidly growing corporate services business, as retail cryptocurrency trading activity has declined amid the ongoing market downturn. CEO Simon McLaughlin stated the company is restructuring after years of significant growth and remains confident in the long-term prospects of digital assets and blockchain technology. Founded in 2015, Uphold offers trading and custody services for cryptocurrencies, fiat, stocks, and precious metals. It has recently expanded to provide infrastructure for banks, fintech firms, and broker-dealers to integrate crypto services. The layoffs occur against a backdrop of a prolonged crypto market slump, with total market capitalization falling to around $2.1 trillion by Q2 2024. Factors include weakened trading volumes, reduced retail participation, interest rate hikes, geopolitical uncertainty, and net outflows from U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs. Uphold clarified it is not shutting down its UK operations or any international offices. The company highlighted strong growth in its corporate platform and announced plans to evolve its consumer app into a broader blockchain-based financial assistant by 2026, offering U.S. stocks, tokenized securities, lending, credit cards, and DeFi yield opportunities.

cryptonews.ru25m ago

Digital Asset Trading Platform Uphold Cuts 17% of Global Workforce Amid 'Crypto Winter'

cryptonews.ru25m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片