Monad up 19% a day – But is MON’s current rise sustainable?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-26Last updated on 2025-12-26

Abstract

Monad (MON) surged 19% in 24 hours, driven by a slight recovery in network activity and increased liquidity. Key factors include a rise in daily active users (averaging 76,000) and new users (around 24,000), alongside the integration of the USD1 stablecoin and the introduction of staking on exchanges, which reduced circulating supply. Technically, MON broke out of a wedge consolidation pattern, with RSI and Bollinger Bands indicating bullish momentum. Sustaining above $0.02169 could push the price toward $0.02667, though a retracement is possible. The project has seen significant capital inflow, ranking as the third-most sold new token in 2025 with over $217 million in sales. Continued growth depends on maintaining user engagement and market sentiment.

Monad bulls are back at it again after the post-launch rally. MON rallied more than 19% in the past 24 hours as of press time, though price rejections were coming in gradually.

The price action of Monad [MON] was turning to the upside, but the day’s rally was driven by a couple of factors. With that said, will MON sustain the upward momentum?

Why is Monad up today?

The network activity as per Artemis data showed that MON saw mixed sentiments, though they looked faintly bullish.

The recent data showed that activity was recovering from the lows seen on the 11th of December. Over the past week, daily active and new users were rising simultaneously, though the former was ahead.

Daily active users were averaging 76,000 while newly onboarded were around 24,000. The number of chain transactions exceeded 1.6 million per day.

The data was flat around the same area, though it was higher than its previous week’s readings. Consequently, price followed it.

Monad chain also integrated the USD1 stablecoin, which lead to more liquidity for trading. As a result, MON’s price movement was pronounced, among top cryptos to have surged by double digits on the day.

Still, the introduction of staking on exchanges led to potential supply control. These unmoved tokens create buying pressure in the circulating lot.

Will MON sustain the momentum?

On the charts, Monad price was out of its wedge consolidation. Price has been trading higher in this wedge since the 18th of December, but managed to break out in the past 24 hours.

The signal from the RSI divergence indicator was bullish while the Bollinger Bands were opening. That meant bulls were in control. On top of that, volatility was alive, explaining the explosive rally that followed the breakout.

Holding above $0.02169 as support would mean that MON price was headed toward $0.02667 as the next target price. However, there was a likelihood that the price could retrace to shake off weak hands.

But will the price maintain bullish momentum after the potential retracement? The next few sessions and market sentiment might tell.

Capital inflow into the ecosystem

Meanwhile, Monad was the third-most sold token in 2025 among the newest entrants into the crypto markets. The project generated more than $217 million in sales, indicating massive capital inflow.

Interestingly, more capital was getting onboarded from the new users aforementioned in the analysis. However, the magnitude of new users was still small.


Final Thoughts

  • Monad price was up about 19% driven by slight recovery in network activity and growth in liquidity.
  • MON’s continued uptrend was dependent on price staying above the breakout level at $0.02169.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat were the main factors driving Monad's (MON) 19% price increase in the past 24 hours?

AThe price increase was driven by a slight recovery in network activity, the integration of the USD1 stablecoin which increased liquidity, and the introduction of staking on exchanges which created potential supply control and buying pressure.

QAccording to the on-chain data, what were the average numbers for daily active users and new users on the Monad chain?

ADaily active users were averaging 76,000, while newly onboarded users were around 24,000. The number of daily chain transactions exceeded 1.6 million.

QWhat is the critical support level that MON needs to hold to continue its upward trend towards the next target price?

AMON needs to hold above $0.02169 as support to be headed toward the next target price of $0.02667.

QWhat technical indicators suggested that bulls were in control of MON's price action?

AThe RSI divergence indicator showed a bullish signal, and the Bollinger Bands were opening, indicating that bulls were in control and volatility was increasing.

QHow much capital inflow did the Monad project generate from sales, making it a significant new entrant in the market?

AThe Monad project generated more than $217 million in sales, making it the third-most sold token among the newest entrants into the crypto markets in 2025.

Related Reads

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit2h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit2h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit2h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit2h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit3h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片