XRP Ledger Holds 63% of Tokenised US Treasury Supply

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-02-17Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-17

Анотація

The XRP Ledger (XRPL) currently holds 63% of the total tokenized US Treasury supply, with an issuance volume of 54.41 million, surpassing networks like Ethereum. Despite this dominance in issuance, transfer activity on XRPL remains minimal, with monthly TBILL transfers amounting to only $200—just 0.003% of the activity seen on other major blockchains. This highlights a significant imbalance between issuance and usage. Recent developments, including collaborations with Aviva Investors and OpenEden, aim to boost real-world asset tokenization on XRPL. The coming months are seen as critical for assessing XRPL's performance in the tokenized treasury market.

The XRP Ledger now shelters two-thirds of overall tokenised US Treasury bills. As per the recent reports, the XRP-associated blockchain platform owns around 63% of the overall treasury token supply.

The data unveils that the XRPL is heading the tokenised US Treasury bills, holding around 63% of the overall supply. This milestone is significant to note, as XRP Ledger’s treasury token issuance volume has attained 54.41 million, crossing prominent networks such as Ethereum.

Regardless of this issuance dominance, the transfer activity on the XRP Ledger is minimal when contrasted with different blockchain giants. The monthly TBILL transfer volume on XRPL attains just $200 as per the reports, at the time when Ethereum and other chains run millions of transactions.

This shows that just a marginal 0.003% activity occurs on the XRP Ledger. This imbalance highlights a prominent challenge facing XRPL. However, the platform controls the overall TBILL issuance; the treasury tokens on XRPL are hardly used.

However, some blockchains are being used as main issuance platforms; others, however, serve as the main channel for trading. It is noteworthy that this comes closely following Binance’s listing of XRPL’s RLUSD stablecoin. As per the reports, the crypto exchange publicised the listing on February 12.

What Does The Latest Report Say?

It is noteworthy that two prominent developments underscore the growth of XRPL’s tokenised treasuries. These advancements comprise Aviva Investors’ large-scale fund tokenisation and OpenEden’s TBILL token.

As per the latest report, Aviva investors collaborated with Ripple to explore tokenisation funds on XRPL. Doppler Finance publicised a collaboration with OpenEden to open up more yield opportunities for XRP and rLUSD holders on the XRP Ledger.

By amalgamating OpenEden’s tokenised real-world asset infrastructure into Doppler’s yield protocol, the platform has prominently impacted the growth of tokenised treasuries on the chain.

As per the industry experts, the upcoming one to three months are crucial to look after, as these months will indicate how XRPL performs in the tokenised treasury market.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Shiba Inu Tokens Left Unburned, SHIB Price Sees Daily Drops After Weekly Gains

Пов'язані питання

QWhat percentage of the overall tokenised US Treasury supply does the XRP Ledger hold?

AThe XRP Ledger holds 63% of the overall tokenised US Treasury supply.

QHow does the monthly transfer volume of TBILL on XRPL compare to other blockchains like Ethereum?

AThe monthly TBILL transfer volume on XRPL is minimal, reaching only about $200, while blockchains like Ethereum process millions of dollars in transactions.

QWhat two recent developments are highlighted as key to the growth of XRPL's tokenised treasuries?

AThe two key developments are Aviva Investors' large-scale fund tokenisation in collaboration with Ripple, and OpenEden's TBILL token in collaboration with Doppler Finance.

QWhat recent listing by Binance is mentioned in relation to the XRP Ledger?

ABinance recently listed XRPL's RLUSD stablecoin, with the announcement made on February 12.

QWhat does the minimal transfer activity on XRPL indicate despite its high issuance volume?

AThe minimal transfer activity, which is only about 0.003%, indicates that while XRPL controls most of the TBILL issuance, the treasury tokens on its platform are hardly being used for transactions.

Пов'язані матеріали

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit29 хв тому

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit29 хв тому

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbit37 хв тому

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbit37 хв тому

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight News41 хв тому

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight News41 хв тому

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit48 хв тому

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit48 хв тому

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit57 хв тому

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit57 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот