Digital Euro Can End Bank Crises, Is Better Than Deposits, Ex-Bank of Spain Chief Says

CoinDeskPolicy發佈於 2023-11-27更新於 2023-11-28

文章摘要

A central bank digital currency (CBDC) could also be used to deregulate banking activities and help the banking sector grow, Miguel Fernández Ordóñez said during a European Pa...

  • Unlike bank deposits, a digital euro issued by the EU's central bank is a safe asset, former Bank of Spain Governor Miguel Fernández Ordóñez told a European Parliament committee.
  • Such a currency could help end economic crises, and even help deregulate banks, he said.
  • EU plans for a digital euro released earlier this year have faced backlash from lawmakers and the public over privacy concerns.
10

A digital euro, unlike bank deposits, is a safe asset and could help end bank crises or deregulate banks altogether, according to former Bank of Spain Governor Miguel Fernández Ordóñez.

Speaking at a public hearing hosted by the European Parliament's Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs to discuss a potential central bank digital currency (CBDC), Ordóñez said that the last two major global economic crises arose from using risky assets like bank deposits, which aren't money but promises to return money.

"Digital euros are euros, but bank deposits are not euros. Deposits are just promises to pay euros, and if banks can't fulfill those promises, then you get crises emerging," he said, adding that a CBDC would have the benefit of stability, justifying the use of the digital euro instead of bank deposits.

Advertisement
Advertisement

One of the chief concerns around CBDCs is their potential to threaten the stability of the banking sector by encouraging customers to withdraw their deposits and convert them into the CBDC. If withdrawals are large enough, it could create a liquidity crunch and other potential problems for the wider economy. To mitigate such a risk, European Union plans for a digital euro propose individual holding limits. The plans have also faced criticism from lawmakers and the public over privacy and other concerns.

Ordóñez, one of four experts testifying at the Tuesday hearing, went on to say that a digital euro could help deregulate banking activities entirely.

"And that deregulation would have a very important impact on growth because banking is the most protected sector. The sector is subject to the most intervention of all economic sectors," Ordóñez said.

Conversely, a digital euro issued by the European Central Bank wouldn't need things like deposit insurance or prudential requirements, which would help improve competition, he said.

A CBDC could also let the ECB have "direct monetary policy," said Ordóñez, also a former secretary of state for finance and economy for the government of Spain.

"So the central bank wouldn't have to change interest rates and we will be able to take monetary policy decisions without having to worry about the impact on banking stability. There are other effects, for example, dealing with the centralization of financial decisions or separating monetary policy from government finances. And there's a very important effect for Europeans because if we had a digital euro, then we could have real European monetary union. What we have at the moment is just physical money, coins, notes," Ordóñez said.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The EU has not decided whether to issue a digital euro, and lawmaker Stefan Berger, who is in charge of shepherding the legislation through the parliament, noted during the hearing that they "don't know the technological aspects" of a CBDC "or if it's going to be blockchain."

Edited by Sheldon Reback.


你可能也喜歡

美国大模型走向封闭,以安全之名

2026年6月,美国政府以安全为由,对前沿AI模型的发布实施管制。Anthropic的最强网络安全模型Mythos 5被要求下架后,仅获准有限恢复至约100家美国机构,其公众版Fable 5恢复时间未定。同时,OpenAI发布的新模型GPT-5.6系列也只对经政府审批的合作伙伴开放API。此事标志着美国政府首次成功介入商业AI模型的发布审批。 然而,涉事公司的安全评估显示,模型并未越过其自设的风险红线。OpenAI评估其模型不具备自主实施端到端网络攻击的能力;Anthropic则反驳政府的担忧基于一个狭窄、非通用的漏洞。行业批评政府的决策缺乏清晰的技术标准和透明的流程。有观点认为,管制行动的背后是模型能力的“可演示性”引发了政治担忧、竞争对手的举报以及新AI行政令寻求执法案例的需求。 文章回顾了上世纪90年代的“密码战争”,当时美国政府试图管制强加密技术的出口,最终因技术扩散无法遏制、损害美国企业竞争力而失败。历史镜鉴提示,对前沿AI的类似管制可能阻碍技术创新与产业投资,并将市场优势让位于以开源开放策略发展的竞争者。 评论指出,一个没有明确标准和时间表的审批流程,可能动摇前沿AI产业的商业逻辑,并将强大工具的访问权集中于少数特权机构,反而可能增加风险。全球开发者社区开始怀念模型自由发布、快速创新的时代,并将更多期待转向持续开放的中国大模型。

链捕手2 小時前

美国大模型走向封闭,以安全之名

链捕手2 小時前

交易

現貨
活动图片