From Shouting 150 Dollars to Liquidating HYPE in Just Three Days, How Much Credibility Does Arthur Hayes Have Left?

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-09Last updated on 2026-06-09

Abstract

How much of Arthur Hayes's market credibility remains? Recently, the "godfather of crypto perpetual swaps" and BitMEX co-founder has faced public criticism, including accusations from on-chain investigator ZachXBT about creating exit liquidity for his followers. Starting last week, Hayes executed multiple sudden sell-offs. He had repeatedly publicly predicted the HYPE token would reach $150. After a $100,000 bet defending Hyperliquid on June 1st, he announced just three days later that he had completely sold his HYPE and NEAR holdings, successfully exiting near the peak. He also sold ZEC and WLD. His sale of WLD appeared to be a classic "pump and dump" maneuver. On June 3rd, he publicly set a $10 target for WLD, causing its price to surge over 35%. By June 6th, he announced he had sold his WLD, citing "anomalous" SpaceX pre-IPO price action, which triggered a sharp price drop. On June 9th, Hayes published a lengthy article explaining his actions, citing factors like rising energy costs and a potential AI bubble burst. Consequently, his family office, Maelstrom, now holds positions in US energy producers and only core crypto assets BTC and ETH, having sold AI-related stocks and non-core cryptocurrencies. This pattern is not new. In 2025, he similarly touted HYPE before selling it at what turned out to be a cycle peak, only to repurchase it at the next cycle's low. Similar scenarios played out with tokens like ETHFI and ENA. Long-term observers have developed a strategy: i...

Original |Odaily Planet Daily(@OdailyChina)

Author |Golem(@web3_golem)

How much market credibility does Arthur Hayes have left? Recently, Arthur Hayes, the "Father of Crypto Perpetual Contracts" and co-founder of BitMEX, has faced public criticism, with on-chain detective ZachXBT also publicly questioning how much exit liquidity he has created using his followers.

Liquidated HYPE, NEAR, WLD

Starting last week, Arthur Hayes performed several unannounced selling operations to exit the top.

Arthur Hayes had repeatedly publicly stated that HYPE would rise to 150 dollars in this cycle. On June 1, Arthur Hayes was passionately criticizing and making a 100, 000 dollars bet with Kyle Samani, former co-founder of Multicoin Capital, for disparaging Hyperliquid. However, just 3 days later, Arthur Hayes announced he had completely liquidated his HYPE and NEAR holdings, with HYPE falling over 13.6% that day. His sell-off successfully exited at the top; HYPE hit a new high of 75.5 dollars on June 4 before falling continuously, currently trading around 62-64 dollars.

In addition to selling HYPE and NEAR, Arthur Hayes also liquidated ZEC and WLD. His liquidation of ZEC might be somewhat justified due to the Orchard Pool attack, but his selling of WLD resembled a classic "KOL cutting retail" operation: secretly accumulating, publicly shilling, and finally selling at a pumped price.

Because from publicly shilling WLD to liquidating WLD, Arthur Hayes only "acted" for 3 days. On June 3, the day before selling HYPE, Arthur Hayes publicly called for WLD to reach 10 dollars, suggesting WLD would become an alternative for investors who find it difficult to directly participate in SpaceX equity trading. After the news spread, WLD rose over 35% that day. But by June 6, Arthur Hayes changed his tune, stating he had sold all his WLD because SpaceX's pre-market price movement was "anomalous." This single, light explanation caused WLD to drop over 20% that day.

The difference between Arthur Hayes and "third-rate KOLs" is that he writes essays, often justifying his actions from the perspectives of macroeconomics and top-level design.

On June 9, Arthur Hayes published a lengthy essay, Reality Test (taking about 20 minutes to read fully), explaining his recent moves. He argued that three factors—rising energy costs due to restricted traffic in the Strait of Hormuz, the IPOs of the three major AI stocks (SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI), and Trump turning against AI for mid-term elections—would burst the AI bubble.

Based on this, his family office Maelstrom holds significant positions in US-listed energy producers and has sold AI-related stocks and non-core crypto assets, holding only BTC and ETH.

Arthur Hayes' Words Shouldn't Be Heeded, But His Actions Must Be Watched

Arthur Hayes' articles are not only adept at using a large amount of economic data and charts to argue points but sometimes also overlay political and historical perspectives, leaving people dazzled. But when you take his words seriously and invest real money following his moves, he might announce the next day that he has liquidated and started talking down, seemingly forgetting what he said the day before, and your portfolio takes a simultaneous hit.

Such operations are common. As early as 2025, Arthur Hayes repeatedly played the "bullish one moment, liquidating the next" script. The most classic example remains HYPE. In August 2025, during a speech at WebX Japan, Arthur Hayes touted HYPE, claiming the token still had up to 126x upside potential (Odaily Note: price was 45.9 dollars that day), but just one month later, he announced he had sold all HYPE for millions in profit, citing the need to avoid token unlock risks.

This sale by Arthur Hayes was precisely at the peak of HYPE's last bull run, after which HYPE fell continuously. It wasn't until mid-January 2026 that Arthur Hayes started buying HYPE again on a large scale. Judging from the price action, his entry point was again the low point of this cycle's rally.

Similar examples include ETHFI and ENA, all involving public bullish statements, followed by unannounced sales, achieving precise exits at the top.(Related reading:You Ran Again First! A Review of Arthur Hayes' Exit Records)

Long-term followers of Arthur Hayes have summarized a methodology: Arthur Hayes' words shouldn't be listened to, but his actions must be closely watched. Follow his accumulation cautiously, but sell decisively when he does.

However, if Arthur Hayes continues such performances, especially cases like this WLD price manipulation, no matter how reasonable the excuses are disguised, his market credibility will be threatened. It's like a crypto version of "The Boy Who Cried Wolf." In the end, Arthur Hayes will inevitably face backlash.

One sentence in his latest published article is correct—"I am still an unabashed gambler," and gamblers generally don't end well.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat recent actions have led to Arthur Hayes' market credibility being questioned?

AArthur Hayes has faced criticism for abruptly selling off assets like HYPE, NEAR, and WLD after publicly endorsing them. For example, he sold HYPE days after predicting it would reach $150 and dumped WLD just three days after recommending it, actions that have drawn accusations of creating exit liquidity for his followers.

QHow did Arthur Hayes explain his sudden sale of AI-related crypto assets like WLD?

AIn his article 'Reality Test,' Hayes cited three main reasons: rising energy costs due to restricted traffic in the Strait of Hormuz, the potential IPO of major AI companies (SpaceX, Anthropic, OpenAI), and the possibility of Trump turning against AI for midterm elections. He claimed these factors could burst the AI bubble, prompting his family office to sell non-core crypto assets and hold only BTC and ETH.

QWhat is the 'methodology' some investors have developed regarding Arthur Hayes' market behavior?

ASome investors have concluded that 'Arthur Hayes' words cannot be trusted, but his actions must be closely watched.' They advise being cautious about following his buying moves but promptly selling when he does, as he has a history of publicly advocating for assets and then selling them at what often turns out to be a peak.

QWhat was a previous instance where Arthur Hayes exhibited similar 'pump and dump' behavior?

AA classic example is with HYPE in August 2025. Hayes publicly promoted HYPE at the Japan WebX conference, claiming it had 126x upside potential. Just one month later, he announced he had sold all his HYPE holdings, profiting millions, citing token unlock risks. This sale occurred near the peak of HYPE's price at that time.

QAccording to the article, what does Arthur Hayes call himself, and what warning is implied about such a label?

AIn his latest article, Arthur Hayes states, 'I am still an unapologetic gambler.' The article implies that such behavior is risky and warns that consistently acting like a gambler manipulating the market could lead to a loss of credibility and eventual backlash, similar to the 'boy who cried wolf' fable.

Related Reads

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit2h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit2h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit2h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit2h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit3h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy HYPE

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Hyperliquid (HYPE) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Hyperliquid (HYPE) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Hyperliquid (HYPE)After purchasing your Hyperliquid (HYPE), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Hyperliquid (HYPE)Easily trade Hyperliquid (HYPE) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

3.4k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy HYPE

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of HYPE (HYPE) are presented below.

活动图片