Michael Saylor Says Quantum Threat to Bitcoin Is Not Immediate

TheNewsCrypto發佈於 2026-02-24更新於 2026-02-24

文章摘要

Michael Saylor, founder of MicroStrategy, addressed concerns about quantum computing as a potential threat to Bitcoin, stating it is not an immediate risk and is at least a decade away. He emphasized that the broader cybersecurity community views quantum risk as a long-term issue rather than a current threat. Saylor expressed confidence in the Bitcoin ecosystem’s ability to adapt, noting that upgrades would be implemented across global systems if such a risk emerged. He also highlighted MicroStrategy’s significant Bitcoin holdings, which now total 717,722 BTC worth approximately $54.56 billion, despite recent market declines.

Michael Saylor, founder of Strategy, formerly MicroStrategy, discussed concerns about the quantum threat to Bitcoin in an interview and clarified that it is not an immediate security risk at this time, as it is ten years away.

​On February 23, Natalie Brunell, who shared a recent episode of her Coin Stories podcast on X with Saylor, in which they discussed several topics around Bitcoin and Strategy. In the middle of the conversation, Brunell asked whether quantum computing poses an existential threat to Bitcoin.

​She noted that many people are not technical enough to independently verify the seriousness of the risk and referenced Strategy’s earlier statement suggesting Bitcoin is “quantum-proof.” She asked Saylor why this is not considered a bigger threat.

​In response, Saylor stressed that quantum risk is not seen as imminent by the larger cybersecurity community. He insisted that the “consensus of the cyber security community broadly held is that quantum risk, if it exists, is more than ten years out. It’s not a this-decade thing.”

Quantum Threat Would Trigger Upgrades

Saylor stated, “The crypto community is the most sophisticated cybersecurity community,” he added, adding that it already makes use of innovative authentication techniques like hardware keys. He proposed that Bitcoin uses extremely sophisticated security measures in comparison compared to traditional banking systems.

​Then, Saylor went on and said that if a quantum risk materialized, it would lead to upgrades in the software that runs the Bitcoin network, the global banking system, the global internet, consumer devices, and all crypto networks. Eventually, post-quantum-resistant cryptography would replace all digital devices. In his view, quantum risk is currently in the spotlight largely because other anticipated risks have not materialized.

​He said, “You’ll see it coming. We’ll all see it coming, as the crypto security community will be the first to identify any real quantum threat, perceive it, and lead the way. Also, it can have enough time to implement necessary upgrades in response to emerging threats.

Strategy’s Bitcoin Accumulation and Market Performance

Saylor had previously posted “The Orange Century” on his X account, hinting at Strategy’s 100th Bitcoin buy. As the company began to accumulate Bitcoin in 2020 and has since expanded to become the biggest corporate owner in the world. The company owns 717,722 Bitcoin, which is worth around $54.56 billion.

​While writing this article, Bitcoin is down over 3% in the past 24 hours, and is trading at $62,884, which is actually down over 29% over the past month. Also, Bitcoin is down beyond 50% from its last all-time high of $126,198.07 in October 2025

Highlighted Crypto News:

Crypto Funds Shed $4B as Outflows Hit Five-Week Streak

TagsBitcoinMicheal Saylorquantum

相關問答

QAccording to Michael Saylor, when is the quantum threat to Bitcoin expected to become a significant risk?

AAccording to Michael Saylor, the consensus of the cybersecurity community is that the quantum risk, if it exists, is more than ten years away and is not a threat for this decade.

QWhat did Michael Sayer suggest would happen if a quantum risk to cryptography did materialize?

ASaylor stated that a materialized quantum risk would trigger upgrades to the Bitcoin network's software, the global banking system, the internet, consumer devices, and all crypto networks, leading to their replacement with post-quantum-resistant cryptography.

QHow does Michael Saylor describe the Bitcoin and crypto community in terms of cybersecurity?

ASaylor described the crypto community as 'the most sophisticated cybersecurity community,' which already employs innovative authentication techniques like hardware keys and uses extremely sophisticated security measures compared to traditional banking systems.

QHow many Bitcoins does MicroStrategy (Strategy) own, and what is their approximate value?

AMicroStrategy owns 717,722 Bitcoins, which are worth approximately $54.56 billion.

QWhat was the price of Bitcoin and its performance at the time the article was written?

AAt the time of writing, Bitcoin was trading at $62,884, down over 3% in the past 24 hours and down over 29% over the past month. It was also down more than 50% from its all-time high of $126,198.07 in October 2025.

你可能也喜歡

Agent接管流量分发权,腾讯、字节、阿里在抢什么?

近日,腾讯、阿里、字节三大互联网巨头几乎同时加码AI智能体(Agent)布局,争夺AI时代的入口主导权。核心在于,谁掌握了Agent,谁就掌握了未来的流量分发权。 **阿里**采取“双子星”策略:千问App正演变为超级Agent,深度接入淘宝、支付宝等生态业务,实现从搜索到交易的全流程操作,并已向外部品牌开放接入;夸克则定位为AI旗舰应用,致力于成为“AI超级框”。在B端,阿里推出企业智能体平台“悟空”,探索“一人AI公司”模式。 **字节**凭借“豆包”App已获超3亿月活,并通过“扣子”平台构建开发者生态,支持多智能体协同。其战略是软硬一体,将豆包能力延伸至AI手机、智能眼镜等硬件,旨在让AI入口无处不在。 **腾讯**的杀手锏藏于微信。正在内测的微信AI智能体可通过右滑直接调用数百万小程序完成任务,将微信生态转化为“服务操作系统”。腾讯试图将AI深度融入现有国民应用,而非另造新入口。 三家的竞争折射出商业逻辑的深刻变化:流量分配权正从“用户自主点击”转向“Agent代为决策”。商业模式从争夺用户时长的“注意力经济”,转向以结果和效率为核心的“意图经济”。未来,服务提供者不仅比拼品牌,更需比拼其接入AI生态的能力。 这标志着从PC网页、移动App到AI Agent的又一次入口更迭,新一轮行业洗牌已然开始。

marsbit58 分鐘前

Agent接管流量分发权,腾讯、字节、阿里在抢什么?

marsbit58 分鐘前

从封杀豆包到拥抱荣耀,微信为什么突然“变脸”?

从严防死守到主动合作,微信对手机AI助手的态度在近期发生了180度转变。过去一年,微信曾封杀字节跳动豆包手机、限制OPPO“AI一键闪记”等功能,坚决反对第三方通过模拟点击操控微信。如今,微信却与华为、荣耀、小米等多家厂商合作,推出A2A(智能体到智能体)助手能力,允许用户通过系统AI助手直接发送微信消息、拨打语音电话。 这一转变源于腾讯在AI竞争中的焦虑。其AI应用“元宝”月活远低于竞争对手,而微信坐拥14亿月活和小程序生态,成为腾讯在AI时代的关键底牌。微信正内测AI智能体,旨在通过自然语言调用小程序服务,但需要打通手机系统这一首要AI入口。A2A合作让手机厂商的智能体作为“接线员”,将用户指令转交微信执行,腾讯借此既保住了生态控制权,又接入了系统级流量。 与之前被封杀的GUI(图形界面模拟操作)路线不同,A2A采用双重授权机制,通过标准化接口调用,微信在其中占据主导。手机厂商之所以愿意合作,是因为GUI强攻路线已被证明行不通,而A2A为其保留了在系统级AI场景中的发展空间,并有助于在激烈的行业竞争中快速提升AI整合能力。尽管存在数据隐私担忧,但A2A被视为比模拟点击更安全合规的路径。 这场合作本质是双方在AI入口争夺中的阶段性妥协:腾讯需要手机入口为微信AI引流,手机厂商则需要突破跨应用调用的合规瓶颈。长远看,腾讯试图将微信打造为AI“服务操作系统”,而手机厂商则希望用户深度依赖系统自带助手,双方生态战略的博弈将持续。AI时代的入口之争,已随着用户一句“帮我发微信”悄然展开。

marsbit2 小時前

从封杀豆包到拥抱荣耀,微信为什么突然“变脸”?

marsbit2 小時前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片