火必周刊（2.13-2.19）

火币资讯Published on 2023-02-20Last updated on 2023-02-20

Abstract

上周不容错过的新闻速览，本周事件抢先一览。

上周不容错过的新闻如下：

⠀

1. 关键词：火必、BLUR、GFT、IGU、SUDO

火必已于2023年2月15日02:30 (GMT+8)开放BLUR (Blur)现货交易(BLUR/USDT)和网格交易(BLUR/USDT)。

火必已于2023年2月15日20:00 (GMT+8)开放GFT (Gifto)现货交易(GFT/USDT)和网格交易(GFT/USDT)。

火必已于2023年2月17日20:00(GMT+8)开放IGU (IguVerse)现货交易(IGU /USDT)和网格交易(IGU /USDT)。

火必已于2023年2月19日19:00(GMT+8)开放SUDO (Sudoswap)现货交易(SUDO/USDT)和网格交易(SUDO/USDT)。

2. 关键词：美国证券交易委员会、Paxos、Binance

美国证券交易委员会已告知加密货币公司Paxos Trust Co.，计划起诉该公司违反投资者保护法。 据知情人士称，美国SEC的执法人员向Paxos发出了一封名为“韦尔斯通知（Wellsnotice）”的信函，称Paxos发行和上架的数字资产BinanceUSD（BUSD）是一种未注册的证券。

2 月 13 日，Paxos 宣布将结束与 Binance 在品牌稳定币 BUSD 上的合作关系。自 2 月 21 日起，Paxos 将根据纽约金融服务部 (NYDFS) 的指示停止发行新的 BUSD，并与 NYDFS 密切合作。

3.关键词：香港、代币化绿色债券

2月16日香港宣布，在政府绿色债券计划（绿债计划）下成功发售8亿港元的代币化绿色债券（代币化绿色债券）。这是全球首批由政府发行的代币化绿色债券。

4. 关键词：美联储、加快加息步伐

美联储梅斯特表示，通胀出现更多的意外上升将使得美联储的货币政策更加激进；可能需要一年的时间才能看到加息的全面影响；必须提高债务上限，美国不能出现债务违约；需要将峰值利率推高至5%以上才能实现通胀目标；如果情况允许，美联储可以加快加息步伐。

5. 关键词：加拿大证券管理局、收紧运营加密货币交易所的要求

据两位了解该计划的人士透露，本月晚些时候，加拿大证券管理局 (CSA) 将收紧对该国运营的加密货币交易所的要求。CSA 在去年中旬宣布，它要求在加拿大运营的未注册加密交易平台在寻求注册时做出某些合规“承诺”。CSA 拒绝讨论预注册承诺 (PRU)制度的更新，但表示将“在不久的将来公布更多细节”。

6. 关键词：索罗斯基金、增加加密货币投资

比推消息，对冲基金巨头乔治·索罗斯 (George Soros) 的投资工具索罗斯基金管理公司 (Soros Fund Management) 似乎在去年年底之前增加了对一些加密货币公司的投资，尽管交易的性质尚不明朗。根据12 月 31 日向美国证券交易委员会 (SEC) 提交的 13F 文件，Soros基金管理公司购买了价值 3960 万美元的加密矿商 Marathon Digital Holdings (MARA) 的可转换债券。可转换债券是公司发行的一种长期债务，可在指定时间段后转换为股票。

7. 关键词：NFT Gaming、IPO

数字游戏开发公司NFT Gaming宣布已获准在纳斯达克资本市场上市其普通股，交易代码为NFTG，首次公开发行1,686,747股普通股，定价为每股普通股4.15美元，总收益约为700万美元。

8. 关键词：俄罗斯、区块链使用合法化

俄罗斯杜马议会今日通过了编号为221502-8的法案，即将进入委员会审议阶段。

据了解，该法案于2022年10月提交，旨在让金融市场参与者将他们的业务与区块链平台结合起来。该法案一旦成为法律，将使区块链的使用合法化。

据Bitcoin Magazine表示，俄罗斯政府计划为西伯利亚的比特币矿工提供税收优惠。此外，俄罗斯央行刚刚表示“准备好允许”比特币和加密货币的国际贸易关系。

9. 关键词：FTX、出售部分资产

FTX 已获得法院批准出售部分所投资产与子公司。FTX 清算人于 1 月 18 日提交了一项动议，其中表示一些被投资方表达了回购 FTX 权益的强烈动机，以促进从其他投资者那里筹集更多资金。美国特拉华州破产法院于 2 月 13 日批准了该动议，授权出售或转让与 FTX 的总资产基数相比「相对最低价值」的某些资产。

10. 关键词：Blur、空投

Blur 通过空投提供了 3.6 亿个 BLUR 代币，这些流通供应使该代币的当前市值约为 2.17 亿美元。然而，它在 BLUR 总供应量中所占比例相对较小，一旦所有代币发行，显然总计 30 亿个 BLUR。到目前为止，已经认领了近 2.6 亿个空投代币，约占 72%。BLUR 今天首次上市时曾飙升至每个代币 5.02 美元，但随后大幅下跌。它目前比那个短暂的峰值下跌了 88%。据Dune数据，BLUR 空投的最高申领者获得了超过 320 万个 BLUR 代币，根据 CoinGecko 当前每个代币约 0.60 美元的价格计算，价值约 193万美元。

本周事件提醒：
1.2月21日（周二）Coinbase公布2022年营收；

2.2月23日（周四），美联储公布2月货币政策会议纪要；

3.2月23日（周四），FOMC永久票委、纽约联储主席威廉姆斯就遏制通胀问题发表讲话；

4.2月23日（周四），美国四季度个人消费支出(PCE)年化季环比修正值；

5.2月24日（周五），克利夫兰联储主席梅斯特和美联储理事杰斐就通胀发表讲话；
6.2月24日（周五），ETHDenver大会将在卡罗拉多举办。

Related Reads

Which Companies Has NVIDIA's "Three-Track Investment Architecture" Invested In?

NVIDIA's investment strategy operates through a "three-track architecture," not just its NVentures venture arm. Corporate Development handles massive strategic bets (e.g., $30B in OpenAI, $10B in Anthropic, $20B in Synopsys). NVentures, a small team, focuses on early-stage, financial investments across sectors like quantum computing (Alice & Bob, PsiQuantum), AI infrastructure (OpenRouter, Tensormesh), and biotech. The NVIDIA Inception accelerator provides non-monetary support. This system allows NVIDIA to nurture startups and lock in strategic partners, creating a vast AI ecosystem. This aggressive capital deployment has drawn scrutiny. Critics like Michael Burry and EU regulators question potential "circular financing," where NVIDIA's equity investments in companies (e.g., CoreWeave, OpenAI) facilitate those companies' purchases of NVIDIA hardware, potentially inflating revenue. Supporters view it as a necessary "virtuous cycle" to secure supply and demand in a compute-scarce market. While NVentures' smaller deals appear like traditional VC, its role within the larger, controversial investment framework remains a point of debate.

marsbit6m ago

Which Companies Has NVIDIA's "Three-Track Investment Architecture" Invested In?

marsbit6m ago

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbit8m ago

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbit8m ago

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbit38m ago

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbit38m ago

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

In 2026, the crypto industry is undergoing a profound infrastructure-level transformation—TradFi assets are migrating on-chain at an unprecedented pace. According to CoinGecko's Q1 2026 report, the total value locked (TVL) of tokenized real-world assets (RWA) has surpassed $31 billion, a nearly 4x increase from $7.8 billion at the beginning of 2025, with the sector’s aggregate market capitalization reaching $19.3 billion. Among these, the market cap of tokenized stocks surged from $2 million to $486 million, with Q1 spot trading volume reaching $15.1 billion—a single quarter already surpassing the entire second half of 2025. RWA perpetual contract Q1 trading volume reached a staggering $524.8 billion, far exceeding the $313 billion for all of 2025. Meanwhile, BlackRock's BUIDL fund has reached $2.3 billion in scale and has filed for two new tokenized funds, signaling that the world's largest asset manager's tokenization strategy is evolving from pilot to product suite expansion. HTX, as a core participant in the crypto exchange sector, officially launched TradFi perpetual futures products including NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, META, and SPY in 2026, enabling crypto users to gain 24/7 trading access to core U.S. equities. Boston Consulting Group predicts that global tokenized asset scale could reach $16 trillion by 2030, while McKinsey offers a conservative estimate of approximately $2 trillion. The on-chain migration of TradFi assets is no longer a "future narrative" but a structural transformation unfolding in real time, as crypto exchanges evolve from single crypto asset trading platforms toward "multi-asset-class trading infrastructure."

HTX Learn40m ago

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

HTX Learn40m ago

Blockchain Association Urges Senate To Pass CLARITY Act With Letter Backed By 160 Ex-Officials

The Blockchain Association, along with 160 former national security and law enforcement officials, has urged Senate leaders to pass the CLARITY Act. They argue that without clear federal regulation, crypto activity will move to opaque offshore markets, hindering U.S. efforts to combat financial crime. The letter highlights that the Act would strengthen law enforcement by expanding anti-money laundering and sanctions requirements under the Bank Secrecy Act, improving information sharing between agencies like the Treasury, DOJ, and FBI, and enhancing oversight of digital asset kiosks with measures like transaction monitoring and fraud prevention. The Association emphasizes these are enforcement enhancements, not deregulation. Momentum for the bill is building, with a Senate vote expected this summer, though it would still need reconciliation with a previously passed House version.

bitcoinist47m ago

Blockchain Association Urges Senate To Pass CLARITY Act With Letter Backed By 160 Ex-Officials

bitcoinist47m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片