Why Do Memes Only Cut You? An Article That Explains Their True Growth Mechanism

比推Опубліковано о 2026-01-21Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-21

Анотація

The article "Why Do Meme Coins Only 'Cut' You? Clarifying Their True Growth Mechanism" offers a fresh, analytical perspective on meme coin dynamics, framing their growth not as irrational speculation but as a mathematically explainable phenomenon. The core argument is that a meme coin’s market capitalization isn't just driven by price increases (Z-axis), but is fundamentally supported and "propped up" by two underlying factors: narrative density (X-axis) and the network of传播 nodes (Y-axis). Together, these form the base radius of a "Wealth Cone." A meme with only height (price) but no base (narrative and community) is like a thin needle—easily toppled. A strong, expanding base is necessary to support sustainable, exponential growth. The proposed XYZ three-dimensional growth spiral model explains the interaction: * **X-axis (Narrative Density):** The meme's core idea, cultural resonance, originality, and the richness of community-created content. * **Y-axis (Propagation Network):** The transmission pipelines, from major influencers (e.g., Elon Musk) to KOLs and finally to retail investors. * **Z-axis (Capital Flow):** The monetization of attention, measured by market cap, trading volume, and crucially, liquidity depth. The lifecycle of a successful meme is a reflexive, spiral ascent through stages: **Ignition** (a Y-axis spike from a KOL callout lifts the Z-axis), **Spin** (price growth attracts more discussion, enriching the narrative), and **Ascension** (an expande...

Author: danny

Original Title:

Why Do the Memes You Buy Only Fall? — Deconstructing the Growth Spiral and Volume of Memes Using First Principles


In the eyes of most people, Meme coins are irrational狂欢, a fool's赌场. But from a mathematical perspective, the birth of every ten-thousand-fold myth is not accidental; it is actually a middle school spatial geometry evolution word problem.

This article proposes a颠覆性的 perspective: The market value of Meme coins is not "grown" but "propped up." The value of Memes can be calculated!

We are accustomed to focusing on the fluctuations of the Z-axis (price height), but we overlook that what determines life and death is the base radius constructed by the X (narrative density) and Y (propagation nodes) axes. A Meme with only height and no base is just a very thin "needle" that topples with the wind; only by continuously expanding the consensus radius can it support a stable, geometrically growing wealth cone under the gravity of capital.

Note: This article is a popular science article on "financial physics," not a rigorous econometric paper, and is only intended to provide a new perspective for viewing Memes.

1. The Beginning of the Theory: The Three-Dimensional Coordinate System of Memes

In the current cryptocurrency market, Meme coins are often seen as irrational狂欢. But is that really the case?

If we strip away the noise of emotions, KOL shilling, and community bandwagoning, we will find that the birth and death of every phenomenal Meme follows a strict mathematical logic.

The essence of Meme coins is the tokenization of the attention economy. Their market value is not determined by traditional discounted cash flow (DCF) but is jointly constructed by the breadth of the narrative, community resonance, and the explosive power of funds.

For better discussion, we define these factors as the XYZ three-dimensional growth spiral model.

These three axes are not just independent variables; there is a strong reflexivity between them—that is, a change in one variable reinforces another, forming a positive feedback loop.

Let's explain these parameters:

X-axis: Narrative Density and Cultural Memes

Definition: The "genes" of a Meme. Includes the core梗 (e.g., Doge), origin story (e.g., CZ's pet name), cultural symbols (e.g., Pepe the Frog), and the richness of community二次创作.

Key metrics: Narrative originality, replicability, emotional resonance.

Y-axis: Propagation Potential and Node Network

Definition: The transmission pipeline of information. From top-tier nodes (CZ, Elon Musk) to secondary nodes (Alpha Callers, KOLs), and then to end nodes (ordinary retail investors).

Key metrics: Node weight, propagation coverage, shilling frequency.

Z-axis: Fund Flow and Liquidity Carrier

Definition: The monetization result of attention. Includes on-chain fund inflows, liquidity depth—i.e., the沉淀的价值 or the total amount of sell orders that can be承接.

Key metrics: Market capitalization, trading volume, turnover rate, and liquidity (the most important metric).

2. Diagram of the Growth Curve of XYZ Axis Interaction

If we plot these three axes in three-dimensional space, the growth trajectory of a successful Meme will generally show a spiral upward trend: (as shown in the figure below)

Bottom (Start): X, Y, Z are all close to zero.

Ignition: The Y-axis surges (KOL shilling), driving the Z-axis (price) to jump. The trajectory line tilts toward the Y-Z plane.

Spin: The growth of the Z-axis attracts more Y (more people discussing), and Y stimulates X's二次创作 (enriching content). The trajectory line begins to rotate around the X-Y-Z axes.

Ascension: As X is upgraded (X'), the base area of the cone expands (broader consensus range), and the Z-axis (market capitalization) reaches a new height.

Failed Meme (Rug Pull): Usually表现为 the Y-axis爆发后, the Z-axis briefly rises, but the X-axis fails to follow up with an upgrade (narrative scarcity), causing the Z-axis to quickly collapse to zero. The trajectory line shows an inverted V-shaped fall.

3. Evolution of the Growth Curve: The Spiral Ascension of Four Stages

From the previous section, we know that the lifecycle of a Meme is not linear but a vortex that continuously expands around the Z-axis (fund flow). In this section, we will analyze it based on the four development stages of Memes.

The figure below shows its standard evolution path: (I was also shocked at how cool AI drew it?!)

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7604686

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the core perspective proposed in the article regarding the growth of Meme coins?

AThe article proposes that Meme coin market capitalization is not simply 'rising' but is 'propped up' by a mathematical model involving narrative density (X-axis) and propagation nodes (Y-axis), which together form the base supporting the value (Z-axis).

QHow does the article define the X-axis in its Meme growth model?

AThe X-axis is defined as 'Narrative Density and Cultural Memes,' which includes the core meme, origin story, cultural symbols, and the richness of community-created content.

QAccording to the article, what is the role of the Y-axis in the Meme coin growth spiral?

AThe Y-axis represents 'Propagation Potential and Node Network,' which refers to the information transmission pipelines, from top nodes like influencers to secondary and end nodes like ordinary retail investors.

QWhat does the Z-axis represent in the XYZ model for Meme coins?

AThe Z-axis represents 'Capital Flow and Liquidity Carrier,' which is the monetization result of attention, including on-chain capital inflow, liquidity depth, and the total value that can absorb selling pressure.

QWhat is the key difference between a successful Meme and a failed one (Rug Pull) according to the model?

AA successful Meme undergoes a spiral ascent where narrative (X) and propagation (Y) expand to support the value (Z). A failed Meme (Rug Pull) sees a brief spike in Y and Z, but a lack of narrative development (X) causes the value to collapse back to zero.

Пов'язані матеріали

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报40 хв тому

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报40 хв тому

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News57 хв тому

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News57 хв тому

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1 год тому

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片