Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-07-21Востаннє оновлено о 2026-07-21

Анотація

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, has launched a new full node software called Zakura version 1.0.0. Developed by Zcash co-founder Sean Bowe and Dev Ojha, with private ZEC donations, its goal is to enable Zcash to process over 50,000 transactions per second (TPS)—matching the scale of Visa and Mastercard—while maintaining full transaction privacy and verifiability. This addresses a key bottleneck, as Zcash currently handles only about 1 private transaction per second. Zakura is a fork of the Zcash Foundation's Zebra node. It features chain pruning and snapshots, reducing disk usage and allowing new nodes to sync in under two minutes. It also offers compatibility with the legacy `zcashd` client interface. The scalability challenge stems from the large data size of privacy proofs. Bowe's Tachyon project aims to use recursive proofs to reduce consensus-layer data needs from ~500 MB/s to ~100 MB/s. For wallet scalability, Valar Group is researching Private Information Retrieval (PIR) tech to allow wallets to fetch their data privately. Zakura supports fast block propagation and the upcoming "Ironwood" network upgrade (NU6.3), scheduled for activation around July 28th. Ironwood was created to contain a critical inflation bug discovered in the Orchard shielded pool in May 2024. The fix uses "turnstiles" to trap any counterfeit ZEC created during the vulnerability period within the shielded pool, preventing it from entering circulation and restoring supply integrity.

Author: Coindesk

Translated by: TechFlow DeepTide

DeepTide Guide: Zcash currently only processes about 1 privacy transaction per second. The goal of the new node Zakura is to achieve 50,000 TPS while maintaining full privacy—the processing scale of Visa and Mastercard. This is a significant signal for everyone focusing on payment privacy and blockchain scaling: privacy and performance are no longer a trade-off.

Those rebuilding Zcash have a dream: to reach the level of global payment giants Visa and Mastercard, processing tens of thousands of payments per second, while maintaining full verifiability and strong privacy guarantees.

The first piece of this plan is Zakura, a new full node software whose version 1.0.0 was released on Wednesday. It is maintained by Sean Bowe, a founding member of Zcash's zero-knowledge cryptography, and Dev Ojha, co-founder of Osmosis and currently in charge at Valar Group. Both teams are funded by private ZEC donations, not by a company or foundation.

"Our dream is to support global payments. Mastercard and Visa process over 50,000 transactions per second; this is our baseline. Under Zcash's current cryptographic scheme, that volume requires nodes to process over 500 MB per second of throughput," a blog post stated. "The existing tech stack doesn't meet this goal. The cryptographic technology our team is developing will close most of that gap."

A full node is a program that keeps a complete copy of the blockchain, here referring to the Zcash ledger, and independently checks whether every transaction complies with the network's rules. Zakura is a fork of the Zcash Foundation's node software, Zebra—meaning it started from the foundation's official code and was rebuilt.

Consensus rules are the shared rulebook executed by every node, determining which blocks and transactions the entire network accepts as valid. If a node applies different rules, it forks and stops following the same chain as the other nodes.

Pruning, Snapshots, and Compatibility

Zakura can also prune, meaning it deletes old blockchain data that the node no longer needs, significantly reducing disk usage. This compresses the chain small enough that the team released a ready-made copy of about 11 GB after stripping old data. New nodes can download this directly instead of pulling the entire history block by block from other nodes.

This allows a node to go from zero to running in under two minutes, which the team calls "680 times faster."

A compatibility mode further replicates the interface of the original client, zcashd, which is reaching its end-of-life on July 18. This means wallets and exchange integrations built for it can continue to work as usual.

Throughput Goals and Tachyon's Role

The reason for building all this is an arithmetic problem.

Mastercard and Visa process over 50,000 transactions per second, a number the team calls a "baseline, not a target." Zcash's current cryptographic scheme requires nodes to receive and verify over 500 MB of data per second to keep up because each privacy transaction carries a proof, and that proof is large.

This is roughly equivalent to receiving a full DVD's worth of data continuously every 10 seconds, a rate no current Zcash software can approach. But the key is understanding why each bottleneck exists.

Bowe's Tachyon project is addressing this problem with recursive proofs, where one proof can attest to the validity of thousands of other proofs, drastically reducing the amount of data that must be checked at the consensus layer.

Under the Tachyon scheme, nodes validate a single proof instead of thousands. The team claims this will reduce consensus data needs from 100 MB/sec to 500 MB/sec, which they believe is technically achievable with careful engineering.

Wallet Bottleneck and Valar's PIR Solution

Wallets face a different problem. Because Zcash hides the recipient of a transaction, a wallet cannot ask a server which transactions belong to it without revealing itself. It must pull everything and test each one, which is why wallet software tops out at about 1 transaction per second.

To eliminate this bottleneck, Valar Group is researching Private Information Retrieval (PIR) technology, which allows a wallet to fetch its own data from a server without the server knowing which entries were requested.

Fast Block Propagation

Fast block propagation means broadcasting newly mined blocks across the blockchain network as quickly as possible. Zakura is the software layer responsible for this task.

It must be fast enough to transmit new blocks between nodes to enable the heavy proof and wallet traffic. It comes with an experimental system, currently disabled by default, designed to deliver each block to every node within half a second.

Near-term testing of these ideas will arrive in late July. Ironwood, formally named NU6.3, will activate at mainnet block 3,428,143, approximately 8:00 AM ET on July 28. Zakura has supported it since its release.

Bowe stated on July 10 that all major organizations have committed to activating at this height, a week later than originally planned because exchanges and wallet providers requested preparation time.

The Origin of Ironwood

Ironwood exists because of a bug that nearly destroyed Zcash in June. The so-called shielded pool is the private side of the network, where amounts and participants are hidden, with zero-knowledge proofs serving as evidence of mathematical operations.

On May 29, Shielded Labs researcher Taylor Hornby discovered a soundness bug in the proof circuit of Orchard (the latest shielded pool) that allowed an attacker to mint fake ZEC on-chain without a trace. This bug had existed since Orchard's activation in May 2022.

Developers disabled Orchard through an emergency response completed on June 2, then restored it on June 3 with a corrected circuit via the NU6.2 hard fork at block 3,364,600.

The patch couldn't address the four years the bug was open. Zero-knowledge proofs reveal nothing beyond the fact that verification passed, so there is no on-chain record of what any Orchard transaction moved. No one can prove that fake ZEC was never created.

Ironwood was built to solve this problem. So-called "turnstiles" at the pool boundaries limit what can leave and enter, leveraging the fact that the amount of ZEC entering or exiting the shielded pool is public, even if transactions inside the pool are private. By enclosing Orchard to block new deposits, the turnstile becomes the only exit, trapping any fake coins inside.

In simple terms, honest balances can migrate out over time, while fake coins may be prevented from exiting entirely and entering the circulating supply. This setup traps any attempt at excess supply at the boundary, restoring confidence in the token supply.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is Zakura and what is its main goal for Zcash?

AZakura is a new full node software for Zcash, version 1.0.0, forked from the Zcash Foundation's Zebra. Its main goal is to enable Zcash to process up to 50,000 privacy-preserving transactions per second (TPS), targeting the throughput level of global payment giants like Visa and Mastercard.

QWhat are the two main technological approaches being developed to help Zcash achieve high transaction throughput with privacy?

AThe two main approaches are: 1) Tachyon, which uses recursive proofs to drastically reduce the amount of consensus data nodes need to verify. 2) Private Information Retrieval (PIR) technology being researched by Valar Group, which allows wallets to fetch their own transaction data from a server without revealing which entries they are requesting.

QWhat practical improvements does Zakura offer for node operators in terms of setup and disk usage?

AZakura offers pruning, which deletes old, unnecessary blockchain data, significantly reducing disk usage. It also provides ready-to-use snapshots of the pruned chain (~11 GB), allowing new nodes to sync and start running in under two minutes instead of downloading the entire history block by block.

QWhat is the purpose of the upcoming Ironwood (NU6.3) network upgrade mentioned in the article?

AThe Ironwood (NU6.3) upgrade, scheduled for activation around July 28th, is designed to address a critical integrity vulnerability discovered in the Orchard shielded pool. It creates a 'turnstile' mechanism to contain any counterfeit ZEC that might have been minted during the vulnerability period, preventing it from entering the circulating supply and restoring trust in the token's reliability.

QWhat was the specific vulnerability discovered in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, and how was it initially addressed?

AOn May 29th, a soundness vulnerability was discovered in Orchard's proof circuit that had existed since its activation in May 2022. This bug could allow an attacker to mint counterfeit ZEC without leaving a trace on-chain. Developers initially addressed it with an emergency response on June 2nd that disabled Orchard, followed by a hard fork (NU6.2) on June 3rd that restored it with a corrected circuit.

Пов'язані матеріали

Latest Interview with Cyber Godfather Tibo: Dedicated Physical Button for Resets, 'I Reset Whenever I Want'

Tibo, the head of OpenAI's Codex project, recently discussed AI's future and OpenAI's strategy in an interview. He revealed that Codex and ChatGPT are set to merge into a single, highly personalized AGI that adapts its interface to individual users. The future of AI Agents, he believes, lies in making complex mechanisms like skill management "disappear," creating a seamless partner that understands context and goals. As models grow more powerful, local hardware will become a bottleneck, pushing agents to the cloud for greater computational resources. He highlighted the upcoming "Ultra Fast" mode, which will significantly reduce response times, shifting workflows back to real-time interaction and "flow" states rather than constant context switching. OpenAI's focus, according to Tibo, isn't just on building the strongest models but on delivering powerful capabilities to as many people as possible, emphasizing broad distribution, community involvement, and lowering barriers to use. Tibo also touched on OpenAI's culture of rapid iteration and empowerment, contrasting it with his past experience at Google. He confirmed that OpenAI is already practicing "recursive self-improvement," using powerful models to optimize infrastructure, creating a feedback loop of increasing capability and efficiency. The interview concluded with his thoughts on future human-AI interaction, which he envisions as increasingly natural, multimodal, and voice-first, adapting to human communication styles rather than the reverse. He also humorously noted the existence of a physical "reset" button for user quotas, symbolizing OpenAI's user-centric approach of compensating users during service issues.

marsbit17 хв тому

Latest Interview with Cyber Godfather Tibo: Dedicated Physical Button for Resets, 'I Reset Whenever I Want'

marsbit17 хв тому

IOSG | EIP-8363 Quantitative Review: Slashing Staking 'Subsidies'—What Does Ethereum Want in Return?

**Title: IOSG | EIP-8363 Quantitative Review: Cutting Staking "Subsidies"—What Does Ethereum Aim to Gain?** **Summary:** EIP-8363 proposes a mechanism to progressively destroy a larger portion of validator rewards as the staking ratio increases, reaching 100% destruction when 50% of ETH supply is staked. This analysis models its impact on issuance, yield, and staking equilibrium, investigates whether ETH's yield truly explains its price, quantifies the on-chain economy's dependence on this yield, and presents conclusions. Key findings: 1. EIP-1559's fee-burn mechanism has become largely ineffective, with burn rates down 98% since 2022. Issuance policy is now Ethereum's primary remaining lever over ETH supply. 2. At the current staking level (~35% of supply), EIP-8363 would cut issuance by ~58.6% and staking APR by ~56.4%, not eliminate it entirely. The mechanism is self-limiting; under reasonable yield thresholds, the system would stabilize at 26–34% staking with 0.3–0.5% annual issuance. 3. No statistically significant correlation exists between historical staking yield changes and ETH price movements. The natural 37% yield decline since 2023 showed no detectable price impact. 4. The on-chain economy's direct dependence on this yield is limited. Liquid staking tokens (LSTs) like wstETH are crucial as collateral (e.g., 34.2% in major lending markets), but their utility persists as long as yield is positive. Staking-focused ETFs represent a tiny fraction (0.19% of supply) of current demand. 5. The debate is essentially a zero-sum wealth redistribution: cutting ~$1.55B in annual issuance transfers value from concentrated staker/intermediary interests (35% of holders) to the diffuse majority of non-staking holders (65%). The proposal is economically rational but faces high political hurdles due to this concentrated opposition. Verdict: The proposal is mildly bullish for ETH (reducing a structural sell-pressure) but bearish for staking intermediaries/protocols. However, its passage is unlikely due to governance dynamics favoring concentrated, organized opposition over diffuse benefits.

marsbit17 хв тому

IOSG | EIP-8363 Quantitative Review: Slashing Staking 'Subsidies'—What Does Ethereum Want in Return?

marsbit17 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片