Kiyosaki Slams Schools for ‘Fake Money’ Indoctrination

TheCryptoTimes發佈於 2025-09-19更新於 2025-09-19

Robert Kiyosaki, the author behind the best-selling “Rich Dad Poor Dad” and a vocal Bitcoin (BTC) advocate, had criticized the U.S. education system. He has called it a form of indoctrination that traps young people into working for “fake money”.

On Wednesday, speaking on “The Bitcoin Podcast,” hosted by Jordan Walker, Co-Founder of Bitcoin Collective, Kiyosaki argued that schools and professors push a flawed financial playbook: attend college, secure a job, grind away, stash savings, and funnel money into 401(k) plans loaded with underperforming assets. 

“Poor people are poor because they have no idea what real money is,” he said. Kiyosaki reserved sharp words for central banks, labeling them “criminal organizations” and even “Marxists.” He claimed their money-printing policies enrich the wealthy while eroding the middle class and the poor. 

He added, “Every time you print money, you print this fake stuff here. Guys like me get richer, but the poor middle class get poorer.” Data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics underscores his point on inflation’s toll. A $1,000 holding from August 2000 to August 2025 would have lost about 47% of its purchasing power. 

Kiyosaki: Bitcoin soars as inflation persists, ETFs risky

The Federal Reserve targets 2% annual inflation, but August 2025 figures clocked in at 2.9% for headline inflation and 3.2% for core inflation, levels above the goal that have persisted since 2021. In contrast, Bitcoin has surged over 900% in the last five years, climbing from roughly $11,670 to about $117,200 as of Thursday, per CoinGecko

Kiyosaki, who bought his first BTC at $6,000, now holds around 60 coins, valued at roughly $7 million. His strategy now includes funneling rental property income into Bitcoin, Ethereum, gold, silver, and oil.

Looking ahead, Kiyosaki reiterated his April forecast that Bitcoin could hit $180 million by this year. Yet he urged caution on exchange-traded funds (ETFs), dubbing them “paper assets” prone to collapse in a bank run, though he conceded they’re the simplest entry for everyday investors.

Kiyosaki’s remarks echo broader debates on inflation’s global bite. Economist Saifedean Ammous, author of “The Bitcoin Standard,” recently predicted on his X post that Argentines would flee the devaluing peso toward the U.S. dollar and Bitcoin. On May 20, 2025, Real Vision CEO Raoul Pal similarly advised on X that stacking crypto and non-fungible tokens against currency erosion.

On July 28, 2025, Kiyosaki warned of a potential U.S. economic crash akin to 1929, urging people to rethink 401(k)s and IRAs heavy in stocks. He noted Buffett and Rogers sold stocks for cash or silver, while he holds gold, silver, and Bitcoin.

Also Read: Atkins Softens SEC Enforcement, Backs Crypto Growth


Mobile Only Image

你可能也喜歡

您会惊讶地发现,WeChat 和 Telegram 在架构层面竟如此不同

微信与Telegram在架构层面有着根本性的差异,主要体现在数据存储、功能设计和生态开放度上。 **数据存储方式**:Telegram提供无限云端存储,所有消息历史在各设备间自动同步。微信则采用本地存储,消息在服务器交付后不保留,因此更换设备需通过特定功能迁移,且桌面版必须依赖手机在线确认才能登录。 **功能设计差异**:在频道讨论方面,Telegram为帖子自动关联评论区,实现一体化讨论。微信的公众号文章评论需经发布者审核才可显示,缺乏与文章直接关联的讨论系统,用户交流需跳转至聊天或小程序。文件传输上,Telegram支持最大2-4GB的文件,微信则限制为200MB,大文件需借助“文件传输助手”或第三方服务。 **开发与生态**:Telegram的Bot API完全开放免费,开发门槛低。微信小程序生态庞大(活跃数量超480万),但属于封闭系统,需经过审核、认证,甚至提供商业许可才能使用部分API,准入要求更高。 **支付整合**:微信支付深度融入中国日常生活,覆盖绝大多数线下场景及公共服务,替代了现金和银行应用。Telegram没有内置的法定货币支付系统,主要通过第三方机器人实现支付功能,尤其侧重加密货币,这反映了其去中心化理念,但在传统金融基础设施完善的地区,限制了其作为日常金融工具的应用。 **安全考量**:文章未深入讨论加密机制。Telegram提供端到端加密的私密聊天选项,而微信聊天信息不采用端到端加密。值得注意的是,微信将通讯与支付高度集成于单一界面,理论上扩大了潜在的攻击面。有数据显示,仅2025年初新加坡就记录了数百起涉及仿冒微信等支付平台员工的诈骗案件,损失巨大。这引出一个技术问题:当通讯与支付功能在同一个应用内结合得越紧密,聊天安全漏洞可能带来的代价就越高。 总结而言,两者代表了不同的平台哲学:微信构建了一个深度融入现实经济的封闭但高度集成的生态系统;而Telegram则围绕开放协议、灵活数据存储和低开发者门槛进行设计。这种架构选择决定了各自的目标用户和使用场景。

cryptonews.ru5 小時前

您会惊讶地发现,WeChat 和 Telegram 在架构层面竟如此不同

cryptonews.ru5 小時前

交易

現貨
活动图片