Digital sovereignty: Reclaiming your private data in Web3

Cointelegraph發佈於 2022-05-07更新於 2022-05-07

文章摘要

As the Fair Data Society puts it, we are laborers in the data economy.

As the Fair Data Society puts it, we are laborers in the data economy. Our personal data — basically, the digital blueprint of our lives — gets collected by platforms we interact with, most often in a non-transparent way. At best, it is used to improve our user experience. At worst, our privacy gets breached, monetized and even weaponized against us.

It all started with the emergence and growth of the user-generated web, as seemingly free social media networks, search engines and companies saw a new opportunity of profiting and went into the business of gathering, storing, analyzing and selling user data. By 2022, the data market had grown immensely. According to Statista, a total of 64.2 zettabytes of data had been created, consumed and put online worldwide by 2020. By 2025, this number is expected to exceed 180 zettabytes.

Talking about the evolution of data sovereignty in a profit-driven climate, professor Sabina Leonelli said:
“Individual agency in the data economy has shrunk, with a few organizations dominating the conditions under which information can be exchanged and used, to the detriment of individual rights and collective action.”
Indeed, over three-quarters of the global search market is under the control of the Google search engine and over 3.6 billion individual users across four social media platforms owned by Meta.

Course for data sovereignty
Big Tech companies recognized the pressure and increasing regulatory demand, so in 2018, the Data Transfer Project was born. Six contributors — Google, Microsoft, Apple, Twitter, Facebook and SmugMug — committed to enabling seamless data transfer among platforms via a common framework with open-source code. Still, it was just the first step toward users reclaiming their data.
In the past few years, the demand for transparency, trustlessness, security and decentralization has formed across multiple sectors of our life: from finance to organizational management to data storage. This is evident in the blockchain technologies and solutions such as decentralized finance, decentralized autonomous organizations and Web3, which aim to grant users full control over their digital lives and protect the basic human right to data privacy.
So, what are data sovereignty and radical data ownership — and how can they be achieved?
In a nutshell, achieving data sovereignty means the user takes full control over their data. They finally get to know (and have a say on) where it goes and what purposes it can be used for, while the data itself is not locked into a single platform. The advocates of this concept are aiming to create a new, fair digital space where information will be used for social good, and its value will be distributed in alignment with Web3 and Fair Data Principles, and there are a number of decentralized instruments that will help achieve that.
Web3: My keys, my data
One of the primary features of Web3 that makes it different from the web we know is the lack of centralized data repositories. Decentralized storages provide us with a single source of truth — the same as blockchain does, just for private and big data.
The use of protocols and a decentralized data layer will make it possible to encrypt and exchange information in a system of peer-to-peer networks, while content-based addressing makes sure that we know the data hasn’t been tampered with: When we download a chunk from a certain address, we know that this data is correct because its hash corresponds to the address.
Moreover, there’s no data sovereignty without data interoperability. As opposed to data monopolies, where users are locked into proprietary interfaces, Web3 is based on the idea of using noncustodial solutions. By using keys, users will be able to access the same set of their private data from multiple platforms (also known as BYOD) and move it freely among storages and apps.
The sign-up process will see changes, too. For one, we use email addresses to create accounts, or tie them to our Google adn Facebook profiles. In Web3, email credentials will be replaced with wallet addresses. “Sign in with Ethereum,” which is funded by the Ethereum Foundation and will probably become a standard, is a good example here. While all interactions with the blockchain are available for public viewing, logging in with an anonymous wallet address will help preserve confidentiality.
Meanwhile, builders and content creators will get access to new ways of monetizing their content. Tokens, both fungible and nonfungible, are the “likes” and “retweets” of Web3. These can be used to reward quality content and share pieces of data, all while making sure the creator gets a fair share of the royalties.
And finally, as far as control over data is concerned, introducing decentralized governance is yet another way to topple the monopolistic power of Big Tech. Decentralized autonomous organizations have the potential to bring democracy and transparency to the decision-making process on the blockchain, as transactions are verified through consensus.
Bringing trust and privacy into the data economy
Achieving digital sovereignty means treating users as persons, not cogs in the data economy machine. To summarize the above, it can be achieved by building human-centric applications where data interoperability and data sovereignty are put first, incentivizing the development of the new web infrastructure that supports encryption, data protection and ethical, transparent business models. Of course, basic digital literacy would also reduce the chances of internet users unwittingly signing away their privacy.
As a closing note, it would be important to emphasize that this is a collaborative effort — one bigger than a single individual or organization — and the whole Web3 space should work together. This way, we can start reclaiming privacy for the individual and bringing trust into the data economy on a societal level.

你可能也喜歡

Agent接管流量分发权,腾讯、字节、阿里在抢什么?

近日,腾讯、阿里、字节三大互联网巨头几乎同时加码AI智能体(Agent)布局,争夺AI时代的入口主导权。核心在于,谁掌握了Agent,谁就掌握了未来的流量分发权。 **阿里**采取“双子星”策略:千问App正演变为超级Agent,深度接入淘宝、支付宝等生态业务,实现从搜索到交易的全流程操作,并已向外部品牌开放接入;夸克则定位为AI旗舰应用,致力于成为“AI超级框”。在B端,阿里推出企业智能体平台“悟空”,探索“一人AI公司”模式。 **字节**凭借“豆包”App已获超3亿月活,并通过“扣子”平台构建开发者生态,支持多智能体协同。其战略是软硬一体,将豆包能力延伸至AI手机、智能眼镜等硬件,旨在让AI入口无处不在。 **腾讯**的杀手锏藏于微信。正在内测的微信AI智能体可通过右滑直接调用数百万小程序完成任务,将微信生态转化为“服务操作系统”。腾讯试图将AI深度融入现有国民应用,而非另造新入口。 三家的竞争折射出商业逻辑的深刻变化:流量分配权正从“用户自主点击”转向“Agent代为决策”。商业模式从争夺用户时长的“注意力经济”,转向以结果和效率为核心的“意图经济”。未来,服务提供者不仅比拼品牌,更需比拼其接入AI生态的能力。 这标志着从PC网页、移动App到AI Agent的又一次入口更迭,新一轮行业洗牌已然开始。

marsbit1 小時前

Agent接管流量分发权,腾讯、字节、阿里在抢什么?

marsbit1 小時前

从封杀豆包到拥抱荣耀,微信为什么突然“变脸”?

从严防死守到主动合作,微信对手机AI助手的态度在近期发生了180度转变。过去一年,微信曾封杀字节跳动豆包手机、限制OPPO“AI一键闪记”等功能,坚决反对第三方通过模拟点击操控微信。如今,微信却与华为、荣耀、小米等多家厂商合作,推出A2A(智能体到智能体)助手能力,允许用户通过系统AI助手直接发送微信消息、拨打语音电话。 这一转变源于腾讯在AI竞争中的焦虑。其AI应用“元宝”月活远低于竞争对手,而微信坐拥14亿月活和小程序生态,成为腾讯在AI时代的关键底牌。微信正内测AI智能体,旨在通过自然语言调用小程序服务,但需要打通手机系统这一首要AI入口。A2A合作让手机厂商的智能体作为“接线员”,将用户指令转交微信执行,腾讯借此既保住了生态控制权,又接入了系统级流量。 与之前被封杀的GUI(图形界面模拟操作)路线不同,A2A采用双重授权机制,通过标准化接口调用,微信在其中占据主导。手机厂商之所以愿意合作,是因为GUI强攻路线已被证明行不通,而A2A为其保留了在系统级AI场景中的发展空间,并有助于在激烈的行业竞争中快速提升AI整合能力。尽管存在数据隐私担忧,但A2A被视为比模拟点击更安全合规的路径。 这场合作本质是双方在AI入口争夺中的阶段性妥协:腾讯需要手机入口为微信AI引流,手机厂商则需要突破跨应用调用的合规瓶颈。长远看,腾讯试图将微信打造为AI“服务操作系统”,而手机厂商则希望用户深度依赖系统自带助手,双方生态战略的博弈将持续。AI时代的入口之争,已随着用户一句“帮我发微信”悄然展开。

marsbit2 小時前

从封杀豆包到拥抱荣耀,微信为什么突然“变脸”?

marsbit2 小時前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片