Circle:Sluggish Market? The Top Stablecoin Stock Continues to Expand

链捕手Pubblicato 2026-05-12Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-12

Introduzione

Circle, the issuer of the stablecoin USDC, reported its Q1 2026 earnings on May 11th, Eastern Time. Against a backdrop of weak crypto market sentiment, USDC's average circulation in Q1 was $752 billion, with a modest 2% sequential increase to $770 billion by quarter-end. New minting volumes declined due to the poor crypto market, but remained high, indicating demand expansion beyond crypto trading. USDC's market share remained stable at 28% of the total stablecoin market, while competition from Tether's USDT persists. A key highlight was "Other Revenue," which reached $42 million, more than doubling year-over-year, though sequential growth slowed to 13%. This revenue stream, including fees from services like Web3 software, the Cipher payment network (CPN), and the Arc blockchain, is critical for diversifying away from interest income. Circle's internally held USDC share increased to 18%, helping to improve gross margin by 130 basis points to 41.4% by reducing external sharing costs. However, profitability was pressured as total revenue growth slowed, primarily due to the significant weight of interest income, which is tied to USDC规模 and Treasury rates. Adjusted EBITDA was $133 million with a 19.2% margin. Management maintained its full-year 2026 guidance for adjusted operating expenses ($570-$585 million) and other revenue ($150-$170 million). The long-term target for USDC's CAGR remains 40%, though near-term volatility is expected. The article concludes that while Circle...

Author: Dolphin Research

On May 11th Eastern Time before the market opened, Circle, the top stablecoin stock, released its first-quarter 2026 earnings.

It is important to clarify that since the scale of USDC and the interest rates on reserve assets are publicly known, about 95% of interest income is essentially predetermined. Therefore, most of the time, Circle's stock price fluctuations follow changes in USDC market capitalization, which are fundamentally tied to factors like expectations for interest rate cuts and changes in crypto asset policies.

The unexpected information that can be interpreted from the earnings report lies in other non-interest income, the company's internal operational efficiency, and the medium to long-term strategic goals reflected in the guidance.

Overall, the highlight of the first quarter remains on "Other Revenue," which the market primarily focuses on in the earnings report, reflecting the steady expansion trend of the USDC ecosystem beyond cryptocurrency scenarios. However, the rigid investments required for this ecosystem expansion will also bring significant volatility and pressure to Circle's short-term profitability.

Details are as follows:

1. Ecosystem Layout: Same Old Script, Crypto Investments Under Pressure, New Scenarios Continue to Expand

(1) Average USDC circulation in Q1 was $75.2 billion. After hitting a bottom in February, it slowly climbed to nearly $77 billion by the end of the quarter despite unfavorable geopolitical frictions, up 2% quarter-over-quarter, similar to last quarter. Newly minted USDC in the quarter was $73 billion, down sequentially, affected by the dismal crypto asset market performance in Q1. However, excluding this impact, minting volume remained at a high level, reflecting the expansion of demand scenarios beyond crypto asset investments.

Meanwhile, redemptions were $72 billion, with faster year-over-year growth, reflecting some users cashing out profits or shifting to other interest-bearing products amid pressure in the crypto asset market.

The ratio of competitor USDT's scale to USDC fell in January but quickly recovered in the following two months. Therefore, from a competitive perspective, USDT still poses a significant competitive threat. After the Drift hacking incident in April, public sentiment turned against Circle, while Tether actively provided real financial assistance to Drift, causing Circle to lose some customers.

We are still in the early stages of growing the overall stablecoin pie, so competition is not yet a major factor affecting USDC's growth.

(2) Distribution within the USDC ecosystem: The share held within Circle increased further to 18%, with the average daily retention ratio also at 17.2%. Over the past year, this has increased quarter by quarter from 6% to the current level. At the same time, the external sharing ratio of reserve interest income decreased slightly by 1 percentage point, with potential for further optimization to enhance profitability.Coinbase accounted for nearly 25%, showing a trend of active retention compared to last quarter.

(3) As of the end of Q1, the number of digital wallets (MeWs, crypto wallets holding more than $10 on-chain) reached 7.2 million, with a net increase of 400,000 sequentially in the quarter, exceeding market expectations and reflecting growth in the platform's direct user base.

(4) In terms of ecosystem expansion news, Q1 mainly involved partnerships with Cash App, Polymarket, and Kyriba (platforms supporting native USDC transactions), while also advancing the Arc blockchain and the scale of CPN transactions.

Total on-chain USDC transactions in Q1 reached $21.5 trillion, up 263% year-over-year. CPN annualized transaction volume based on March was $8.3 billion. In April, the new product Managed Payments was launched, allowing financial institutions to enable stablecoin payments without managing digital assets.

2. Revenue Has Highlights But Less Impressive Than Last Quarter: Non-Interest Revenue Performance Exceeds Expectations, But Sequential Growth Slows.

The aforementioned B2B ecosystem expansion also brings Circle revenue beyond reserve interest – recorded under "Other Revenue." Therefore, in addition to helping expand the USDC market, this is also a second growth curve Circle is developing to counter pressure from reserve interest growth during a potential rate-cutting cycle.

Other revenue in Q1 reached $42 million. Although still a small proportion (6%), it still achieved double-digit year-over-year growth despite a higher base. However, looking at the trend, the sequential growth rate of 13% slowed compared to last quarter's 29%, making it less impressive than last quarter.

3. Gross Margin: Increased Retention Share Buffers Cost-Sharing Pressure

The market previously worried that while expanding its ecosystem, Circle would need to share reserve interest income with partners. Additionally, Coinbase's earnings report revealed its rising share of USDC, which could increase Circle's channel distribution costs and pressure gross margins.

The reality is that Circle continues to alleviate cost growth pressure by increasing its own share of USDC holdings. Among these, the cost paid to Coinbase as a share of the total cost-sharing expense is decreasing (from 97% to 75%). It's worth noting that Coinbase, having the most leverage in its partnership with Circle, also has the highest revenue-sharing ratio at 50%.

Furthermore, software, payments, and other infrastructure service revenues within Other Revenue are mostly high-margin businesses. This quarter, growth in other businesses was faster, and their contribution to revenue also increased. The final gross margin was 41.4%, improving by 130 basis points sequentially.

4. Under Rigid Investment Cycle, Profit Under Pressure: Operating Profit Declined Significantly Year-over-Year, Also Due to the Sensitivity of Profit to Changes in the Large-Share Interest Income Under Rigid Investment Cycles.

However, in the Q1 earnings report, management maintained its guidance for the 2026 fiscal year, keeping the full-year adjusted operating expense range unchanged at $570-585 million, better than the market's higher investment expectation ($725 million).

5. Future Growth: Guidance Unchanged, Short-Term Volatility Warrants Caution

(1) Regarding the outlook for USDC scale growth over multiple years, Q1 management maintained its expectation of a 40% CAGR over multiple years. However, similar to last quarter, Dolphin Research believes caution should be exercised and immediate pricing in is not necessary: Given significant market changes, this can be temporarily overlooked. Based on last year's situation, this medium-to-long-term qualitative guidance does not guarantee short-term achievement.

(2) Other revenue also maintains a target of $150-170 million, representing 46% year-over-year growth. If simply annualizing Q1, it's $167 million, right within the target range. However, Dolphin Research believes that with the effective advancement of the CLARITY Act, there is still great potential for this guidance to be beaten.

6. Key Financial Metrics Overview

Dolphin Research's View

Q1 performance is similar to a "strengthened" version of last year's Q4 – sentiment for crypto asset trading cooled further, but Circle did not stop expanding into other scenarios, resulting in even greater short-term profit pressure.

Although Coinbase and Circle belong to different parts of the industry chain, and the impact during unfavorable crypto asset market conditions differs for both (Circle is less affected), and there is also the issue of profit-sharing between them, in the short term, their trading rhythms largely move in tandem in terms of the broader direction.

Therefore, last quarter, we focused on a safety-first price given crypto asset pressure and unclear policy timelines. This quarter, we are more inclined to assess how much upside recovery space remains. The current valuation of $28 billion corresponds to Dolphin Research's neutral expectation from its initial coverage last year (refer toCoinbase vs Circle: Who Dominates in the Symbiotic Yet Cutthroat Stablecoin Arena?).

However, given significant short-term volatility, we estimate based on this year's performance outlook:

Assuming for the remaining three quarters of this year, crypto asset market conditions stabilize but last year's bull run may not be replicated due to inflation and interest rate expectations. Therefore, we project stablecoin scale to grow 5% sequentially (QoQ growth from Q2 to Q3 last year was 12%), reaching $870 billion by year-end. Assuming an unchanged federal funds rate of 3.5%, total annual interest income would be $2.8 billion. Other revenue is expected to exceed the upper guidance limit of $170 million, resulting in total revenue of $3 billion, a 9% year-over-year increase.

With a gross margin of 42% and guided adjusted operating expenses midpoint of $580 million, adjusted operating profit would be $680 million. Yesterday's closing price**** (***Locked content and detailed valuation analysis have been published in the article of the same name in the "Dynamics - In-Depth" section of the Longbridge App).

In summary, Circle's current valuation has largely completed a reasonable recovery process. The opening of further upside depends on the expansion progress of stablecoins and USDC specifically. In the short term, the effective advancement of the CLARITY Act, barring more systemic macro risks, could provide some positive sentiment, supporting the current valuation.

Detailed Analysis Below

I. Circle's Basic Business Framework

Circle is the issuer of the stablecoin USDC. Its primary revenue comes from: (1) Interest on reserve assets, which is tied to the circulating supply of USDC and Treasury interest rates. (2) Other revenue, including fees from providing Web3 software (SaaS subscriptions), CPN payments (fees based on transaction amount/number), and service or gas fees from the Arc blockchain (charged per transaction).

To mitigate the impact of potential interest rate cuts, Circle is actively developing its other revenue streams. In 2025, it primarily advanced CPN payments and the Arc blockchain business. Currently, other revenue accounts for nearly 5% and is expected to accelerate growth and expand its scale.

On the expense side, Circle's internal operational costs are mainly employee compensation. External costs primarily consist of channel sharing and transaction costs, which account for about 60% of revenue (most going to Coinbase). The adjusted EBITDA margin, after adding back depreciation and stock-based compensation, is around 20%, lower than most fintech platforms. Therefore, while expanding the ecosystem, expectations of increased cost-sharing have led some investors to worry about Circle's short-term profit pressure.

From a medium to long-term perspective, ecosystem expansion is more critical. Currently, USDC ranks second in the overall stablecoin market. Compared to the leader USDT, its advantage lies in compliance. Once the CLARITY Act is enacted, USDC is expected to further leverage its "relative" advantage and attract more institutional capital.

II. USDC Ecosystem: Accelerating New Minting, Short-Term Impacted by Crypto Asset Pressure

Average USDC circulation in Q1 was $75.2 billion, down sequentially, but climbed to $77 billion by quarter-end, up 2% sequentially. Minting in the quarter was $73 billion, redemptions were $72 billion. Net new issuance slowed significantly compared to Q3. According to Coinmarketcap, USDC circulation balance plummeted rapidly in January amid a panic sell-off in crypto assets, only rebounding in early February.

1. USDC External Market Share

In the overall stablecoin market, USDC's share remained stable sequentially at 28%. Compared to its direct competitor USDT, USDC has not demonstrated sustained competitive advantage.

2. Internal Channel Competition for USDC

Regarding the distribution of USDC across different channels, the share held internally by Circle continued to increase, reaching 18%.

Based on Coinbase's Q1 earnings report disclosure, its share of USDC circulation increased sequentially to 25%, indicating a trend of active retention compared to last quarter.

Another core metric reflecting ecosystem development – the number of active digital wallets. As of the end of Q1, the number of digital wallet MeWs (crypto wallets holding more than $10 on-chain) reached 7.2 million, a net sequential increase of 400,000, which is speculated to have continued slowing due to pressure in the crypto market.

III. Other Revenue Continues to Exceed Expectations, But the Trend is Not Aggressive Enough

Since about 95% of Circle's revenue from reserve asset interest is essentially public information, the main source of expectation variance is other revenue, and Q1 performance continued to exceed expectations.

Specifically, other revenue primarily includes income from minting, transactions, custody, Web3 API suite, tokenized fund USYC, and fees from CPN launched last April (fixed access fees + settlement/audit fees per transaction, Arc chain gas fees, etc.).

Other revenue in Q1 was $42 million, up 13% sequentially, showing a slowdown and was less impressive than last quarter. Additionally, the company's guidance for full-year other revenue remains at $150-170 million. From a sequential growth trend perspective, this is not particularly aggressive. Dolphin Research believes that if USDC expands normally, there is potential to beat this guidance.

The main revenue, which constitutes the majority, is affected by the pace of USDC expansion and the current Treasury rate environment. In Q1, the average USDC scale increased 70% year-over-year, while the interest rate dropped to 3.5%, down 64 basis points year-over-year. Ultimately, reserve interest revenue growth was 17%, slowing rapidly.

However, expectations for future rate cuts have basically fallen to zero. Therefore, with stable interest rates, if scale expands normally over the next three quarters (QoQ >5%), there is still hope for 5-10% growth for the full year despite year-over-year pressure from interest rates.

IV. Profit Under Pressure Amid Rigid Investments

Q1 gross margin increased by 130 basis points sequentially to 41.4%. Circle continues to alleviate channel cost-sharing pressure by increasing its share of USDC holdings. Additionally, software, payments, and other infrastructure service revenues are mostly high-margin businesses. This quarter, growth in other businesses was faster, and their revenue contribution also increased.

Despite slowing revenue growth pressure in Q1, various expense items still maintained high growth. Final adjusted EBITDA was $133 million, with a margin of 19.2%, up 50 basis points sequentially.

The company's guidance for full-year 2026 costs and operating expenses (excluding SBC and depreciation/amortization) remains unchanged at $570-585 million, representing 10% year-over-year growth, lower than market expectations.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat are Circle's two main sources of revenue as described in the article?

ACircle's two main sources of revenue are: 1) Interest income from reserve assets, which is tied to the circulating USDC scale and treasury rates. 2) Other income, which includes fees from Web3 software services (SaaS subscriptions), Circle Payment Network (CPN) transactions, and services or gas fees related to its Arc public chain.

QHow did Circle's 'Other Income' perform in Q1 2026, and why is this metric significant?

AIn Q1 2026, Circle's 'Other Income' reached $42 million, representing 6% of total revenue. It continued to double year-over-year, though its sequential growth rate of 13% slowed compared to the previous quarter's 29%. This metric is significant because it reflects the expansion of the USDC ecosystem into non-cryptocurrency use cases and serves as a potential 'second growth curve' for the company, especially as it aims to offset future pressure from declining interest income.

QWhat is the main competitive threat to USDC mentioned in the article, and what is the current state of that competition?

AThe main competitive threat to USDC mentioned is the rival stablecoin USDT (Tether). The article states that USDT's competitive threat 'remains significant.' While USDC maintained a 28% share of the overall stablecoin market, its share relative to USDT did not show a sustained competitive advantage. The competition is currently in the early stages of growing the overall stablecoin market, so it is not yet the primary factor limiting USDC's growth.

QWhat was the trend in USDC's internal channel distribution during Q1 2026, particularly regarding holdings by Circle and Coinbase?

ADuring Q1 2026, the proportion of USDC held within Circle's own ecosystem increased further to 18%, with a daily average retention rate of 17.2%. This has grown consistently from 6% over the past year. Meanwhile, based on Coinbase's quarterly report, its share of the circulating USDC also rose to nearly 25%, indicating an ongoing trend of active retention on that platform.

QWhat are the key factors the article's author (Dolphin Research) considers for Circle's future valuation and growth potential?

AThe author believes that Circle's current valuation is mostly reasonable after a correction. Future growth and valuation expansion depend on the pace of stablecoin and USDC adoption. In the short term, the effective advancement of the CLARITY Act could provide positive market sentiment to support the current valuation, assuming no major systemic macro risks. The author also notes that while management maintains a long-term USDC growth target (40% CAGR), investors should remain cautious as short-term performance may not immediately meet this qualitative guidance.

Letture associate

Borrowing Money from a Hundred Years Later, Building Incomprehensible AI

Tech giants like Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft are undergoing a radical financial transformation due to AI. Their traditional "light-asset, high-free-cash-flow" model is being dismantled by staggering capital expenditures on AI infrastructure—data centers, GPUs, and power. Combined 2026 guidance exceeds $700 billion, a 4.5x increase from 2022, causing free cash flow to plummet (e.g., Amazon's fell 95%). To fund this, they are borrowing unprecedented sums through long-dated, multi-currency bonds (e.g., Alphabet's 100-year bond). The world's most conservative capital—pensions, insurers—is now funding Silicon Valley's most speculative bet. This shift makes these companies resemble heavy-asset industrials (railroads, utilities) rather than software firms, threatening their premium valuations. Historically, such infrastructure booms (railroads, fiber optics) followed a pattern: genuine technology, overbuilding fueled by competitive frenzy, aggressive debt financing, and a crash triggered by financial conditions—not technology failure. The infrastructure remained, but many original builders and financiers did not survive. The core gamble is a "time arbitrage": using cheap debt today to build scale and lock in customers before AI capabilities commoditize. They are betting that AI revenue will materialize before debt comes due. Their positions vary: Amazon is under immediate cash pressure; Meta's path to monetization is unclear; Alphabet has a robust core business buffer; Microsoft has the shortest path from infrastructure to revenue. The contract is set: the most risk-averse global capital has lent its time to Silicon Valley, awaiting a future that is promised but uncertain.

marsbit23 min fa

Borrowing Money from a Hundred Years Later, Building Incomprehensible AI

marsbit23 min fa

The 'VVV' Concept Soars 9x in Half a Year, The New AI Narrative on Base Chain

"The article explores the 'VVV' concept as the new AI-focused narrative within the Base ecosystem, centered around the token $VVV of the privacy-focused, uncensored generative AI platform Venice, led by crypto veteran Erik Voorhees. Venice has seen significant growth in 2026, with its API users surging, partly attributed to exposure from OpenClaw. The platform now boasts over 2 million total users and 55,000 paid subscribers. Correspondingly, the $VVV token price has risen over 9x this year. Key to its performance are tokenomics designed for value accrual: reduced annual emissions, subscription revenue used for buyback-and-burn, and a unique staking mechanism. Staking $VVV yields $sVVV, which can be used to mint $DIEM tokens. Each staked $DIEM provides a daily $1 credit for using Venice's API services, creating tangible utility. The article also highlights other tokens associated with the 'VVV' narrative. $POD, the token of distributed AI network Dolphin (which co-developed Venice's default AI model), saw a massive price surge. $cyb3rwr3n, a project for a Venice credit auction market, gained attention due to perceived connections to Venice's team despite official denials. Finally, $SR of robotics platform STRIKEROBOT.AI rose after announcing a partnership with Venice for robot vision-language model development. Overall, the 'VVV' ecosystem combines AI platform growth, deflationary tokenomics, and innovative utility mechanisms, driving significant investor interest and price action in related tokens."

marsbit31 min fa

The 'VVV' Concept Soars 9x in Half a Year, The New AI Narrative on Base Chain

marsbit31 min fa

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

The pre-IPO stock token market is experiencing significant turmoil following strong statements from AI giants Anthropic and OpenAI. Both companies have updated their official policies, declaring that any transfer of their company shares—including sales, transfers, or assignments of share interests—without prior board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized in their corporate records. This means buyers in such unauthorized transactions would not be recognized as shareholders and would have no shareholder rights. A major point of contention is the use of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), which are legal entities commonly used by pre-IPO token platforms to pool investor funds and indirectly acquire shares from employees or early investors. The companies explicitly state they do not permit SPVs to acquire their shares, and any such transfer violates their restrictions. They warn that third parties selling shares through SPVs, direct sales, forward contracts, or stock tokens are likely engaged in fraud or are offering worthless investments due to these transfer limits. This stance directly threatens the core model of many pre-IPO token platforms, which rely on SPV structures. The announcement revealed additional risks within this model, such as complex "SPV-within-SPV" layering that obscures legal transparency, increases management fees, and creates a chain reaction risk of invalidation. Following the news, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). The market reaction highlights a divergence: while asset-backed pre-IPO tokens plummeted, purely speculative pre-IPO futures contracts, which are bilateral bets on future IPO prices with no claim to actual shares, remained relatively stable as they are unaffected by the transfer restrictions. The industry is split on the implications. Some believe the fundamental logic of pre-IPO token trading is broken if leading companies reject SPV-held shares, potentially causing a domino effect. Others, like Rivet founder Nick Abouzeid, argue that buyers of such unofficial tokens always knowingly accepted the risk of non-recognition by the company. The statements serve as a stark risk warning and a corrective measure for a market where valuations for some AI-related pre-IPO tokens had soared to irrational levels, far exceeding recent funding round valuations.

marsbit1 h fa

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

marsbit1 h fa

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

The pre-IPO token market has been rocked by strong statements from Anthropic and OpenAI. Both AI giants have updated official warnings, declaring that any sale or transfer of their company shares without explicit board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized on their corporate records. This directly targets Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), the common legal structure used by pre-IPO token platforms. These platforms typically use an SPV to acquire shares from employees or early investors, then issue blockchain-based tokens representing a claim on the SPV's economic benefits. Anthropic and OpenAI's position means that if an SPV's share purchase lacked authorization, the underlying asset could be deemed worthless, nullifying the token's value. Anthropic explicitly warned that any third party selling its shares—via direct sales, forwards, or tokens—is likely fraudulent or offering a valueless investment. The crackdown highlights risks in the popular SPV model, including complex multi-layered "Russian doll" SPV structures that obscure legal ownership, add fees, and concentrate risk. If one layer is invalidated, the entire chain could collapse. Following the announcements, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). In contrast, purely speculative pre-IPO prediction contracts remained stable, as they involve no actual share ownership. The move is seen as a corrective measure amid a market frenzy where some pre-IPO token valuations (e.g., Anthropic's token hitting a $1.4 trillion implied valuation) far exceeded recent official funding rounds. Opinions are split: some believe this undermines the core logic of pre-IPO token trading if top companies reject SPVs, while others argue buyers always assumed this legal risk when accessing unofficial channels. The statements serve as a stark warning and a potential catalyst for market de-leveraging and clearer boundaries.

Odaily星球日报1 h fa

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

Odaily星球日报1 h fa

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

"AI Membership: The Hidden Cost Pushing Workers Toward 'Poverty'" The widespread corporate push for AI adoption is creating a hidden financial burden for employees. Companies, from giants like Alibaba to small firms, are mandating AI use, often tying token consumption to KPIs, but frequently refuse to cover the costs. Workers are forced to pay for subscriptions out of pocket to stay competitive and avoid being replaced. Front-end developer Long Shen spends up to 2000 RMB monthly on tools like Cursor and ChatGPT Plus, seeing it as a necessary 3% salary investment to handle 90% of his coding tasks. While it boosted his performance and led to promotions, he now faces idle time at work, pretending to be busy. Designer Peng Peng navigates strict company firewalls by using personal devices and accounts for AI image generation tools like Midjourney, spending hundreds monthly without reimbursement, while her boss demands faster, more numerous revisions. The pressure creates workplace anxiety and suspicion. Programmer Li Huahua, after a friend's experience of raised KPIs following AI success, fears being branded a "traitor" for using it yet worries about falling behind if she doesn't. The dynamic allows management to demand results without understanding the tools or covering expenses, treating employees like AI "agents." While some, like entrepreneur Jin Tu, find high value in paid AI, building entire systems and winning competitions, for most, it's a trap. Free tools like Kimi and Doubao are introducing fees, closing off alternatives. The initial efficiency gains individual advantage, but as AI becomes ubiquitous, the personal edge disappears, workloads increase, and a cycle of dependency begins. Workers like Long Shen realize they cannot maintain AI-generated code without AI, making stopping harder than continuing to pay. The tool promising liberation is instead becoming a compulsory, costly chain in the modern workplace.

marsbit2 h fa

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片