Zcash Flaw Sparks Monero Audit Interest as Privacy Coin Debate Heats Up

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-06-06Востаннє оновлено о 2026-06-06

Анотація

A significant security flaw in Zcash's Orchard privacy pool was disclosed by non-profit developer Shielded Labs, causing ZEC's price to drop 38% in 24 hours before a modest recovery. The vulnerability, discovered on May 29th by security researcher Taylor Hornby using Anthropic's Opus 4.8 AI model, could have allowed an attacker to create an unlimited supply of counterfeit ZEC tokens undetected. This event has intensified the privacy coin debate. In response, Hornby announced plans to audit Monero (XMR), a leading privacy-focused cryptocurrency that, unlike Zcash, defaults to hiding all transaction data. Hornby expressed confidence in finding vulnerabilities in such privacy coins. The disclosure has cast fresh security scrutiny on the sector.

After non-profit developer Shielded Labs revealed a serious weakness in the blockchain’s Orchard privacy pool, which could have jeopardized the integrity of the token supply, Zcash (ZEC) fell 38% in 24 hours, speeding up the drop. Recent trading for ZEC has been around $361, with a low of $290, and the price has made some modest recovery of around 8% in the last 24 hours as per data from CMC.

Fresh Security Scrutiny

On Thursday night, Shielded Labs released a comprehensive disclosure about X, exposing a security hole that, if used, might have enabled an attacker to secretly produce an infinite supply of fake ZEC tokens. Imagine someone sneaking into the Federal Reserve’s dollar printing machine and making off with a bunch of additional cash; the only difference is that not even the Fed would know it happened.

The flaw was found on May 29th by Taylor Hornby, a security expert hired by Shielded Labs in April 2026 to find protocol weaknesses before bad guys could. The Orchard circuit is the cryptographic scheme supporting Zcash’s most sophisticated privacy pool; Hornby performed a focused evaluation of it using Anthropic’s newly published Opus 4.8 AI model.

One of the tokens that security researcher Taylor Hornby plans to audit next is privacy coin Monero. Hornby utilized Anthropic’s Opus 4.8 AI model to discover a serious flaw in Zcash. Hornby said, “Absolutely!” when asked on X whether he could find vulnerabilities in private coins like Monero. Adding that, Monero will be put up to my list of things to audit.

Unlike Zcash, which gives users the option to be either visible or shielded, Monero (XMR) defaults to hiding transaction data and is one of the biggest privacy-focused cryptocurrencies.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Worldcoin Falls Terribly as Arthur Hayes Dumps WLD

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the key event that triggered the drop in Zcash's price and sparked interest in auditing Monero?

AThe key event was the disclosure by Shielded Labs of a serious security flaw in Zcash's Orchard privacy pool, which could have allowed an attacker to secretly create an unlimited supply of fake ZEC tokens.

QWho discovered the critical vulnerability in Zcash's Orchard circuit, and what tool did they use?

AThe vulnerability was discovered by security expert Taylor Hornby, who was hired by Shielded Labs. He found the flaw using Anthropic's newly published Opus 4.8 AI model.

QHow did the disclosure of the Zcash flaw specifically impact its price (ZEC) in the short term?

AFollowing the disclosure, Zcash (ZEC) fell 38% within 24 hours, reaching a low of around $290. It later saw a modest recovery of about 8% in the subsequent 24 hours.

QWhat is the fundamental difference between Monero's (XMR) and Zcash's (ZEC) approach to privacy, as mentioned in the article?

AThe fundamental difference is that Monero defaults to hiding all transaction data by design, whereas Zcash gives users an option to choose between transparent (visible) or shielded (private) transactions.

QWhat is the next project that security researcher Taylor Hornby plans to audit, and what was his confident response regarding finding vulnerabilities in it?

ATaylor Hornby plans to audit the privacy coin Monero next. When asked on X if he could find vulnerabilities in privacy coins like Monero, he responded, 'Absolutely!'

Пов'язані матеріали

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit8 хв тому

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit8 хв тому

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbit16 хв тому

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbit16 хв тому

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight News20 хв тому

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight News20 хв тому

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit27 хв тому

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit27 хв тому

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit36 хв тому

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit36 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот