Why 21Shares believes ‘passive strategies’ for crypto ETFs are outdated

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-03-26Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-26

Анотація

21Shares President Duncan Moir argues that passive 'HODL' strategies for crypto ETFs are becoming outdated. Instead, the firm advocates for active management to capture yield and diversification opportunities in the growing asset class. Key strategies include yield-generating products like a preferred stock ETP offering an 11.5% dividend, staking rewards in ETFs, and thematic offerings such as a Bitcoin-and-gold ETP. While U.S. investor interest remains focused on large coins, European institutions are exploring newer assets and application layers. Despite a decline in total crypto ETF AUM to $130 billion, active strategies aim to drive future demand.

For most Bitcoin OGs in the space, the main crypto investment strategy has always been ‘HODL,’ which has been enough to outperform most assets in certain periods.

Early asset managers who entered the sector also adopted a similar passive strategy for their respective crypto ETFs (exchange-traded funds). They have been holding the crypto assets in the hope that, in three, six, or 12 months, their value would appreciate.

According to 21Shares president Duncan Moir, however, crypto ETFs are transitioning from passive management to active strategies. Moir noted that the sector was a ‘nascent’ and ‘growing asset class’ that fits perfectly with active management.

At the core of this new strategy is scaling yield streams and extra earning opportunities beyond just holding the crypto assets. From a regional crypto ETF demand, Moir said,

The interest is still concentrated in the larger coins in the US. In Europe, institutional clients are more interested in newer assets and the application layer beyond the Layer-1.

Source: CoinShares

In fact, on a year-to-date (YTD) basis, the U.S. leads with $638 million in crypto inflows, followed closely by Germany at $377 million and Switzerland at $233 million.

Crypto ETFs evolution and diversification

For Moir, the mature investor base in Europe, who already hold Bitcoin and Ethereum, is looking to expand their crypto allocation with better offerings.

This led to 21Shares launching an ETP tied to Strategy’s preferred stock, Stretch (STRC), which offers an annual dividend yield of up to 11.5% payable monthly. This is one of the Strategy’s ways of raising capital for Bitcoin buys.

Moir noted that the product has been an instant success across several regions, underscoring a strong appetite for yield-bearing assets that are feasibly accessible via traditional platforms.

Additionally, crypto ETF staking rewards have become another active strategy to maximize investors’ returns.

Grayscale and BlackRock’s push for staking rewards in their respective Spot ETH ETFs is one example of asset managers seeking more opportunities for investors.

Finally, Moir said they also look for major thematic trends or future shifts that can be maximized. The approach informed the launch of 21Shares’ Bitcoin-and-gold ETP, based on the rising demand for safe havens amid debasement trade and rising U.S. fiscal debt.

It remains to be seen how the new active strategy will drive demand into crypto ETFs. As of writing, the total crypto ETF assets under management (AUM) were about $130 billion, down from nearly $240 billion at the peak of 2025.

Source: Blockworks

Final Summary

  • 21Shares’ Duncan Moir said that active strategies will be at the center of the next crypto ETF management.
  • Yield-focused wrappers and staking rewards are some active strategies asset managers are deploying for investors.

Пов'язані питання

QAccording to 21Shares president Duncan Moir, why are crypto ETFs transitioning from passive to active strategies?

ABecause crypto sector is a 'nascent' and 'growing asset class' that fits perfectly with active management, focusing on scaling yield streams and extra earning opportunities beyond just holding crypto assets.

QWhat regional differences in crypto ETF demand does Duncan Moir highlight between the US and Europe?

AIn the US, interest is concentrated in larger coins, while in Europe, institutional clients are more interested in newer assets and the application layer beyond Layer-1.

QWhat are two specific active strategies mentioned that asset managers are using to maximize investor returns?

AYield-focused wrappers (like the ETP tied to Stretch offering 11.5% annual dividend) and staking rewards in crypto ETFs.

QWhat was the rationale behind 21Shares launching a Bitcoin-and-gold ETP?

AIt was based on the rising demand for safe havens amid debasement trade and rising U.S. fiscal debt, capitalizing on major thematic trends.

QWhat is the current total assets under management (AUM) for crypto ETFs as mentioned in the article?

AAbout $130 billion, down from nearly $240 billion at the peak of 2025.

Пов'язані матеріали

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbit3 год тому

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbit3 год тому

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手3 год тому

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手3 год тому

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit5 год тому

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit5 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片