World Liberty Financial (WLFI) on the Rise: Is This a Bullish Play or a Short-Term Bounce?

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-24Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-24

Анотація

World Liberty Financial (WLFI) has posted a 5.25% gain in the last 24 hours, trading at $0.1796 after reaching a high of $0.1802. The token shows bullish momentum, with potential to test resistance at $0.1810 or higher if gains continue. However, a bearish shift could see it retrace toward support at $0.1782 or lower. Technical indicators suggest growing bullish momentum: the MACD line is above the signal line, the CMF indicates mild buying pressure, and the RSI is at 65.61—approaching but not yet in overbought territory. The Bull Bear Power reading of 0.0107 shows weak but present bullish dominance. Market sentiment remains optimistic, though stronger momentum is needed for a decisive upward move.

At press time, both red and green charts were visible in the market. Some of the crypto tokens are losing momentum, and the rest are seeking to run out of the red zone. Meanwhile, World Liberty Financial (WLFI) has turned the market tide by posting a steady 5.25% gain in value over the last 24 hours.

WLFI chose to trade on the downside, at a low of $0.1698 in the morning hours, and the gradual bullish shift pushed the asset’s price up to a high level of $0.1802. At the time of writing, World Liberty Financial trades at $0.1796, with its daily trading volume having dropped to the $99.23 million zone.

The recent price action of World Liberty Financial shows bullish pressure, and its price might move up and test the resistance at around $0.1810. Assuming the current gains amplify, it could trigger the golden cross to take place, and the price would go above the $0.1824 mark.

On the flip side, with a bearish shift, the World Liberty Financial price may retrace towards the $0.1782 support level. Further correction on the downside would strengthen the bears and potentially invite the death cross to unfold. This could push the asset’s price below $0.1768.

Momentum Building: World Liberty Financial Eyes Uptrend

World Liberty Financial’s Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) line is above the signal line, indicating that the bullish momentum is building. The recent price gains are stronger, and the upward movement may continue. In addition, the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator of WLFI is settled at 0.06, suggesting mild buying pressure. The capital is flowing mildly into the asset, showing early accumulation. It could gain traction if the value continues to rise.

Moreover, the ongoing market sentiment of WLFI is bullish, with the daily Relative Strength Index (RSI) value at 65.61. It may approach the overbought territory, and the trend still has enough room to run. If it pushes closer to 70, the market may show signs of consolidation.

The Bull Bear Power (BBP) reading of World Liberty Financial at 0.0107 implies the presence of bullish dominance in the market, but the momentum is weak and not decisive yet. The price action is strong, though it needs a higher reading to likely confirm a stronger upside move.

Top Updated Crypto News

Against the Odds: Livepeer (LPT) Defies a Slumping Market With a 20% Run

Трендові криптовалюти

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the price change of World Liberty Financial (WLFI) over the last 24 hours mentioned in the article?

AWorld Liberty Financial posted a steady 5.25% gain in value over the last 24 hours.

QWhat are the two key technical indicators mentioned that suggest a building bullish momentum for WLFI?

AThe Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) line being above the signal line and the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator at 0.06 suggest a building bullish momentum.

QAccording to the article, what is the current RSI value for WLFI and what does it indicate?

AThe daily Relative Strength Index (RSI) value is at 65.61, indicating a bullish market sentiment that is approaching but has not yet reached the overbought territory.

QWhat are the potential resistance and support levels identified for WLFI's price?

AThe potential resistance level is around $0.1810, and the support level is at $0.1782.

QWhat does the Bull Bear Power (BBP) reading of 0.0107 imply about the current market momentum for WLFI?

AThe Bull Bear Power (BBP) reading of 0.0107 implies the presence of bullish dominance, but the momentum is weak and not yet decisive, requiring a higher reading to confirm a stronger upside move.

Пов'язані матеріали

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit13 хв тому

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit13 хв тому

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbit21 хв тому

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbit21 хв тому

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight News25 хв тому

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight News25 хв тому

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit32 хв тому

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit32 хв тому

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit41 хв тому

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think