WLFI Responds to Rumors of 'Trump Family Exit': Bank License Approval Has Entered Final Stage

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-05-08Востаннє оновлено о 2026-05-08

Анотація

Amidst rumors that the Trump family had quietly exited World Liberty Financial (WLFI), Donald Trump Jr. and co-founder Zach Witkoff addressed the claims at the Miami Consensus conference. Trump Jr. dismissed the rumors as originating from the removal of the Trump family's names from the company's website and subsequent amplification by social media bots. Both affirmed that Don Jr. and Eric Trump remain co-founders. The conversation also covered WLFI's ongoing legal battle with Tron founder Justin Sun. After Sun sued WLFI last month alleging managerial misconduct, WLFI filed a countersuit, accusing Sun of spreading false information and shorting the WLFI token. Witkoff stated the lawsuit was a "last resort" and filed with evidence. Significantly, Witkoff revealed that WLFI's application for a national trust bank charter from the OCC is in the "final stages" of securing conditional approval. This charter is crucial for the company's USD1 stablecoin operations but has drawn criticism from Democratic lawmakers like Senator Elizabeth Warren, who has labeled the application potential evidence of corruption.

Author: Sander Lutz

Compiled by: TechFlow News

TechFlow Introduction: Amid swirling rumors of a "Trump family exit" from World Liberty Financial, Donald Trump Jr. and co-founder Zach Witkoff publicly addressed the speculation at the Miami Consensus conference. Beyond clarifying the rumors, Witkoff revealed the company is in the "final stages of obtaining conditional approval" for its national trust bank license application. Simultaneously, the company has filed a counterclaim against Tron founder Justin Sun. A single clarification has brought to light three separate threads: the license, litigation, and political controversy.

Donald Trump Jr. responded on Thursday at the Miami Consensus cryptocurrency conference to a recent claim circulating on social media: that he and family members had quietly exited World Liberty Financial.

"I think I saw something on Twitter about Don and Eric having walked away from the project," said Zach Witkoff, the other co-founder of World Liberty, on stage.

"That's news to me," Trump Jr. chimed in. He attributed the rumor to World Liberty's earlier removal of the list of co-founders, including President Trump and his three sons, from the company's official website. Subsequently, some individuals capitalized on this change, with bot accounts amplifying the speculation.

"If you get enough people just kind of running with whatever they're fed, plus you've got bots pushing it... If it were true, I wouldn't be on this stage," Trump Jr. said.

"To my knowledge, Don and Eric are still co-founders of this project," Witkoff added.

It is worth noting that the moderator for this Q&A, David Wachsman, is himself the head of public relations for World Liberty and not a neutral third party.

Counterclaim Against Justin Sun: 'We Would Not Sue Without Evidence'

The conversation then shifted to the lawsuit World Liberty filed this week against cryptocurrency entrepreneur Justin Sun, the founder of the Tron network and one of World Liberty's largest financial backers. Last month, Sun sued World Liberty first, alleging serious misconduct by the company's management.

World Liberty subsequently filed a counterclaim, asserting that Sun not only publicly spread false statements about the company but also secretly shorted the company's native token, WLFI, in an attempt to drive down its price.

"We would not be bringing this suit without the evidence," Witkoff said, calling the legal action a "last resort."

Bank License: 'Final Stages of Conditional Approval'

Witkoff then steered the discussion towards World Liberty's regulatory ambitions. In January of this year, the company submitted an application for a national trust bank license to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), an agency under the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Once approved, World Liberty would be able to provide crucial banking service functionalities for its USD-pegged stablecoin, USD1.

"We're very excited about getting the charter," Witkoff said. "I think we're in the final stages of getting conditional approval."

This very license has been a focal point of criticism from Democrats in recent months. Senator Elizabeth Warren has repeatedly pointed to World Liberty's bank license application as evidence of what "may be the most disgraceful presidential corruption scandal in American history."

Трендові криптовалюти

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main subject of the response given by Donald Trump Jr. and Zach Witkoff at the Miami Consensus conference?

AThey are responding to and denying rumors circulating on social media that Donald Trump Jr. and his family members have quietly exited the World Liberty Financial project.

QWhat recent legal action did World Liberty Financial take against Justin Sun?

AWorld Liberty Financial filed a counter-lawsuit against Justin Sun, alleging that he publicly spread false statements about the company and secretly shorted its native token, WLFI, to suppress its price.

QWhat regulatory application did Zach Witkoff reveal is nearing a critical stage?

AZach Witkoff revealed that World Liberty Financial's application for a national trust bank charter with the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) is in the final stages of potentially receiving conditional approval.

QAccording to the article, who has been a major critic of World Liberty Financial's bank charter application?

AU.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren has been a major critic, repeatedly labeling the application as potential evidence for "perhaps the most disgraceful presidential corruption scandal in American history."

QWhat reason did Donald Trump Jr. suggest for the origin of the exit rumors about his family?

AHe attributed the rumors to World Liberty previously removing the list of co-founders, which included President Trump and his three sons, from its website, which was then amplified by individuals and bot accounts.

Пов'язані матеріали

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

**Summary: A Conversation with Jia Hang on Two Decades of China's Payment Globalization** Jia Hang, a veteran with over twenty years in payments, reflects on China's attempts to build a global payment network through three key phases: UnionPay (card networks), Alipay+ (digital wallets), and now, stablecoins. His journey began at UnionPay International, aiming to establish China's card network abroad. While successful in following Chinese tourists ("where Chinese go, UnionPay goes"), it struggled to achieve true global scale. The core lesson: card networks like Visa/Mastercard's unassailable advantage isn't just technical standards, but their deeply entrenched **governance and profit-sharing models** that create powerful network effects. Competing as the "same species" is nearly impossible. At Ant Group, he led Alipay+, a strategy to bypass card networks by interconnecting local e-wallets worldwide. While innovative, it faced a similar ceiling. Mobile QR payments and card swipes were essentially **the same species competing for the same pie**, lacking a disruptive value proposition for users or a sustainable new incentive model to replace the card networks' established flywheel. Today, at Singapore's DCS, Jia focuses on stablecoin-based payments. He argues stablecoins represent a fundamental shift. They are not competing with Visa for consumer payments but challenging the **traditional banking and account system for value movement**. Products like "U Cards" (stablecoin-linked payment cards) are transitional, leveraging existing card networks for acceptance while building new rails. The real potential lies in stablecoins enabling seamless, low-cost global value transfer, potentially reorganizing the financial infrastructure around **accounts rather than cards**. Jia believes stablecoin adoption for local retail payments, cross-border transactions, and as high-yield savings vehicles is becoming irreversible. This could gradually reduce reliance on traditional fiat channels, especially in regions with weak currencies or capital controls. The quest for the "next global payment network" continues, now centered on whether stablecoins can successfully bridge Web2 and Web3, establish new governance, and create compelling user value beyond mere cost reduction.

marsbit11 хв тому

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

marsbit11 хв тому

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

Circle's stock price has plunged approximately 76% from its 2023 peak, reflecting a major market revaluation. Despite this, Circle President Heath Tarbert emphasized the company's focus on long-term execution and its dominant position with USDC's $73 billion circulation across 34 blockchains. The competitive landscape is intensifying. A new consortium-backed stablecoin, Open USD, is attempting to challenge incumbents by sharing reserve yields with partners. More significantly, Visa's new stablecoin platform, initially supporting Open USD while also being compatible with USDC, could erode Circle's network effects. In response, Circle is expanding into real-world payments through partnerships like the one with Japan's JCB. Separately, Tether (USDT) faces a two-year compliance window under new U.S. regulations, requiring it to adjust its reserve composition away from assets like Bitcoin and loans towards cash and U.S. Treasuries. Meanwhile, in Hong Kong, Standard Chartered-backed fintech firm Dian Dian is poised to launch a licensed HKD-pegged stablecoin (HKDAP), moving the industry into a phase where the real test is integrating licensed stablecoins into actual payment flows and corporate treasury systems. The sharp decline in Circle's stock underscores a broader shift: the stablecoin market is moving from a winner-takes-all dynamic to a multi-player competitive arena where execution, compliance, and real-world utility are becoming paramount.

marsbit11 хв тому

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

marsbit11 хв тому

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight News21 хв тому

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight News21 хв тому

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbit38 хв тому

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbit38 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот

Популярні статті

Як купити WLFI

Ласкаво просимо до HTX.com! Ми зробили покупку Official World Liberty Financial (WLFI) простою та зручною. Дотримуйтесь нашої покрокової інструкції, щоб розпочати свою криптовалютну подорож.Крок 1: Створіть обліковий запис на HTXВикористовуйте свою електронну пошту або номер телефону, щоб зареєструвати обліковий запис на HTX безплатно. Пройдіть безпроблемну реєстрацію й отримайте доступ до всіх функцій.ЗареєструватисьКрок 2: Перейдіть до розділу Купити крипту і виберіть спосіб оплатиКредитна/дебетова картка: використовуйте вашу картку Visa або Mastercard, щоб миттєво купити Official World Liberty Financial (WLFI).Баланс: використовуйте кошти з балансу вашого рахунку HTX для безперешкодної торгівлі.Треті особи: ми додали популярні способи оплати, такі як Google Pay та Apple Pay, щоб підвищити зручність.P2P: Торгуйте безпосередньо з іншими користувачами на HTX.Позабіржова торгівля (OTC): ми пропонуємо індивідуальні послуги та конкурентні обмінні курси для трейдерів.Крок 3: Зберігайте свої Official World Liberty Financial (WLFI)Після придбання Official World Liberty Financial (WLFI) збережіть його у своєму обліковому записі на HTX. Крім того, ви можете відправити його в інше місце за допомогою блокчейн-переказу або використовувати його для торгівлі іншими криптовалютами.Крок 4: Торгівля Official World Liberty Financial (WLFI)Легко торгуйте Official World Liberty Financial (WLFI) на спотовому ринку HTX. Просто увійдіть до свого облікового запису, виберіть торгову пару, укладайте угоди та спостерігайте за ними в режимі реального часу. Ми пропонуємо зручний досвід як для початківців, так і для досвідчених трейдерів.

392 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2025.09.01Оновлено 2026.06.02

Як купити WLFI

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни WLFI (WLFI).

活动图片