The AI Stock Genius Who Made 60x Bets $7.7 Billion on Nvidia Topping Out

链捕手Published on 2026-05-20Last updated on 2026-05-20

Abstract

An AI-focused hedge fund named Situational Awareness LP, known for its 60x returns, has taken a significant bearish stance on semiconductor stocks in Q1 2026. Its 13F filing reveals a massive 148% quarterly increase in nominal exposure to $13.677 billion, with over 60% of the new exposure directed towards put options on major chip players. Key bearish bets include $2.04 billion in puts on the VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and $1.56 billion on NVIDIA, alongside positions against Broadcom, Oracle, AMD, and others. The fund simultaneously increased its long equity holdings in AI infrastructure and compute providers like CoreWeave and Bitcoin mining companies repurposing for compute. The core thesis behind this positioning is a shift in the primary constraint for AI expansion. The fund argues that while GPU supply was the critical bottleneck in previous years, the new limiting factors for large-scale AI cluster deployment are physical infrastructure: electrical grid access (with multi-year backlogs in the US), power availability, land, and data center construction timelines. The fund is not betting against AI's success but rather hedging against potential valuation corrections in semiconductor stocks whose prices may have run ahead, while directly investing in the downstream physical bottlenecks—power and data center capacity—it believes will capture value next. This move translates a previously theoretical narrative about infrastructure constraints into a concrete, high-convic...

Author: BiBi News

On May 18, 2026, Situational Awareness LP submitted its 13F filing for the first quarter of 2026.

The fund's nominal exposure to U.S. stocks and options expanded from $5.52 billion at the end of 2025 to $13.677 billion, a single-quarter growth of 148%.

However, what caught market attention was not the size, but the structure: over 60% of the new nominal exposure was entirely placed in put options on the semiconductor sector.

What Q1 Did

The put options cover nine targets: VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH), NVIDIA, Broadcom, Oracle, AMD, Micron, TSMC, ASML, Intel.

Among them, SMH has the largest put nominal size at $2.04 billion, followed by NVIDIA at $1.56 billion. Micron and TSMC hold both call and put options, indicating a bet on volatility rather than a one-sided short.

It should be noted that the 13F filing only discloses the nominal value of options, making it impossible to directly determine the net short size. These put positions could be active shorting or could be hedging protection purchased while holding long positions.

The full intent cannot be reconstructed from the filing alone.

In the stock direction, the fund continued to bet on computing infrastructure.

CoreWeave holdings increased from 6.1 million shares to 7.18 million shares; IREN and Applied Digital were similarly increased;

The expansion was most pronounced in the miner direction: Bitfarms (now renamed Keel Infrastructure) increased from 6.9 million shares to 19.88 million shares, CleanSpark increased from 1.64 million shares to 12.28 million shares, Riot Platforms increased from 6.17 million shares to 11.5 million shares.

Bloom Energy reduced holdings by 3.59 million shares but still holds about $879 million in market value, while retaining 408.5 thousand call options. This is profit-taking, not a change in direction.

Exits were concentrated in the optical communication direction.

Lumentum and Coherent were completely liquidated; last quarter, Lumentum's position accounted for as much as 8.68%, this quarter it is zero.

Intel's operation deserves separate attention: last quarter held about 20 million call options, all liquidated this quarter, while establishing new put option positions.

Not a flat position, but a complete reversal in direction, from bullish to bearish.

Where the Bottleneck Is, the Money Is

The logic behind this 13F is a specific judgment on supply and demand: the constraints on AI expansion are shifting.

Over the past two years, the core constraint limiting AI scale was GPU shortage, so the market persistently traded NVIDIA, HBM memory, advanced manufacturing, and optical communication. During this phase, the semiconductor sector as a whole received a significant premium.

However, as computing clusters scale towards hundreds of thousands or even millions of GPUs, new constraints are emerging.

Grid connection applications in the US currently have a backlog exceeding 2TW, with an average wait time of over five years; transformer capacity is limited, and new data center construction cycles are measured in years; chips can continue to expand production, but the electricity, land, and construction capabilities needed to support their operation cannot keep pace.

Under this judgment, the logic of shorting the semiconductor sector is not the belief that AI will fail, but that valuations in the chip sector have already priced in expectations, and value is migrating to downstream physical infrastructure.

Buying puts on SMH and NVIDIA hedges against potential valuation corrections in the chip sector; continuing to hold CoreWeave, transformed miner companies, Bloom Energy, is betting on the real bottlenecks: electricity and data center capacity.

CoreWeave's operation also confirms this thinking: call options were slashed from 10.81 million to 1.81 million, while common shares increased from 6.1 million to 7.18 million shares.

The direction hasn't changed, only the high-leverage option positions were swapped for common stock to reduce portfolio volatility impact.

From $225 Million to $13.677 Billion

This fund was founded in September 2024; its first 13F disclosed U.S. stock exposure of about $225 million. By the end of 2025, this number had grown to $5.52 billion; as of March 31, 2026, the nominal exposure reached $13.677 billion.

In the first half of 2025, the fund achieved a return of about 47%, while the S&P 500 rose only about 6%; for the full year, it outperformed the S&P 500 by about 12.5 percentage points.

Before founding the fund, this 24-year-old German published a 165-page paper titled "Situational Awareness: The Decade Ahead," outlining judgments on the AGI timeline and that power and computing infrastructure would become the biggest bottlenecks. The fund's early capital came from Nat Friedman, Daniel Gross, and Stripe co-founders Patrick and John Collison.

The significance of this quarterly report is that it translates a judgment that was previously more narrative into concrete portfolio structure.

Chips are merely the entry point for expansion; what truly determines the speed of AI expansion is whether, in the real world, power can be connected, data centers can be built, and grid connection approvals can be obtained within five years.

If this judgment holds, the keywords for AI investment over the past two years were GPU and models; in the coming years, they may be electricity, land, and construction time.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the most significant action taken by Situational Awareness LP in Q1 2026, as revealed by its 13F filing?

AOver 60% of the fund's new nominal exposure was placed in put options on the semiconductor sector, signaling a major directional bet against or a hedge for the chip industry. This includes significant put positions on VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and NVIDIA.

QWhich physical infrastructure sectors did Situational Awareness LP increase its long positions in, and why?

AThe fund increased long positions in power and data center infrastructure companies like CoreWeave, IREN, Applied Digital, and bitcoin miners transitioning to data centers (e.g., Bitfarms, CleanSpark, Riot Platforms). This was based on the belief that constraints for AI expansion are shifting from GPU shortages to bottlenecks in electricity, land, and construction capacity.

QWhat was Situational Awareness LP's specific action regarding Intel in Q1 2026, and what does it indicate?

AThe fund completely closed its approximately 20 million call option positions on Intel from the previous quarter and simultaneously established new put option positions. This indicates a complete reversal in view, from bullish to bearish on the company.

QAccording to the article's analysis, what is the core logic behind the fund's seemingly contradictory moves of holding puts on chips while being long on infrastructure?

AThe core logic is that the valuation for chip companies has already priced in high expectations, while the real constraint for future AI growth is the availability of physical infrastructure like power grids and data centers. Therefore, the fund is hedging potential chip valuation pullbacks while betting on the rising value of the downstream infrastructure bottlenecks.

QHow has Situational Awareness LP's performance been since its inception, and who were its notable early backers?

ASince its founding in September 2024, the fund's nominal exposure grew from $225 million to $13.677 billion by Q1 2026. It significantly outperformed the S&P 500, delivering ~47% returns in H1 2025 versus the index's ~6%. Early backers included prominent figures like Nat Friedman, Daniel Gross, and Stripe co-founders Patrick and John Collison.

Related Reads

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit56m ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit56m ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit1h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit1h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit1h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit1h ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit3h ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy GENIUS

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Genius (GENIUS) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Genius (GENIUS) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Genius (GENIUS)After purchasing your Genius (GENIUS), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Genius (GENIUS)Easily trade Genius (GENIUS) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

3.0k Total ViewsPublished 2026.04.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy GENIUS

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of GENIUS (GENIUS) are presented below.

活动图片