[daily public chain] sol exchange accounts for 37%, and avax accounts for us $10.1 billion

Huobi Research發佈於 2022-03-25更新於 2022-03-29

文章摘要

Since 2017, large-scale ambushes have emerged and the fittest have been eliminated in the wheel of the times.

Since 2017, large-scale ambushes have emerged and the fittest have been eliminated in the wheel of the times. Until this year, the public chain has ushered in a collective outbreak, from Polkadot, a cross chain network of slot auction, to many emerging public chains such as Solana, avalanche and Cardano. Ethereum has created a public chain with great competition demand, giving birth to greater market opportunities.

More than 100 public chain projects are common and cross chain, which is a new trend

At present, there are more than 100 active public chains, which can be divided into single chain and cross chain according to the attributes of the chain, and the cross chain is represented by Boca and has become the mainstream trend of this era. Overall, the number of public chains has formed a certain scale, and the competition is quite fierce.

1、Solana

Solana started the upsurge of public chain. What's the difference between them?

Solana's fire has directly stirred the upsurge of the public chain camp, including avalanche, fantom, near and so on. The market pays more attention to the public chain, and both capital, project parties and developers are full of interest in this track. So, what are the differences between them?

In terms of technical architecture:

Solana: poh clock scheme

Different from most pieces + eth2 0 scheme, Solana created a unique and innovative poh clock mechanism in the public chain circle The scheme decouples the block out time and state. In terms of global consensus, it is not limited by the hard requirements of block size and block out time. Through the global clock, a globally available time chain is generated for all nodes. The state update can be carried out asynchronously. The verifier can send state updates to other nodes in real time. The poh clock gives the participants of Solana ecology more expandable space, Further improve and expand the overall throughput capacity.

Lock data

Sol's lock up scale has been pulled back from a high level, with a peak of US $15 billion in 2021. On March 24, the scale of lock up reached US $7.34 billion, and there is a large space for data callback of lock up volume.

In terms of the proportion of lock up on the sol chain, the proportion of loan lock up and decentralized exchange lock up is relatively large, while the scale of loan, pledge and mining lock up is small. According to the latest data on March 24, the decentralized exchange locked positions of US $2.76 billion, while loans, pledges and mining were US $1.17 billion, US $1.65 billion and US $1.4 billion.

Token price

The linkage effect between slol price and lock volume is good, and the sol price has dropped from a high of more than $240 to a minimum of $80. The current price on March 24 is $102. In the later stage, we can pay attention to the ecological development, as well as the trading opportunities of the upward lock up volume and price recovery.

2. Avalanche: three chain structure

Avalanche agreement entered the public view by means of incentives, and realized the sharp rise of currency price and lock up volume. Similarly, as a smart contract platform, avalanche is very novel in architecture design and adopts the three chain structure of X chain, C chain and P chain. X chain is a transaction chain, which mainly deals with point-to-point asset creation and transaction transactions between individuals; C-chain is a smart contract chain compatible with EVM, and the basic defi projects are built on C-chain; P chain is a platform chain, which is mainly responsible for token pledge, coordinating network verifiers, creating user-defined subnets and other affairs. The three chains perform their respective functions, but complement each other, further liberating avalanche's network performance.

Lock data

Avax lock up data increased by leaps and bounds in 2021. The data rebounded from a low of $2 billion to a maximum of more than $14 billion, with a growth space of more than six times. The current TVL value is US $10.15 billion.

In terms of the proportion of avax chain lock, the proportion of lending, lock and decentralized exchange lock is relatively large, while the scale of mining and cross chain lock is small. On March 24, the loan lockup reached its peak. The scale of loan lockup was US $4.6 billion, that of decentralized exchange lockup was US $4 billion, and that of mining and cross chain lockup was US $900 million and US $1.1 billion.

Token price

Avax experienced great growth in 2021, rising from $15 in August 2021 to a high of $135. From the second half of 2021 to the beginning of 2022, the price of avax remained around $85. Compared with the vicinity of TVL's decline, there is more room for price correction. Next, we can focus on low absorption opportunities.

你可能也喜歡

Claude Code 推出动态工作流:让AI学会自己组队干活

Claude Code 推出了动态工作流(workflows)功能,使AI能够根据任务动态组建多个智能体(Agent)团队协同工作,从而解决复杂的长周期任务。 该功能的核心价值在于,它改变了Claude Code原有的“单智能体在单一上下文内规划并执行”的模式。通过动态工作流,Claude可以将任务拆解,分派给多个拥有独立上下文的子智能体并行处理、交叉验证甚至彼此竞争,最后综合结果。这有效缓解了单智能体在处理长任务时常见的“智能体惰性”(提前宣布完成)、“自我偏好偏差”(倾向认可自己的结论)和“目标漂移”(逐渐偏离原始目标)等问题。 动态工作流通过执行一个包含特殊函数的JavaScript文件来协调子智能体。它支持多种实用模式,例如:将任务分类后路由给不同智能体;将任务拆分为多个小步骤并行处理再综合(扇出并综合);生成多个方案后通过锦标赛机制竞争筛选;以及进行对抗式验证等。 其应用场景显著超越了传统的代码任务,扩展至非技术领域。示例包括:代码迁移与重构、深度研究与事实核查、对大量简历或工单进行排序、从历史会话中提炼行为规则、进行事故根因调查、对积压任务进行大规模分诊,以及在命名、设计等需要探索和品味判断的任务中生成并筛选方案。 文章也指出,动态工作流并非万能。它通常会消耗更多token,因此不适合所有常规编程任务。最佳实践仍在形成中,开发者需要根据任务复杂度判断是否使用。用户可以通过详细提示(prompt)设计工作流,并结合 `/goal` 和 `/loop` 等指令,或设置token使用预算来优化效果。创建的工作流可以保存、共享甚至通过技能(skill)进行分发。 总的来说,动态工作流标志着Claude Code从一个代码助手向一个可编排的智能体工作台演进。未来AI工具的竞争力,可能不仅在于单个模型的智能程度,更在于其组织可靠、可复用执行流程的能力。

marsbit6 分鐘前

Claude Code 推出动态工作流:让AI学会自己组队干活

marsbit6 分鐘前

Hyperliquid,华尔街全天候交易便利店

《华尔街日报》报道,去中心化加密交易平台Hyperliquid已成为华尔街交易者,尤其是短线操作者的重要工具。其核心优势在于提供全年无休、全天候交易服务,允许投资者在美股休市(如周末)时提前建仓或平仓,以捕捉如地缘政治事件等带来的市场波动。对冲基金交易员Vala Zeinali分享了他利用该平台在中东冲突消息发布后,及时交易原油衍生品并获得高额回报的经历。 平台由前高频交易员Jeff Yan创立,旨在提供高性能且用户自主托管资产的交易系统,以应对类似FTX破产的风险。尽管公司仅有11名员工,但其业务增长迅速,去年营收约8亿美元,其原生代币HYPE市值已达约160亿美元。 Hyperliquid提供多样化的交易标的,包括比特币、标普500指数、原油以及SpaceX等未上市公司的永续合约,吸引了大量传统金融和加密领域资金。平台的高杠杆特性也意味着高风险,曾在市场剧烈波动时导致巨额爆仓。 目前,美国用户虽被协议禁止使用,但仍有人通过VPN访问。平台吸引力还在于其简洁的界面、丰富的产品以及活跃的社区文化,用户甚至可以直接与创始团队互动。Hyperliquid计划未来拓展至预测市场和期权交易领域,其终极目标是整合所有金融业务。然而,监管机构警告,永续合约结构复杂,面向散户的风险披露可能不足,存在隐患。

marsbit6 分鐘前

Hyperliquid,华尔街全天候交易便利店

marsbit6 分鐘前

谁为代理提供资金?

文章探讨了人工智能代理支付领域的关键问题:治理层的价值与竞争。OpenAI曾因缺乏清晰的购物规则(如退货、防欺诈)而关闭代理购物功能,这凸显了治理(支出控制、身份验证、政策执行)在代理经济中的核心地位。 目前,代理支付平均金额仅31美分,传统支付手续费(如Stripe)使得利润微薄,这为低成本的加密货币结算层(如Layer-2稳定币支付)创造了机会。Coinbase的x402协议和Stripe等公司推出的机器支付协议(MPP)正在争夺支付基础设施的主导权。 然而,真正的价值不仅在于处理交易,更在于管理资金流动的规则,即治理层。钱包(如Stripe收购的Privy)因其处在资金流动的关键节点,成为实施消费限额和审批的理想治理层。Stripe、Coinbase等巨头正通过垂直整合技术栈(覆盖结算、钱包、协议、治理等层面)来建立竞争优势。它们通过投资或收购治理初创公司,确保无论治理功能是内嵌还是独立,都能获利。 分析指出,支付处理终将商品化,价值会向上转移到决定交易能否发生的治理环节。预计到2030年,AI代理交易额可达3-5万亿美元,即使收取很低的治理费率,也能产生数十亿美元收入,堪比Coinbase目前的年订阅服务总收入。因此,在钱包、结算和治理层进行垂直整合,通过浮动余额收益、结算费用和合规费用多元获利,将是企业在代理支付时代保持竞争力的关键商业模式。

marsbit34 分鐘前

谁为代理提供资金?

marsbit34 分鐘前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片