Yongche Founder Zhou Hang: Cryptocurrency, Finally Its Time Has Come

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-04-05Востаннє оновлено о 2026-04-05

Анотація

Cryptocurrency, after years of being perceived primarily as a speculative asset or a complex technological curiosity, is finally finding its true purpose: not as money for humans, but as money for machines. While cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum failed to become practical daily payment tools for people due to volatility, poor user experience, and regulatory complexities, they are perfectly suited for the emerging Agent-to-Agent (A2A) economy. In this new paradigm, AI Agents autonomously transact with each other—purchasing data, API calls, or computational resources—using crypto wallets and smart contracts. They require no customer support, handle micro-payments efficiently, and operate across borders without traditional banking hurdles. Protocols like x402 are reviving the long-dormant "402 Payment Required" HTTP status code, enabling machines to negotiate and pay for services seamlessly within milliseconds. We are witnessing a fundamental shift: machines will use cryptocurrency as a high-frequency, efficient medium of exchange in the background, while humans continue to use traditional fiat currency for daily life. Cryptocurrency isn’t replacing the bank account; it’s becoming the silent, foundational layer of a new machine-driven economy.

Author: Zhou Hang

Over the past decade, if you mentioned "cryptocurrency" to an average person, the words that likely came to their mind were: getting rich quick, pump and dump schemes, hackers, or some incomprehensible geek toy.

From the emergence of Bitcoin (BTC) to the smart contract revolution of Ethereum (ETH), to the noise of various public chains and stablecoins, this world has been noisy for over a decade. Countless brilliant minds and massive amounts of capital have flooded in, trying to build a decentralized utopia.

But we still feel confused in real life: besides being a highly volatile speculative asset, besides buying low and selling high on exchanges, what is cryptocurrency actually useful for? When we go downstairs to buy a cup of coffee, we still scan WeChat Pay or Alipay; for international transfers, we still go through cumbersome bank wire processes.

It claims to颠覆finance, yet it似乎can't even handle the most basic "payment" properly.

Until today, with the arrival of the A2A (Agent to Agent) intelligent economy, this confusion finally has an answer: cryptocurrency did not fail; it just spent the past decade targeting the wrong users.

Why Cryptocurrency Couldn't Become "Human Money"

When Satoshi Nakamoto released the Bitcoin whitepaper in 2008, the title prominently read: "A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System." His original intention was to create an everyday payment tool.

In 2010, a programmer named Laszlo bought two pizzas with 10,000 Bitcoins. This was seen as the great beginning of cryptocurrency payments. But the subsequent script went in another extreme direction.

There are three insurmountable practical obstacles why cryptocurrency cannot become money for daily human use:

First is volatility. When something is worth $1 today, might drop to $0.5 tomorrow, or rise to $2, no one dares to price things in it. There's an economic常识called "Gresham's Law" (good money is hoarded); when you expect Bitcoin to rise, you absolutely舍不得use it to buy pizza.

Second is the anti-human experience. Humans are creatures who极度dislike hassle. Crypto payments require you to妥善保管a long string of私钥like gibberish; once lost, assets are instantly zeroed out, with no customer service to help you recover them. You also need to understand what Gas fees are and endure long waits during network congestion.

Finally, regulation and taxes. In many countries, buying a coffee with cryptocurrency is considered an "asset sale" by the tax authority, for which you need to calculate and declare capital gains tax.

Humans need stable, simple financial services with customer service backup and legal protection. The traditional banking and fiat system, while having friction, perfectly meets human needs for security.

Cryptocurrency tried to pull humans into a cold, absolutely rational, self-risk code world, and was naturally rejected by humans, eventually morphing into a form of "digital gold" and speculative chip.

Machine Money: When Agents Become Consumers

But what if we shift our perspective from "human" to "machine"?

In the A2A intelligent economy, hundreds of millions of AI Agents will be calling APIs, buying computing power, acquiring data, and even negotiating rental contracts for you in the background every day. The CEO of Coinbase pointedly noted: "AI can't take an ID card to open a bank account, but they can control a crypto wallet without any障碍."

For AI Agents, the advantages of the traditional financial system are all disadvantages, and the disadvantages of cryptocurrency are all advantages.

Machines don't need customer service; they only trust code. Traditional contracts require lawyers to draft, courts to enforce, and banks to settle, taking days or even months. In the Agent world, they use "smart contracts"—this is essentially a program stored on the blockchain. When conditions are met, funds are automatically transferred instantly, with no possibility of违约. This is the true "machine-native contract."

Machines need millisecond-level micro-payments. Imagine an AI Agent is generating a report for you; it needs to buy a piece of real-time data from another Agent for $0.001. The per-transaction fee for traditional credit card networks is as high as $0.30,根本无法supporting such micro-transactions. Through加密networks, an Agent can complete extremely low-cost settlement in hundreds of milliseconds.

Machines have no borders and no identity. They don't need complex KYC (Know Your Customer) verification. As long as they have a private key, an Agent running on a server in Singapore can instantly pay an Agent running in Tokyo.

A Status Code That Slept for 30 Years

The最能embody this paradigm shift is a真实history full of metaphor in the internet world.

If you often surf the internet, you must have encountered "404 Not Found." In the initial design of the HTTP protocol, there was actually another status code called 402 Payment Required.

The pioneers of the internet foresaw that the future network would not only need to transmit information but also value. But because there was a lack of a native internet payment layer at the time, this 402 status code was硬生生shelved for 30 years, almost never truly used.

Until 2025, a payment protocol designed specifically for AI Agents was born, its name is x402.

Through the x402 protocol, when an Agent requests data from another server, if payment is required, the server no longer pops up a credit card form for humans to fill out, but directly returns a machine-readable "402 Payment Required" instruction. After receiving the instruction, the Agent instantly calls USDC (a dollar-pegged stablecoin) from its crypto wallet to complete the payment. The entire process ends in hundreds of milliseconds, and the data channel opens.

No registration, no scanning, no password verification. Value flows seamlessly at the bottom layer of the internet, just like data.

Human Money and Machine Money: The Folding of Wealth

According to data from blockchain analytics firms, in the short few months from late 2025 to early 2026, AI Agents have already completed hundreds of millions of payments via stablecoins. Cryptocurrency no longer needs to prove itself more useful than Alipay; it has sunk into the deep sea of the internet, becoming the silently运转blood of millions of machines.

But the story doesn't end here. When machines start to have wallets, start to earn and spend money autonomously, as humans deeply固化by the concepts of "cash" and "bank accounts," how should we understand this new form of wealth? What is the relationship between our money and the machine's money?

In the past, wealth was显性的, physical. You took out a banknote, or opened a banking App watching the balance数字change, you had a切肤之感of "spending money."

But in the future, wealth will be folded.

Imagine you hire an AI Agent to operate a social media account for you. You don't need to pay it a salary; you just need to initially top up its "Agentic Wallet" with 100 USDC (equivalent to $100).

Next, this Agent begins its autonomous狂奔: it pays another data Agent 0.05 USDC to get hot trends; pays a drawing Agent 0.1 USDC to generate an illustration; after the article is published, it automatically deposits the advertising revenue it earned (maybe 0.5 USDC) into its own wallet.

In this process, the machine's money疯狂流转, earns interest, and is consumed at millisecond speed in the underlying network. And you, as the human owner,根本看不到these密密麻麻micro-payment bills. You don't need to understand what x402 is, or what smart contracts are.

The only thing you see is a极简report this Agent sends you weekly: "This week投入$10, net profit $50, profits have been withdrawn to your fiat bank account."

This is the ultimate division of labor between humans and machines regarding wealth: Machines handle friction, humans enjoy the results.

Machine money (cryptocurrency) is for flowing,它是high-frequency, cold, production material pursuing极致efficiency;而human money (fiat) is for feeling, it is for buying coffee, paying rent,承载life security—the final destination.

Cryptocurrency did not eliminate bank accounts; it just pushed complex financial transactions one layer down. While humans enjoy the极致convenience brought by AI on the front end, in those unseen底层, a financial system专属to machines is silently重塑the business rules of this world.

Пов'язані питання

QAccording to the article, why has cryptocurrency failed to become a mainstream payment method for humans?

ACryptocurrency has failed as a mainstream human payment method due to three main obstacles: high price volatility discouraging its use for daily transactions, a user-unfriendly experience involving complex private key management and gas fees, and complicated regulatory and tax implications like capital gains tax on everyday purchases.

QWhat is the core argument about who the real user of cryptocurrency should be?

AThe core argument is that cryptocurrency has been looking for the wrong user for the past decade. Its real user is not humans, but AI Agents. The 'Agent to Agent' (A2A) smart economy is where cryptocurrency finds its purpose, as it is perfectly suited for machine-to-machine transactions.

QHow do the needs of AI Agents make cryptocurrency's disadvantages into advantages?

AFor AI Agents, the disadvantages of cryptocurrency for humans become advantages. Machines don't need customer service and trust only code. They require millisecond-level micropayments that traditional systems can't support due to high fees. They have no nationality and can bypass complex KYC requirements, allowing for instant, borderless transactions between agents using only a private key.

QWhat historical internet protocol code is mentioned, and what new protocol is proposed to finally fulfill its original purpose?

AThe historical HTTP status code '402 Payment Required' is mentioned, which was envisioned for internet value transfer but was unused for 30 years due to a lack of a native payment layer. The new protocol proposed to fulfill this purpose is called 'x402', designed for AI Agents to make instant, automated micropayments.

QWhat is the described 'ultimate division of labor' between human money and machine money?

AThe ultimate division of labor is: 'Machines handle friction, humans enjoy the results.' Machine money (cryptocurrency) is for flow—it is high-frequency, cold, production capital that pursues extreme efficiency in the background. Human money (fiat currency) is for feeling—it is the final destination for buying coffee, paying rent, and carrying a sense of security in daily life.

Пов'язані матеріали

Vitalik: Building Index-Tracking Assets Based on Options Rather Than Debt

Vitalik Buterin proposes constructing index-tracking assets using synthetic options rather than debt-based mechanisms. The core problem is enabling exposure to a price index (T, e.g., USD/ETH) in a trust-minimized environment where only ETH is a trustless asset, relying solely on a decentralized oracle. Traditional approaches, like algorithmic stablecoins, use debt positions and require real-time, binding oracles for liquidations, which are difficult to secure. This article suggests a paradigm shift: eliminating liquidation and using options as the fundamental building block, requiring only a "slow" oracle. The design defines two synthetic assets, P and N, with parameters for the index T, a strike price S, and an expiry M. At any time, 1 ETH can be split to create a (P, N) pair or merged back. At expiry M, the oracle determines T's value x. P receives min(1, S/x) ETH, and N receives max(0, 1 - S/x) ETH. This structure inherently avoids insolvency risk (P+N=1) and can share an oracle with prediction markets. To gain stable exposure to T (e.g., USD), a user would hold deeply "in-the-money" P options (with S significantly below the current price) and periodically "roll" them to lower strikes as the price approaches the current strike, rebalancing their portfolio. This transfers the decision of *when* to act from a protocol-enforced liquidation (requiring a real-time oracle) to the user or an automated wrapper. Users can manage MEV risk and oracle dependency by choosing their rebalancing timing and data sources. A key trade-off is accepting some quadratic drift (deviation from perfect peg), estimated at 1-4% annualized volatility. Buterin argues this cost is reasonable compared to fiat currency volatility or equilibrium shifts in other stablecoins. The success of this model depends heavily on designing low-slippage market mechanisms for the rebalancing process, leveraging users' low time preference to execute trades patiently.

marsbit44 хв тому

Vitalik: Building Index-Tracking Assets Based on Options Rather Than Debt

marsbit44 хв тому

"Water Scarcity": The Hidden Fatal Flaw of AI Infrastructure

“Water Scarcity: The Hidden Vulnerability of AI Infrastructure” In June 2026, SpaceX revised its IPO prospectus to highlight a core resource constraint alongside power and processors: water. This move signals a pivotal shift where water scarcity has transformed from an operational cost to a major, uncontrollable investment risk, directly threatening AI data center expansion. The scale of the problem is immense. U.S. data centers consumed an estimated 17 billion gallons of water for direct cooling in 2023, with indirect water use for power generation exceeding 211 billion gallons. Giants like Google alone use billions of gallons annually, with single sites consuming volumes equivalent to a medium-sized city. This water is largely “consumptive,” evaporated into the atmosphere and lost. This massive demand is colliding with scarcity. Tech companies are building “water tigers” in arid regions, sparking community protests in places like Mexico and Arizona, where data centers can legally use millions of gallons daily—enough for tens of thousands of residents. These conflicts are not about illegality, but about a mismatch between historic water allocation frameworks and new, colossal demand. The consequences are real. Community opposition, largely centered on water, has reportedly stalled or canceled $64 billion in U.S. data center projects over two years. Simultaneously, investors are pressuring companies for greater water footprint transparency, viewing it as a financial risk, not just an ESG metric. Technological solutions like air or liquid cooling involve trade-offs between water and electricity use, with final choices dictated by local constraints. The irony is stark: while industry leaders envision AI as a utility “like water,” its physical infrastructure is straining real-world water supplies. The race for AI supremacy may ultimately be governed not by the fastest chip, but by the slowest water meter.

marsbit1 год тому

"Water Scarcity": The Hidden Fatal Flaw of AI Infrastructure

marsbit1 год тому

Global Card Issuance Enters a Compliance-Driven Era: WasabiCard is Building the Next-Generation Payment Infrastructure

Global card issuance is entering a compliance-driven era, with WasabiCard building next-generation payment infrastructure. The platform asserts that as stablecoins increasingly enter cross-border payments, corporate settlements, and global commerce, the industry is shifting focus from "availability" and "growth-driven" models to long-term, compliant operation under global frameworks. Competition will center on sustainable compliance and global infrastructure capabilities. Stablecoins are evolving from on-chain assets into key payment tools in global business, with card issuance acting as critical infrastructure connecting digital assets to traditional payment networks like Visa and Mastercard. This expansion has revealed structural issues, including cross-regional issuance, BIN resource management, and insufficient AML and risk controls. In response, the industry is moving away from reliance on "grey efficiency" towards prioritizing compliance, risk management, and long-term operational stability. WasabiCard outlines its strategy: collaborating with licensed principals and local partners for localized operations, building robust KYC/AML systems, strictly separating commercial and consumer BIN usage, and enhancing global issuance, payment, and cross-border fund flow infrastructure. The goal is to build stable, scalable payment infrastructure amid evolving global regulations, shifting industry competition from scale to infrastructure capability. As stablecoins integrate further with global commerce, payment infrastructure will become a fundamental, embedded component of internet business. WasabiCard will continue to develop capabilities in global card issuance, stablecoin payments, cross-border fund flows, and API-driven financial workflows.

marsbit1 год тому

Global Card Issuance Enters a Compliance-Driven Era: WasabiCard is Building the Next-Generation Payment Infrastructure

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片