Why Hyperliquid is ‘quietly outgrowing’ Coinbase on THESE fronts

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-02-11Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-11

Анотація

Hyperliquid, a decentralized exchange (DEX), is significantly outperforming Coinbase in key metrics, with nearly double the notional trading volume ($2.6T vs. $1.4T). Its native token, HYPE, has also delivered superior investor returns, up 32% YTD compared to COIN's 27% decline. Both platforms are competing to become an "everything exchange," but Hyperliquid has rapidly expanded beyond crypto into tokenized assets like gold and silver, which now account for over 30% of its volume. It currently handles 10% of Binance’s perpetual volumes, 32% of Bybit’s, and 24% of OKX’s. Despite regulatory risks being a concern, Hyperliquid’s growth continues, with its token eyeing key support levels amid renewed market interest.

Over the past few months, Hyperliquid has been playing catch-up to major centralized exchanges (CEXs). Now, it has begun flipping them on key metrics.

According to the analytics firm Artemis, the DEX platform is “quietly outgrowing” Coinbase with nearly 2x in notional trading volume.

“Notional trading volume: Coinbase $1.4T, Hyperliquid $2.6T. That’s nearly 2x Coinbase’s volume... from an onchain exchange. And the market is noticing.”

The outperformance has gone beyond ecosystem traction. Hyperliquid’s native token, HYPE, has also surpassed Coinbase’s COIN in investor returns. On a year-to-date (YTD) basis, HYPE holders have netted 32% while COIN holders were down 27% – A nearly 60% lead on investor gains.

The race for ‘everything exchange’

The comparison between the two platforms makes sense because both are pushing towards an “everything exchange” vision. Coinbase covers services spanning asset custody, trading, prediction markets, and more.

Similarly, Hyperliquid aims to house all finance under one roof and has made significant strides despite being operational for over a year.

After conquering the crypto perpetual markets and rivaling incumbents like Binance, Hyperliquid’s debut into tokenized markets via equity perps exploded. Now, over 30% of Hyperliquid’s DEX volume comes from non-crypto assets, dominated by gold and silver.

The results? Slow and steady clawing of market share from Binance and other top centralized players. Since last August, Hyperliquid has handled over 10% of Binance’s perpetual volumes.

Although the October crash led to a cool-off of the ratio to 10%, the perp DEX platform traction has since been climbing again. Compared to Bybit, Hyperliquid now handles 32% of its perpetual volumes and 24% of OKX’s activity.

Overall, at press time, the perp DEX was handling over 6% of total CEX volumes, with a strong renewed traction in 2026.

HYPE eyes key support

Market watchers have cautioned that the only threats to the massive growth can be a hack or regulatory risk, especially from the U.S Department of Justice (DoJ).

“Agree here that hype’s biggest risk is regulatory. They need to get much more embedded with the tradfi elites as regulators will eventually get involved.”

That said, HYPE has been a key beneficiary of the traction, with rising revenue funding token buybacks.

However, HYPE’s cool-off isn’t over yet, and a retest of $26-$28 support zone (white) could offer new buying opportunities if risk sentiment improves after the U.S inflation print scheduled for Friday.


Final Thoughts

  • Hyperliquid saw 2x more derivatives market activity compared to Coinbase.
  • The DEX platform handled over 6% of total CEX perpetual volumes amid renewed traction in 2026.

Пов'язані питання

QAccording to the article, how does Hyperliquid's notional trading volume compare to Coinbase's?

AAccording to analytics firm Artemis, Hyperliquid's notional trading volume is nearly 2x that of Coinbase, with $2.6T compared to Coinbase's $1.4T.

QWhat is the year-to-date (YTD) performance difference between the HYPE token and Coinbase's COIN stock?

AOn a YTD basis, HYPE holders have netted a 32% gain, while COIN holders were down 27%, giving HYPE a nearly 60% lead in investor gains.

QWhat significant non-crypto market did Hyperliquid debut in, and what is its impact?

AHyperliquid debuted in tokenized markets via equity perps, and now over 30% of its DEX volume comes from non-crypto assets, which are dominated by gold and silver.

QWhat percentage of Binance's perpetual volumes has Hyperliquid handled since last August?

ASince last August, Hyperliquid has handled over 10% of Binance's perpetual volumes.

QWhat are cited as the primary threats to Hyperliquid's massive growth?

AThe primary threats cited are a potential hack or regulatory risk, especially from the U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ).

Пов'язані матеріали

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit2 год тому

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit2 год тому

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit3 год тому

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit3 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片