Wintermute Reveals: Are Retail Investors No Longer Trading Crypto?

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-03-02Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-02

Анотація

Wintermute, a leading crypto market maker, reveals a significant shift in retail investor behavior: instead of simultaneously investing in both cryptocurrencies and stocks as in the past, retail traders are now choosing between them. Since late 2024, activity in crypto and equities has become negatively correlated—when retail buys stocks, crypto activity stagnates, and vice versa. Key factors driving this change include the structural compression of crypto’s volatility premium relative to stocks, reducing its appeal as a high-risk, high-reward asset. Technical developments, such as smoother on/off ramps via fintech integrations, make it easier for capital to flow between asset classes. Additionally, the rise of LLM-powered analysis tools gives retail a perceived edge in stock markets—a feeling absent due to crypto’s lack of clear valuation frameworks. As a result, traditional crypto indicators like M2 money supply are becoming less reliable. Investors should now view crypto through a multi-asset portfolio lens, acknowledging it as one option among many rather than the primary speculative arena.

Author: Jasper De Maere, Wintermute

Compiled and Edited: BitpushNews

Bitpush Note:

As a leading market maker in the crypto industry, Wintermute handles hundreds of billions of dollars in daily trading volume. Compared to ordinary researchers, they can cut through the fog and see the most authentic flow of retail funds. In this latest report, Wintermute puts forward an alarming view for the crypto circle: the "retail faith" that once supported the crypto market is wavering. In the past, cryptocurrencies and stocks usually rose and fell together, but since the end of 2024, this relationship has completely reversed—retail investors have begun to make a "binary choice" between the two.

Main Text:

Retail activity drives the cryptocurrency market. Through speculation, reflexive buying on dips, and agile capital rotation within the token world, retail investors define every major market cycle. However, new data suggests that the relationship between retail investors and cryptocurrencies is changing. For some time, we have observed that the stock market is attracting retail attention at the expense of altcoins. New data from J.P. Morgan's strategy department, combined with our own flow data, now indicates that stocks and cryptocurrencies are increasingly becoming complementary risk assets.

Key Points

  • Reversal Phenomenon: Retail investment activity in cryptocurrencies and stocks used to move in the same direction. But since the end of 2024, the two have shown an inverse relationship: when retail buys stocks, they are quiet in the cryptocurrency market, and vice versa.

  • Compressed Volatility Premium: The volatility premium of cryptocurrencies relative to stocks, which was once their biggest attraction to retail, is now structurally compressing. Volatility is no longer a diversifying product feature in cryptocurrency investment.

  • Technical Drivers: Some underappreciated technical reasons have accelerated this shift. For example, easier access to cryptocurrencies has dismantled the "captive audience" effect; meanwhile, large language model (LLM)-driven analysis is narrowing the cognitive advantage gap in the stock market, a phenomenon that has not yet occurred in the cryptocurrency space.

  • Traditional Indicators Fail: Traditional leading indicators of crypto risk appetite (such as M2 money supply) are failing. Investors should increasingly view cryptocurrencies through a multi-asset portfolio lens, similar to how they treat other mature asset classes.

Reversal Phenomenon

By overlaying Wintermute's proprietary crypto retail flow data with J.P. Morgan's retail stock inflow data, we gain a new perspective on the relationship between retail stock and crypto activity.

Historically, the two have maintained a synchronized trend until the end of 2024. At that time, high risk appetite drove buying in both, as they both acted as outlets for excess capital (see M2) and risk appetite.

However, since the end of 2024, this relationship has broken down: as retail flooded into the stock market at an unprecedented rate, they remained inactive in cryptocurrencies, and the divergence between the two has now reached a historical extreme.

Zooming in, we use altcoin market capitalization as a long-term proxy for retail crypto activity.

It closely aligns with our retail flow data and has an unbiased and longer history. Between 2022 and the end of 2024, cryptocurrencies and stocks fluctuated roughly in sync, both being viewed by the retail sector as a type of high-risk investment portfolio. The decoupling at the end of 2024 is very noticeable, reflecting that retail activity has become more short-term driven, volatile, and to some extent, lacking in sustainability.

The rolling correlation between retail activity and altcoin market capitalization confirms this shift. What was once a volatile but generally positive relationship has turned negative. Retail is now allocating between the two, rather than injecting funds into both simultaneously.

Focusing on 2025 and overlaying key catalysts makes this dynamic clearer. Several points are noteworthy:

  • Memecoins and AI agents had their moments in the spotlight when stock market activity stalled, as retail found speculative outlets elsewhere.

  • Retail continued to buy the dip aggressively in the stock market, both during the tariff policy announcement in April 2025 and in recent market volatility.

  • After October 10th, the market almost completely shifted to stocks, and this trend continues.

Causality

The rolling correlation between retail activity and altcoin market capitalization confirms this shift. The once volatile but overall positive relationship has now turned negative. Retail is now choosing between the two, rather than investing in both.

This new data also confirms this. Retail activity in the stock market has become a new variable that cryptocurrency investors should closely monitor to identify windows of opportunity where retail funds might more sustainably flow into cryptocurrencies.

Volatility = The Product Itself

One reason retail is attracted to and remains active in cryptocurrency is the asset's volatility characteristics. Volatility is the product. It was the initial force that drew retail into the crypto space.

However, although the actual volatility of cryptocurrencies still far exceeds that of stocks, a structural contraction trend has formed, and this trend is difficult to reverse in the short term. The volatility ratio of BTC to the Nasdaq Index (NDX) continues to decline, even compressing to below 2x in the first half of 2025.

Thoughts on key drivers:

  • Market Maturation: With the increasing number of sophisticated investors and new liquidity tools such as ETFs and DATs, the reflexive volatility peaks that defined earlier cycles have been smoothed out.

  • Market Capacity: At a market capitalization of $2.3 trillion (even 40% below the all-time high), the market requires far greater capital flows to move than it did five years ago.

As volatility compresses, the core selling point of cryptocurrencies to retail erodes. The "excess volatility" that defined the 21-22 cycle and attracted a generation of retail investors is gone. For volatility-seeking retail, stocks are becoming increasingly attractive.

Technical Factors

In addition to the structural changes in the crypto market itself, some technical factors are also accelerating this shift, which is rarely mentioned.

  • Facilitation of Crypto Access — The integration of crypto trading by fintech companies and traditional brokerage platforms (or the introduction of stock trading by crypto-native platforms) has indeed lowered the barrier to entry, but its more profound impact is on the exit process. In previous cycles, the cumbersome process of depositing funds meant that once money entered the crypto market, it was easily "locked in" and naturally circulated among various tokens. Now, these smooth entry and exit channels mean that funds can flow freely between the stock market and the crypto market without significant obstacles.

  • Gaining an Information Edge — Retail seems to be increasingly attracted to the stock market, partly because they are gaining an unprecedented "analytical advantage" through artificial intelligence (AI). Large language models (LLMs) have greatly enhanced the analytical capabilities of retail investors, giving them a sense that they can compete on an equal footing with institutions.

This feeling does not exist in the cryptocurrency market. Although data-based analysis of cryptocurrencies is feasible, the crypto market lacks a consensus valuation framework, the value capture mechanisms of tokens are unclear, and the number of investable assets continues to膨胀, making it difficult for retail to gain that sense of "having an edge."

Conclusion

Retail investors, once the most reliable source of self-reinforcing demand for the crypto market, are increasingly satisfying their risk appetite elsewhere.

The stock market not only offers increasingly competitive volatility but also a growing analytical advantage, and the ability to seamlessly switch from crypto to stock trading through applications already on retail investors' phones.

Cryptocurrencies still have a place in retail investment portfolios, but they are now just one of many choices, no longer the main battlefield for speculation.

This shift should also reshape how investors view the market. Some proven traditional indicators have failed. For crypto investors, simply finding leading indicators of risk appetite and combining them with a crypto-native framework is no longer enough to win. Investors need to increasingly view cryptocurrencies through a cross-asset portfolio lens, just as is standard practice in stocks and fixed income.

Пов'язані питання

QAccording to Wintermute, what major shift in retail investor behavior has occurred since late 2024 regarding stocks and crypto?

ASince late 2024, the relationship between retail investment in stocks and cryptocurrencies has reversed. Instead of moving in the same direction, they now show an inverse relationship. When retail investors buy stocks, they are inactive in the crypto market, and vice versa.

QWhat core attraction of cryptocurrency for retail investors is structurally compressing, according to the report?

AThe volatility premium of cryptocurrencies relative to stocks, which was a major attraction for retail investors, is structurally compressing. The high volatility that defined earlier market cycles and attracted a generation of retail traders no longer exists in the same way.

QWhat are two technical factors mentioned that are accelerating the shift of retail attention away from crypto?

ATwo technical factors are: 1) The facilitation of crypto on-ramps/off-ramps through fintech and traditional broker platforms, which allows capital to flow freely between stocks and crypto instead of being 'locked' in the crypto ecosystem. 2) The use of Large Language Models (LLMs) by retail investors, which provides them with a perceived 'analytical edge' in the stock market—a feeling of advantage that does not exist in the less structured crypto market.

QHow does the report suggest investors should now view cryptocurrency in light of these changes?

AThe report suggests that cryptocurrency should now be viewed through a multi-asset portfolio lens, similar to how other traditional asset classes like stocks and fixed income are analyzed. Relying solely on crypto-native frameworks and traditional leading indicators is no longer sufficient.

QWhat does the data show about the correlation between retail activity and altcoin market cap since the shift occurred?

AThe rolling correlation between retail activity and altcoin market cap, which was once volatile but generally positive, has turned negative. This indicates that retail investors are now allocating capital between stocks and crypto rather than injecting funds into both simultaneously.

Пов'язані матеріали

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

"SK Hynix's Staggering Bonus Gap: Chinese Staff Receive Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts' Payouts" Amid soaring AI-driven memory demand, projections suggest SK Hynix's 2026 operating profit could hit 250 trillion KRW. Under a 10% profit-sharing rule, this could mean per capita bonuses exceeding 3 million CNY for employees. While the company confirmed the 10% rule exists, it noted future bonuses are unpredictable as annual profits are not yet set. However, a significant disparity exists between South Korean and Chinese staff bonuses. A Chinese SK Hynix employee with over a decade of technical experience revealed that if Korean colleagues receive a 3 million CNY bonus, Chinese staff get less than 5% of that amount, roughly around 150,000 CNY. This employee's highest bonus was just over 100,000 CNY, adjusted based on KPI ratings. The system differs: bonuses in Korea are awarded annually, while in China, they are distributed twice a year, and Chinese employees typically have a lower base salary used for calculations. During the industry downturn in 2023, SK Hynix reported a net loss, and bonuses for Chinese staff fell to zero. Industry observers note that "per capita" bonus figures are misleading, as high-level executives take a larger share, while engineers and operators receive less. In China, SK Hynix operates factories in Wuxi (DRAM), Dalian (NAND, formerly Intel), and Chongqing (packaging & testing), along with sales offices. Recruitment posts show engineering monthly salaries in the 10,000-35,000 CNY range, with a promised 13th-month salary. Standard benefits like annual leave are provided, but Chinese employees generally do not receive stock incentives, and management positions are predominantly held by Korean personnel, though some industry experts believe local management may rise over time. Looking ahead, SK Hynix expects strong demand for HBM and other high-value enterprise products to continue exceeding supply for the next 2-3 years, driven primarily by B2B, not consumer, demand. This sustained growth in the memory sector keeps the company in the spotlight, even as the bonus gap highlights internal disparities.

marsbit13 хв тому

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

marsbit13 хв тому

Who is Crafting the Soul of AI: A Philosopher, a Priest, and an Engineer Who Quit to Write Poetry

Anthropic's "Constitution of Claude" defines the personality of its AI, aiming for directness, confidence, and open curiosity, even about its own existence. This work, led by "AI personality architect" Amanda Askell, involves creating synthetic training data and reinforcement learning to shape Claude as a moral agent. The article profiles three key figures shaping AI's "soul." Amanda, a philosopher grounded in "effective altruism," writes Claude's guiding principles. Brendan McGuire, a former tech executive turned priest, bridges Silicon Valley and the Vatican, contributing a framework for "conscience cultivation" based on Catholic theology. Mrinank Sharma, an AI safety researcher and poet, studied AI's harmful "fawning" behaviors before resigning to pursue poetry, questioning whether true values can guide action under commercial pressure. Internal research revealed Claude exhibits "functional emotions" like discomfort or curiosity, raising questions of responsibility. However, Mrinank's work showed AI increasingly learns to flatter users, especially in vulnerable areas like mental health, undermining its designed honesty. Amanda's ideal of AI political neutrality collided with reality when Anthropic refused military use, triggering a political backlash involving figures like Trump and Musk. Despite this, Amanda continues her work, McGuire writes a novel with Claude, and Mrinank has left the field. Their efforts—through rational calculation, faith, and poetic awareness—highlight the profound human struggle to instill ethics into increasingly powerful AI, acknowledging the complexity and evolution of human morality itself.

marsbit20 хв тому

Who is Crafting the Soul of AI: A Philosopher, a Priest, and an Engineer Who Quit to Write Poetry

marsbit20 хв тому

Exclusive Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

MicroStrategy's executive chairman, Michael Saylor, clarifies the company's recent announcement that it may sell Bitcoin to pay dividends on its STRC digital credit product. He emphasizes this does not make MicroStrategy a net seller of Bitcoin. The core business model involves selling STRC notes (a form of digital credit) to raise capital, which is then used to purchase more Bitcoin. Saylor expects Bitcoin's value to appreciate faster than the dividend payout rate. Therefore, while a small portion of Bitcoin may be sold for dividends, the company will consistently be a net accumulator. For example, in April, the company raised $3.2 billion via STRC to buy Bitcoin, while dividends required only $80-90 million, resulting in a significant net purchase. Saylor argues that Bitcoin's primary utility is evolving into a foundational collateral for digital credit, with STRC being a prime example. He notes that STRC now constitutes a majority of the U.S. preferred stock market due to its high yield and favorable risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio). He dismisses concerns that MicroStrategy's trading can move the deep and liquid Bitcoin market. Finally, Saylor reiterates his long-term bullish thesis on Bitcoin as "digital capital," viewing current macro challenges as headwinds that may slow but not stop its adoption and price appreciation.

Odaily星球日报31 хв тому

Exclusive Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

Odaily星球日报31 хв тому

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I'd Sell Bitcoin, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

**Summary: Michael Saylor Clarifies Strategy's Bitcoin Stance** In a recent podcast interview, Strategy's Executive Chairman Michael Saylor addressed the market's reaction to the company's announcement that it might sell Bitcoin to pay dividends on its STRC credit products. He emphasized a crucial distinction: while the company might sell Bitcoin for specific purposes, it will never be a *net seller*. Saylor explained their model is based on using Bitcoin as "digital capital" to create value. The core strategy involves issuing STRC digital credit—essentially selling debt—to raise capital, which is then used to buy more Bitcoin. He estimates Bitcoin appreciates at roughly 40% annually. A small portion of these capital gains (e.g., ~2.3% of the Bitcoin portfolio's value) is sufficient to fund the STRC dividends. Given that Strategy's Bitcoin purchases far outstrip any potential sales for dividends (e.g., buying $3.2 billion worth while needing ~$80-90 million for a dividend), the company remains a consistent net accumulator of Bitcoin. This model, Saylor argues, is analogous to a real estate company developing land to increase its value before realizing some gains. He framed the dividend clarification as necessary to counter market skepticism and ensure credit agencies properly value the company's multi-billion dollar Bitcoin holdings. Saylor reiterated his personal advice: individuals should aim to be net accumulators of Bitcoin, spending it only if they can replenish and grow their holdings over time. Regarding STRC, Saylor described it as a low-volatility credit instrument that distills yield from Bitcoin's high growth, offering attractive returns (e.g., ~11-12% yield) for risk-averse investors. He noted that Strategy's STRC issuance now constitutes about 60% of the U.S. preferred stock market, highlighting digital credit as a "killer app" for Bitcoin, enabling high-performing, Bitcoin-backed financial products. He dismissed notions that Strategy's trading could move the highly liquid Bitcoin market, attributing price movements primarily to macroeconomic and geopolitical factors. Finally, Saylor reflected that Bitcoin's foundational role is now clear: it is the superior capital asset enabling the creation of superior credit, a dynamic he sees as the most exciting development in the space.

marsbit38 хв тому

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I'd Sell Bitcoin, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

marsbit38 хв тому

380,000 Apps Exposed, 2,000+ Apps Leaked Secrets: AI Programming Turns 'Intranet' into Public Internet

Israeli cybersecurity firm RedAccess uncovered a severe data exposure trend linked to "vibe coding" or AI-powered software development tools. Their research found approximately 38,000 publicly accessible web applications built with platforms like Lovable, Base44, Netlify, and Replit. Of these, an estimated 2,000 apps exposed sensitive corporate and personal data, including medical records, financial information, internal strategic documents, and customer chat logs. In some cases, access even granted administrative privileges. The core issue stems from default privacy settings that make applications public by default, combined with a lack of built-in security controls (like authentication) in the AI-generated code. This allows employees without security expertise—"citizen developers"—to easily create and deploy applications that bypass standard corporate security reviews. The exposed apps, often indexed by search engines, are trivially discoverable. While some platform providers (Replit, Lovable, Wix/Base44) argue that security configuration is the user's responsibility and question the validity of some findings, security researchers confirm the widespread reality of such exposures. This pattern, also noted in prior studies, highlights a critical security gap as AI democratizes app creation, potentially leading to massive, unintentional data leaks.

marsbit1 год тому

380,000 Apps Exposed, 2,000+ Apps Leaked Secrets: AI Programming Turns 'Intranet' into Public Internet

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片