XRP Ledger Holds 63% of Tokenised US Treasury Supply

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-02-17Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-17

Анотація

The XRP Ledger (XRPL) currently holds 63% of the total tokenized US Treasury supply, with an issuance volume of 54.41 million, surpassing networks like Ethereum. Despite this dominance in issuance, transfer activity on XRPL remains minimal, with monthly TBILL transfers amounting to only $200—just 0.003% of the activity seen on other major blockchains. This highlights a significant imbalance between issuance and usage. Recent developments, including collaborations with Aviva Investors and OpenEden, aim to boost real-world asset tokenization on XRPL. The coming months are seen as critical for assessing XRPL's performance in the tokenized treasury market.

The XRP Ledger now shelters two-thirds of overall tokenised US Treasury bills. As per the recent reports, the XRP-associated blockchain platform owns around 63% of the overall treasury token supply.

The data unveils that the XRPL is heading the tokenised US Treasury bills, holding around 63% of the overall supply. This milestone is significant to note, as XRP Ledger’s treasury token issuance volume has attained 54.41 million, crossing prominent networks such as Ethereum.

Regardless of this issuance dominance, the transfer activity on the XRP Ledger is minimal when contrasted with different blockchain giants. The monthly TBILL transfer volume on XRPL attains just $200 as per the reports, at the time when Ethereum and other chains run millions of transactions.

This shows that just a marginal 0.003% activity occurs on the XRP Ledger. This imbalance highlights a prominent challenge facing XRPL. However, the platform controls the overall TBILL issuance; the treasury tokens on XRPL are hardly used.

However, some blockchains are being used as main issuance platforms; others, however, serve as the main channel for trading. It is noteworthy that this comes closely following Binance’s listing of XRPL’s RLUSD stablecoin. As per the reports, the crypto exchange publicised the listing on February 12.

What Does The Latest Report Say?

It is noteworthy that two prominent developments underscore the growth of XRPL’s tokenised treasuries. These advancements comprise Aviva Investors’ large-scale fund tokenisation and OpenEden’s TBILL token.

As per the latest report, Aviva investors collaborated with Ripple to explore tokenisation funds on XRPL. Doppler Finance publicised a collaboration with OpenEden to open up more yield opportunities for XRP and rLUSD holders on the XRP Ledger.

By amalgamating OpenEden’s tokenised real-world asset infrastructure into Doppler’s yield protocol, the platform has prominently impacted the growth of tokenised treasuries on the chain.

As per the industry experts, the upcoming one to three months are crucial to look after, as these months will indicate how XRPL performs in the tokenised treasury market.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Shiba Inu Tokens Left Unburned, SHIB Price Sees Daily Drops After Weekly Gains

TagsTokenizexrpXRP Ledger

Пов'язані питання

QWhat percentage of the overall tokenised US Treasury supply does the XRP Ledger hold?

AThe XRP Ledger holds 63% of the overall tokenised US Treasury supply.

QHow does the monthly transfer volume of TBILL on XRPL compare to other blockchains like Ethereum?

AThe monthly TBILL transfer volume on XRPL is minimal, reaching only about $200, while blockchains like Ethereum process millions of dollars in transactions.

QWhat two recent developments are highlighted as key to the growth of XRPL's tokenised treasuries?

AThe two key developments are Aviva Investors' large-scale fund tokenisation in collaboration with Ripple, and OpenEden's TBILL token in collaboration with Doppler Finance.

QWhat recent listing by Binance is mentioned in relation to the XRP Ledger?

ABinance recently listed XRPL's RLUSD stablecoin, with the announcement made on February 12.

QWhat does the minimal transfer activity on XRPL indicate despite its high issuance volume?

AThe minimal transfer activity, which is only about 0.003%, indicates that while XRPL controls most of the TBILL issuance, the treasury tokens on its platform are hardly being used for transactions.

Пов'язані матеріали

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbit13 хв тому

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbit13 хв тому

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手24 хв тому

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

链捕手24 хв тому

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, has launched a new full node software called Zakura version 1.0.0. Developed by Zcash co-founder Sean Bowe and Dev Ojha, with private ZEC donations, its goal is to enable Zcash to process over 50,000 transactions per second (TPS)—matching the scale of Visa and Mastercard—while maintaining full transaction privacy and verifiability. This addresses a key bottleneck, as Zcash currently handles only about 1 private transaction per second. Zakura is a fork of the Zcash Foundation's Zebra node. It features chain pruning and snapshots, reducing disk usage and allowing new nodes to sync in under two minutes. It also offers compatibility with the legacy `zcashd` client interface. The scalability challenge stems from the large data size of privacy proofs. Bowe's Tachyon project aims to use recursive proofs to reduce consensus-layer data needs from ~500 MB/s to ~100 MB/s. For wallet scalability, Valar Group is researching Private Information Retrieval (PIR) tech to allow wallets to fetch their data privately. Zakura supports fast block propagation and the upcoming "Ironwood" network upgrade (NU6.3), scheduled for activation around July 28th. Ironwood was created to contain a critical inflation bug discovered in the Orchard shielded pool in May 2024. The fix uses "turnstiles" to trap any counterfeit ZEC created during the vulnerability period within the shielded pool, preventing it from entering circulation and restoring supply integrity.

marsbit39 хв тому

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

marsbit39 хв тому

Replicating the "DeepSeek Moment"? Wall Street Unanimously Says: Kimi K3 Instead Strengthens Computing Power Demand

Title: Wall Street Sees Kimi K3 as a Catalyst for Compute Demand, Not a "DeepSeek Moment 2.0" Summary: Following the release of Moonshot AI's powerful open-source model Kimi K3, initial market reaction mirrored the "DeepSeek moment" that sparked a sell-off in compute stocks earlier in 2025, fearing reduced demand for AI infrastructure. However, major Wall Street banks including UBS, Nomura, BofA, and Citi argue the opposite: K3 will accelerate, not weaken, demand for compute, memory, storage, and networking. Their analysis centers on K3's specifications—2.8 trillion parameters, 1M token context, and MoE architecture—which represent a "scale" story rather than a pure "efficiency" one like DeepSeek R1. These features increase pressure on inference, memory (especially KV cache), and storage. Analysts invoke Jevons Paradox: as high-quality models become more affordable (K3 is cheaper than top closed models but not the cheapest), usage and token volumes expand, ultimately increasing total compute consumption. The reports highlight that competition will force leading US AI labs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) to invest more in training and iteration to maintain their edge. Furthermore, the rise of capable open-source models like K3 is expanding the global AI developer ecosystem, with Chinese models now accounting for over 45% of developer traffic. Key beneficiaries identified across the AI infrastructure chain include memory/storage players (e.g., Micron, Samsung), compute leaders (Nvidia, TSMC), networking suppliers (due to "super-node" cluster needs for deploying K3), and cloud platforms (e.g., Alibaba) that host diverse model ecosystems. The consensus is that stronger open-source models are an entry point for the next wave of infrastructure demand diffusion, provided workload growth outpaces efficiency gains.

链捕手42 хв тому

Replicating the "DeepSeek Moment"? Wall Street Unanimously Says: Kimi K3 Instead Strengthens Computing Power Demand

链捕手42 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片