Ethereum Classic Pathways by ETC Cooperative, Istora, and Donald McIntyre

项目方ETC(Ethereum Classic)Published on 2024-07-29Last updated on 2025-11-10

Ethereum Classic Blog

Ethereum Classic Pathways by ETC Cooperative, Istora, and Donald McIntyre

Donald McIntyre
Development, Philosophy

banner

This post is based on the presentation the author did at WDMS Oman in March of 2024.

Smart contracts are the second most important invention of the blockchain industry. Satoshi Nakamoto actually had planned smart contracts for Bitcoin. However, because of technical problems with its design, Bitcoin did not support smart contracts inside its highly secure environment. This is why Vitalik Buterin invented Ethereum Classic (ETC), which is the original Ethereum, to be a POW blockchain, with digital gold, and that it could be programmable. Hence, ETC is Bitcoin’s philosophy with Ethereum’s technology. In other words, the best of both worlds.

ETC is a unique combination of attributes because it is not only a POW blockchain and has a fixed monetary supply schedule, but also is programmable with smart contracts. This is a unique positioning for Ethereum Classic that has already made it the largest POW smart contracts blockchain in the world, and the fifth largest POW blockchain overall. These three pillars make true the aspirations of “Code Is Law” and “Unstoppability”.

Bitcoin’s innovation, enabled by POW, is permissionlessness and sound internet money. ETC’s innovation is to add programmability to permissionlessness and sound internet money, making applications unstoppable. With smart contracts inside Ethereum Classic, decentralized applications are much more secure than any type of application running on external systems, data centers, or cloud services. Indeed, applications in ETC are the most secure apps in the world.

As a POW blockchain with smart contracts, ETC has the most valuable position in the industry because, after the move by Ethereum to POS, ETC became the largest POW programmable blockchain in the world that is digital gold. POS smart contract blockchains are insecure, and POW blockchains without smart contracts are less versatile AND less secure.

As ETC has a fixed supply cap of 210,700,000 ETC; and there are around 148 million already issued; then, there are more or less 62,700,000 ETC still to be mined. This is an estimated future revenue of more than $1.4 billion dollars at current prices, of which around 50% will be paid to miners in the next 10 years. However, because of its continued growth and excellent positioning as programmable digital gold, mining revenues are likely to be significantly higher.

Although people often talk about "roadmaps" for these projetcs, ETC does not actually have a roadmap. As Istora Mandiri, a very important ETC community member, explained in a post on the ETC community website, in a truly decentralized blockchain there cannot be roadmaps. Technological roadmaps are imposed by leadership, corporations, or foundations. Decentralized blockchains such as Bitcoin or Ethereum Classic do not have presidents, leaders, administrators, or managers. Everything happens through the improvement proposal process, which in ETC is the “Ethereum Classic Improvement Proposal (ECIP) process”. Instead, ETC has a pathway that is forged on the go by the ECIP process through intense debates in the ecosystem.

Having said this, then, there are several parallel proposals for technological upgrades of the ETC blockchain, for example, this is the ETC Cooperative’s proposed pathway for 2024:

  1. Enhancing Client Stability and Functionality:
  • Comprehensive Maintenance and Enhancement of the Core-Geth Client
  • Advanced Support and Refinement in Cross-Client Testing (Core Geth, Erigon, Core Geth Light, and Hyperledger Besu)
  1. Network Observation and Analysis Advancements (to check network health):
  • Node Infrastructure for Observation and Analysis
  • Upgrading Chain and Network Monitoring and Incident Reaction Systems
  • Upgrading Network Analysis Tooling
  • Unified Infrastructure Management (there are many servers managed manually, and the idea is to unify everything with a single deployment interface called Ansible)
  1. Technological Development and Exploration:
  • The EVM Object Format (EOF): To continue advocacy for inclusion to Ethereum and ETC (the Prague hard fork in ETH in the second half of 2024 may include EOF but it is competing with Verkle trees)
  • EIP 1559: We will be exploring enablement on ETC to have full parity with Ethereum in this aspect as well
  • Verkle Trees: We will research ETC implications in the absence of a beacon chain (the Patricia Merkle Tree will be replaced with Verkle Trees to enable stateless clients)
  • Privacy-Oriented Geth Deployment, we will study to add privacy technology to ETC’s node software such as VPN services
  • Enhancing regression testing and automating release processes (to better check how new releases affect older releases, etc.)

Istora Mandiri himself proposed the following pathway:

  1. Erigon Client Adoption:
  • One potential path for Ethereum Classic is the adoption of the Erigon client, which would make the network more secure and accessible. Erigon allows for faster syncing and validation on cheaper hardware, making it an attractive option for a wider range of users and strengthening the ETC network.
  1. Upgradability and EVM Object Format (EOF):
  • Another possible direction for ETC is the implementation of the EVM Object Format (EOF), which would enable upgradability of the Ethereum Virtual Machine. EOF is particularly useful for ETC as it opens the door to backwards-incompatible updates while maintaining the "Code is Law" principle. This also paves the way for more easily adopting EVM innovations made by other projects.
  1. Cryptographic Primitives for L2 and Privacy:
  • ETC may also benefit from adding cryptographic primitives similar to those planned for in Ethereum mainnet to support L2 protocols and enhance privacy features. These additions would provide a solid foundation for scaling and improving the overall functionality of the network.
  1. L2 Scaling and Compatibility:
  • While Ethereum mainnet has long-term goals for layer-1 level sharding, much effort is currently focused on L2 protocols, such as rollups. ETC can take advantage of these technologies and adopt them for compatibility and scaling. This would allow Ethereum Classic to grow in tandem with the broader Ethereum ecosystem.

And, the roadmap that I proposed in a recent article is the following:

  1. Cancel MESS (Modified Exponential Subjective Scoring): I am happy to report that this has been implemented with the ETC hard fork, Spiral, which was activated in the mainnet on February 5th of 2024!

  2. Move Core Geth to the Ethereum Classic community GitHub repository: This would restore sovereignty of the community on the node client software.

  3. Solve backward compatibility with the account and EVM versioning system: This would solve the risk of smart contracts breaking each time there is a hard fork.

  4. Develop a tool to easily audit the real supply of ETC: This would bring certainty to the correct supply number of ETC.

  5. Set the block size to 8 million gas: This would help to control bloat and take away from miners the ability to change the block size, as happened recently.


Thank you for reading this article!

To learn more about ETC please go to: https://ethereumclassic.org

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

Vitalik Buterin's recent algorithmic stablecoin proposal envisions using an option-like mechanism to create a stablecoin without the liquidation risks inherent in traditional collateralized debt position (CDP) models. The design splits one unit of ETH into two components: a 'stable' leg (P) that maintains value up to a certain strike price, and an 'upside' leg (N) that captures any appreciation above that price. Together, they always sum to one ETH, eliminating the need for debt or liquidation mechanisms. From an options perspective, the stable leg essentially functions as a synthetic, covered call position. However, significant challenges exist. For the stable asset to maintain its peg, it must continuously roll deep in-the-money call options, leading to potential rollover slippage, predictable trading paths vulnerable to front-running, and liquidity issues. Crucially, the system's scalability depends on a constant demand for the upside leg—a form of leveraged ETH long position without funding rates or liquidation risk. It's unclear if such persistent, specific demand will materialize from speculators or market makers who have simpler alternatives like perpetual swaps. The author, drawing from experience with Rysk, argues that DeFi options have struggled as standalone trading products due to complexity and fragmented liquidity. Their potential lies instead as foundational infrastructure underpinning more complex financial primitives like stablecoins, structured yields, or index products—transforming from a direct product into a core pricing and risk distribution engine for the next generation of on-chain finance.

marsbit1h ago

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

marsbit1h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit3h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit3h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit4h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片