From Calling for $150 to Liquidating HYPE in Just Three Days, How Much Credibility Does Arthur Hayes Have Left?

Odaily星球日报Published on 2026-06-09Last updated on 2026-06-09

Abstract

Arthur Hayes, co-founder of BitMEX and a prominent crypto figure, is facing scrutiny over his market credibility. Recent on-chain data and public criticism, notably from detective ZachXBT, question whether he uses his influence to create exit liquidity for his followers. Hayes has executed several abrupt sell-offs, including publicly advocating for HYPE to reach $150 before completely selling his holdings just three days later, after which the price dropped sharply. He similarly promoted WLD with a $10 target, only to sell his entire position three days afterward, citing vague concerns about SpaceX's pre-IPO activity and causing a significant price decline. Hayes justifies these moves with detailed macroeconomic analyses, such as a recent essay citing energy costs and AI market risks, explaining his shift into energy stocks and core cryptocurrencies BTC and ETH. However, his pattern of bullish public statements followed by unannounced sell-offs—previously seen with tokens like ETHFI and ENA—has led many investors to adopt a strategy of ignoring his commentary but closely monitoring his on-chain actions for sell signals. Analysts warn that this "cry wolf" pattern risks eroding his market trust, with Hayes himself admitting in a recent article, "I remain an unapologetic gambler."

Original |Odaily Planet Daily(@OdailyChina)

Author|Golem(@web3_golem)

How much market credibility does Arthur Hayes have left? Recently, "the father of crypto perpetual contracts" and BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes has faced public criticism. On-chain detective ZachXBT has also publicly questioned how much exit liquidity he has created using his followers.

Liquidating HYPE, NEAR, WLD

Starting last week, Arthur Hayes performed several unexpected sell-offs to exit at the top.

Arthur Hayes had repeatedly stated publicly that HYPE would rise to $150 in this cycle. On June 1, Arthur Hayes passionately clashed with former Multicoin Capital co-founder Kyle Samani, who had disparaged Hyperliquid, and even made a $100,000 bet with him. However, just 3 days later, Arthur Hayes announced he had completely liquidated his HYPE and NEAR holdings. HYPE fell over 13.6% that day. His sell-off indeed allowed him to exit at the peak. HYPE reached a new high of $75.5 on June 4 before starting a continuous decline, currently trading around $62-64.

Besides HYPE and NEAR, Arthur Hayes also liquidated ZEC and WLD. Liquidating ZEC due to the Orchard Pool attack might be somewhat understandable. However, his sell-off of WLD resembles a classic "KOL dumping on retail" operation involving pre-positioning, public shilling, and finally pumping and dumping.

Because from publicly shilling WLD to liquidating it, Arthur Hayes only "pretended" for 3 days. On June 3, the day before selling HYPE, Arthur Hayes publicly shilled WLD with a $10 target, suggesting WLD would become an alternative for investors who couldn't directly participate in SpaceX equity trades. After the news spread, WLD rose over 35% that day. But by June 6, Arthur Hayes changed his tune, stating he had liquidated WLD because SpaceX's pre-IPO price action was "abnormal." This flimsy explanation caused WLD to drop over 20% that day.

The difference between Arthur Hayes and "third-rate KOLs" is that he writes lengthy posts, often justifying his actions from macroeconomic and top-level design perspectives.

On June 9, Arthur Hayes published a long article titled "Reality Test" (requiring about 20 minutes to read fully) explaining his recent moves. He believes three factors will burst the AI bubble: rising energy costs due to restricted traffic in the Strait of Hormuz, the IPOs of three major AI stocks (SpaceX, Anthropic, OpenAI), and Trump turning against AI for the midterm elections.

Therefore, his family office Maelstrom holds significant positions in U.S.-listed energy producers and has sold AI-related stocks and non-core crypto assets, holding only BTC and ETH.

Don't Listen to Arthur Hayes's Words, But Watch His Actions

Arthur Hayes's articles not only skillfully use extensive economic data and charts to argue his points but sometimes also overlay political and historical perspectives, which can be quite impressive. But when you take his words seriously and invest real money following his moves, he might announce a liquidation and turn bearish the very next day, seemingly forgetting what he said the day before, while your portfolio takes a simultaneous hit.

Such operations are not uncommon. As early as 2025, Arthur Hayes repeatedly performed the "bullish one day, liquidate the next" routine. The most classic example remains HYPE. In August 2025, Arthur Hayes promoted HYPE during a speech at Japan WebX, claiming the token still had up to 126x upside potential (Odaily note: the price was $45.9 that day). Yet just one month later, he announced liquidating HYPE, profiting millions, citing the need to avoid token unlock risks.

Arthur Hayes's sell-off then occurred precisely at the peak of HYPE's previous bull run, after which HYPE fluctuated downward. It wasn't until mid-January 2026 that Arthur Hayes again made large-scale purchases of HYPE. Judging from the price chart, his entry point for HYPE was again at the low point of this current cycle.

Similar examples include ETHFI and ENA, where he publicly expressed bullish views, then sold off without warning, achieving precise exits at the top. (Related reading:You Ran First Again! A Record of Arthur Hayes's Top Exits)

Long-term followers of Arthur Hayes have summarized a methodology: don't listen to Arthur Hayes's words, but you must watch his actions; follow his entries cautiously, and decisively liquidate when he sells.

However, if Arthur Hayes continues such performances, especially cases like manipulating WLD price volatility this time, no matter how reasonable the excuses are disguised, his market credibility will be threatened. This is like a crypto version of "The Boy Who Cried Wolf." In the end, Arthur Hayes will surely face backlash.

He said one thing right in his latest article—"I remain an unapologetic gambler," and gamblers usually don't end well.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWho is Arthur Hayes and why is his market credibility being questioned?

AArthur Hayes is the co-founder of BitMEX, often called the 'father of crypto perpetual contracts.' His market credibility is being questioned due to recent actions where he publicly promoted certain cryptocurrencies like HYPE and WLD, only to sell his holdings shortly after, which critics label as a classic 'pump and dump' strategy, manipulating exit liquidity from his followers.

QWhat specific cryptocurrencies did Arthur Hayes recently sell, and what were the consequences?

AArthur Hayes recently sold his holdings in HYPE, NEAR, ZEC, and WLD. For example, after publicly stating HYPE would reach $150, he sold it three days later, causing its price to drop over 13.6%. He also sold WLD just three days after promoting it, leading to a price drop of over 20%.

QWhat reasons did Arthur Hayes give in his article 'Reality Test' for selling his AI-related crypto assets?

AIn his article 'Reality Test,' Arthur Hayes cited three main reasons for selling AI-related crypto assets: 1) Rising energy costs due to restricted traffic in the Strait of Hormuz, 2) The potential IPO of major AI companies (SpaceX, Anthropic, OpenAI) bursting an AI bubble, and 3) His belief that former President Trump would oppose AI to aid midterm elections. Therefore, his family office shifted to holding energy stocks and core cryptocurrencies like BTC and ETH.

QAccording to the article, what is the suggested strategy for investors regarding Arthur Hayes's actions?

AThe article suggests that investors should not blindly follow Arthur Hayes's public statements but should closely monitor his actual on-chain transactions. The recommended strategy is to be cautious when he buys ('建仓谨慎跟随') and to decisively sell when he sells ('卖出果断清仓').

QWhat historical example does the article provide to show a pattern in Arthur Hayes's behavior?

AThe article provides the example of HYPE from August 2025. Arthur Hayes publicly promoted HYPE at the Japan WebX conference, claiming it had 126x growth potential. Just one month later, he sold all his HYPE holdings near the peak of that price cycle, citing token unlock risks, and re-entered the market at a low point in early 2026.

Related Reads

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit2h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit2h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit2h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit2h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit3h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy HYPE

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Hyperliquid (HYPE) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Hyperliquid (HYPE) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Hyperliquid (HYPE)After purchasing your Hyperliquid (HYPE), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Hyperliquid (HYPE)Easily trade Hyperliquid (HYPE) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

3.4k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy HYPE

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of HYPE (HYPE) are presented below.

活动图片