Crypto President, or the Yuan Shikai of the Industry?

比推Xuất bản vào 2026-03-05Cập nhật gần nhất vào 2026-03-05

Tóm tắt

An article titled "Encryption President or Industry's Yuan Shikai?" draws a historical parallel between former U.S. President Donald Trump and Yuan Shikai, a Chinese general who briefly restored imperial rule in 1915, suggesting that both were initially seen as saviors but ultimately betrayed their supporters' trust. The piece argues that Trump was embraced by the crypto industry during the 2024 election as a pro-crypto leader who would ease regulatory pressures. His administration did take initial friendly steps, such as replacing SEC Chair Gary Gensler and pausing lawsuits against major exchanges, which helped drive Bitcoin to new all-time highs. However, the article claims this support was superficial and self-serving. It highlights that Trump and his family allegedly engaged in lucrative meme coin schemes, with tokens like TRUMP and MELANIA, which reportedly earned the family over $1 billion before crashing and harming retail investors. This behavior is compared to the corruption of President Ulysses S. Grant's administration. Furthermore, the author contends that Trump’s trade war and tariff policies, particularly the escalation against China in October 2025, triggered a massive market crash. On October 11, 2025, Bitcoin plummeted from $126,000 to around $102,000, leading to over $19 billion in liquidations and marking the start of a crypto winter. The article concludes that Trump used crypto for political gain and personal enrichment rather than genuinely supporting...

Author: Ma He, Foresight News

Original Title: President Trump, the 'Yuan Shikai' of the Crypto Industry


On a winter night in 1915, beneath the red walls of Xinhua Gate in Beiping, China was engaged in a high-stakes gamble concerning its national destiny.

The elites who had once championed the republic, the tycoons fearful of turmoil, and even the capital giants from across the oceans held their breath, watching the man sitting on the chair in Zhongnanhai—Yuan Shikai. Four years prior, the revolutionary army had overthrown the Qing dynasty, yet the foreign powers chose Yuan, not Sun Yat-sen, to be the helmsman of the nation.

But Yuan Shikai was not the savior people had hoped for. Urged on by his close associates, he changed the era name to "Hongxian," plunging China back into imperial rule. However, after just 83 days, his Chinese Empire collapsed amidst widespread scorn, and China descended into decades of warlord strife.

A hundred years later, in the emerging financial frontier of cryptocurrency, people are also searching for their own "strongman." The 2024 US presidential election saw Trump hailed by the crypto industry as the savior who could break regulatory shackles and lead the industry into the mainstream. From venture capitalists in New York to crypto nouveau riche in Silicon Valley, from traditional financial institutions on Wall Street to retail investors in Southeast Asia, everyone placed their bets on this "Crypto President."

Yet, barely a year later, when the tariff war he wielded became the trigger for the crash on October 11, 2025, panic swept through the entire crypto market. As countless leveraged long positions were ruthlessly liquidated, people suddenly awoke: the Trump who had been so highly anticipated might just be the chief culprit of this crypto winter.

The relationship between Trump and the crypto industry is best described by the phrase, "Success also Xiao He, failure also Xiao He."

On March 4, Trump reposted a tweet from the Coinbase CEO, reiterating his commitment to making the US the global cryptocurrency capital. His slogans were loud and appealing, but does reality match his words?

The last person Trump favored provides a contrary answer. When the sweet cooperation between Musk and Trump at the White House ended in a rift after just a few months, you understand that the future of cryptocurrency Trump painted is also an illusion.

After taking office, Trump did act. The notorious SEC Chairman Gensler resigned disgraced in early 2025, replaced by the more crypto-friendly Paul Atkins. SEC lawsuits against several crypto companies were suspended or dropped, giving exchanges like Coinbase and Kraken a sigh of relief. Trump also signed an executive order to establish a dedicated task force to study how to incorporate cryptocurrency into the US financial regulatory framework.

These measures did provide a short-term boost to the market. Bitcoin's price rose steadily from $52,000 in September 2024, and by early October 2025, BTC once broke through $126,000 to set a new all-time high. People began talking about an "institutional bull run" and an "ETF bull run," as if a new golden age was dawning. Although Ethereum performed weakly, it also hit a new all-time high after a significant correction and months of consecutive gains.

As of March 3, 2026, US Bitcoin spot ETFs had accumulated total net inflows of $55 billion, and Ethereum spot ETFs had accumulated total inflows of $11.62 billion.

However, this optimism was short-lived. Just as Yuan Shikai's initial republican experiment ultimately led to the restoration of the monarchy, Trump's "friendliness" towards the crypto industry gradually revealed its true colors.

The Carnival of Family Wealth Extraction

In January 2025, just before Trump's inauguration, a meme token named "TRUMP" quietly launched. This token, named after the president himself, saw its price soar to $77 within days of launch, with its market cap skyrocketing to tens of billions of dollars, creating an exaggerated wealth effect. Some players in Chinese-speaking communities made millions or even tens of millions of dollars in profits from this meme coin in a short period.

From a tokenomics perspective, the Trump family held a significant portion of these two tokens. According to on-chain data analysis, Trump himself and associated entities held a considerable share of the total supply of TRUMP tokens.

These "Creators & CIC Digital" groups total 80% (800 million tokens) and are the main holding portion of the token. According to official and reliable sources, these portions are controlled by two entities related to the Trump family:

  • CIC Digital LLC: This is an affiliate of The Trump Organization, directly linked to the Trump family.

  • Fight Fight Fight LLC: Owned by Celebration Cards LLC, an entity also linked to Trump-related projects.

These entities collectively hold the remaining 80% of the tokens.

Its price has now fallen to around $3.50, a drop of approximately 20 times.

Following closely, First Lady Melania also launched her own token, "MELANIA." The token's market cap exceeded $10 billion on its first day but quickly crashed due to insider selling, shrinking to less than $2 billion. In June 2025, according to Lookonchain monitoring, the team behind the official Melania meme token MELANIA sold a cumulative 821,800 MELANIA (8.22% of the total supply) through 44 wallets over the past 4 months, cashing out a total of 244,934 SOL (approximately $35.76 million).

Those who bought in became the bagholders.

For a time, the Trump family seemed to become the "token-issuing family" of the crypto world.

In October 2025, according to an investigation published by the Financial Times, the Trump family had earned over $1 billion in pre-tax profits through various cryptocurrency-related products and companies in the past 12 months.

This kind of using political influence for personal enrichment is extremely rare in American history.

19th-century President Ulysses S. Grant shared a commonality with Trump: they both entered the political arena as "outsiders" or "saviors." Grant, a hero of the Civil War, was highly anticipated by the public; Trump, a business magnate, promised to "Make America Great Again."

However, the Grant administration became one of the most corrupt in US history. Although Grant himself may not have been subjectively greedy, he was extremely protective of his associates, condoning large-scale enrichment by family members and subordinates. The most famous among these was the "Gold Corner" of 1869—Grant's confidants attempted to manipulate the price of gold, nearly causing the US financial market to collapse.

Trump's meme coin operations bear a striking resemblance to the scandals of the Grant era. Although there is currently no evidence that Trump directly manipulated the market, using the presidential身份 to endorse family tokens is essentially a monetization of power. Worse, this behavior sets a dangerous precedent for the entire industry.

Following the Trump couple's token issuance, imitators emerged one after another. Argentine President Javier Milei, this self-proclaimed "anarcho-capitalist" leader, also launched his own meme coin in 2025. However, this token farce ended in scandal—extensive insider trading was exposed, early investors (including Milei's relatives and friends) sold at the token's peak, while ordinary retail investors lost everything.

Meme coins, a crypto category originally tinged with banter and community culture, gradually became "cash machines" under Trump's demonstration effect.

More and more politicians, influencers, and celebrities began issuing their own tokens, converting fans' trust into personal wealth. The accelerated inflation of this bubble not only weakened the credibility of the crypto industry but also increasingly associated the term "cryptocurrency" with "scam" and "speculation" in mainstream discourse.

It was also from that time that a $70 billion FDV became an insurmountable hurdle for meme coins, and many began to decline.

Data from DefiLlama shows that January 2025 was the peak moment for Pump.fun trading volume, which subsequently began to decline sharply, with activity plummeting. In January 2025, the highest daily trading volume could reach $550 million; now, it hovers around $60 million per day.

Even though so-called "Binance Life" and other once-hotly speculated meme coins later emerged on BNB Chain, their FDV failed to break through $1 billion.

After October 11, as the crypto market turned bearish, meme coin performance also slumped.

Market liquidity was carved up by token-issuing cliques and savvy traders.

Another crypto project, WLFI, has a management team composed of the Trump family and the Witkoff family. Among the Trump family, including eldest son Donald Trump Jr., second son Eric Trump, and the nominal youngest son Barron, are all listed.

Currently, under a series of incentive activities, the market cap of the stablecoin USD1 has jumped to $4.6 billion. The Trump family, through the DT Marks DEFI LLC entity, holds approximately 38% of the equity in WLF Holdco LLC, and WLF Holdco LLC is the sole member of World Liberty Financial, Inc. (the company responsible for developing the WLF protocol and operating the governance platform). DT Marks DEFI LLC is held by Trump family-related entities, with Trump himself holding about 70% of the equity in this entity.

After June 2025, their equity share was further reduced to about 40%, recently stabilizing at around 38% (according to the latest official statement, related to an investment party associated with UAE Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan acquiring a 49% equity stake; this transaction was completed in early 2026, bringing $500 million in funding, with the Trump family entity receiving $187 million).

Additionally, the Trump family and its affiliates hold 22.5 billion WLFI tokens (total supply 100 billion tokens,占比 22.5%). At the current price of $0.10, this is worth $2.25 billion. On the other hand, the family is entitled to 75% of the net proceeds from WLFI token sales (after deducting reserves, fees, etc.) according to a service agreement.

Cryptocurrency is a Tool, Not a Goal

If meme coins became a cash machine for the Trump family, then the subsequent series of tariff wars exposed Trump's true attitude towards cryptocurrency: in his eyes, crypto might be just a tool, not a major innovation worthy of attention.

Although the Trump administration was indeed more lenient than its predecessor in terms of regulation, this leniency was selective and utilitarian. For areas that could bring direct benefits to the Trump family (like meme coins), regulation was almost non-existent, also leading to endless chaos within them.

The essence of this "selective friendliness" was to garner votes and reward supporters, not to genuinely promote the healthy development of the crypto industry. Trump needed the support of crypto industry voters, so he made various promises during the campaign; but he did not truly understand, nor did he truly care about, the long-term value of this technology. Once the interests of the crypto industry conflicted with Trump's political agenda, the former was often sacrificed.

Cryptocurrency has a short history. With its dual attributes of finance and technology, holders are mostly young people, the tech nouveau riche. Before the election, the voices and shouts of young people were crucial for votes. Trump did not miss this opportunity, gaining the好感 of industry voters through promises and attending crypto summits. By loudly promising to "end the crackdown on the crypto industry" in his campaign speeches, he successfully packaged himself as the guardian of technological innovation.

On the other hand, Trump's image has never been well-received on Wall Street. From multiple bankruptcies and liquidations to legal disputes, traditional banking institutions have never stopped being wary of him. Even after taking office, some top capitals on Wall Street, as supporters of the Democratic Party, were naturally unwilling to become his financial alchemists. In this context, cryptocurrency could not only become a "financial backdoor" to avoid traditional regulation and bypass bank scrutiny but also a handy weapon for him to build a family economic empire. By pushing the family business into the crypto industry, he is trying to create a "Trump financial empire" independent of the existing financial order.

Thus, it is evident that what Trump favors is not cryptocurrency, but a new weapon that can help him bypass regulation and expand his voter base. Whether this divine weapon is cryptocurrency or AI, he doesn't care. But looking back at the crypto industry, as an emerging industry, does cryptocurrency's current situation most need the sugar-coated bullets of President Trump? The most棘手的问题—the current innovation drought in cryptocurrency—was overlooked amidst this superficial victory.

Reviewing the development history of the crypto industry, every bull run has been accompanied by major technological innovations. The 2013 bull run originated from Bitcoin's first mainstream attention; the 2017 bull run saw Ethereum's smart contracts开启 the ICO frenzy; the 2021 bull run brought new application scenarios with DeFi (Decentralized Finance) and NFT (Non-Fungible Token).

However, by 2025, the crypto industry had hit an innovation bottleneck. DeFi玩法 had been chewed over repeatedly, yields were getting lower and lower, and risks were getting higher and higher; the NFT market, after experiencing a bubble burst, has yet to find real value support; numerous tracks were proven false one after another, with token launches becoming the starting point of project death.

In contrast, innovation in the AI field is in full swing. Companies like OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic continue to launch astonishing new models, and AI applications are渗透 into various industries. From content creation to code generation, from medical diagnosis to financial analysis, AI has demonstrated enormous potential to change the world.

This contrast is残酷的. In the battle for capital and talent, AI is comprehensively crushing the crypto industry. In 2025, global venture capital investment in AI reached a record high, while funds flowing into the crypto industry continued to shrink. More and more developers are moving from Web3 to AI, and more and more investors are shifting funds from cryptocurrency to AI stocks.

The Trump government was also indifferent to this. Although Trump promised during the campaign to make the US the "crypto capital," his administration did not introduce any substantive policies to cultivate the crypto industry. No tax incentives, no R&D subsidies, no talent training programs. In contrast, Trump once announced that Japan's SoftBank Group, OpenAI, and Oracle would invest $500 billion in building infrastructure to support AI development in the US.

The innovation drought in the crypto industry, coupled with the siphon effect of AI, plunged the entire sector into an unprecedented predicament in 2025. And Trump's tariff war was another step on this fragile foundation.

The "Fatal Blow" of the Tariff War: Market Plunge and Crash

If the meme coin controversy was a slow poison, then the tariff war launched by Trump was a heavy blow to the crypto market.

The rationale for Trump's trade war was "protecting American manufacturing" and "reducing the trade deficit"—goals unrelated to the crypto industry. However, the financial turmoil triggered by the trade war severely hit the crypto market. Trump seemed毫不在意—on his list of priorities, the interests of the crypto industry clearly ranked behind trade policy.

On February 1, 2025, Trump signed an executive order, announcing an additional 10% tariff on all Chinese imports under the pretext of combating the influx of fentanyl. After negotiations failed to meet expectations, Trump launched a comprehensive tariff escalation in early April, dubbed "Liberation Day."

On April 2, Trump announced a 34% tariff on Chinese goods. Within a few days, tariff rates in some areas soared to 100% or even higher. China immediately announced retaliatory tariffs of equivalent proportions (34% and subsequent) on US goods.

BTC also fell from $88,000 to $74,500, hitting the lowest point in the first half of 2025.

The sensitivity of the crypto industry stems from the fact that when the macro environment deteriorates and risk assets are sold off, the crypto market is often the first to be affected. And Trump's tariff policy恰恰 created such a恶劣的 macro environment.

However, this tariff war was just the prelude. Who could have thought that on October 10, Trump would suddenly announce via social media that, due to China's restrictions on the export of critical minerals (rare earths), the US would impose punitive tariffs of 100% to 130% on all Chinese imports.

The news caused剧烈震荡 in global financial markets. The Dow Jones Industrial Average opened down over a thousand points, and the Nasdaq fell even more sharply. In the crypto market, panic sentiment was amplified infinitely.

On the evening of October 10, BTC continued to fall, sliding from $120,000. Around 4 a.m. on October 11, the market changed suddenly. BTC suddenly dropped to $113,000, and soon after探至 $102,000. Affected by BTC, ETH also once探至 $3,435, SOL once探至 $168.79, SUI even插针至 $0.5597, and ATOM on the Binance exchange fell to $0.001. On-chain Gas also once soared to 450 Gwei. Backpack experienced malfunctions due to market volatility, and the Kraken exchange was temporarily inaccessible.

Even more惨烈 were the highly leveraged derivative markets—according to Coinglass data, that day's open interest data showed that in the past 24 hours,全网爆仓 reached $19.179 billion, a historical record. Among them, long positions爆仓 amounted to $16.715 billion. Globally, 1,633,245 people were liquidated. The largest single liquidation order occurred on Hyperliquid – ETH-USDT, worth $203 million. By platform, Hyperliquid saw over $10.2 billion in liquidations, Bybit over $4.6 billion, and Binance over $2.3 billion.

Exchange servers frequently宕机 under the huge访问量, many investors were unable to close positions in time and could only watch their positions get liquidated. Social media was filled with desperate voices: some lost their down payment for a house, some lost their children's tuition fees, and some even contemplated suicide.

The chain effect of this crash was profound. Many crypto projects were forced to shut down due to broken funding chains, exchange layoffs spread throughout the industry, and regulators began to re-examine their lenient policies towards the crypto industry. Once bustling crypto summits became deserted, and once意气风发的 crypto KOLs fell silent or left the circle.

The market officially entered a bear market from that moment.

And Trump? He made no mention of the crypto market's惨状.

At this moment, the crypto industry finally recognized reality: the highly anticipated "Crypto President" was never their friend. Trump used the crypto industry to gain political capital and used meme coins to amass family wealth, that's all.

Over a hundred years ago, Yuan Shikai went from "republican savior" to "usurper of the nation," dealing a heavy blow to China's modernization process. Today, Trump's term is not over yet, and no one knows if he is the "Crypto President" or the "Black Hand of the Industry."

However, genuine technological innovation will not die because of the betrayal of a political figure. Those in the crypto industry who have experienced all this understand that only technological progress and value creation are the true moat of an industry.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7617062

Câu hỏi Liên quan

QWhat historical figure does the article compare Donald Trump to in the context of the cryptocurrency industry?

AThe article compares Donald Trump to Yuan Shikai, a historical Chinese figure who initially promised republicanism but eventually restored imperial rule, leading to decades of warlord chaos.

QWhat specific action by Trump in October 2025 is cited as the trigger for a major cryptocurrency market crash?

ATrump's announcement of imposing punitive tariffs of 100% to 130% on all Chinese imports, citing China's restrictions on critical mineral exports, triggered a massive market panic and crash on October 11, 2025.

QHow did the Trump family allegedly profit from the cryptocurrency market according to the article?

AThe Trump family allegedly profited by launching and promoting meme coins like 'TRUMP' and 'MELANIA', where they held significant portions of the token supply, and through associated entities and projects, earning over $1 billion in pre-tax profits within a year.

QWhat was one of the negative consequences of the meme coin trend amplified by Trump's influence?

AThe meme coin trend, amplified by Trump's influence, led to a loss of credibility in the cryptocurrency industry, associated it more with 'fraud' and 'speculation', and caused a significant decline in market activity and innovation, with many investors suffering substantial losses.

QHow did Trump's tariff policies indirectly impact the cryptocurrency industry beyond the immediate market crash?

ATrump's tariff policies created a hostile macroeconomic environment that led to a sustained bear market, caused numerous crypto projects to shut down due to broken funding chains, triggered widespread layoffs in exchanges, and prompted regulators to reconsider their lenient stance on cryptocurrency.

Nội dung Liên quan

Phí Hàng Ngày Trên XRP Ledger Giảm Xuống Dưới 400 USD Khi Câu Hỏi Về Hoạt Động Mạng Lại Xuất Hiện

Mạng lưới XRP Ledger (XRPL) lại một lần nữa được đưa vào tầm ngắm khi dữ liệu phí hàng ngày được báo cáo giảm xuống dưới 400 USD, theo số liệu từ DefiLlama. Mức phí thấp vốn là một thiết kế và điểm mạnh của XRPL, nhằm đảm bảo giao dịch rẻ và dễ tiếp cận. Tuy nhiên, doanh thu phí cũng có thể được xem như một chỉ báo về mức độ hoạt động, nhu cầu thực tế và quy mô sử dụng có trả phí trên mạng. Việc phí đốt hàng tuần chỉ khoảng 3.100 USD làm nổi bật sự tương phản với các blockchain như Ethereum hay Bitcoin. Trong khi những người ủng hộ coi phí thấp là dấu hiệu của hiệu quả, thì một số ý kiến có thể đặt câu hỏi liệu mức phí thấp như vậy có phản ánh đủ nhu cầu giao dịch giá trị cao hay không, nhất là trong bối cảnh XRP thường được gắn với câu chuyện về thanh toán và ứng dụng doanh nghiệp. Điều quan trọng là không suy diễn quá mức từ một ngày phí thấp. Nó không có nghĩa mạng lưới thất bại hay ngừng hoạt động, mà chỉ cung cấp một dữ liệu để phân tích thêm. Bối cảnh này cũng tạo nên sự so sánh thú vị với các nỗ lực mở rộng của Ripple vào RLUSD, thanh toán AI và hạ tầng thanh toán doanh nghiệp. Cần theo dõi xem liệu con số phí có phục hồi không, số lượng giao dịch có kể một câu chuyện khác không, và các công cụ khám phá chuỗi khối XRPL như Bithomp có xác nhận xu hướng này hay không. Các câu chuyện crypto mạnh mẽ ngày càng đến từ dữ liệu on-chain, bản cập nhật giao thức và thông báo chính thức, hơn là chỉ từ bình luận. Do đó, báo cáo này nên được xem như một phần của bức tranh tổng thể về môi trường vận hành crypto, dựa trên nguồn đã xác minh và để ngỏ cho các dữ liệu tiếp theo.

bitcoinist1 giờ trước

Phí Hàng Ngày Trên XRP Ledger Giảm Xuống Dưới 400 USD Khi Câu Hỏi Về Hoạt Động Mạng Lại Xuất Hiện

bitcoinist1 giờ trước

Ripple Ra Mắt XRPL AI Starter Kit Cho Các Thanh Toán Đại Lý XRP Và RLUSD

Ripple đã ra mắt Bộ công cụ khởi động AI XRPL, một bộ công cụ dành cho nhà phát triển được thiết kế để giúp các tác nhân phần mềm thực hiện thanh toán bằng XRP và Ripple USD (RLUSD). Đây được mô tả là Giai đoạn 1 trong nỗ lực mở rộng hơn vào lĩnh vực thanh toán tự động trên XRP Ledger. Bộ công cụ này tích hợp hỗ trợ cho tiêu chuẩn thanh toán x402 và bao gồm Máy chủ MCP Tài liệu XRPL, cho phép kết nối các hệ thống AI như Claude và Cursor trực tiếp với tài liệu kỹ thuật của XRPL. Động thái này mang đến cho XRP một câu chuyện mới tập trung vào tính hữu ích, trong bối cảnh các nhà phát triển và công ty thanh toán đang khám phá cách các tác nhân tự trị có thể thanh toán cho API, dịch vụ, dữ liệu và các giao dịch máy với máy khác. Ripple không chỉ nói về chủ đề AI mà đang cố gắng kết nối các tác nhân AI với hạ tầng thanh toán sử dụng XRP và RLUSD, nhắm đến các giao dịch cần tốc độ xử lý nhanh, phí thấp và ổn định. Đối với thị trường, đây là một bản cập nhật sản phẩm cụ thể từ nguồn chính thức. Các bước tiếp theo cần theo dõi bao gồm cập nhật tài liệu kỹ thuật, ví dụ mã nguồn, hoạt động trên mạng thử nghiệm và phản hồi từ các nhà phát triển.

bitcoinist4 giờ trước

Ripple Ra Mắt XRPL AI Starter Kit Cho Các Thanh Toán Đại Lý XRP Và RLUSD

bitcoinist4 giờ trước

Bitcoin sẽ lên 400.000 USD? Nhà phân tích sử dụng biểu đồ chồng lấp với Vàng để đưa ra dự báo táo bạo cho năm 2026

Phân tích viên Vivek Sen cho rằng Bitcoin (BTC) có thể đạt 400.000 USD vào năm 2026 dựa trên việc so sánh biểu đồ hiện tại của BTC với cấu trúc phá vỡ đỉnh trong lịch sử của vàng. Tuyên bố này xuất phát từ một phân tích chồng lớp biểu đồ trực quan, không phải từ một mô hình định giá chính thức. So sánh với vàng được đưa ra vì Bitcoin thường được coi là tài sản lưu trữ giá trị kỹ thuật số, và các quỹ ETF Bitcoin đã củng cố thêm nhận định này. Tuy nhiên, bài viết chỉ ra rằng đây không phải là một dự báo chắc chắn. Bitcoin và vàng có quy mô thị trường, tính thanh khoản, mức độ biến động và nhóm nhà đầu tư khác biệt. Giá Bitcoin còn chịu ảnh hưởng mạnh bởi các luồng ETF, vị thế phái sinh và đòn bẩy trong thị trường tiền mã hóa. Để kịch bản 400.000 USD có thể xảy ra, thị trường cần có dòng tiền thể chế ổn định, điều kiện vĩ mô hỗ trợ nhu cầu với tài sản cứng, và một môi trường crypto tăng trưởng rộng rãi. Mục tiêu này chủ yếu nên được xem như một kịch bản lạc quan từ một nhà phân tích mạng xã hội, chứ không phải là dự báo có trọng số xác suất. Nó nhấn mạnh rằng so sánh với vàng cung cấp một khuôn khổ tăng giá, nhưng cần được xác nhận bởi hành động giá và dòng tiền thực tế trên thị trường.

bitcoinist8 giờ trước

Bitcoin sẽ lên 400.000 USD? Nhà phân tích sử dụng biểu đồ chồng lấp với Vàng để đưa ra dự báo táo bạo cho năm 2026

bitcoinist8 giờ trước

Đồng Hồ Halving Bitcoin Chỉ Ra Giai Đoạn Đáy, Nhưng Tín Hiệu Chu Kỳ Cần Thận Trọng

Crypto Rover, một nhà phân tích và người có ảnh hưởng trong không gian tiền điện tử, đã chia sẻ biểu đồ chu kỳ halving của Bitcoin, cho rằng BTC hiện đang ở trong "giai đoạn đáy" điển hình trước khi bước vào một pha tăng giá mạnh. Bài đăng dựa trên so sánh mô hình và nhịp điệu với các chu kỳ trước đó, gợi ý rằng thị trường có thể đang lặp lại lịch sử. Tuy nhiên, tuyên bố này cần được tiếp cận một cách thận trọng. Bài viết được xếp vào dạng bình luận của nhà giao dịch và có tính đầu cơ cao, không phải là tín hiệu xác nhận. Tác giả được đánh dấu là nguồn có rủi ro cao, thường có xu hướng quảng bá lạc quan. Biểu đồ không cung cấp mô hình thống kê, xác nhận on-chain hay mức giá vô hiệu hóa rõ ràng. Hơn nữa, phân tích chu kỳ halving trở nên kém tin cậy hơn khi Bitcoin trưởng thành. Các chu kỳ trước diễn ra trong một thị trường nhỏ, ít thanh khoản hơn, trong khi thị trường hiện tại chịu ảnh hưởng bởi các quỹ ETF spot, dòng tiền phái sinh lớn và các điều kiện vĩ mô. Bài báo kết luận rằng lập luận về "đồng hồ halving" chỉ cung cấp một khuôn khổ tham khảo về thời gian cho phe tăng giá, chứ không phải là tín hiệu giao dịch chắc chắn. Tín hiệu thị trường thực sự sẽ phụ thuộc vào việc Bitcoin có thể giữ vùng hỗ trợ then chốt, hình thành các đáy cao hơn và được hỗ trợ bởi thanh khoản cũng như cấu trúc thị trường rộng hơn. Một sự phục hồi mạnh mẽ sẽ củng cố lập luận này, trong khi một đợt giảm sâu sẽ biến nó thành một dự đoán sai lầm khác.

bitcoinist10 giờ trước

Đồng Hồ Halving Bitcoin Chỉ Ra Giai Đoạn Đáy, Nhưng Tín Hiệu Chu Kỳ Cần Thận Trọng

bitcoinist10 giờ trước

Giao dịch

Giao ngay
Hợp đồng Tương lai
活动图片