7*24

Hot topic

Market

Activities

火币HTX报道，4月3日，美股三大指数收盘涨跌不一，道指跌0.13%，纳指涨0.18%，标普500指数涨0.11%。

【美股三大指数收盘涨跌不一】火币HTX报道，4月3日，美股三大指数收盘涨跌不一，道指跌0.13%，纳指涨0.18%，标普500指数涨0.11%。

美股三大指数收盘涨跌不一

火币HTX报道，4月3日，SpaceX在IPO中的目标估值据悉超过2万亿美元。

【SpaceX在IPO中的目标估值据悉超过2万亿美元】火币HTX报道，4月3日，SpaceX在IPO中的目标估值据悉超过2万亿美元。

SpaceX在IPO中的目标估值据悉超过2万亿美元

火币HTX报道，4月3日，去中心化永续合约平台 Hyperliquid 正持续蚕食中心化交易平台的市场份额。3 月，Hyperliquid 在永续合约总交易量中的占比已攀升至接近 6%，较一年前的约 3.5% 明显提升，月度交易量接近 2,000 亿美元。 
尤为值得关注的是，这一份额的增长发生在整体交易平台交易量自 2025 年 8 月峰值回落的背景下，表明 Hyperliquid 是在真正抢占市场份额，而非单纯受益于整体交易量上涨。在链上竞争对手中，dYdX 和 GMX 均未能在交易量增长或产品扩张上跟上 Hyperliquid 的步伐，后者目前已成为去中心化永续合约领域的明确领跑者。 
非加密资产的扩张是这一趋势背后愈发重要的结构性因素。石油等大宗商品现已可在 Hyperliquid 实现 24/7 交易，非加密资产交易量在平台整体活跃度中的占比正持续提升。这凸显了去中心化平台相对于传统市场的结构性优势——传统交易商若需等到 CME 周日晚间开盘才能对冲石油仓位，须承担整个周末的跳空风险，而 24 小时全天候交易平台则完全消除了这一风险。

【Hyperliquid持续抢占CEX市场份额，永续合约市占率逼近6%】火币HTX报道，4月3日，去中心化永续合约平台 Hyperliquid 正持续蚕食中心化交易平台的市场份额。3 月，Hyperliquid 在永续合约总交易量中的占比已攀升至接近 6%，较一年前的约 3.5% 明显提升，月度交易量接近 2,000 亿美元。 
尤为值得关注的是，这一份额的增长发生在整体交易平台交易量自 2025 年 8 月峰值回落的背景下，表明 Hyperliquid 是在真正抢占市场份额，而非单纯受益于整体交易量上涨。在链上竞争对手中，dYdX 和 GMX 均未能在交易量增长或产品扩张上跟上 Hyperliquid 的步伐，后者目前已成为去中心化永续合约领域的明确领跑者。 
非加密资产的扩张是这一趋势背后愈发重要的结构性因素。石油等大宗商品现已可在 Hyperliquid 实现 24/7 交易，非加密资产交易量在平台整体活跃度中的占比正持续提升。这凸显了去中心化平台相对于传统市场的结构性优势——传统交易商若需等到 CME 周日晚间开盘才能对冲石油仓位，须承担整个周末的跳空风险，而 24 小时全天候交易平台则完全消除了这一风险。

Hyperliquid持续抢占CEX市场份额，永续合约市占率逼近6%

opn24小时涨幅10.06%，暂报0.1903USDT

【HTX数据监测显示，opn暂报0.1903 USDT，24小时涨幅为10.06%。】opn24小时涨幅10.06%，暂报0.1903USDT

HTX数据监测显示，opn暂报0.1903 USDT，24小时涨幅为10.06%。

edge触及0.758美元创新高，24小时涨幅9.86%。

【HTX数据监测显示，edge最高涨至0.7586美元，创历史新高，暂报0.758美元，24小时涨幅为9.86%。】edge触及0.758美元创新高，24小时涨幅9.86%。

HTX数据监测显示，edge最高涨至0.7586美元，创历史新高，暂报0.758美元，24小时涨幅为9.86%。

火币HTX报道，4月3日，伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队宣布展开“真实承诺4”行动第91波军事打击，对以色列中部特拉维夫和北部海法进行新一轮导弹袭击。革命卫队称，一枚携带数百公斤弹头的弹道导弹已造成以色列多处严重损毁。 (CCTV国际时讯)

【伊朗发起第91波打击】火币HTX报道，4月3日，伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队宣布展开“真实承诺4”行动第91波军事打击，对以色列中部特拉维夫和北部海法进行新一轮导弹袭击。革命卫队称，一枚携带数百公斤弹头的弹道导弹已造成以色列多处严重损毁。 (CCTV国际时讯)

伊朗发起第91波打击

火币HTX报道，4月3日，WTI 5月原油期货结算价报111.54美元/桶，涨幅11.41%，自2022年以来首次收于每桶110美元上方。

【美国原油结算价自2022年以来首次高于110美元/桶】火币HTX报道，4月3日，WTI 5月原油期货结算价报111.54美元/桶，涨幅11.41%，自2022年以来首次收于每桶110美元上方。

美国原油结算价自2022年以来首次高于110美元/桶

火币HTX报道，4月3日，Kroll 债券评级机构（KBRA）将 Ripple Prime 的美国经纪交易商及控股公司评为 “中等质量” BBB 级别，为最低投资级别，Ripple Prime 为机构投资者提供交易、借贷及结算一体化服务。KBRA 指出，该评级反映其业务仍处于“扩张阶段”，收入主要集中于交易所衍生品清算和短期国债融资。

【Kroll给予Ripple Prime “中等质量”BBB评级】火币HTX报道，4月3日，Kroll 债券评级机构（KBRA）将 Ripple Prime 的美国经纪交易商及控股公司评为 “中等质量” BBB 级别，为最低投资级别，Ripple Prime 为机构投资者提供交易、借贷及结算一体化服务。KBRA 指出，该评级反映其业务仍处于“扩张阶段”，收入主要集中于交易所衍生品清算和短期国债融资。

Kroll给予Ripple Prime “中等质量”BBB评级

edge24小时涨幅10.14%，暂报0.7352USDT

【HTX数据监测显示，edge暂报0.7352 USDT，24小时涨幅为10.14%。】edge24小时涨幅10.14%，暂报0.7352USDT

HTX数据监测显示，edge暂报0.7352 USDT，24小时涨幅为10.14%。

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) released “Statement to Address Misconceptions in the Wake of Collapse of FTX.” MAS said that it cannot protect local users who dealt with FTX as FTX is not licensed by MAS and operates offshore. MAS has consistently warned about the dangers of dealing with unregulated entities. MAS also explained why MAS treated Binance differently from FTX, specifically why it was placed on the Investor Alert List (IAL) while FTX was not. While both Binance and FTX are not licensed here, there is a clear difference between the two: Binance was actively soliciting users in Singapore while FTX was not. Binance in fact went to the extent of offering listings in Singapore dollars and accepted Singapore-specific payment modes such as PayNow and PayLah. MAS received several complaints about Binance between January and August 2021. There were also announcements in multiple jurisdictions of unlicensed solicitation of customers by Binance during the same period. With regard to FTX, there was no evidence that it was soliciting Singapore users specifically. Trades on FTX also could not be transacted in Singapore dollars. Further, on MAS’ referral, the Commercial Affairs Department commenced investigation into Binance for possible contravention of the Payment Services Act (PS Act). MAS required Binance to stop soliciting Singapore users. To assure MAS that it was no longer doing so, Binance put in place various measures including geo-blocking of Singapore IP addresses and the removal of its mobile application from Singapore app stores. These measures were intended to demonstrate beyond doubt that Binance had ceased soliciting and providing services to Singapore users. MAS said that there are hundreds of offshore crypto exchange, and thousands of other entities offshore that accept investments in non-crypto assets. It is not possible to list all of them and no regulator in the world has done so. The most important lesson from the FTX debacle is that dealing in any cryptocurrency, on any platform, is hazardous. Crypto exchanges can and do fail. Even if a crypto exchange is licensed in Singapore, it would be currently only regulated to address money-laundering risks, not to protect investors. Further, even if a crypto exchange is well-managed, cryptocurrencies themselves are highly volatile and many of them have lost all value.

Detail

【MAS: It cannot protect FTX local users, FTX debacle shows any crypto trading platform is at risk】The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) released “Statement to Address Misconceptions in the Wake of Collapse of FTX.” MAS said that it cannot protect local users who dealt with FTX as FTX is not licensed by MAS and operates offshore. MAS has consistently warned about the dangers of dealing with unregulated entities. MAS also explained why MAS treated Binance differently from FTX, specifically why it was placed on the Investor Alert List (IAL) while FTX was not. While both Binance and FTX are not licensed here, there is a clear difference between the two: Binance was actively soliciting users in Singapore while FTX was not. Binance in fact went to the extent of offering listings in Singapore dollars and accepted Singapore-specific payment modes such as PayNow and PayLah. MAS received several complaints about Binance between January and August 2021. There were also announcements in multiple jurisdictions of unlicensed solicitation of customers by Binance during the same period. With regard to FTX, there was no evidence that it was soliciting Singapore users specifically. Trades on FTX also could not be transacted in Singapore dollars. Further, on MAS’ referral, the Commercial Affairs Department commenced investigation into Binance for possible contravention of the Payment Services Act (PS Act). MAS required Binance to stop soliciting Singapore users. To assure MAS that it was no longer doing so, Binance put in place various measures including geo-blocking of Singapore IP addresses and the removal of its mobile application from Singapore app stores. These measures were intended to demonstrate beyond doubt that Binance had ceased soliciting and providing services to Singapore users. MAS said that there are hundreds of offshore crypto exchange, and thousands of other entities offshore that accept investments in non-crypto assets. It is not possible to list all of them and no regulator in the world has done so. The most important lesson from the FTX debacle is that dealing in any cryptocurrency, on any platform, is hazardous. Crypto exchanges can and do fail. Even if a crypto exchange is licensed in Singapore, it would be currently only regulated to address money-laundering risks, not to protect investors. Further, even if a crypto exchange is well-managed, cryptocurrencies themselves are highly volatile and many of them have lost all value.

MAS: It cannot protect FTX local users, FTX debacle shows any crypto trading platform is at risk

XRP账本如何融入SWIFT推动25家银行处理区块链交易的行动？

关于2026年比特币ETF资金流入最低日的一切，以及抛售是否即将来临

2%用户贡献90%交易量：Polymarket的真实画像

从0.014美元预售到2027年5美元：17,857枚Ozak AI代币如何从250美元增值至89,000美元

Garlinghouse揭示Ripple真正转向发行自身稳定币的原因

以太坊价格正重演历史剧本，过去曾引发10,000%和4,000%暴涨

MAS: It cannot protect FTX local users, FTX debacle shows any crypto trading platform is at risk

免責聲明：以上內容不代表 HTX 的任何立場，HTX 不為任何交易提供相關決策建議。

相關文章

全部評論0最新熱門

熱門話題

相關文章