Why Doesn't Stripe, Valued at $160 Billion, Go Public?

比推Опубліковано о 2026-03-10Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-10

Анотація

Stripe, valued at $159 billion, and Plaid, valued at $8 billion, recently conducted tender offers, reflecting a structural shift in how companies access capital and provide liquidity. This trend allows firms to bypass traditional IPOs, avoiding dilution and regulatory burdens. The private secondary market reached $240 billion in 2025, surpassing global IPO proceeds. Companies now wait an average of 16 years to go public, and private market assets have doubled to $22 trillion over 12 years. New infrastructure layers like Forge and EquityZen facilitate secondary trading, while platforms like Robinhood’s Ventures Fund I are opening private markets to retail investors. However, risks include structural complexity, valuation opacity, and counterparty risks. Despite a 2025 IPO rebound, many companies trade below their offering prices, making tender offers an attractive alternative amid geopolitical and macroeconomic uncertainty.

Author: Michiel Milanovic

Original Title: What does Stripe at $160B mean for traditional IPOs?

Compiled and Edited by: BitpushNews


In the past two weeks, payments giant Stripe announced a tender offer valuing the company at up to $159 billion;

Meanwhile, fintech infrastructure provider Plaid also completed a tender offer valued at $8 billion;

A few days later, Robinhood's Ventures Fund I listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), allowing retail investors direct access to a basket of private company equities;

These events are interconnected, reflecting a structural shift in how companies access capital, provide liquidity, and ultimately consider going public.

Why is that?

Let's start with Plaid.

Founded in 2013, the company acts as an infrastructure layer connecting consumers' bank accounts to financial apps like Venmo, Robinhood, and Chime. Apps pay Plaid to allow users to seamlessly connect banks, verify credentials, and share account information. This is particularly valuable in the US, where regulations do not mandate banks to share information with third parties (unlike the UK's Open Banking and the EU's PSD2).

In fact, it's reported that half of all Americans have indirectly used Plaid's services through various financial apps. The company's valuation peaked at $13.4 billion in 2021, and it was once planned to be acquired by Visa for $5.3 billion, but regulators ultimately blocked the deal. After being repriced at $6.1 billion in April 2025, its latest $8 billion tender offer reflects renewed momentum. Its revenue is expected to reach $430 million in 2025, with 20% of its new customers now being AI companies.

Meanwhile, Stripe is a payments giant founded in 2010 by brothers John Collison and Patrick Collison.

Leveraging a decade of exponential growth in e-commerce, the company recently reported impressive 2025 performance. Total payment volume reached $1.9 trillion, a 34% year-over-year increase, equivalent to roughly 1.6% of global GDP. While revenue is undisclosed, sources estimate at least $5 billion in revenue for 2024. Today, Stripe's revenue suite alone (including Stripe Billing, Invoicing, Tax, etc.) is on track to achieve $1 billion in annual recurring revenue (ARR).

Beyond payments, Stripe is actively building around cryptocurrency and Agentic Commerce, seeing them as catalysts for online consumption. It acquired stablecoin platform Bridge for $1.1 billion, bought wallet infrastructure provider Privy, and is building Tempo—an L1 blockchain focused on payments, currently being tested by Visa, Nubank, and Klarna. Its latest $159 billion tender offer price represents a 74% increase from last year.

ARK Invest Big Ideas 2026

A tender offer is a secondary transaction that allows new or existing investors to buy shares directly from employees and early shareholders. It provides liquidity without diluting the company's equity or incurring the regulatory and structural burdens of an IPO.

Stripe and Plaid are part of a larger trend: companies successfully bypassing public markets in favor of private transactions.

It's reported that Anthropic is exploring a tender offer valuing it over $350 billion, while Revolut recently completed an employee share sale at a $75 billion valuation.

In 2025, private secondary market transaction volume soared to $240 billion, up from $162 billion in 2024. In comparison, global capital raised through traditional IPOs was about $140 billion.

As private capital markets boom, the pace of companies entering public markets has slowed. Companies now wait an average of 16 years to go public, 33% longer than a decade ago. Over the past 12 years, total private market assets have more than doubled to $22 trillion. Some of the world's most valuable companies, including SpaceX and OpenAI, remain private, with valuations that rival or exceed those of large public companies.

This has led to two key market developments:

First, the birth of new capital market infrastructure layers. We recently analyzed the rise of platforms like Forge and EquityZen, which facilitate secondary trading of private company shares. Charles Schwab acquired Forge for $660 million in November, while Morgan Stanley acquired EquityZen in October (amount undisclosed).

Second, the opening of private markets to retail investors. Robinhood's newly formed Ventures Fund I listed on the NYSE last Friday, raising $658 million and holding shares in large private companies like Ramp, Stripe, and Revolut. This isn't the first; Destiny Tech100 listed in March 2024, offering a portfolio of 100 VC-backed companies, including SpaceX and OpenAI. But Robinhood can distribute directly to its 28 million users, and as with its performance in public stocks, it has a proven track record of popularizing asset classes historically reserved for institutional investors.

Beyond this, the Trump administration signed an executive order last summer paving the way for $8.7 trillion in 401(k) retirement accounts to invest in alternative assets like cryptocurrency and private markets.

We see these as major catalysts for further growth, but they also expose some hidden risks.

One is the structural complexity behind purchasing private stock. Brokers often bundle these shares into their own special purpose vehicles (SPVs) and charge fees, and these SPVs sometimes hold positions in other vehicles. These overlapping counterparty risks and fees can obscure what assets investors actually own. The next macroeconomic downturn will be accompanied by the unraveling of SPV positions and ensuing litigation.

Then there's the issue of valuation transparency. Valuations of private companies are often anchored to the most recent funding round, which might only happen once or twice a year. This limits price discovery and creates a gap between the reported net asset value (NAV) and the price public markets are willing to pay.

The Financial Times recently reported that Robinhood's Ventures Fund I fell 11% on its first day of trading. Meanwhile, Destiny Tech 100 once traded at nearly 20 times its NAV. This unpredictability is not ideal for retirement savings accounts.

Meanwhile, regulators are beginning to push reforms to make public markets more attractive. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce expressed concerns about private markets in a February speech: the pressure for companies to go public has diminished, but private markets lack equivalent price discovery mechanisms, accessibility, and liquidity.

SEC Chairman Paul Atkins recently proposed a three-pillar plan to "make IPOs great again" (his words) by easing disclosure requirements and reforming securities litigation. Whether these reforms will be implemented remains to be seen.

Private transactions aside, IPOs did see a significant rebound in 2025. Eleven venture-backed fintech companies, including Circle and Klarna, went public, with more on the way. Kraken and Bitgo have filed confidentially, while companies like Ramp and Gusto are preparing by cleaning up cap tables, hiring new CFOs, or engaging investment banks. F-Prime estimates the total market capitalization of fintech could grow from $947 billion to $1.2 trillion.

Whether these companies get their desired price is another matter. By year-end, only 2 of the 11 companies were trading above their IPO price. Chime was privately valued at $25 billion but went public at $13.5 billion. Klarna went public at $17.3 billion but ended the year at $10.9 billion.

With heightened geopolitical tensions and an uncertain macroeconomic outlook, companies still on the sidelines may find that the tender offer playbook is the path of least resistance. For now, at least, liquidity in private markets remains sufficient to absorb the supply of these unicorns.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7618554

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is a tender offer and why are companies like Stripe and Plaid choosing this method over a traditional IPO?

AA tender offer is a secondary transaction that allows new or existing investors to buy shares directly from employees and early shareholders. It provides liquidity without diluting the company's equity and avoids the regulatory and structural burdens of an IPO. Companies like Stripe and Plaid are choosing this method because it allows them to access capital and provide liquidity while remaining private, bypassing the complexities and scrutiny of public markets.

QHow has the private market's growth impacted the timeline for companies to go public?

AThe growth of private markets has significantly extended the average time companies wait before going public. Currently, companies wait an average of 16 years to IPO, which is 33% longer than a decade ago. This is due to the abundance of private capital, which allows companies to stay private longer and achieve valuations that rival or exceed those of large public companies.

QWhat are some of the risks associated with retail investors gaining access to private company stocks through vehicles like Robinhood's Ventures Fund I?

ARisks include structural complexity, as brokers often bundle these stocks into special purpose vehicles (SPVs) that may hold positions in other instruments, creating overlapping counterparty risks and fees that obscure what investors actually own. There is also a lack of valuation transparency, as private company valuations are based on infrequent funding rounds, limiting price discovery and creating a gap between reported NAV and what public markets are willing to pay.

QWhat recent regulatory changes have made alternative assets like private market investments more accessible to retail investors?

ALast summer, the Trump administration signed an executive order that paved the way for 401(k) retirement accounts, which hold $8.7 trillion in assets, to invest in alternative assets like cryptocurrencies and private markets. This change has significantly increased retail investor access to these previously institution-only asset classes.

QDespite the rise of tender offers, did the IPO market see a resurgence in 2025, and what was the performance of these newly public companies?

AYes, the IPO market significantly rebounded in 2025, with 11 venture-backed fintech companies going public, including Circle and Klarna. However, by the end of the year, only 2 of these 11 companies were trading above their IPO price. Many companies, such as Chime and Klarna, went public at valuations significantly lower than their previous private valuations.

Пов'язані матеріали

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbit7 хв тому

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbit7 хв тому

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

OpenAI is shifting its business strategy away from promoting its most expensive, flagship models for every task. Recent price cuts—80% for GPT-5.6 Luna and 20% for Terra—signal a deeper change: the company now actively advises users that many tasks don't require the most powerful model. Instead, OpenAI recommends a tiered approach: use the high-end GPT-5.6 Sol for complex planning and analysis, then delegate execution to cheaper models like Luna. This mirrors moves by Anthropic, which recently launched Claude Opus 5 at half the price of its top model, Fable 5. Both companies are de-emphasizing flagship models as primary revenue drivers, using them instead for brand prestige and technological showcases. The industry is entering a "mass-market" phase, similar to automotive, where high-volume, cost-effective models handle daily operations and drive scale. OpenAI's price reductions are partly enabled by AI models themselves optimizing underlying code and infrastructure, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of efficiency gains and cost reduction. Competition is shifting from "who is smartest" to "who offers the best value." The goal is no longer selling individual models but fostering widespread API adoption and ecosystem lock-in. By making AI calls cheap and ubiquitous, companies like OpenAI aim to become the indispensable, utility-like infrastructure powering automated workflows—the "water and electricity" of software, quietly embedded everywhere.

marsbit7 хв тому

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

marsbit7 хв тому

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

The market's expectation for a September Fed rate hike surged dramatically in early August, jumping from under 50% to over 80% within a week. This shift followed a contentious July FOMC meeting, where a 9-3 vote to hold rates revealed growing dissent from hawkish members advocating for an immediate hike to combat persistent inflation. The primary catalyst for this repricing is rising oil prices, driven by renewed geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz, which threaten global supply. Energy costs directly influence inflation metrics, making the upcoming July CPI report (due August 12th) a critical data point. If it shows inflation reaccelerating, the probability of a September hike will solidify. For Bitcoin and crypto assets, this is typically bearish news. Bitcoin continues to behave as a high-beta, liquidity-sensitive risk asset. A rate hike raises the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets and could drive capital toward money markets, pressuring crypto prices in the short term. However, historical patterns suggest that if a hike is perceived as the end of a tightening cycle rather than the start, any negative price impact may be brief. U.S. stocks, particularly crypto-linked equities like Coinbase and growth-oriented tech stocks, are also vulnerable. Higher rates increase discount rates in valuation models, putting pressure on high-multiple companies. This coincides with a pivotal tech earnings season where investor focus has shifted from massive AI capital expenditure to tangible revenue and cash flow generation. Companies with negative cash flow and weak growth narratives could face heightened volatility if borrowing costs rise in September. In summary, a September Fed hike has evolved into a mainstream market scenario. Key factors to watch are oil prices, the July CPI report, and Fed communications, which will determine the final decision and its impact on volatile crypto and equity markets.

marsbit18 хв тому

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

marsbit18 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片