XRP price retreats to $1.35 support – But ONE signal points to recovery

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-03-27Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-27

Анотація

XRP's risk-adjusted returns, as measured by the Sharpe Ratio, have shown signs of recovery, moving into positive territory at 0.0267 after a significant decline in February. This suggests the asset may be generating better returns relative to its volatility. However, the price has repeatedly retreated to the $1.35 support level. For a sustained bullish recovery, increased spot demand and aggressive buyer activity are crucial. Recent data shows a drop in the Taker Buy-Sell Ratio, indicating sellers have regained dominance. Additionally, a recent spike in Open Interest and the Estimated Leverage Ratio points to increased speculative trading, which raises the risk of liquidation events and higher price volatility.

The risk-adjusted returns could be improving for Ripple [XRP], data showed. The Sharpe Ratio is used to help investors understand if an asset generates high returns, once adjusted for volatility.

A rising Sharpe Ratio would imply a better risk-adjusted performance, observed an analyst in a post on CryptoQuant Insights. The metric saw a deep decline in February as the early January rally faded into a deeper downtrend. At that time, a Bitcoin [BTC] and crypto market-wide sell-off forced XRP prices from $2.35 to $1.21, a 48% drop.

The XRP gains in mid-March saw the 30-day returns spike higher. Recently, the Sharpe Ratio has improved gradually and has been hovering around the positive territory with a reading of 0.0267.

A sustained increase in the metric would mean that XRP is generating more gains with less volatility and could set the stage for a gradual bullish recovery. Yet, over the past six weeks, the price has kept pulling back to the $1.35 support, the same level XRP retested once more on the 26th of March.

The positive reading on the Sharpe Ratio showed that the risk-adjusted returns have improved moderately. It remains to be seen if the situation improves for the investors.

A drop-off in demand reflected bearish XRP sentiment

To keep the risk-adjusted returns rising, XRP needs increased demand which drive a sustained uptrend. A market that is not overleveraged would also keep the deep liquidity hunts at bay, reducing the daily volatility.

The Taker Buy-Sell Ratio was examined to understand the buyer aggression. In mid-March, when XRP rallied to $1.54 when Bitcoin reached $75k, the taker buy orders were prevalent. The 7-day moving average of the taker Buy/Sell Ratio climbed above 1 and stayed there for a few days, something that has only happened thrice in 2026.

This impetus didn’t last long. Over the past ten days, the crypto market correction saw sellers take the upper hand once again.

Additionally, the estimated leverage ratio has seen an uptick lately. An AMBCrypto report had pointed out that the reduced Open Interest (OI) behind XRP, combined with increased spot demand, meant that volatility risk was falling.

However, in the past 24 hours, the XRP OI has increased by 5.4%, the Estimated Leverage Ratio also spiked from 0.134 to 0.155. It signaled increased risk appetite from speculative traders. At the same time, it also warned of an increased threat of a hunt for liquidations and the associated price volatility.

Final Summary

The Sharpe ratio climbed back into positive territory after the deep drop during the February price correction.
Sustained spot demand and aggressive buyer activity are needed for XRP to defend the $1.20-$1.35 support and climb higher. Current market conditions were not favorable.

Трендові криптовалюти

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

Пов'язані питання

QWhat does the Sharpe Ratio indicate for Ripple (XRP) according to the article?

AThe Sharpe Ratio indicates that the risk-adjusted returns for XRP are improving, meaning it is generating more gains with less volatility, which could set the stage for a gradual bullish recovery.

QWhat was the price range of XRP during the February sell-off mentioned in the article?

ADuring the February sell-off, XRP prices dropped from $2.35 to $1.21, representing a 48% decline.

QWhat does the Taker Buy-Sell Ratio measure, and what did it show for XRP in mid-March?

AThe Taker Buy-Sell Ratio measures buyer aggression. In mid-March, it showed that taker buy orders were prevalent, and its 7-day moving average climbed above 1, indicating strong buying pressure.

QWhat recent change in the Estimated Leverage Ratio signals increased risk for XRP traders?

AThe Estimated Leverage Ratio spiked from 0.134 to 0.155, signaling an increased risk appetite from speculative traders and a heightened threat of liquidation hunts and price volatility.

QWhat are the two key factors needed for XRP to defend its support level and climb higher, as per the final summary?

ASustained spot demand and aggressive buyer activity are needed for XRP to defend the $1.20-$1.35 support level and climb higher.

Пов'язані матеріали

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbit6 год тому

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbit6 год тому

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手6 год тому

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手6 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit8 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit8 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手9 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手9 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit10 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit10 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни ONE (ONE).