Winklevoss‑Backed Gemini Cuts Up To 25% Of Staff, Exits UK, EU, And Australia

bitcoinistОпубліковано о 2026-02-06Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-06

Анотація

Gemini, the cryptocurrency exchange founded by the Winklevoss twins, announced significant layoffs and a withdrawal from key international markets. The company is cutting up to 25% of its workforce, affecting around 200 employees, and will wind down operations in the UK, EU, and Australia. This decision is part of a strategic shift to focus resources on its new prediction markets platform, Gemini Predictions, which the founders believe represent a major future growth opportunity. They cited regulatory complexity and operational challenges as reasons for scaling back global expansion. Since its mid-December launch, the prediction platform has seen over 10,000 users and $24 million in trading volume. The company's stock (GEMI) has fallen over 85% from its all-time high.

Gemini (GEMI), the cryptocurrency exchange founded and run by billionaire twins Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, announced significant changes to its business on Thursday, including deep job cuts and a withdrawal from several major international markets.

Gemini Scales Back Global Operations

Gemini plans to reduce its workforce by up to 25%. This decision could affect approximately 200 employees worldwide, as the exchange disclosed its increased focus on artificial intelligence (AI)-related operations.

The cuts will span multiple regions, including the United States and Singapore. At the same time, it will wind down operations in the United Kingdom, the European Union, and Australia, signaling a sharp pullback from markets it once viewed as central to its global expansion strategy.

In a blog post published Thursday, the Winklevoss twins acknowledged the challenges the company has faced overseas. They said operating in foreign jurisdictions has proven difficult due to a combination of regulatory hurdles and operational complexity.

As a result, the founders said Gemini had become overstretched and needed to simplify its structure to remain competitive. The twins described the layoffs as a necessary step to realign the company with its long‐term goals.

“Today, we are reducing our size again by roughly 25%,” they wrote, adding that they believe the resulting organization will be better positioned to carry out the crypto exchange’s mission.

Winklevoss Twins’ Bet On Prediction Markets

The restructuring comes as Gemini narrows its focus toward what the founders see as the next major growth opportunity: prediction markets.

The Winklevoss twins said they believe prediction markets have the potential to become as large as, or even larger than, today’s capital markets. In their view, these platforms can harness collective intelligence and market dynamics to generate insights about future events in ways traditional systems cannot.

As part of this strategy, Gemini has invested in securing the necessary license to launch its own prediction marketplace, positioning the company as an early entrant in what it describes as a new and promising frontier.

The exchange launched Gemini Predictions in mid‐December and says early adoption has been encouraging. According to the company, more than 10,000 users have already participated, trading over $24 million on the platform since its debut.

The founders framed this shift as an evolution of Gemini’s vision. While the company’s first decade focused on building infrastructure for the future of money, they now envision a broader “super app” that bridges both money and markets.

They added that to successfully pursue this direction, Gemini must concentrate its resources and reduce distractions. By scaling back its global operations and workforce, the company aims to free up the bandwidth needed to develop and expand its prediction market offerings.

The 1-D chart shows GEMI’s 85% crash since its September public debut. Source: GEMI on TradingView.com

At the time of writing, the exchange’s stock, trading under the ticker symbol GEMI, was trading at $6.69. This represents a 7% drop in the past 24 hours and is over 85% below the stock’s all-time high of $45.90.

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Пов'язані питання

QWhat percentage of its workforce is Gemini cutting, and which major international markets is it exiting?

AGemini is cutting up to 25% of its workforce and is exiting the United Kingdom, the European Union, and Australia.

QWhat new area of focus did the Winklevoss twins cite as the reason for the company's restructuring?

AThe Winklevoss twins cited a new focus on prediction markets and AI-related operations as the reason for the restructuring.

QAccording to the founders, what were the main challenges that led to the decision to pull back from international markets?

AThe main challenges were a combination of regulatory hurdles and operational complexity in foreign jurisdictions.

QWhat is the name of Gemini's new prediction market platform, and what early adoption metrics were shared?

AThe platform is called Gemini Predictions. Early adoption metrics show over 10,000 users have participated, trading over $24 million since its mid-December debut.

QHow much has Gemini's stock (GEMI) fallen from its all-time high, and what was its price at the time of writing?

AAt the time of writing, the stock was trading at $6.69, which is over 85% below its all-time high of $45.90.

Пов'язані матеріали

Investors Are Now Hunting for AI Projects on Bilibili and Xiaohongshu

Investors Turn to Bilibili and Xiaohongshu to Source AI Projects The AI hardware boom is in full swing in 2025, with a surge in smart wearables like AI glasses, rings, toys, and companion robots. This frenzy has investors scrambling, not just sifting through business plans, but actively hunting for promising "under-the-radar" projects on youth and tech-enthusiast content platforms like Bilibili and Xiaohongshu. The logic is straightforward: for consumer-facing AI hardware, genuine user demand and potential pitfalls are often revealed earlier in public discussions, comments, and critiques on these communities than in formal pitches. As one industry insider notes, these products must ultimately be tested and understood by real people. This shift highlights a crucial challenge in the sector: user education. The success of AI hardware depends on moving beyond mere efficiency gains to fulfilling higher-order needs like "unleashing personal creativity." Products must convince users they are natural, unobtrusive additions to daily life. Early hype, as seen with devices like the Rabbit R1, often fades if the product fails to clearly solve real-world problems, leading to high return rates and market rejection. The market is now entering a shakeout phase. 2026 is seen as a year of commercial validation. Some projects have already stalled or been canceled due to market resistance, lack of differentiation, or financial woes. However, the long-term opportunity remains vast, with forecasts predicting a multi-trillion dollar global AI hardware market by 2030. The competition is intensifying. With giants like OpenAI and Meta preparing their own hardware, and Chinese companies launching diverse AI-powered products, the battle for user attention, product excellence, and market understanding is just beginning. The core principle endures: in the AI era, it remains a user-sovereign market.

marsbit14 хв тому

Investors Are Now Hunting for AI Projects on Bilibili and Xiaohongshu

marsbit14 хв тому

"Agents' Last Exam", Claude Fable 5 Actually Loses to GPT 5.5

Surprisingly, in the newly released "Agents' Last Exam" (ALE) benchmark from UC Berkeley, GPT-5.5 has outperformed the recently launched and highly-regarded Claude Fable 5. ALE tests AI agents on their ability to perform real-world tasks across 55 professional domains—such as 3D modeling in Siemens NX, creating game scenes in Unreal Engine, and visual effects work in Adobe After Effects—by granting them full GUI and command-line access. In the core task completion rate ranking, GPT-5.5 configurations secured the top two spots (24.0% and 23.0%), while Claude Fable 5 with Claude Code came in third (22.0%). Notably, the highest pass rate was only 24%, and the most difficult "Last-Exam" tier saw most top models, including GPT-5.5 and Fable 5, scoring zero. The benchmark also revealed significant cost and efficiency gaps: Fable 5 spent over four times more money than GPT-5.5's most expensive configuration for a slightly lower score, and was much slower. ALE differs from previous knowledge-based benchmarks by evaluating practical "ability to do" rather than static knowledge retrieval. Its tasks are derived from real expert projects, automatically scored, and designed to prevent cheating through a rotating pool of private challenges. The results suggest that high performance on traditional benchmarks does not necessarily translate to proficiency in complex, open-ended real-world work. The study also notes that agents often fail by prematurely declaring tasks complete without proper verification, and that no single model excels uniformly across all diverse domains.

marsbit20 хв тому

"Agents' Last Exam", Claude Fable 5 Actually Loses to GPT 5.5

marsbit20 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片