The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

marsbit發佈於 2026-06-16更新於 2026-06-16

文章摘要

SpaceX's trillion-dollar valuation is built on its three core businesses: Starlink (profitable, 60% of revenue), rockets (driving down launch costs), and AI (a major investment area). This creates a financial cycle: Starlink funds rocket development, which enables low-cost launches for AI hardware, generating future revenue. This cycle fuels annual capital expenditures of tens of billions, flowing to a vast supply chain. Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability. The first group includes irreplaceable players like NVIDIA (GPU/CUDA ecosystem), Eutelsat (critical radio spectrum), Filtronic (specialized amplifiers), Materion (strategic beryllium), and STMicroelectronics (antenna chips). The second group consists of hard-to-replace suppliers due to high switching costs, such as Honeywell (flight control), Carpenter Technology (specialty alloys), Hexcel (carbon fiber), Broadcom (data exchange), and Linde (industrial gases). The third group comprises high-volume, cost-critical suppliers for mass-produced items like Starlink terminals. Key names include Wistron NeWeb (primary manufacturer) and several A-share companies like Shenzhen Sunway (connectors), Pies New Materials (forgings), Western Superconducting (alloys), and Yingliu (castings). Other niche players include Trimble (timing), Astronics (power distribution), and CTS (thermal management). The article argues that investing in these suppliers, rather than SpaceX stock directly, offers an alternative opportunity. Th...

Author: nini

If you missed the Apple supply chain in 2010, the Tesla supply chain in 2020, or even the Nvidia supply chain you've been regretting these past two years,

the SpaceX supply chain is just getting started.

Of course, I think chasing SpaceX itself doesn't seem very cost-effective. Its stock rose 19% on its first day of trading, from a price of 135 to 160, with a price-to-sales ratio approaching 100 times, and the company is still losing huge sums of money. Retail investors rushing in on the first day face significant pressure.

So what I'm suggesting are the companies that supply it.

History has repeatedly validated the same logic: super terminals' frenzied nurturing of the supply chains behind them. When Apple made the iPhone 4 in 2010, Luxshare Precision had revenue of 10 billion yuan; a decade later it hit 92.5 billion, with its stock price rising 30-fold. When Tesla's Shanghai Gigafactory went into operation in 2019, CATL's market cap was just over 100 billion yuan; five years later, it surpassed 1 trillion. Nvidia exploded in popularity these past two years, and Zhongji Innolight's market cap rose from tens of billions to over 100 billion.

Apple, Tesla, Nvidia—each time the super terminal stood center stage, but the ones who really made big money were the supply chain companies behind them.

SpaceX spends tens of billions of dollars annually buying chips, materials, components, and industrial gases. These purchase orders gradually become real revenue on the books of certain companies. After the prospectus was made public, this supply chain has data that can be checked for the first time.

We can first look at where SpaceX's money comes from and where it goes

Its business mainly consists of these three parts. First, Starlink. Last year's revenue was 11.3 billion USD, accounting for 60% of the group, with over 10 million global subscribers—this is the only consistently profitable part of SpaceX, one could even say all the money-losing ventures after this are funded by it.

Second, rockets. The Falcon and Starship programs have an annual R&D investment of 3 billion USD, resulting in the world's lowest commercial launch cost, with a plan for 100 launches in 2026 and demand for 1,500 Raptor engines. Third, AI. It lost over 6 billion last year. On the ground, it's building the Colossus supercomputer, packed with 220,000 GPUs, and planning orbital data centers in space.

So, the flow of money is simple: money earned from Starlink → invested into rockets to bring launch costs down → low-cost launches send AI hardware into space → AI computing power is rented out to generate more revenue. It's roughly that kind of cycle.

This cycle scatters tens of billions of dollars in purchase orders annually. So whose pockets does this money go into?

Categorized by replaceability, suppliers fall into three types.

First type: Irreplaceable, at least in the short term

  1. NVIDIA. The Colossus supercomputer's 220,000 GPUs are all from them. But NVIDIA's real moat isn't the hardware; it's CUDA. The world's AI training basically uses this software ecosystem to write code. Hardware can be swapped, but the migration cost of a decade's worth of code can't be recovered in a year or two. We can understand it as: as long as SpaceX is building supercomputers, NVIDIA is collecting money.
  2. Eutelsat, ticker SATS. It holds the radio spectrum licenses for satellite communications. What is spectrum? Think of it as lanes in the sky. Physical laws determine there are only so many; whoever occupies them first gets them. No matter how advanced your technology is, you can't create a band out of thin air. Musk's satellite-to-phone functionality must pass through here; without paying the toll, signals would collide with other satellites. Plus, SATS holds about 3% of SpaceX shares. The day before the IPO, it rose 11%, with options trading volume 11 times the usual.
  3. Filtronic, ticker FTC, listed in London (note: not searchable on U.S. markets). They make millimeter-wave signal amplifiers for Starlink satellites, making signals travel farther and clearer. In 2024, they signed a 47.3 million GBP contract; SpaceX contributes 83% of its revenue, and they have subscription rights for up to 10%. This thing seems small, but aerospace-grade certification requires years of repeated testing in vacuum, radiation, and extreme temperature ranges. Once certified, SpaceX won't easily switch because the re-certification cycle can't keep up with production ramp-up. And Filtronic's stock price has nearly doubled in a year.
  4. Materion, ticker MTRN. The world's only fully integrated beryllium metal producer, from mine to finished product, controlling about 56% of global supply. Beryllium is one-third lighter than aluminum, six times stronger than steel, with a melting point near 1300°C—light, strong, and high-temperature resistant; few metals on Earth satisfy all three conditions simultaneously. The F-35 fighter jet, the Webb Space Telescope's mirror, and Starship's load-bearing structures all use it. The U.S. Department of Defense lists beryllium as a strategic material; Materion is the sole certified supplier for the F-35, with certification spanning over a decade. This shows its scarcity.
  5. STMicroelectronics (STM). They make phased array antenna chips for SpaceX, with cumulative deliveries exceeding 5 billion units, covering over ten thousand satellites. STM predicts its low-earth orbit satellite business will reach 2 billion USD by 2028 and 2.9 billion USD by 2030.

Second type: Technically replaceable, but the cost of switching is too high

  1. Honeywell, ticker HON. Rocket flight control and inertial navigation systems—everything about where the rocket is, where it's flying, and what attitude it maintains is controlled by them. Decades of certification accumulated from Apollo to the Space Shuttle to commercial spaceflight. Changing suppliers is like transplanting the rocket's brain; all underlying code must be rewritten from scratch, and new certification must be run from the beginning. SpaceX launches over a hundred times a year; it can't stop the launch schedule to save on procurement costs.
  2. Carpenter Technology, ticker CRS. Provides specialty steel alloys for the Raptor engine. Vacuum melting, repeated purification, impurity control to parts-per-million levels. A tiny deviation means disaster in the combustion chamber. This material process isn't something that can be passed on by blueprints alone; building equivalent production lines might take decades.
  3. Hexcel, ticker HXL. Supplies aerospace carbon fiber. Every extra kilogram on the rocket means one less kilogram of payload. Carbon fiber frames are half the weight of metal with no loss of strength. They've collaborated with SpaceX for over a decade; the material formula and weaving processes are specifically tailored for SpaceX's needs. Switching to another would require re-validating the entire material system from scratch.
  4. Broadcom (AVGO) handles the terabit-level data exchange between satellites and ground. To prevent traffic jams with high-speed data distribution, you rely on it. The Linde Group invested 100 million USD in an air separation plant near Starbase, Texas in 2025, dedicated to supplying liquid oxygen and nitrogen. This is because the massive amounts of high-purity industrial gases consumed in rocket launches cost less the closer the source is; the location itself is a moat.

Third type: Requiring stable mass production at the lowest possible cost

You might not have seen a Starlink dish in person, but think about it: they plan to deploy a full 30 million units globally. Each one contains thousands of components and dozens of assembly steps, must be produced on an assembly line like a smartphone, and must withstand aerospace-grade vibration and temperature extremes.

At this scale, technology isn't the primary factor anymore; the most important thing is who can deliver stably and who can drive costs down the most.

The logic of Foxconn manufacturing for Apple applies here exactly. Wistron NeWeb Corp, ticker 6285, is the world's largest contract manufacturer for Starlink terminals and routers. The quality control standards were honed over years of collaboration with SpaceX, so it's not something just any factory can take on.

Moving up are several A-share listed companies. Sunway Communication (300136) is the global exclusive supplier of high-frequency connectors inside Starlink terminals; SpaceX-related orders in 2025 are approximately 1.05 billion yuan. Parker Hannifin Aerospace China (605123) is the sole Chinese supplier of forgings for Starship bodies and engines, with orders around 680 million yuan, accounting for 35% of its revenue. Western Superconducting Technologies (002149) is the exclusive supplier of niobium alloy for Raptor engines, with orders around 1.02 billion yuan. Yingliu Co., Ltd. (603308) makes core castings for Raptor turbopumps, accounting for 42% of its own revenue—SpaceX's orders are already the largest revenue source for this company.

Looking at smaller players. Tianyin Electromechanical can be likened to making the star trackers on Starlink satellites; satellites use them to look at stars to determine their attitude, and their market share exceeds 60%. Tongyu Communication makes Starlink ground antenna modules, with projected 2026 orders of 300 million yuan.

There are also a few on the U.S. markets. Trimble (TRMB) manages time; tens of thousands of satellites flying overhead must have their clocks synchronized to the same beat, a microsecond off and communications fail. Astronics (ATRO) manages rocket power distribution. CTS (CTSH) manages heat dissipation. These aren't exactly cutting-edge tech, but they are indispensable cogs in the entire system.

You might ask, these companies have always existed; why now?

Three reasons.

  • First, procurement volume is just starting to ramp up. There's a plan for 100 launches in 2026, Starship testing is accelerating, and AI data centers are scheduled to begin orbital deployment in 2028. The target for Starlink terminals is 30 million units; there are only 10 million subscribers now. The rate at which SpaceX is scattering money hasn't peaked yet.
  • Second, transparency has opened up for the first time. SpaceX was previously a private company, making procurement data a black box. After the prospectus was made public, quarterly and annual reports will continue to disclose information, allowing the order growth rates of supply chain companies to be tracked and verified.
  • Third, consider historical patterns. The Apple supply chain took a decade from the iPhone 4 to its peak. The Tesla supply chain has been going for seven years from Model 3 mass production to now. The position of the SpaceX supply chain today is more like Tesla in 2018—mass production just starting, suppliers just being finalized, order growth just beginning its steep climb. And with Starship still in testing, Starlink still expanding, and AI data centers not yet built, it's currently equivalent to its 2018.

Finally

Buying SpaceX on its first day of trading, in my view, is paying for Musk's dream—and a very expensively priced space dream at that. Of course, you could say you simply believe in Musk, and that's your dream too.

But perhaps we can look at it from another angle.

Looking along the supply chain, what we're betting on is something else. Because regardless of how SpaceX's stock price moves, someone has to take its annual tens of billions in purchase orders. These orders are independent of the stock price; they are monthly revenue arriving on schedule.

This article does not constitute investment advice. Some issues remain here, such as the cyclical nature of beryllium metal, geopolitical discounts for Taiwanese companies, insufficient liquidity in small companies, and the possibility of re-shuffling certifications due to technological iteration. Each company needs to be judged separately.

But if you didn't get an allocation on SpaceX's IPO day,

then you can adopt a different strategy: don't chase the high-flyer. Let's go look at the quiet suppliers.

The giant has ignited its engines. This time, the shovels are within your reach~

相關問答

QAccording to the article, what is the core logic of the 'super terminal' model for investment returns, and which historical companies serve as examples?

AThe core logic is that while super terminal companies (like Apple, Tesla, Nvidia) capture the spotlight, the greatest investment returns have often come from their supply chain partners. The article cites examples like Luxshare (Apple), CATL (Tesla), and Zhongji InnoLight (Nvidia), whose revenues and valuations soared as the terminal companies scaled.

QWhat are the three main categories of SpaceX suppliers mentioned in the article, and what is the defining characteristic of the first category ('Cannot be replaced in the short term')?

AThe three categories are: 1) Suppliers who cannot be replaced in the short term. 2) Suppliers who are technically replaceable, but the cost of switching is too high. 3) Suppliers needed for stable mass production at the lowest cost. The defining characteristic of the first category is a near-insurmountable barrier, such as a dominant software ecosystem (Nvidia's CUDA), control of a scarce physical resource like radio spectrum (Eutelsat), or a critical material where the supplier holds a global monopoly (Materion's Beryllium).

QWhich company is described as the sole global supplier of high-frequency connectors for Starlink terminals, and what is its approximate 2025 SpaceX-related order value?

AThe company is Sunway Communication (stock code 300136). Its approximate 2025 SpaceX-related order value is 1.05 billion RMB (about 105 million USD implied by the 10.5亿 figure).

QThe article suggests SpaceX's supply chain investment opportunity is just beginning. What are the three reasons given to support this timing?

AThe three reasons are: 1) Procurement volume is only just starting to increase, with plans for 100 launches in 2026, Starlink terminal targets of 30 million units, and future AI data center deployment. 2) Transparency is opening for the first time due to the IPO, allowing supply chain order growth to be tracked via financial reports. 3) Historical parallels suggest the supply chain is at a stage similar to Tesla's in 2018, with scaling just beginning and order growth starting to accelerate.

QWhat alternative investment strategy does the author propose for those who missed the SpaceX IPO or find its valuation too high?

AThe author proposes looking at the companies in SpaceX's supply chain instead. The argument is that regardless of SpaceX's stock price volatility, it must continue issuing hundreds of billions in annual procurement orders, which translate into stable, recurring revenue for its suppliers. This approach is framed as 'not chasing the rocket, but buying the shovels.'

你可能也喜歡

Chainlink CCIP 加入央行数字货币试点项目

Chainlink的跨链互操作性协议CCIP正被用于多个央行的数字货币及资产代币化结算试点项目,标志着该协议进入了区块链基础设施领域重要的机构性实验场景。这些试点包括巴西的Drex数字雷亚尔计划、中国香港的Ensemble代币化沙盒网络,以及香港金融管理局的e-HKD+项目(涉及澳新银行的A$DC)。目前这些均为试验阶段,尚未投入商业生产,但具有重要意义,因为它们展示了受监管机构如何测试公共区块链基础设施概念。 央行的试点项目虽然多数不会立即转化为完整生产系统,但揭示了机构正在探索的方向,尤其是互操作性这一核心主题。未来金融体系很可能由多个受监管的网络、支付系统和结算层构成,因此安全可靠的跨链通信与价值传输成为关键基础设施需求。CCIP在这些试点中扮演了跨链消息传递和结算层的角色,用于测试支付对支付结算、跨境资产流动等场景。 对Chainlink而言,参与这些试点有助于强化其机构市场定位,表明其技术正在对可靠性、风险控制要求极高的环境中接受检验。然而,试点不等于正式采用,要实现持续的商业化采用仍需克服监管审批、技术整合和机构协调等多重挑战。整体来看,这反映了资产代币化结算正成为一个重要的机构议题,行业焦点已从简单的资产发行转向互操作性、跨境结算和可编程金融基础设施。

bitcoinist31 分鐘前

Chainlink CCIP 加入央行数字货币试点项目

bitcoinist31 分鐘前

XRP账本修订案临近验证节点投票截止日期

XRP Ledger(XRPL)即将进入一项关键验证者投票窗口期,决定是否激活拟议的协议修正案。这凸显了XRPL升级并非仅由开发代码发布驱动,而需经过网络治理流程。 修正案通过rippled发布流程和验证者投票系统推进。与其他XRPL变更类似,拟议修正案需要获得广泛验证者支持才能激活,通常要求达到并维持80%的验证者同意门槛持续一段时间。这一设计旨在确保升级审慎,避免仓促变更,让参与方有充分时间评估新功能。 验证者在XRPL治理中扮演核心角色,其投票决定直接影响协议是否引入新功能,进而塑造未来在支付、资产发行和去中心化交易所等方面的效用。虽然市场注意力常集中于价格波动,但此类协议升级对网络的长期发展更为关键,可能影响智能合约功能、资产特性、交易类型及运行可靠性。 需要明确的是,投票截止日期并不意味着升级必然激活。即使功能已包含在代码版本中,仍需获得足够且持续的支持。验证者可能支持、保留支持或要求更多审查,这是一个健康的决策过程。 对XRP而言,修正案进程之所以重要,是因为其长期价值与XRPL的实用性能紧密相连。协议的进步若能带来更多用例、更好的工具和更强的应用需求,才能真正提升网络效用。因此,当前进展更应被视为基础设施的推进,而非单纯的市场价格信号。 总之,XRPL正进入又一个治理检查点,本次投票将反映验证者对推动下一组协议变更的态度。

bitcoinist46 分鐘前

XRP账本修订案临近验证节点投票截止日期

bitcoinist46 分鐘前

Solana稳定币市值突破150亿美元,网络流动性不断深化

Solana稳定币总市值突破150亿美元,显示出该网络流动性进一步深化。这一里程碑数据来自DeFiLlama,表明Solana生态中的稳定币活动日益活跃,为交易、支付、去中心化金融(DeFi)和链上结算提供了更坚实的基础。 稳定币是链上金融的“营运资本”,用于交易出入场、协议借贷、流动性池和支付结算,其增长比单纯的投机活动更能体现网络的真实效用和流动性提升。Solana凭借低费用和快速确认的优势,吸引了大量美元流动性。 目前,USDC和USDT仍是主导,但Solana的稳定币生态正趋于多样化。这有助于DeFi协议、支付应用和机构产品的集成,但也带来了复杂性,用户需关注资产的流动性、可赎回性和风险。 稳定币的增长直接利好Solana DeFi和支付领域:借贷市场可深化,去中心化交易所的大额交易滑点更低,支付应用能结算更多价值。这强化了Solana将高性能与日益增长的流动性及用户友好应用相结合的核心叙事。 关键点在于,市场将关注这些稳定币是否被活跃使用,而不仅仅是供应量。Solana的挑战在于通过构建有吸引力的应用,将流动性沉淀下来。跨越150亿美元大关是一个重要信号,表明Solana正在构建支撑更大规模金融活动的基础,其发展叙事正逐渐脱离纯粹的炒作周期。

bitcoinist1 小時前

Solana稳定币市值突破150亿美元,网络流动性不断深化

bitcoinist1 小時前

交易

現貨
活动图片