$40M lifeline? Why Circle-Lighter’s revenue-sharing deal could reignite LIT

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-13Last updated on 2026-02-13

Abstract

Lighter (LIT) perpetual DEX has reportedly secured a revenue-sharing deal with Circle on interest income from USDC deposits, which analysts project could generate $30–40 million annually. This is seen as a key lifeline for the platform, which has seen a sharp decline in trading volume and revenue since the end of its farming program in late 2025. The deal is expected to subsidize trader fees, potentially boosting open interest and trading activity. It may also support token buybacks and fee rebates. Following the news, LIT’s price surged 10%, extending its February recovery to 20%. Some consider the token undervalued relative to competitors.

Lighter [LIT] perpetual DEX has reportedly reached a revenue-sharing deal with Circle on interest income from USDC deposits on the platform. According to analysts, this could be a key lifeline and bullish catalyst for its ecosystem and native token.

The deal could fetch $30-$40 million in annual revenue, according to projections by Ryan Watkins, co-founder of crypto VC firm Syncracy Capital. Watkins added,

“The reason why this is exciting is not because it will directly lead to more buybacks (it will indirectly). It’s a subsidy for traders who will now pay less funding on positions. Should increase open interest.”

Potential impact on Lighter

Since the end of the second phase of farming in late 2025, Lighter’s airdrop farmers have declined, derailing perpetual volumes and Open Interest (OI).

According to DeFiLlama, the DEX’s weekly perp volumes dropped from about $300 billion in November 2025 to below $50 billion in February 2026 – A 6x decline in the past two months.

With slow growth, monthly revenue also fell by nearly half from $24 million in November to $13 million in January. So far in the first half of February, Lighter has generated just $1.7 million, underscoring more pressure on its revenue stream.

Since it also runs buybacks like Hyperliquid, the said revenue-sharing deal could help bolster token accruals and trading fee rebates.

For the unfamiliar, Circle earns interest income on the USDC reserves invested in U.S. Treasury bonds.

For USDC circulating on Coinbase, the exchange nets 100% of the interest income on USDC reserves. Additionally, it captures 50% of the USDC’s income outside its platform, with the deal reportedly generating Coinbase over $900 million in 2024 alone.

Other platforms have pushed to capture similar revenue streams or opt for their in-house stablecoin and keep all interest income. This is what led to Hyperliquid’s native stablecoin USDH.

That said, the specifics on the sharing deal with Lighter and Circle were not public as of press time. However, some market watchers speculate that the deal may be behind the recent trading fee rebates announced by the platform.

For his part, Syncracy Capital’s Daniel Cheung believes that LIT may be “criminally undervalued” at current levels.

“The perps category will be bigger than anyone expects and $LIT is criminally undervalued at 5% of HYPE with 10% of its fees.”

Will LIT extend its recovery?

LIT surged by 10% after the update, bringing its February recovery gains to 20%.

If the uptrend extends itself, the recovery could hit 33% if the $1.7-level is tagged. On the downside, the trendline support would be a key support to watch.


Final Thoughts

  • Lighter has reportedly reached a deal with Circle to share interest income revenue generated by USDC circulating on the platform.
  • Analysts believe the deal could help drive fee rebates and attract traders to the platform again.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the potential annual revenue that Lighter could generate from its revenue-sharing deal with Circle, according to Ryan Watkins?

AAccording to Ryan Watkins, co-founder of Syncracy Capital, the deal could fetch $30-$40 million in annual revenue.

QHow did Lighter's weekly perpetual volumes change from November 2025 to February 2026?

ALighter's weekly perpetual volumes dropped from about $300 billion in November 2025 to below $50 billion in February 2026, a 6x decline.

QWhat key benefit does the revenue-sharing deal provide for traders on Lighter, as highlighted by Ryan Watkins?

AThe deal acts as a subsidy for traders, meaning they will now pay less funding on their positions, which should increase open interest.

QWhy did Daniel Cheung from Syncracy Capital believe LIT was 'criminally undervalued'?

ADaniel Cheung believed LIT was criminally undervalued because the perpetuals category will be bigger than expected and LIT was trading at 5% of HYPE's valuation while generating 10% of its fees.

QWhat was the immediate price reaction of the LIT token after the news of the deal was announced?

AThe LIT token surged by 10% after the update, bringing its February recovery gains to 20%.

Related Reads

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit2h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit2h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit2h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit2h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit3h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片