WLFI alleges coordinated attack as USD1 shrugs off brief depeg

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-02-23Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-23

Анотація

World Liberty Financial (WLFI) alleged a coordinated attack against its USD1 stablecoin on 23 February, after the token briefly depegged below $1 amid heavy trading volume and social media speculation. The company claimed attackers compromised cofounder accounts, spread fear online, and opened large short positions to profit from volatility. USD1 quickly rebounded to its $1 peg, which WLFI attributed to its fully-backed mint-and-redeem mechanism. The price dip coincided with unverified rumors, including claims that cofounder Eric Trump had deleted WLFI-related posts, though no evidence supports this. While the incident highlights how sentiment can impact stablecoins, WLFI provided no technical proof of manipulation, and USD1's rapid recovery suggests a liquidity-driven event rather than a structural failure.

World Liberty Financial [WLFI] said a “coordinated attack” targeted its USD1 stablecoin on Monday, 23 February. This came after the token briefly slipped below its $1 peg amid a burst of online speculation and heavy trading.

In a post shared around mid-afternoon, World Liberty Financial claimed that attackers had compromised several accounts linked to cofounders.

Also, it claimed they amplified fear through social media and opened large short positions in WLFI-related markets to profit from the volatility. WLFI said the effort ultimately failed, pointing to USD1’s rapid return to parity.

“Thanks to USD1’s sound mint-and-redeem mechanism and full 1:1 backing, we are trading steadily at par,” the company said, urging users to rely on verified channels for accurate information.

What triggered the volatility?

Market data shows USD1 trading slightly below $1 for a short period, with prices dipping to the $0.995–$0.998 range before rebounding.

The move coincided with heightened discussion on X following unrelated investigative teases by onchain investigator, ZachXBT. Some users speculated about links to the WLFI ecosystem.

Several posts claimed that Eric Trump — World Liberty Financial cofounder — had deleted WLFI-related messages, fuelling concern around the project.

However, a review of available posts shows no clear evidence that his account had previously published WLFI-related content.

While references to World Liberty Financial as a company do exist, a specific search for WLFI on his page didn’t yield any results. Claims of deleted token-specific posts cannot be independently verified.

Market response, not structural stress

Despite the sharp intraday move, USD1’s price action suggests a liquidity-driven reaction rather than a breakdown in the stablecoin’s backing or mechanics.

The token quickly reverted to trading at or near $1, consistent with WLFI’s assertion that mint-and-redeem flows absorbed selling pressure.

Also, analysis of the WLFI token showed it dipped around the same time as its stablecoin counterpart. Its price dropped to around $0.108 before bouncing back to around $0.113, as of this writing.

WLFI did not provide technical details to substantiate claims of hacked accounts or paid influencer activity, and no independent evidence has yet emerged confirming coordinated manipulation.

Still, the episode underscores how rapidly sentiment-driven narratives can impact even fully backed stablecoins in thin or reactive market conditions.

Final Summary

USD1 briefly dipped below $1 but recovered quickly, suggesting liquidity stress rather than structural failure
WLFI alleges a coordinated attack, though key elements of that claim remain unverified

Трендові криптовалюти

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

Пов'язані питання

QWhat did WLFI allege was the cause of the brief depeg of its USD1 stablecoin?

AWLFI alleged that a 'coordinated attack' was the cause, involving compromised accounts of cofounders, social media fear amplification, and large short positions opened to profit from the volatility.

QOn what date did the alleged attack on the USD1 stablecoin occur?

AThe alleged attack occurred on Monday, 23 February.

QWhat was the lowest price range that USD1 traded at during this event before rebounding?

AUSD1 traded in the $0.995–$0.998 range before rebounding to its $1 peg.

QAccording to WLFI, what mechanism ensured the stablecoin's rapid return to its $1 peg?

AWLFI stated that USD1's sound mint-and-redeem mechanism and its full 1:1 backing ensured its rapid return to parity, absorbing the selling pressure.

QWhat was the name of the on-chain investigator whose unrelated investigative teases on social media platform X coincided with the increased discussion and speculation about WLFI?

AThe on-chain investigator was ZachXBT.

Пов'язані матеріали

How 40.8M staked ETH could strengthen Ethereum’s edge over Bitcoin

Ethereum is showing signs of strengthening against Bitcoin, driven by two key trends. First, significant whale accumulation is occurring, with large holders not just buying ETH but immediately staking 100% of it. This locks away supply, signaling long-term conviction. Ethereum's total staked ETH has reached a record 40.8 million, with a growing entry queue and 33.5% of supply now staked, further tightening liquid availability. Second, Ethereum's DeFi ecosystem is experiencing robust activity, with WETH whale transactions at a multi-year high and Total Value Locked (TVL) rising sharply. These converging factors—reduced supply from staking and increased on-chain demand—are translating into technical strength. The ETH/BTC ratio has broken above resistance and is approaching the 0.03 level, setting the stage for potential continued outperformance against Bitcoin.

ambcrypto35 хв тому

How 40.8M staked ETH could strengthen Ethereum’s edge over Bitcoin

ambcrypto35 хв тому

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

Storm's Eye: South Korean Market De-leveraging Nears Completion The recent sharp correction in South Korean equities, with the KOSPI index dropping 32% from its June high, has been a key trigger for global tech stock volatility. The core driver was not a fundamental shift but a forced de-leveraging process within the market's unique structure, which is now largely complete. Two main leverage channels amplified the sell-off: 1. **Leveraged ETFs:** Their size, proportionally four times larger than in the U.S., peaked near $50 billion. Their mandatory daily rebalancing mechanism created a vicious cycle of "price drop → forced selling → further drop." Approximately 75% of this excess has been unwound, shrinking to $26 billion, with regulatory curbs now blocking new inflows. 2. **Hedge Fund Leverage:** Using swaps to magnify exposure, hedge funds saw their net long positioning fall by over 50% from peak levels. The most intense phase of this institutional de-leveraging is over. In contrast, **retail margin debt** poses minimal systemic risk. At 0.5% of market cap, it is far lower than in the U.S. or China, lacks automatic triggers, and is concentrated in smaller stocks. The conclusion: the high-leverage structures most prone to "chain-reaction selling" have been substantially cleared. The market is transitioning from a liquidity-driven crash to one priced more on fundamentals. The article argues that the AI trend—centered on Korean memory chips—remains intact. This episode represents a painful but necessary clearing of crowded trades, not the end of the AI revolution. For investors, the key question is conviction in the long-term AI direction; if the trend is real, current volatility is a cost of entry, not a terminal risk.

链捕手46 хв тому

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

链捕手46 хв тому

92.9% of crypto tokens launched since 2024 trade below TGE price: CryptoRank

A recent analysis by CryptoRank reveals that 92.9% of cryptocurrency tokens launched since 2024 and with a market capitalization exceeding $100 million are now trading below their initial Token Generation Event (TGE) price. The study, examining 113 projects, found only eight—or 7.1%—remain profitable, with the median return across the dataset being a stark -95.7%. Top performers include Hyperliquid (HYPE), which gained 1,519%, followed by Ondo Finance (ONDO), EverValue Coin (EVA), and Midnight Network (NIGHT). The findings indicate a market that has become highly selective, with capital concentrating on a small number of projects demonstrating real utility, adoption, or ecosystem growth. This contrasts with previous cycles where new tokens often saw sustained rallies. Investors are now scrutinizing factors like tokenomics, circulating supply, and unlock schedules more closely. This trend may influence future token launches, prompting projects to prioritize sustainable distribution models and long-term growth over aggressive initial valuations, as high fully diluted valuations (FDVs) and large future token unlocks often lead to significant price pressure.

ambcrypto47 хв тому

92.9% of crypto tokens launched since 2024 trade below TGE price: CryptoRank

ambcrypto47 хв тому

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

"The Enduring Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payments Lack a First Principle" Stripe is reportedly attempting to acquire PayPal, marking a significant shift reminiscent of PayPal's merger with the original X.com 30 years ago. The article analyzes Stripe's strategic challenges and the broader payments industry landscape. Despite its initial success with a developer-friendly API model, Stripe missed its optimal IPO window during the pandemic and has since seen its valuation decline. Its attempts to expand through acquisitions and new ventures, particularly in stablecoins (like its OUSD project) and Agent-focused payments (ACP/MPP protocols), have faced headwinds. The author argues that the payment industry remains highly fragmented and is ultimately an adjunct to the traditional banking system. This structure limits the potential for any single player, including Stripe, to achieve complete dominance. While stablecoins and the future rise of autonomous Agent economies present potential growth avenues, they are not yet mainstream and still require integration with the existing financial system. For now, Agent-based transactions are largely used for speculative "volume boosting" rather than substantive business applications. Stripe's current move to acquire PayPal is seen as an attempt to bolster its weak consumer-facing (C-side) business after its stablecoin-focused strategies faltered. Meanwhile, PayPal is described as structurally outdated, unable to revive itself through new products like Venmo or PYUSD. The future of payments may lie not in payments themselves but in value-added services like more efficient settlement networks. The author suggests that companies like Stripe and Circle, which are building their own blockchains (Tempo, Arc) and stablecoins, are positioning themselves to eventually profit from high-efficiency settlement systems. These new networks could potentially bypass some traditional banking layers. In conclusion, the article posits that third-party payment is a perpetually fragmented battlefield where scale alone cannot ensure victory. Players must find new models, focusing on efficiency to compete with the entrenched banking system. Stripe's acquisition of PayPal represents a bet on this uncertain future.

链捕手1 год тому

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

链捕手1 год тому

Ondo Finance up 14% as entity buys $61M ONDO – Is more upside coming?

Ondo Finance (ONDO) surged over 14% in 24 hours, becoming the top performer among the top 100 cryptocurrencies. The rally was driven by significant whale accumulation, including a $61 million ONDO purchase from a Coinbase Prime wallet, and a quadrupling of perpetual futures volume to $155 million. Technically, ONDO has broken out of a multi-month triangle pattern and is forming a potential higher low around $0.34, with indicators like the MACD and RSI supporting bullish momentum. Key resistance levels are at $0.40, $0.44, and $0.48. The strong institutional buying suggests potential for further upside, though a failure to break resistance could see a retracement to $0.34 or $0.30.

ambcrypto1 год тому

Ondo Finance up 14% as entity buys $61M ONDO – Is more upside coming?